0:00 / 0:00
Daf Yomi Weekly Review Class Bava Basra - Pages 39b to 46b at Scheiner's Shul
161 views
Come review the week's Daf Yomi at Beis Medrash Ohr Chaim every Sunday morning with Rabbi Yehuda Spitz
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
okay welcome everybody would also like
to welcome all our listeners on Torah
any
time um welcome welcome we're going to
start
today T all the way at the end of the D
and we're going to try to get
until towards the end of the BL let's
jump right into it
the name of wants to say that if a
person makes a we learned this already
last week that you need to make it
either in front the two people in front
of three people here we saying you need
to do it in front of two people however
the is that you don't need to write
what's thees that even though the person
did not command them to write it they
would still write it
why even
though
however that's regarding
same thing would be with a what's a is a
person that's getting forced into a sale
or something that he does not want to do
he goes to to a them and he tells them
that he's getting forc and says it has
to
be it's not considered and it's
worthless
however a person that he owes money to
somebody
then regarding since it's
since if it's going to end up being is
going to end up being himself therefore
you have to say what
about which is that's also it's good
enough the top of
[Applause]
the that is also going to work in front
the two people and you do not need to
say
however is if someone wants to be what
he does is he goes to bz if for whatever
reason the a are either going to Medina
they're leaving what you want to do is
you want to be with these you go to and
three make a however it has to be da
three because if it would only be to
then all it is is and it's not going to
help you it's gim it helps like a and
it's going to work and that the when
said all these he could have said it at
one time the reason why I didn't because
it was said at separate times we broke
it
up says he anything of all these things
that we just
said what me is the scenario of why
because if you're telling me
that and that's why I'm able to do it
even
though then you should need why does two
help
however the struggle is if it's not a
have to say it why because it's
a on
that so why why don't you need to tell
him life he's happy that he writes it
therefore he does not need to tell them
that's why they could write even though
they were not
[Applause]
told both want to say that if a person
comes over to you and asks you to write
to my do it has to be a person that he
wants to write my dog against someone
who's not going to listen to toz why
because otherwise on you riding my dog
why don't you take him to bz like a
mench therefore unless he's such a type
of person we do not write him
however AR they
say even such a person like us that we
will listen to We Still write
a it's very possible you're not gonna be
able to get the time therefore would
even write for
some that has to be that the a need to
write what they know about the scenario
why it's considered aness and if they
don't write this the case behind it the
story it's not
considered so simple
question what are we talking
about if you're
riding or he's just letting him know
that he's forced there's nothing there's
no reason that he has what to gain by
running my V then we can understand that
a person is desperate for cash he needs
cash flow he's going to sell something
at a very cheap price so what he does is
he writes a a do and then when he when
he's able to recoup and get his cash
back he makes believe that there was
never a Sal he has what to gain so only
as me we can understand he tell
me so what is the scenario we're talking
about so where's the scenario
there was a person who gave his par to
his friend for three
years what happened was after three
years he forgot to make a and the person
in the took the took advantage of that
and he went over him and he told him as
follows if you sell it to me no problem
I'll pay you the cash I'll pay the fair
value however
otherwise I'm going to take advantage
that he never made and I know I could
get saying I it off
you such a scenar my da explains what's
going on is as follows to give a little
more context the person in this scenario
knows he's in a situation that the
person the par this is holding something
against him and he's able to tell
him you go over to the person quietly
and you tell him no problem I'm willing
to buy it for you before that you write
him a and you say what happened you give
the whole history and you and then you
come in front of the person and you ask
him to buy it in front of the ad so if
he buys it in front of the ad again it's
the biggest R now you
can because you already officially
bought it a different time how in the
world would you buy it against in such a
scenario would take effect and it would
work to protect him against this person
trying to scam him regarding taking
advantage of him not making the two do
a person that
rights we're going to explain exactly
what he has to say what not to say then
it's not considered a good we say the
person did not want to give it to
him what is that
case he tells
Witnesses go hide and write the in such
a case we do not say it's a
good he doesn't tell them explicitly to
go out and write such a such a case it's
considered it's not a
good what is the difference between
these
two answers the case of sto he doesn't
tell him anything so according to the
when he doesn't tell him anything it's
going to be because as long as he never
told him anything it's fine he didn't
tell him to hide according to lnas
however it's because he has to tell them
explicitly to
go and write such
however
[Applause]
says is not going to help to give it to
ruin as a mat however it's going to be
helping to protect that other people
can't get this mat either someone like
shim later
on says made a
mistake and he learned it from an
incident that happened and he tried to
learn from that however
saying it's a
to there incident that happened there
was a person that
went he wanted to marry a certain
woman no problem if you write to me o
who's a very wealthy person he says give
me everything I'll marry you however
it's very important to note that it
wasn't a in the that has to do with but
otherwise if it was you wouldn't have
what to handle regarding incident later
so other I'm not willing to marry
you so he went and he wanted to go and
right he really wanted to marry
her comes the
and talking third person what's going to
be with me
the Tells
Witnesses go to this place go R it to
the after you ride it
to then go right to the is so afterwards
they found out realized what was
happening and the is realized what was
happening what happened was they got
married the reason why is not is because
since he wrote it
the was quite clear that he was forced
in a position to write it in a scenario
write then you don't want it to be
however in it's a regular scenario when
you give a lat that's not a we do say
that you're willing to be magnet to this
[Applause]
person what is we said ear we have
was and that
says
we're rather however we are
and
therefore
however we don't take it away and
that's we explained this earlier that
the whole point of a just a support that
on its own is not a doesn't be kind of
anything rather helps that we don't know
who's saying the truth we have two
people we have a mar com saying in the
field below to him we have here for
three years so usually we learned the
case of is against you therefore in a
scenario after three years where it's
common to lose it then we would give it
to the
however that if there's no
[Applause]
whatsoever we're going to say that you
cannot get this car and the's gonna ask
on
this what are you
doing no one told me
anything not
however he says he sold it to
me he gave it to me as a gift or father
sold it to
me we're
see but a person coming he's his
father rather is going to be for him
because it's
unexpected that a person should have to
know there's no expectation that a
person should have to know regarding the
business dealings of his own
[Applause]
father maybe the
scenario the reason why he said such a
thing
of and he didn't know that
we're going to tell him on his own that
maybe he had he lost it going we
find we T open up the mouth of someone
that's mute that we don't say such a
thing and we're not going to T it for
him and
consider which stands
forah there those two incidents were
about to say that there was a flaw and
they moved their boundary marker into
their neighbors
field let's jump into this m what
happened was had a flood in his
land he went after the storm he went and
put back the fence in his neighbor's
boundary I'm going to see it was a
mistake also afterwards they realized
what happened that it was a mistake and
he put it in his neighbor's
boundary so told him you have to give it
back go put it back where it really
belongs so he asked him back says I
already have a
who you going
like we don't passing like them we
passing like so what is going
on I know
this he was helping me put it back in my
in his own property in a deeper
Space by
mistake if you would have known as your
neighbor's property you wouldn't done
this just like you didn't
know therefore it's a
regular and you must give it back that
is the with now we're GNA say a very
similar incident regarding
ra if had a store in the Z that and it
knocked
off the it knocked off all the boundary
markers and it pushed it and he went
since everything fell and he went to fix
it he put it in his neighbor's property
he put it in a the boundary the fence in
the neighbor's property also Comm made
of Yuda they went in front of Yuda also
I see went the neighbor he was upset he
saw what happened he brought two
[Applause]
witnesses one witness was saying we're
talking about saw there's a bunch of
Rose one witness said he pushed into his
property two rows and one witness at
three rows amay zil you
says at least pay at least move back two
rows cuz there this two going
in least he gave it at least
two who you like who are youing like
this
and he answer back I'm
[Applause]
going we have
[Applause]
on two sets of
Witnesses in a scenario we have two sets
of witnesses they're both being saying
the exact date and time what happened
with happened however the only argument
is really how much money was borrowed
then one says one per saying 200 one
saying 100
so what are the
even on
one ACC if you have one set and and both
of the are
saying regarding the
money so that's who we're going like in
our scenario we have one set of and the
boat saying at least two rows going
inside therefore you must remove you
must remove the fence at least two Rose
I could bring you a letter
from so he wasn't so
impressive when he go bring me the
letter we'll talk till then there's
nothing to discuss and you must remove
you must go back to roast let's
continue was a person that was living in
the attic for four
years after four years the owner of the
house comes back finds
him my what are you doing in my
house I bought it off you told me bought
it from
you they went in front of and he said as
follows he's willing to say as long as
you find me a witnesses that could say
that the original person you say you
bought it from was living there at least
one day then I'm willing to give you
somewhat of a credibility to what you're
saying but without one day there's no
credibility going on
whatsoever put it in your hands
otherwise I'm not going to do it
was saying I was sitting in front of my
uncle the says it was and it's very
interesting he was an uncle from his
father and from his mother they talk
they were step siblings they married
each other and brings us from aor in
saned that's a common thing that people
buy and flip very quickly they don't
have to live there that's what they do
for a living however was able to
perceive from what he was saying at
least
if he's willing to say that I that I
bought I saw R I bought it from buy it
from you
then could have easily said that I
bought the prop from you because he was
there for more than three years we're
talking about he was there for at least
four
years that you need to have somewhat of
credibility and he needs to be there at
least one one day says in
the and the
a you don't need a something you need
and that says right away doesn't like
this
say maybe don't need anything not a or
and and this is what the
saying I was for my father therefore the
doesn't like to say that another say
a person when he buys property he not
willing to throw
it then we could understand that even if
a going to tell me needs a witness at
least the witnesses that he was there
for at least one day that we could
understand however to
say does basic investigation before he
buys a property it's very to say that he
was totally scammed that even if people
talk that he had a property really maybe
thought his father had the property but
there was really no credibility to
that what is
means measuring what happens if he's
able to produce witnesses that the
person he bought it from was in the car
with the measuring
stick that's good enough and it's no
different like he was different one
day it's very common that a person
that's what they do they measure the
property and they see if it's a good
business deal or not so there's no R
whatsoever and you would have to produce
witnesses that he was there for at least
one day according to what the two dots
[Applause]
M we're talking about a scenario where
you have four people involved you have
Ru
shim so let's explain this what happened
was is tining as a shim is saying he
bought it from ruin and he does not have
AAR even though when it says Kar it can
be that shim has AAR that he bought it
from ruin otherwise there's no there's
no question that he's the original Mar
he bought it however shim doesn't have
AAR however Ley has AAR that he bought
from shim and after one year yehud has
AAR that he bought it from Ley so
there's two stars going on that was
every year there's three separate
people as long as there's AAR it's
considered a and the main reason is
we're understanding when there's AAR
going on there's a call since there's a
call if you
were you should have been since
were however it sounds like only but if
it was a it wouldn't be a so the basic
understanding is cuz Aiden doesn't have
a call therefore I never knew that I I
was supposed to be so this is this
really true
of says
regarding and the only reason why you
could be able to be is because there's a
call it's very clearly that is a call so
why is RA saying that the scenario above
of only with the that
which mean to say is there's a
difference
by is there's not a call that's ha
there's no reason to spread that people
are doing the sale however it's enough
public knowledge that if you do basic
basic investigation a basic inquiry
you'll hear that he sold the property so
if he's
a then since it's not hak he doesn't do
any quiries if anything he sees that
he's keeping there's no one there for
more than a year if anything it look
suspicious however regarding M before
you buy property
regarding you do a basic question to see
if anyone bought it and a basic inquir
Rel the result that
was really
say regarding how we see
otherwise however only so what are we
saying
comp me
know can be it's G to help us CU
himself
even how could you compare the two you
can't compare why
not it's very it's very normal procedure
when a person that borrows money he's at
a bad State usually and he doesn't want
to tell anybody he maybe has to bring
Witnesses but he doesn't spread it
because people are going to know that
he's needing for money businessmen are
going to take advantage and it's going
to lower the prices of all his
properties like that his properties
don't lose value however when you sell
anything he tries to spread the word
like that there's more bids on the
property if anything goes
higher therefore you can't ask me
[Applause]
from is not going to work because it's
very
as long as there's a star or even even
even if there's a
you the scenario father ate the other
for one year and the son had it for two
years or the other way
around or even a
scenario then comes the third
year so we clearly see
that that's the only reason why we can
understand
is because the should have known that
there was involved I'll ask you a
question
says if you ate in front of the father
one year or this is the other way around
where you're the person going into the
car or even in
a or even ate in front of the father
then he was died son
was even fr
for six years the person sold
it over here when a person who's sitting
in a car and the son that was sold there
was a call going out you should have
held on to
the even though he sold it
to he sold the entire block of he didn't
real if you would explicitly mention in
the sale the s that he's in should have
held on to
the we're going to learn now nothing to
do
with rather
simple if a person's holding on to
something we tell you I'm right now the
new owner
and now the mission is going to talk
about scenarios where it's not so black
and white it's not so
simple someone who's a Craftsman like we
call it whether he's a tailor whether
he's a phone repair shop whatever it is
something that makes sense while you
have the thing on you or even we're
going to go
into
cers administrators of property because
it's very reasonable to understand why
they're holding on it we're going to see
in on specifically the back and forth to
understand whether this or not
husband and wife they use it whether
it's stuff they use or father for
son
however the whole Shadow we're talking
about these cases
is however some wants to give him to do
something gives a gift or they split
they want to make a k that should be
firm somebody doesn't have dies what
happens as soon as he dies everything
becomes he
then's gonna explain in the as long as
he fixed something he locked the door he
built the
wall and therefore it's considered
it's we have different versions how to
read the mishna is it just to give a
little there's a is much more of AES
that would not have vers it's quite
obvious why this suit is sitting by the
repair shop by the
tailor it's very common we do buyout so
we split a property the second I'm
holding on to the property fully for a
few years we can assume fairely that you
did a buyout and it's taka yours so we
have
a
more wouldn't have
however would have
says they could be with each
other we're gonna see that's the whole
next and they also become those three
things whether it's aness or cave with a
head in an order when there was times
was
persecution really
say says
is not coming to tell Us's
only how could you say
says and that
answers it's not
why what's that mean in a scenario where
one place where it is a kazaka where you
held on to completely and one place
where you don't have a kazaka is where
you held on to it half of the better
field says the one field was able to
produce much
more so let's explain this one line to
give a little context of what's the
mean some want to learn there's two
extremes it's two exact opposites some
want to learn when do you have a is when
you're in
the however in a scenario where you
split the property the second the person
splits and he gets the better half you
have a kak and some learn the exact
opposite when you have the property for
half you don't have but if you gave him
the whole entire property completely
then you do have so what's the beer why
would one
hold the answer really is two words
annual investment what's that mean what
the really becomes when they're involved
do they care about getting an annual
return every single year so the that
holds that there
a he holds
have an annual investment therefore if
you gave so and completely for three
years we say he has a in a case where
you split it very nice he's getting a
better percentage let's say a 15% return
the first three years the sh because he
has the better field and the next three
years he'll get the %. that's that Mand
however the other Mand holds the other
haisa holds you know when you have a
kazak when you have a kazak is when
you're in the field only halfway however
when you're in the field completely
then you don't have why they hold a
person doesn't need an annual return
however a person's not willing to give
more of annual return to rather they
split it equally so if he's in the S
halfway then he
has however when he's in the that's when
we want to say that he will not have a
the basic we're trying to explain is do
a person need an annual return or not
based on that we can
understand want to
say the both cases we're talking about
the should have had the entire
property when does is when we learned in
the Miss already where it talked
about that's when you have you should
split
itar was so small it didn't make sense
financially didn't add up what to do is
to have the as a it made sense that
you'll get it for 3 years I'll get it
for 3 years in such a scenario it's not
a goof
that's what the was right is
considered what are you come to tell
me say
it why you telling me a very interesting
way of talking to tell
[Music]
again to give a little to understand the
is that we learned this
extensively what's the na there's two
Naas one Naina is when he goes into a
that's not meant for trees it's meant
for a grain and he plants is he only
gets his however that's one point so he
ends up he's on the bottom side another
point is what happens if he enters the
property means it's mature crops it's
almost ready to get harvested basically
all you have to do is just cut it on
such a case if it's you don't get any in
it that's one point however when it's we
say when I invited you in to come take
care of my property part of the is yes
some of the crop is ready it's mature
but I want you to finish up the job and
you'll take your fear prophets it's
worth it for me
so is a that goes don't tell
me that he gets two points he's going to
get like a he's going to get not just
his expenses he's going to get full
profits number one and if he walked into
the other was mature produce he's going
to get that Al there's one question Food
For Thought is is how do we really
understand over here the the argument
back and forth between the is I'm tining
so why should I if I'm tining not that
your nus I'm tining that you have this
for three years and I get the other
three years so what's it mean I would
only have a din of like a like I get
only somewhat of my I should get the
whole entire thing according to you
complaining that I am not a that I'm a
the whole entire is to me so how do you
really understand you
have
of or that he only get like an
um
okay the M says the could be made on
each other simple question how could he
tell
me as long as they never really split up
the car he's really gaining and he's
really being made for himself
of he
[Applause]
writes I have nothing to do with this
property so still doesn't have very nice
you did a you talked says it's like you
know you're hoping
however to do I'm let go
it he didn't say
anything on
that you made a k with it
made a k with it
then therefore
the what help to make a k you
still it still helps that since this was
once since this C was yours very nice
you let go of it but the people that you
have your could come and take it from
this and therefore you won't have we're
going to see
later you're not going to
have on that
you accept right away text us what's
mean me from anybody comes and says this
is not
ours You're Gonna Want to protect this
property and stay where it
is that only people like about people
that come from me
otherwise is this really true that a
person does a helps why are we not for
something called collusion well people
make games with each other they say we
call it sometimes we figure it out let's
do something and then we'll figure it
out afterwards we find the
says the was stolen from the
city all to be
involved if you could just get away with
it by letting
go let two people just say m is just
scenario do whatever you have to do and
then get away with
it whether it's not the point everybody
has to listen to everybody listens to
therefore even if you try saying you're
be try to bring
another a person says I want to give a
for the city
the exact two
people we're talking
about you can't
be person says I want to give him M for
the for the we learned this
extensively does that make sense why
should the have to lose
why do we
call because we all need
it
we're if this a set annual fee of annual
everyone has to give $180 a year
let two go and give their pledge give
whatever they have to give their du
and you give what have to have to give
and should be
dying there's no set and therefore you
have what to gain because the pot is
full even when there's ever we all
know this because once the part is full
it's full we're going to understand that
eventually everyone's Fe is going to go
lower because there's a surplus of
public
funds we're going on to we're
saying
questions this is
ready shouldn't be why do I
have we all
know and we're thinking in the how many
the very crucial we're thinking that
you're getting half and I'm each one's
watching on the half of each other and
that Republic says
no I'm going to watch
today and you're going to watch tomorrow
that even though we know that a verbal
commitment is good enough and that over
here itself the commitment is only
happening later then it's not
considered turn we're about to go into
this next little BR but it's quite
extensive
and it's going to go until all the way
almost a full entire blot so let's break
it down we're going to see
raes and all these
two this this one very small specific
but it's quite
extensive we have a that
says if a person sells a house or a
field
why now we all know basic B
understanding usually means
responsibility doesn't mean doesn't mean
return basic understanding means I'm
accepting my myself responsibility okay
the
says then you're not
why right away the a very simple
question what's the difference
betweenin
verse on that we have
so let's let's let's try to say this
outside and then see inside were talking
about very specific case again there's
four people involved there's Ru
shim and the is going to question why do
we have to say it's all these cases why
let's take it step by step Ru shim shim
was overheard complaining that Ru is
lying Ru is a gospel
went so sh and then what happened was
ruin sold it to shim shim is holding on
to the car now comes yehudah and he's M
and he's saying it's his field so
according to shim in his head he has two
people he has to deal with he has to
deal with Yehuda and he has to deal with
ruen in the future so over here in such
a case you're shim cannot testify
against Yehuda we're gonna see what the
testimony is but he can't testify
against Yehuda because he's because he
wants to prot protect himself for r that
is the basic case of the therefore it's
talking about and
such's you know what the case of the
is not that there's no witnesses that he
stole it because otherwise would have a
question rather that's shim his tiny
that he stole from
him now comes
the and
he's shim is to go against Yehuda to
attack Yehuda cuz eventually we're going
to say why is happy that it stays where
it is because in the future he going to
go
against if you're telling me that it
belongs
to once he's admitting that I ever
belonged to Lady how in the world in the
future he's going to be able to go
against R and
that all he's really saying
is whether he's going to be
he's not really defending Ley and ruing
all he's trying to do is give out a kna
punch to yehuda's
testimony whatever bullets you're going
to use for Le knock it out from ru
really knock it out from UD you're gonna
have again gonna have to bring aen that
belong to you and the whole thing is a
fraud the that we
say right we all learned this concept we
find this in however the does throw in
that the wording over here is the
opposite it's
really we didn't want to play with the
words everyone understands that is
better is the opposite that yehud is the
problem and it's much easier he's going
to see that it's going to be much easier
to deal withu that's one
ter B they both have y that's going to
work and keep it if he's holding on to
the property and shim has a that it's
going to keep in the property however
shim and y's a are quite equal when they
come to B it's going to be what's the
when you have two peers of against two
separate people and we don't know what
to do they're both Tiding
something whenever you have two people
coming to us and we don't know what to
do because they're both bringing ad and
could be very nice we have to leave it
status quo what is the status quo
wherever the K is we leave it so Z so
what's thear tar T say I don't want shim
stinging themselves
I don't want Yehuda having the K because
if Yehuda is going to take it away from
Ley by knocking that Ru it's come at
Yehuda is going to have the K and it's
not going to help my because even the
adn't going to bring we're going to
leave it status quo we're going to leave
it by yehuda's if he's able to knock out
Yehuda if anything he's going to come
the and then if any day Yehuda comes
later to try to knock him out it's
goingon to be again Gonna Leave a status
quo it's going to
stay so now the's question
why are we saying what are we saying
we're saying that sold it to Ley and
then comes Yuda why are we going so
complicated say Ru did to Ley in the
exact same scenario you have Ru shim
take out Le and you have Yehuda so why
can't it be that Yehuda is coming
against Ru and that's the case why do we
need a involved very simple question
that
answers by the case of the saer we're
gonna see that it needs specifically to
have a m involved since it's metal we're
going to learn whenever there's a and
that's what the helps it helps you're
not gonna be able to get it back and
therefore you're not so
why therefore we needed the case the
safer we need the safer to be
very nice helps that you don't get back
the object you're not going to get the
part
ofal the money the money value he's not
going to be and that he can get back so
we're back to square
one why
hey
the we learn to stand who steals and he
feeds his kids
so now the questions okay so you're
getting all confused you're telling me
there's a
guy be Irish say the case is talking
about Irish very black and white Ru took
it Ru died now we're talking about a
Irish and more than that clarifies the
question that we
agree according to the people that hold
is only extension of the father doesn't
have a no then we can understand this
case what are you going to
say another question
on what's
the what's that mean just
say in the case
of shipment can't be made because it's
that's his whole goal is to get it back
you can't get it back because of these
two question that's part
of because of these questions we knock
out we're not saying is not like rather
we're not going to put the on that for
that with the concept the
way rather want to
say he
himself come take it therefore he's
that's why
testimony that's only we're talking
about in a
case that it's
not why is it not
it's
it's because there's no call and more
than that will never make two points
first of all no one's going to no one's
going to want to buy Matalin right
there's not black away you can't really
find anything about it that's number one
and number two it doesn't even make
sense to put a she against matal it's
very easy to
hide doesn't move K really Ain Exel it's
very easy to put a lean against the
K G say what do you mean the person
writes could take all my clothing even
that's it's when he has you could take
it
away second he sells it that's
means you're designating a specific
place where to get your
from
says you sell
it which is very distinct like humans
right we could it's more than K it's
more than just Cara we're going to see
that has a call that you're able to tell
and EV you're able to tell everyone
looks different you're able to tell
[Applause]
one has a call one doesn't have a call
it's nothing to do it sounds like has
nothing to do with hak it's not going to
help you're right that they do bring
down it's Haka but it sounds like it's
more has to do with a call everyone
understands this person specifically he
looks different we can understand why
there's a call and is a however a her a
specifically a no one's going to be able
to tell therefore you can't be
from it even when there is a still
another issue
with such a
thing
person however throws in there's two
points we need to
know because usually it's so unless you
explicitly write that it's not like and
you mean it then it works because
and it can be what we call like a
Certificate of Insurance sample
sometimes you have to just send out
samplesample just means you're going to
copy from it it has to be a real star
that has my mus it and has something use
so back to the question so could be very
nice so why we're back to the question
why in the world can you be on that
ansers we're talking about where you
bought it and immediately sold it there
no now we know that there's no there was
no on
it maybe it's a scenario where the she
is going to be on the future he's
basically saying in the next three
months whenever I
bu here we can
see
right right we had that child from here
we can clearly see that it's not
very we're talking about scenario where
the is saying we know for a fact he
never
had the
continues back in this
question he
doesn't
however the question is very
even usually means if comes and takes
away the no problem that's part of the
risk you lose your value you bought for
that's why I gave you a discount because
there's a chance comes up is going to
come and take away the car however if it
comes out that you were scam and it was
never even your we're
thinking nothing you owe me money
because you're a scammer so the back to
the question why you not because you
have to remember back we're talking
about a case where someone's coming and
saying never belonged to you that's the
case we're not talking about we're back
to why is not considering
we're talking
about this means say this we know that
the parent of this we're talking about
specifically where he was before there
was even has to be like that otherwise
again for collusion so we're talking
about where he's always been talking
that it's a that for sure belong to
you that's part of it
what you're buying I think what we call
it the lemon or something right you're
buying something that's worthless and
talking
mine what it's a risk that's part of the
RIS that he's taking you got a steep
discount for that
risk let's go through this
case what is this case talking about
other then he's going to go back to get
this tell me the guy's broke has nothing
left what do he care no one else is
going to tell he has nothing to take
he's totally bankrupt and that aners
you're right has no other
still he doesn't want to be considered a
Russ therefore he wants to pay up
his right what to help there's someone
going to lose money someone's losing all
their all their money so either way and
that he answers to himself he convinces
himself he says
no you I don't consider
yourself because that was part of the
deal the person that lent me money he
has nothing to lose he has nothing not
nothing to lose he had nothing that he
should get hurt in the process therefore
I don't want live
[Music]
the people that go up
to the people that go
from they should all know this to
say a guy pulls up Hest he grabs it away
and says it's
his he has to help him to retreat to get
it back
however when we're part of
this we're talking about when is the
have to get involved is when the is
saying that maybe the guy is right I
don't recognize this animal that it was
yours you're reminded to me that this
guy is just being a bully and he's being
a regular honest now a king of all what
do he want me to
do another point
is when a guy is a GH when a guy comes
and steals what is he doing with the
sadle on the donkey if he takes the
Dunkey in the saddle it shows that Tak
is a GH he's taking everything however
if he comes and only takes the donkey
beli leaves in the saddle he's saying
I'm not a g this Tak belongs to you but
thear is mine it's giving somewhat a
credibility to the that he
saying he takes we say
he's you don't have to get all my time
every knows
the their mouth is full of on the right
hand there's nothing do you can't get
involv now we're gonna get into the next
with the
says I'm going to try to explain it as
much as possible it's quite heavy
the really the argu
andab says when does
the only time is when he got witnesses
testified that he got the that he gotor
this this suit let's use the case we're
talking about a suit by a tailor let's
try to stick to one case we're talking
about the guy is aing that the suit is
sitting by the
tailor however if the suit even though
it's sitting here today we see it as
long as it was not given to
him we don't know how it is
he
now very crucial to understand this that
is a fundamental argument we're see Raba
Rab's timing is that Raba is saying that
even if we see the Cara we see this not
Cara we see this suit in the tailor
since he can say there's many many
tailor M alone there's dozens just
because the suit is sitting in my place
is not a ride that you come to me you
never shop by me you always go to other
people so that is enough to say I'm no
different than a regular person is when
this that he gave it to him how to you
to fix that is what going to see in a
moment this is how we're learning it
that's how I learned it two days ago
okay what's the help why is
it even if he gave back a testimony
Witnesses
if no one sees it today he could easily
say so why I don't understand why is
it
no so that's why it's not GNA help if I
give it back if as long as this a it's
not going to help because I either way
have to give it back a so I can't I
don't have AIG to say
okays what's and he answers him
back you sold it to
me you gave it to me as a
gift it's worthless and he has to get
back if he says that you told him to
give it to me
right away for
tomorrow what's the difference of the
and the what's the difference if you the
one specifically that sold it to me or
you told the to sell it to me what's the
difference the're both shouldn't make a
difference between
and it's coming through somebody
else we're talking about that the is not
the one who sold it them rather saying
Le has now says to you
told
couldas so that was the point
so this is
the clearly says the case of the he in
the case of Russ in the case of the
we're saying the case is he saw it so
what the
case let's bring the take it away
because it was a case he saw
it very clearly there's no as long as he
sees it he could take it away
so that says that he has to
be and that
[Applause]
says going to tell
me and then he
answers I don't have I would be believed
with the with the
of what happens in a very specific case
you go you brought your suit to the
cleaners now you have an argument how
much you made up to owe him
you made
up2 I only made up a dollar so now what
do we do
so as long as the Talis is still in the
um
shop he has to prove it that it's one
otherwise he gets two however what
happens he gives it back so then it
depends if it's still on the
time just like we learned
regarding the there explains that a is
and all the other things he has to
juggle he doesn't remember if he paid
him they're relying on what to
get so now this is's question what's the
case if you telling me there was and was
there when he gave him this object this
clothing let's ask what was the price
what was the wages they made
up clearly we're talking about there's
no And even though they saw it what say
this
is he could just
say much the wages and that says
no the cas because he could have said he
was the one
who sitting
there is to ask this is talking to be
knock out
the says so just to give a comparison
whenever the doesn't we have to say a
typical person has a in the exact same
scenario of what whether it was then who
you have goes through
now very
clear that's a very clear very
feir what's the case
tell me those Witnesses so if me so
let's say I'm not a rather I
got I'm a stranger but I have witnesses
testifying
that have no choice to say there
no there no me I have I have a I could
have
said I bought
it say
one last point a is going to argue on
if to put it down very very in a basic
level
the really is is how do we look at when
we see a something in the shop if you
have a suit in the shop Z wants to say
this let's be real let's be logical this
suit is sitting in the
cleaners it's obvious to Fe it's very
fear assessment to say let's be real you
got it you got it it's to fix or to
clean has a tin back he says as long as
you cannot prove it to me how I got it I
have a to say that all you are this
is you not a by me since you're not a by
me therefore that's really what my
understand the
basic is if a person can such a thing
let's go right we're going to go in one
last what
is a person goes home he went to a place
he sees he's wearing somebody else's
suit can he use it me while it's a very
famous famous question says if you got
it from the cleaners let's say
or even though you look at your suit you
recognize it's not my suit the you can
continue wearing it until the owner
comes back and changes your suit we're
assuming there was exchange that
happened be going to wedding what do
they call theer right the people you
give your your your suit your your coats
in the winter and you come home you see
somebody else's thing
then so again a wedding for example or
so simple
question why the case by you could why
when you come home from a wedding you
can't on that
say we just saw it earlier
who his uncle from his father and his
mother he's answering the question he's
saying the difference is that by um
people get on it's on commission there's
such a concept that plenty of companies
even today they sell clothing on
commission so since this um has many
suits in a shop that belong to him where
he commissioned to sell it we're going
to assume as a followers we're going to
say that the person you're wearing the
suit is Tak doesn't belong to Y it's his
suit that's meant to go for sale so why
did he give it to you cuz your suit that
you don't have he by mistake gave it to
somebody else and we're going to see
what's the difference how do you know
when it was a mistake or not because why
that this is maybe just like he gave you
the super mistake why is that other
person he's not able to wear it and you
are able you are able to wear it we have
to be and that's what we're going to say
right
now when the himself gave it to you
then it's very feir to say that it was a
mistake
however even he himself when he gives
you the suit back you're now to wear
it he says take this
suit when he tells you specifically take
your suit because we're saying he's
making a mistake and
that
why it's not Asal and now answer now
just to give a little more clarity why
it could be two people someone else is
wearing your suit but when he gave it
back he said take your suit so he knows
the someone who's really wearing your
suit knows wait a second the take your
suits oh so this Tak doesn't belong to
me I'm know to use it can you you
remember that he said take a suit and
we're going to say it was D and we're
going to say that the suit I'm wearing
Tako doesn't belong to anybody and
therefore I'm able to
wear let me show you
the what do they do they make themselves
look
into Ser you come back to the woman he
say can I get my TOS back he gives you a
stare and he says I don't know I don't
know who you are never
happened so what happens shows him I
have witnesses that recognize a suit and
it's very similar to my suit now again
the witnesses of they're not saying 100%
it's your suit because then there's
Witnesses rather they're saying there's
a suit that if you bring it out we'll be
able to tell we need a closer
look
no I can't show the privacy policy I
should show you just because you're
complaining we respect our customers
that's where you see
their I can't show
it let's go see it if it's true I can't
you Hipp
policies right
because says that
when you see it with but if it's it's
just a guess and the say let's bring it
out then you can't do it thought for a
second said let's try to see if we could
even fool
the he's going to make him fool he's
going to fool him to make him believe
there was a raw why the tells him okay I
got it you're trying to you're trying to
play tough with me I might why are you
holding on to my let's let's be
real because I have money for you right
I owe your money
so let's take out the suit let's value
it then you're going to bring Witnesses
quickly to see that the suit's
yours take how much you owe you let's be
real the suit I don't owe you $1,000 the
suit's worth $1,000 owe you a few let's
evaluate
right you don't know what you're talking
about these people these are a a fool a
scammer could smell another scammer and
then he
says he smells right through your roots
he knows that you're really trying to
play on him and he tells
him don't worry I already don't need
your
evaluation the people before you we
already evaluated the suit and between
me and you without the a the suits much
worth much more less than what and back
to but hypothetically starts talking
that hypothetically and these are
there's no hope in getting out of it you
might as well give up okay one last
point
of the M says a sharecropper
does not
get why is
it a either gets a half or whatever it
is whatever the minig but they don't get
the whole
entire for the past three years you're
seeing this holding on to the
entire you know talking about we talking
about very
specific it's a generational gener
family is going back many decades that
they were the artist involved and such
arst was talking got normal that they
used it already for a few years the
trust goes back decades and it got to a
point where they already made up that
you have it for a full few years cuz
establish one point it's p to us you're
always going to gain by having one
person have the entire s whenever you
split the course eventually go higher so
when it gets to the point where you
really trust if it makes sense to RS
about the office he could have it for a
few years then I'll get all the prophets
few years
later if there's an orus even about the
office an orus if he totally
subcontracts everything 100% every last
point he's not even involved in the then
he
has a person is not going to let the
Aris 100% subcontract all the work
because he's not in the car he's already
not involved doesn't have so much so
much Nas to make sure that the property
is going to produce a
lot however
um
um however if you delegate you yourself
are on the property rather you delegate
some of the work then you don't
have they bring down over they bring it
down that he's making him that yes it's
quite common he can't handle the work
the fields got bigger and bigger got too
much for him he had to sub he had to
delegate some of the work but since he's
on the carco he's going to have it's not
a he didn't feel threatened to be one
last
what not on that he
said he could be
made say
not it's really dependent if Theus has
what to lose if he didn't get his share
his crop yet and he still didn't do the
Harvest cuz otherwise the field is going
to get taken away from him however in a
scenario where the Harvest already ended
the Year we're at the we're at the break
and he already got everything that could
be made two points first of all he could
always find more work there's plenty of
arim out there that you know that need
his services and the other point is he's
not even 100% sure his job is secure
therefore he could be made we're going
to pick up next
week base