Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Okay, good evening everyone.
We're continuing in dafa shavua. We're
learning maseches nedarim.
Daf peh hey amud aleph.
The gemara on peh dalet amud bet.
Just brought the machlokes between Rebbi
and Rebbi Yossi Rebbi Yehuda.
Because the gemara asked a stira. First
the mishna said on peh gimmel amud bet
that if you asked her all by chanim, the
chanim could take your tumas meisis
against your will. That shows ta'avas
hana'ah
>> [clears throat]
>> is not considered monetary value.
Then the next case of the mishna says if
I asked her these chanim and these
levi'im,
other chanim and levi'im could take but
not those.
So we see ta'avas hana'ah is mamon. So
the gemara says that's okay.
It's not a That's not sure. Ha?
Rebbi v'ha Rebbi Yossi Rebbi Yehuda.
Namely,
we have a machlokes
between
Rebbi and Rebbi uh Rebbi Yossi Rebbi
Yehuda. If you steal someone's tevel,
how much you have to pay?
So Rebbi holds you have to pay the value
of the tevel. That seems to indicate
ta'avas hana'ah
mamon.
Rebbi Yossi Rebbi Yehuda says no, you
only pay the value of chulin.
So what's the machlokes?
The gemara says that seems to indicate
that Rebbi savar ta'avas hana'ah mamon.
Rebbi holds you have to pay the value of
all the tevel. Holds ta'avas hana'ah is
mamon.
And Rebbi Yossi Rebbi Yehuda savar
ta'avas hana'ah ein oin mamon.
And therefore, the first part of the
mishna that says they could take it
against their will,
they could take it against the will of
the person who asked her them b'hana'ah,
they hold ta'avas hana'ah is not mamon.
And the second part of the mishna that
says you have to give it to others,
holds ta'avas hana'ah is mamon.
So the gemara is not like the guy I am a
terrorist Hannah in a moment. Really
everyone holds it doesn't have value. I
was the shot in the safer that you have
to give it to others
my turn I shall I hormone come
here where we're talking about is where
the true man the master wasn't separated
yet. You're not talking about true man
master. You're talking about table that
has in it true and master that wasn't
separated.
That's the case that Rebbe and Rebbe
Judah are arguing on. Rebbe and Rebbe
don't argue about
my mind or not. Everyone holds
is not my mind. I if it's not my mind,
why does Rebbe hold you have to pay
back?
>> [clears throat]
>> The demigod is like it's because the guy
didn't separate true master masters not
yet.
We don't look at it that it's like it
was separated.
No, it wasn't separated yet. So in the
meantime you stole
my table. Says Rashi
says the run third line
the Rebbe Rebbe holds
true masters.
Since you they didn't separate true man
master have a look at cooling.
It's like cooling.
She boy the love
it's like all cooling. It's like the
cooling that's in it because it's not
like it was separated. Rebbe Saba
that since you have to separate it it's
commission hormone dominant. It's like
it was separated. The aim lawyer behind
cooling. You don't have any
ownership of it.
Therefore you only pay the value of the
the um
cooling. So good ask on that wait a
second.
The table is Hannah in a
How would this explain why Rebbe holds
that you have to pay?
Okay, then we're saying that everyone
holds toy bus on a is not my mind.
And what do they argue on?
Rebbe holds that
you have to pay the value of the tevel.
Um
Rebbe holds that you have to pay the
full value
because you you took something that
entirely belonged to the owner. And
Rebbe used to Rebbe used to Yehuda holds
no,
it's like you already were mafrishit.
It's not the pshat
that you stole my toy bus on a.
It's It's
In other words, according to Abiosi
Rebbe Yehuda, why um
At first the Gemara wanted to say the
the machlokes whether you have to pay
for the for the full
tevel is well, you stole my toy bus on a
of who I could give the trumah to. Now
we're saying no, everybody agrees toy
bus on a is not my mind. So then why
does Rebbe hold
you have to pay?
Rebbe holds
that you have to pay for the simple
reason that it's not considered like I
gave it yet.
So the Gemara says, well, wait a second.
V toy bus on a in a moment.
>> [clears throat]
>> If toy bus on a is not my mind,
then mali hormo mali loy hormo. What
difference does it make if it was
separated or not?
Meaning,
even if it wasn't separated,
why would Rebbe hold
that you're going to have to pay the
entire value?
Why?
>> Even if it wasn't separated, he's going
to have to separate it, so it's not a
loss.
What does that mean?
Meaning
Rebbi holds that you have to compensate
the guy
for his trumah and ma'aser. Why?
Why does Rebbi hold? What was the
Gemara's svara that that you have to pay
the guy?
Rebbi's svara was, "Well, you have to
compensate the guy because right now it
wasn't separated yet. So, you stole the
guy's chullin, so you have to pay for
the whole thing."
No, now we're saying
that
why would I have to pay the guy for the
trumah
and ma'aser?
Why would I have to pay you? Eventually,
you're going to have to separate the
trumah and ma'aser.
So, then why do I need to compensate you
for it? If you say I have to compensate
you for the ta'avah sanah, I understand.
But if ta'avah sanah is not mamon,
then who cares if it wasn't separated
yet? Still,
there is trumah and ma'aser in here, and
you don't have any ownership over it.
So, if ta'avah sanah is not mamon, who
cares if you didn't separate it?
So, the Gemara says like this,
Elah heino ta'amah d'Rebbi. is the
reason of Rabi.
Really, terumah
is not mammon.
I, if it's not mammon, why do I have to
pay you for
the
stealing the whole thing? It's a
penalty. Kansu Rabbanan l'ganav, the
Chachamim penalized the ganav ki hechech
d'lo lignov, so he doesn't steal.
So,
therefore, you have to compensate
for the entire
value, lest you come to steal, as a
deterrent, so that you don't steal.
Now,
the Gemara says, even if you want to say
terumah is mammon, Rabi Yosi b'Rabi
Yehuda says, Rabi Yosi b'Rabi Yehuda
holds, no.
He holds, kansu Rabbanan l'ba'al habayis
ki hechech d'lo yishal l'tivla. It's the
opposite. Really, terumah is mammon. And
Rabi Yosi b'Rabi Yehuda holds that you
don't have to pay me
for the value of the terumah, even
though you caused me a loss. The reason
is, the Rabbanan
penalized the owner because why does he
Why is the owner keeping tevel in his
house? He should have separated the
terumah and ma'asros to begin with. He
shouldn't have had this in his house.
Let's see the Ran.
Alachainu ta'ama d'Rabi.
Hashta, lo yemi ba'ilan is the ta'avah
terumah mammon or ainah mammon.
Now, the Gemara is saying
that the machlokes here is not whether
terumah is mammon or not.
The issue of terumah ainah mammon.
If you hold terumah is not mammon,
according to Rabi Yosi b'Rabi Yehuda,
it's good.
For Rabi Hainu ta'ama.
Rabi holds the reason is the kansu
Rabbanan l'ganav l'shalem terumah ainah
the
Knesset the gun of to pay the Torah
shall be
about bias.
As a Knesset
really Torah is not my mind, but
we Knesset the gun of to pay the bias.
These
and even if you want to say it is my
mind the Rebbi according to Rebbi it's
good. For Rebbi
I knew time out. The Rebbi according to
Rebbi
here's the reason that you only pay the
Shabbat.
You know why?
Really I owe you the money, but I don't
have to pay
for the
Torah
is the Torah
Shabbat Torah is the Torah. So in other
words what the Torah is saying now is
the
Rebbi and Rebbi has nothing to do with
Torah
or in a moment. If you want to say in a
moment then Rebbi is good and Rebbi
holds you have to pay as a Knesset for
taking the guys for stealing the guys
Torah. And if you want to say Torah is
my mind why is Rebbi saying you don't
have to pay?
The reason you don't have to pay
is we Knesset the owner for hanging on
to the Torah of the Torah.
If this is the case if the
is not whether Torah is my mind or not
then we're up the creek without a paddle
because how do we explain the mission of
why does the first statement in the
mission I say that if you ask
you you have to give it to them they
could take it against your will.
And the second part says if you ask her
these
you have to give it to others. So the
mission I seems to be contradicting
itself whether Torah
or not. But now we're saying this is not
the mission of Rebbi and Rebbi.
Once it's not the mission of
Rebbi
then what's the mission of in our
mission? How do we explain these two
different statements?
So Rebbi
Rebbi says
Rather says like this, shani truma.
Truma is different. Really rather is
going to say toivas hana'as mammon.
And that's why in the safer
if I answered these kohanim
then I'm not allowed to give the truma
to these kohanim. I have to give it to
others.
Because if I give it to these, I get
they're getting hana'ah.
I'm getting hana'ah. In other words, if
I say
I'm not
What was the case of
the mishna again?
The case of the mishna is kohanim
v'leiyim v'leiyim. I answered kohanim
and leviyim to get hana'ah from me.
So, then
if I answered these kohanim and these
leviyim
if toivas hana'ah is mammon
I'm not allowed to give it to them.
Cuz they're benefiting from me.
I'm giving them the benefit.
You know, if toivas hana'ah is mammon
then
I'm not allowed to give them
I would have to give the truma ma'aser
to other kohanim and other leviyim.
I, so why in the reisha
could they take it against my will?
If toivas hana'ah is mammon, no, in the
reisha shani truma.
Truma is different. What does that mean
truma is different? Truma is different
when you answered all the kohanim in the
world.
The high new time it could here's the
reason why they could take it against
your will. B'shum the truma leichas el
kohanim. Truma could only be eaten by
kohanim.
But
if truma could only be eaten by all by
kohanim and I answered all kohanim
v'keivan d'ka asur l'histarei alav alav
u
And since
since he made a neder that
and he answered all the Kohanim upon
himself, shavya afro d'alma. He's He's
making it like dust.
What did he say? He said it's also to
all Kohanim. So, if he if he answered to
all Kohanim,
so then he loses the terumah
So, if he loses the terumah, so then the
coin could take it.
Really, terumah is my money.
But if you answer all the Kohanim in the
world, then you don't you lose the
ability to give it to the Kohanim. So,
if you lose the ability to give it to
the Kohanim, then you've destroyed the
terumah. Really fundamentally, Rava is
saying terumah is my money.
If I have the right to give it to who I
choose, that has monetary value. The
only thing is, if I answer all the
Kohanim in the world, then I've lost
that right. I can't give it to any coin.
So, I can't give it to any coin. I've
self-destructed. I've caused
the my terumah to self-destruct. So, in
that case, I've made it afro d'alma.
Look in the Ran. Rava Amar, shani
terumah kol amar kol uma is like terumah
money.
The whole Mishnah holds terumah is my
money. The seifa The seifa is good. The
Kohanim elu
>> [clears throat]
>> that if I answer these Kohanim,
other Kohanim could take it.
Varisha and then the reisha ta'ama de
yitlu bal karchei. Here's the reason why
they could take it against you. Our
Mishnah The terumah
Kohanim. Terumah is only fit to Kohanim.
She actually only So, I can't give it to
you. So,
therefore, given the maser alayu, since
you answered it to all Kohanim, shavya
afro d'alma, I made it dust. The afkurei
lahi terumah she ish l'aba.
The same thing would go for ma'aser.
Namely,
if I also all the levi'im from taking
ma'aser, so then I've rendered
uh valueless the tiv'as hana'ah of
ma'aser, cuz I can't give it to anyone.
So, that's
the way Rava explains the Mishnah on
page gimel amud bet.
Says the Mishnah, "Koinam she'eini
ois'el piha, I asser, I'm not going to
give hana'ah."
I'm not going to work
al pi avah, for the mouth of my father.
Ve'al pi avicha, for the mouth of your
father. Ve'al pi achi, for the mouth of
my brother. Ve'al pi achicha, for the
mouth of your brother.
Ein
yachol hafer. [clears throat]
So, the husband can't be made for the
neder.
Why should he be able to be made for the
neder? It's not nidrei inah nefesh, and
it's not bein od lebeina.
She'eini ois'el picha, let's say she
said, "I'm not going to work for you."
Ein tzarich lafer, he doesn't have to
annull it, because she has to work for
him, because the ma'aseh yadai'im of a
wife go to the husband.
Rebbi Akiva omer, Rebbi Akiva says, "No,
he he does annull it."
Rebbi Akiva omer, yafer, he should
annull it. Why? Cuz she maybe
she mat'adef alav yoser mi're'ai, she
might earn more than is fit to him.
She only has to support him for x number
of dollars. There's a certain amount.
Um
she has to work five sela
a reish, meaning she has to produce x
number
of weight of income a week. But whatever
she does more, that's she owns it. So,
Rebbi Akiva says, he
um he should annull the nether because
this way he's annulling
what she has to work for him goes to him
anyway even if he doesn't annul it, but
the excess so then he should annul
because she might make more than that
five seller.
And so in other words the annulment is
on the excess.
Okay, and wait a second. How is he
annulling it? Why would he annul it?
Is that
she doesn't have to give it to him. So
is that the nether?
That's that's the question.
The mission will bring another opinion.
Yafer, he should annul it for another
reason.
Because she might get divorced.
Cuz he might divorce her at which point
she that the nether will be annulled.
We'll see her love.
And then she's going to be also to him.
She won't be able to remarry him because
her mercy of dying will become also to
the husband. So annul it now for a time
when the nether might be later.
I'm not sure what said to her via menu.
The law goes like a menu.
But wait a second. The law goes like a
menu.
That
the nether that she makes
to us her her husband when she's married
to him
is
annulled. The nether is annulled for a
later time.
Right now a nether is like an carbon.
But that means right now she's to work
for him. So it's not now. When is it
for when he divorces her?
So that means you could create an Issur
hekdesh for a later time.
Does that show us l'memra, shall we say,
the ksav sh'mal Adam maktish davar sh'lo
b'olam?
From the fact that you can make a neder
because Rebbi Akiva says you should
annul it for later. Well, that means the
neder will be chal later. What do you
mean the neder will be chal later? Adam
maktish davar sh'lo b'olam? Shall we say
we see from here Adam maktish davar
sh'lo b'olam?
And the Gemara says, "Rami, I'll ask you
a stira."
Hamaktish maseh yishtei, if you are
maktish your wife's handiwork
and we'll see what the stira is
tomorrow.
If Shmuel seems to say
that you can be maktish davar sh'lo
b'olam, well,
let's see if that uh
if that works out.
Okay, friends. Daf that was Daf Pey Hey
Amud Aleph.
And
uh
we're nearing
the masechta ends on Daf Tzadi Aleph.
So,
we're we're within our arm's reach of
soif maseches Nedarim. Habba l'Tova.
Have a great night. Kol tuv.
>> Recording stopped.
>> Thank you.