Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
this Torah class is brought to you by
Torah anytime.com
okay good morning
everyone it should be but I want to
share with you uh one brief point of and
then uh we'll try to learn the next to
okay the
mishna
in has the following
suff he
says we know
that you can only be with yeah the only
way to be is with you cannot
be any other way doesn't work doesn't
work so you have to do B now we know
when you're coing a woman for kadan you
need you need W Witnesses how about
when you're well let's say you're a
woman with not a a regular woman you
need you need
a same way needs and needs needs what
about we hold
like
just
like the same way if they both did if
they both
did even if she was
sleeping this may be is special because
we know if you
do even if she's sleeping your maybe you
don't
need so the
says if the was
not let's
say he didn't Mar
her you're not
with you can't just give her a get
because the same way K
and so the real says very
interesting that for for the needs
the the
needs why just
like the himself had a sh maybe because
you're
kind you don't need no the says you need
he quotes the you
need so
the he brings a
sh he
says this is such a good question
on we had
the
of and we had a following dilemma
because in order we say that when a
woman saysain she saysain that she was
not didn't go into S as an arusa soar
said what's the case exactly an arusa
doesn't drink the sa Waters El she
drinks the waters when she's in the then
the guy did and he lived with her when
she was Under Suspicion but then he's
not cleansed from sin and the sight of
waters won't work so thear says he lived
with her he had as an arusa and then he
did and then she went into
seclusion so then thear says oh but a
parallel Case by sh he lived with her
before
theam but then she's a full-fledged
says the
the why can't you say the following case
if you hold that
needs just say the did to the without so
he got her before the bo got her but he
didn't do nin in other words he didn't
doin why because there's no in
other words we have this dilemma he
can't have relations with her after
because it's not he would he would be
guilty if he does
he can't do before because then she
wouldn't be
called
because so says just say he did without
and according to
the without is not a Kenyon so it's not
a Kenyan so he's not a y's she's still
a says the
Raj
she says he lived with me and therefore
the B got her before the bo got her
however he didn't live with
her
because he lived with her before she was
maana
so the Raj
says number one what kind of question is
this if he's not her
with then she can't drink why can't she
drink because the bottom line is you
only drink the waters if you're
in and you need to
be so if he did and he wasn't
it's
not you say you did there's no such
thing
as
HE capable of
drinking it should say it's a
typo
you need now moreover that I understand
you
need and you need him to live with her
before the
bo you need the B to live with her
before the bo he's not the B he's a
stranger you're right he lived with her
before the bo but he it's not that the B
lived with her before the bo because his
be did not make
him
however the rra disagrees with the and
the r entirely and he says besides that
in my opinion you don't need for
the the be of a
why I hold that a does not
need even if he lived with her
privately this is the woman that has
been to
her right we had that before where did
we have
that in the notes they
quote what does the say over
there let's see over
here
nope
um what was the S
of that was the reason
why he doesn't have to give her
a that was the the gar said that in
other words God gave this woman to him
there's nothing he could do about it so
the manner in which he acquires her is
not is not required
of so basically this is I think a
fundamental whether
needs the is the says yes the r says yes
the Raj says no the Raj says even if you
did need Adam it would still not solve
the great mystery onest B again the
mystery is the gamar seems to be
troubled how do you have a case of sh y
drinking the waters because ultimately
if he had be with her he's K if he
didn't have be with her you
need so The Simple Solution would be he
lived with her without adidos the Raja
says first of all she would not be able
to drink because he's not the Bal second
of all that's not
called because he's not the Bal
okay so that's uh the point of for for
and I would like to
do you've just experienced another Torah
class brought to you by Torah
anytime.com
