0:00 / 0:00
Controversy in the Holy City - Part 2
50 views
The Rabbanim of Jerusalem Respond to Rav Akiva Yosef Schlesinger Responds Subscribe and hit the bell to see new videos!!! • Visit the Rav's site: https://www.rabbidg.com • Have a Question? Contact the Rav: https://www.rabbidg.com/contact • Order Rabbi Glatstein's Books: https://www.rabbidg.com/rabbi-glatstein-books Date This Shiur Was Given: 9/17/2020 #Torahstudy #Judaism #Jewish #Torah #Spiritual #Rabbi
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
this torah class is brought to you by
torahanytime.com
okay good evening everyone let's
continue this really uh interesting
adventure
about uh the subject of
where the kiva yosef schlesinger's
attempt
to reinstate uh smikha
in the uh to reinstate takaya shofar on
shabbos in the holy city of
yerushalayim and last night we learned
13 different arguments that rav
schlesinger
offered
and uh how do the
or the majority opinion how did they
respond to his taina now the first tita
yeah let me try to do that let me see if
i could bring up the myrmicons thank you
let's see if we could do this
um
share screen
okay
it's going to be very hard to read
because the
uh
not bad
not not terrible
even better
yeah a little larger
not bad
okay
so again let's
continue the first haina
of rabbiki yosef schlesinger is
that we know
that a mitzvah arisa could push off in a
sudden
namely the example he brought with tsar
balikayam
by the way if anybody happens to be
learning mission brew with us today's
mission abra
spoke about the issue to put a cup under
an egg that was born on yamtif because
it's mavato the cleave from being able
to be used
so therefore
the um
uh the rabbiquibios of schlesinger
argued we know that sarba al-echaiyam
would allow you to violate being mavato
akhli me hanoi that being the case
if a
do-iraisa could push off a rabbana and
why can't sheifer on shabbos push off
so the argument against that is very
clear
that sarbalaichim is not a mitzvah it's
not a mitzvah
is an issue
an israeli raisa
not necessarily would it push off with
rabban even though you can't what do you
mean but a director could push off allah
say yeah but sometimes
by the way if you want to follow inside
i'm in uh page three
second column
ice
um base
okay
so
the halacha that uh dairisa
it could push off a dirabonan
mashayinkin the assay
of
we have no precedent that could push off
the drab on lest you come to carry next
argument from kibios of schlesinger is
that an assay of the rabbim
could push off even a dairisa
and i say of the rabbim even a dragon
could push off even at arizona for
example your ladder free in avid kanani
you could free in avid kanani to make a
minion because the it's a mitzvah of the
robin and that could push off a
drab on excuse me that could push off at
the rise of him
we know you're not allowed to work
avadhim so the assay of
the assay of uh making a minion which is
only the rabbanon of arabim could push
of the direction of
him
so therefore we should say it's kia
shaifer which is a mitzvah of the rabim
should also push off the lav
of uh shema yavi renu if it should even
be able to push off a
dair isa so
rebbi mikhail tikachinsky said the way
we address that interestingly is that
the issue of
idu
is not a real dairisa
it's only an asmrta de rabbanon and not
an assay gemura
now i would say well still but that
means a
uh the rabbanon of the rabbim could push
off
so why can't the day rise that kia
shahifar push off the drab of shamiyah
i personally would add in the sugiya of
freeing the avid kanani
and violating
i believe the iran over there says an
interesting thing the what's the issue
of freeing in avid kanani it comes from
you can't give a guy a gift for nothing
but where you stand to gain
you're not giving it to them for nothing
so i would say the reason why you could
free your evan kanani in violation is
because there's no israel
iran says over there
because it's derived from like such a
name and when you're gaining something
there's no israel at all so in my humble
opinion that's not a good precedent next
in australia he says something i'm not
percent clear he says that
if you're at all in doubt whether the
rabbanon extended their zero to a
certain case and to be mavata
a director
you should not apply it if you're music
if they said they're din there
so the
um
says no that is not correct that's not
what it means
what it means is not don't apply the
abundant if you're not sure if it
applies
but rather
if they said to be okay
that's only when
there's a vaday issa drab on and now
when there's a mahloikis weather there's
an ester drab
but if there is an israel
let's say of rabbah which definitely
applies then it would apply even to the
oykar dharmanathara
now here's the next argument
that which the ran
and the tory evan
rely on the fact
that you remember the ron and the tory
evans said well this is different than
lula now honestly i'm not really clear
about that question but there wasn't a
distinction made between lulav and
shaifar
in that we had an easier time being
mavata lulav because
you could always take it on a different
day masha inc
don't want to be mad
for me
how could the rabbana be
for completely
so that was
that was the question of the of the ran
and based on that that was the argument
of the round and based on that argument
that the hammond don't want to be okay
the shofar rev
want them to say that we should rely on
the riff that you could blow bazman azad
and shabbos so so they the khak you
can't have your cake and eat it you want
to rely on the roofer you want to rely
on iran
the rift is the one who says that it
applies bismarck but if you want to rely
on the run
the round doesn't hold like the riff the
round number said you're allowed to blow
shayfar
even on a basin that doesn't have smicha
so you want to rely on the iran's
argument that how could the
and therefore they left the situation
where you could be oaker the sheifer
but the iran doesn't hold like the rift
that you're allowed to blow the shaifar
the round does not hold like the rift
that you're allowed to blow the shofar
if you don't have a besden of smoochim
furthermore says
are not being ok for entirely you know
why
because there's a rule there's always
next year so you blow next year and i
blowed last year
the kahama are not going to be okay the
whole concept of shayfa but on
if on a year where roshana comes in on
shabbos maybe they will be oaker
that you blow the shot for even on
shabbos
so if there's a fairish russia that you
blow it even on shabbos
can't be
so the
response to that is the shar hamelech
that says there's a jerosha that you
blow the shaffer even on shabbos
that's only rabbi sai
that's only fits in according to
rebelezer who holds mahshire mitzvahs
durkheis
but according to the other
tanoayam that makshire
mitsuma are not
then we don't have this drasha
okay
furthermore
do you remember rabbi yosuf salazar
wanted to say that even the rambam would
agree to the rift that you don't need a
besden of smuchem
because the rambam he argued how old you
only need
the top than that's possible
however
a besden
even if it doesn't have smikha but if
bisman is that it's the best person you
have namely let's say in the time when
there was no smith
the rambam would agree to the rift that
you could use that kind of besden and
blow the shaifar
so
um
feel that that's very
incorrect none of the poison uh grip the
rambam in that fashion
moving right along
argument huss
he wanted to say
that the same way that a towel of a
robin could be used by the rabbin
because they will
remind each other
so too why don't we say that
since the shaifer is being blown by the
rabbim there's no zera they're abundant
because they'll remind each other so
first of all
says that that svara that 10 people
could use one towel does not hold true
in the moscone of the gemara
but furthermore that's by definition a
faulty argument because if it was true
then rabba never would have been able to
make zero of the movato shoiferon
shabbos because what do you mean shama
yavi reno but it's a robin and they'll
remind each other so clearly rabbit
didn't care about that svara
furthermore do you remember that he
argued that bismarck we don't have a
rishis harab
we don't have a big thorough flare
so the
argued back so then why does the mishnah
say
that when the bastish was destroyed
they were masaki no only to blow in
desden and not anywhere else but there
were no more russia's harabs so clearly
if they said when the temple is
destroyed when there are no more rishis
harabins you still can't blow on shabbos
so that means they held like this
that the original gezero was made in a
time that there were russia's harabam's
and once the zero was made for them
then the zero applies everywhere even
even in a carmelus
i mean let's say guys in quarantine
and uh let's say for example um i can't
say
who
but there's a certain yeshiva that i
know that a lot of children go to
that was closed down yesterday and their
parents are going up the wall what do
you do with the kids all day at
aravyamtiv i'm not saying who when where
i cannot reveal
and not only that the department of
health calls the parents on the hour
how was your kid exposed where was your
kid exposed and then they tell you where
the kid was exposed and then they tell
you and they call the grandparents in
brooklyn about the kids
and they have a whole list of
indiscriminate questions and now you
know okay but be it as in a
let's say someone's in quarantine i have
a new thing inertia straw they're in
quarantine so they should blow shore
french habits because there's no xerox
show me abraham
because the the mossad is gonna i don't
know what to them
can i ask you i don't understand this
whole
that inherits this world the time when
the basal big dish was kion
the right
possible
was just a robin that i can think of
i mean you had villages you had
courtroom it was in
an
economy that was uh full of agronomy
right i mean it was it was all um
farms basically
the only place might have been usually
other than that when could they possibly
have had a recession i mean even then i
don't think uh why were they worried
so apparently once rabbah made xera
about a possible case of isha sarabham
that gizero applies even a nurse to say
and even in a karmalis
and and uh
says that it would apply a new shallam
even when the gates are locked because
once the rabbis made xera they made it
because of the sarabin but it extended
to all times and to all areas
furthermore
you want to say well just you know to
make things better this is an ice your
aleph
will make a bed of 23. says
23 help
23 is the malevolent murdered if you
need a bezel that has michael
then
then you need them to have smith you
could have 200 guys and they could allow
no shots and play skim they're not cred
it's not a credible sound sanhedrin if
you don't need
smith then what does 23 do
furthermore if you remember because of
the plight of russian jewry his argument
was okay so if it's not blowing the shot
for us or it's like we're blowing
khashog's royce to alarm the people to
pray but the question is you're not
going to block outside son
of because of exercise
finally toward the end
the kiva yosef schlesinger says
he wanted to argue
the whole gazero is you might come to
carry the shoifer after you use it so
we'll put it under
we'll refund the police and we'll make
police then to guard the shauffer that
nobody carries it
well he says we know there's one thing
when it comes to the xeros of the
rabbanon
and that is
la nitin leshiuren the hachem
okay we're worried that if you dance you
might make a musical instrument yeah but
let's say a guy says uh
look i i will make a musical instrument
i'm a clumsy guy so i so that guy could
clap his hands
when they make zero they make a blanket
gazera so it's not going to help if you
appoint shoitrim and guard the shoifer
so that nobody carries the shofar
and finally
the final argument of rabbi yes and goes
look
who gets the issue
for blowing the shaipha
the listeners no not the listeners the
blower so the blower gets is but
everyone else is mikayama mitsudai raisa
so isn't there a principle it's
preferable
for someone to do a small aveira to be
mazaka others in a big
mitzvah so let the i'll be the guy i'll
blow the shauffer i'll violated rabban
and then they'll all get a director
why don't we say
he says number one
la mesa the guy
so i would argue if that's the case then
that defeats the hogzei of rabbah
then uh what's rabbis gazer i have one
guy blow the surfer for everyone else
and he'll take it on the chin for
everybody else
that's what he says to him cain here let
me read that inside
he says
is it a mitzvah of era now by the way
maybe tomorrow i'll give a little clip
there's a macho kiss i believe rabbi
kevin others
according to rabbah
that you're not a blow shauper because
xero shami have rendered
let's say you did blow the shauffer are
you say the mitzvah or the
were they oyker the kim
now by the way this whole argument of a
kibios of schlesinger is assuming you
get the myth if you wouldn't get the
mitzvah then there wouldn't be no point
in telling him blow the shafter for
everybody else
now so number one this is oyker the
whole din of rabbah but number two
la maisa this guy has an asura so he's
now to do it but he argues further
that incorporated in the gezera of not
blowing is also not telling someone else
to blow for you that's part of the xera
so in fact those who commissioned
someone to blow the shaifar
now by the way that might be part of
what rabshmo salant supposedly said
he said if rabikiva yosef schlesinger
was blowing the shofar
would go ahead and listen to it behind
the wall
now he meaning i would never ask him to
maybe maybe i would be violating this
hijab
but if i would know he's doing it anyway
then i would go to listen maybe i could
make an appearance because that would
that would lend my support and maybe
then he would also be incorporating this
to drab on but at the very least um
at the very least rabbi sai
this was what was the counter response
from kibayos of schlesinger
and it's uh quite amazing that i do not
think that after his attempt or maybe
his possible blowing in that fateful
year that it was ever blown again on
shabbos but
hashem
there will be a time when rosh hashanah
comes out on shabbos that we will blow
the shaifar
i would assume
that when meshiach comes
and the
reinstated
so
according to even the rambam you'll be
able to blow shayfar
in yerushalayim
and for sure in the miktash we won't be
guys or shamayavirano
so hopefully hashem
i guess if meshiach comes tonight or
tomorrow
then we will hear the show for the
shabbos but either way we hope to hear
the tikka bishophar goddall
so this was the story and the
interesting uh controversy
and i want to take the opportunity to
wish everyone a xivoxi motiva and a good
bench jar thanks for joining
[Music]
looking forward to a what fresh year
you've just experienced another torah
class brought to you by torahanytime.com