Chullin Daf 85

All right, D pay Fridays we were talking about mera about how your to even continue to do the which we said played into the shil whether or not kam might be an extension of the rabba didn't like it because he had a from the said you don't the yiff and if you do the you're not the dam because of that since ma is kashabas still the suffic will not be so that v won't be certainly a suffix not going to said the Bryce finished by saying the the Bryce then continued to be and the Bryce had finished by saying that this is one of the verm that said was of chuva but still copper had a chupa. So we assume that the BC was talking about which we assume was talking about and was by saying that maybe that was over but it might be which the Gar says where and therefore you see from the price he shouldn't be able to do the chabas for the and now after that review we're picking it up five lines from the bottom of this is from the Brycea that we were talking about. They had said is not in the butt even in the so what is the suffix that's going to be a suffic whether or not it is suffic when it's vi when there's a v certainly is there going to be any shila about when there is a suffic In other words, if the Tyrus says you got to blow the shifer on a day that's clearly Yumpt cannot stand in the way of its and therefore it has to be blown on a day that you are being even though there's still is oftenist who you don't know if it's an isha or an isha and we see that that to blow is going to be that would be a riot that should not be is not going to be phased by that because I'm not really by anist because even that's not that she's a visha you'd still blow a for like the says they don't do only the men do the carbonus but not the nshim can do if they choose to so just like holds the rus to Mika if she wants to. She also can blow the rash if she wants to. So a person who is a sufficish suffic has the right to blow the and the fact that person can blow doesn't bring a riyah that a suffic of another like is going to be but the raan hold that an isha can't do and likewise she can't blow the scher and therefore according to her if someone is a suffic by blowing the chaer that's a riot that any including is going to be in terms of there's an important tus at the bottom of bay when tis when the Ty says we know that the reason why you don't blow the onabas is because and that's not neg what kind of would that be which says that if is not in there's not even and according to if you don't have any at all you don't say because you have to have that so being that there wouldn't be on that side it would be to carry back to the even to their because there was a shifer in the base of mush on you're going to say you don't have that mus at all so you don't have a riot from say with a suffic of like a the said how can you bring a riot from milo which is not by night. How can you compare that to which is by night on Yamra? It sounds like you're saying it's a not a night thing on but it is on other nights. You never do me at night. This is what he meant to say because there is no meal at night. That's one of those things that he was able to answer back even though nobody had another answer. Okay. So to Mishna let's say or a bird and it turns out to be a so you can't eat this thing. Now the question is do I have to do a so these are classic and lastly let's say and it becomes a like you're trying to do a proper but you ruined it or those areas because there there's not a at all and therefore there's no mitzvah of on those situations. Now in the last peric by the mission said that if you sh an animal and it turns out that one of them is a traa there's a whether or not there's an according to your from malus because whereas the hold it is considered but the problem is we're kind of swapping the for this Mishna because in this Mishna mayor over here said there is a even though your animal turns out to be a traa so who argue with should be shim and the who argue with should beer so Why is our mission referring to the in the previous mission referring to her mayor as mayor's name since Rebi liked the mayor. So therefore when he wrote the Mishna he wrote it as the to give it that more more credence and he liked. So there's no steer here. It's all rebi choosing to affix the name to the he liked. So why why does he like it over there? He's going to learn from that. So too also here by even though it's a sharita but might according to that is not called because when was telling his helpers to make auding no because it's not a perfect What difference does it make? They they mean the same thing. So why can't you use it even though it's a different word? Because we have a precedent for that zoo. Since it means the same thing, you can make that way. That's only when you don't have a better word to use. It's not something that's exact where you have like you learn from the identical word since it's the same exact word. So what's the reason for like this way better? because they done in so the difference of context is enough for reason for go to every mayor and what would a mayor who argues with all this what would he say isn't there also by as well even though it's written by that applies to so even according to shim is not really doing bottom line may and that's why he called my time to be mayor why Now on the other way, why is her mayor hold that bib? We learn the spilling out from that. That's why it's who argues about that you were going to eat. That means it has to be right to eat. Well, Mary, what would he say? You can't eat an That's where it's coming to be. But he'll say also is not to eat. So therefore the term must be all the other kind of animals as well from that's why he liked what said because of this exchange turning over this mayor says that that's not for everything because you can't eat it. You're not going to say and is going to soon ask well obviously but for now let's continue. And the other way is not saying it's not even still it's not going to make it to noa. So going back now well obviously no one's going to ever suggest that is going to make it kosher. Now going back to the fourth paric might think according to mayor that it besita maybe I think the mother would work for that Uber and therefore it won't require Dr. Baba that according to her mayor there's no den pakua and therefore even though you did a kushita on the mother there is no shak on this Uber well frankly more of a tisbor may paka but mayor said always does need how could there ever have even been a benu which comes from a traa would be mut based on the mother's mayor the in this den is that holds a one thing and another thing but that there is a whole that you've just the whole idea of pu and therefore I would think maybe the mother should work for the uber and it should not require it that according to mayor and by extension rebi does not hold that the mother's is going to work to be mater the ail of this ben pakua and now moving to the next thing rababa because it even according to is not called but still it's not going to have to be mix there are some animals that don't have to and which is one that doesn't have to za it's beforeish and since the Bryson learns this from a pusk certainly is going to agree with this so why would Robin need to tell us according to that there's no tom and for We're talking about a particular we learned in theory said it will be considered even though it's a tra and therefore should even have to and therefore a that according to it is even though it's now this whole discussion that we just had is predicated on the idea that a is going to be but according to it's not going to be only makes sense if you tell me the regular is of a therefore you can't be n from it so according to since it's not a therefore won't be a to which answers factor in it's true he does hold because as the mission says and the same thing will be which obviously can't be a proper carbon but if it's also has to be burned now okay that would give me the reason why I got to burn this which could have never really been brought as a carbon in the first place but there's a muck for but if you told me that according to only why you have to burn it only because maybe someone's going to come to eat it outside of the bish but we do not do that. So must be and this is where we're going to call it and we'll pick it up with ya bikis.