Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Chullin Daf 139
4 views
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right, lamid test as we begin the
final per of the pericil.
I'm pronouncing it shaloh as opposed to
the way I pronounced it my whole life. I
remember one time when my father-in-law
took me to Revid Con and I asked the
Mashila about the potential opportunity
to be Mim Shiloh and he said no it's
Shiloh and Rabbi Gross discusses it over
here as well because really the Pik says
because that's because it's that the two
words are next to each other. It's but
the mitzvah is still going to be
okay
in and outside of
both before and after the
As we'll talk about more in the garra,
there is no
there's a in the sense that is both
whether or not it's as we'll learn a lot
more about whether or not it's captured
or controlled or in your however we're
going to define misum that there is no
mitzvah if it's your pet and it's misum
because as opposed to
ain't
And let's define that
paradise. These kinds of wild birds that
are nesting in the paradise in the
orchard. As Rashi says, they left the
house. They ain't coming back home. And
they became wild. And Rashi gives us an
important line here.
They could escape. So they're not being
controlled and therefore they're
considered.
These more domesticated style birds are
going to be Rashi says they are raised
in homes. So they will be from
a non-cusser bird is going to be from
but
additionally
a not kusher bird sitting on kosher eggs
or the or a kusher bird
on a non-cosher nest you're also and
lastly zer this particular bird called a
ky tached as a partridge where the
nature of it is specifically to sit on
the eggs of other birds
as We'll learn more about in the
Gumarish
all these that we've had in these at the
end here explain the mitzvah that is in
question was both in Israel and outside
of
that was not really necessary to tell us
in the first place because we know that
all mitzvah that are not are going to be
in and outside of Israel. So that's
always
because as you remember from Shab where
there's a there because the T of Mishna
said in and outside
and it's brought that way also that
there is no mitzvah outside
that's always we know it's going to be
that of is
The whole context of
that would make sense comes the mission
in the beginning of says that even when
there's no bas and there's no carbonus
there still will be
and both and say
there's a there because of course it's
going to
just because the animal became that's a
reason to be of no there's no reason for
that and therefore is but the other ones
we need to know it's
didn't we say the mission about iska
talking about and therefore there is a
that even
in the of the way Rashi explains this is
that even though there's a general cl of
but there's a in saying though we'll be
in despite the fact that it's already
and for the time why did the Mishna need
to even say it was in the first place
it's because we had a mission shouldn't
have said the whole because it was posit
so so why when we were saying it
beforehand that we weren't saying it's
also so
it must be that the Tana was telling us
the of where it was and therefore he
also said it even and therefore you
can't be mad Okay. The mission then
tells the mid of
my why is there no
the Tyra is talking about a mitzvah
where to send it away but that's
you have another instruction by which is
to take it to the B mikdash. So the Tyra
can't be talking about something that is
hegdish to which Omar says if that's the
case
let's say you have this very dangerous
murderous bird and it kills a person and
therefore it needs to now be killed by
Bezdon and it has now subsequently
escaped and now we discover Aillaa the
hen sitting on its nest.
Becausedon
this murderous bird that you've now
found you can't do with it because the
terror says you got to do as opposed to
the other instruction which is to have
it executed. So what's the case that ra
is talking about
if already this bird had its day in
court and it's already been decided that
it is Misa moving over to then barku
then that bird is already misa and the
way rashi understands this kasha is how
could it have practically escaped it was
already misa thevah is totally not
phased by that and says well kasha let's
say escaped and the way the ritzvah
understands the garam's kasha is that
now it's user bahan and therefore you
can't be mim the mitzvah with it
goard we must be talking about or at
least ravine is talking about a case
where this murderous bird has not yet
had its day in court it has not yet been
decided that it's
now you have a mitzvah to bring it to be
where there's a mitzvah for us to bring
those who are to bring them to
what's the case of these birds that the
mission is telling us your
I mean how did you ever get this if you
took birds that you had in your house
and you
can't take the birds that were in your
house that You were theoretically able
to be Maktish. And now tell me you're
putter. You were already putter because
they were already in your house.
It must be that you saw it outside and
it was potentially
and I was
how were you able to in such a case?
It has to be just for the mechanics of
making it in the first place.
Shinu the mission must be talking about
where you picked up these Ephraim
outside and therefore you're them with
and you were immediately mish them and
then you put them right back down and
Rash explains the mother bird wasn't
there. So the is when the mother bird
gets back since these were already you
just made them heish you're now going to
be putter but
in such a case even if they would be
that would still be
as the mission is going to soon tell us
if you take these birds and you put them
back into the nest.
So in such a scenario where you picked
up the birds you even if you
weren't macked the just by picking
up the birds you right away have ruined
the opportunity to do the mitzvah when
the mother bird returns. Okay.
Must be the mission is talking about a
case where you picked up the mother
bird. Your makdish the mother bird and
then you put that mother bird back into
the cane. Well, that's also not going to
work because of
because you were first beforehand and
therefore being is not going to somehow
be your I'm reading this carefully
because
is a little unclear. At what point did
you become in the rash's lion over here
is Rashy's first word over here. When
you find the nest is when you're
that my friends is very important
because there is a classic shain when do
you become only if you want the eggs
when you just stumble across it. famous
chuva of the kavaser that's probably
going to come up a couple times in this
per inim
that a person is in independent of
everything else just that's kind of how
rashi sounds
doesn't learn that way and of course
you're only once you actually pick it
upon the gar is asking that as soon as
you have this mat of the fact that
you're not going to somehow be mafia
that as the says
if first you're an animal and then
But
then
the fact that you were afterwards does
not absolve you of your of and in the
same way the fact that you are being
mish this mother bird is not going to
somehow absolve you of your
fort
we're talking about if you're mish these
little where you're mish the product of
the shy as some sort of carbonado and
then they were maru and they escaped and
they went someplace else. So therefore,
you're able to mish these little birds,
but once they escaped, they're no longer
considered misum and therefore they're
going to be and raising about someone
who's mish
not the actual because as we're going to
soon see in the gam's talking about and
not and they would have to be very young
little birds
that you didn't do it for the country
but rather just for now we'll break this
down.
I get that why we were talking about
the whole tour of
talking about
my time. Why was trying to limit the
Mishna to only talking about what's
wrong with which is certainly broader?
It has to be the only
since they had their
going to have the from
but like that's saying that the heish
here in question is about
it doesn't have the
but yet it's only
once it rebelss and and leaves which is
the case we're talking about.
So according to you zakra if you're only
and then it's it will become no longer.
Now why is it no longer hegish? Because
things lose their ownership if they
can't be controlled including hegish. So
if it's going to be very important top
tis over here
even regular animals of
that can't be controlled
and says that's the over here that since
it's mored it's going to be heer. So if
I have a dog that I simply cannot keep
on the leash and it just bolts away from
me all the time and someone else can
control it, it's going to be theirs.
It's not mine. And this is in general.
We have the garis and baba basra about
the barrels of honey that are leaking
and someone else comes and can cop it
up. They're kind because if you can't
control your own product, you don't get
to have it. The other person who could
control it can have it. And just to
expand on this a little bit more, this
is part of a I believe in general
kenyanim that the purpose of a kenyan is
not so much that I should have yakas to
something. Let me explain. when I pick
up a pen in Russia that's heker why do I
need to be kind to it I can write with
this pen I can use this pen what's the
point in my whole kenyan the and the
answer of course is the reason why a
kenyan is significant when you pick up
this pen in rush ra is because I don't
want my neighbor to take it from me but
the histamus was there beforehand so the
whole tlas of a kenyan or ownership
really is cel the whole point of my
kenyan is so that you can't take it from
me and therefore only in as much that I
can make it practically mine and not
yours it's mine It's kind of a deep
idea. But if I can't be massal like you,
it's a concern in my ownership because
that's kind of the whole point of
ownership in the first place. The P in
the beginning of precious Vikra that
says Odumak and Rashi brings that in the
same way Odum Harishin never brought
from Gazel because Hak shalo. So too
we're not allowed to bring from Gazel
and the question is did Odarishian run
around and make a Kenyan on everything
in the whole world. So you could learn
that Hashem was mak everything to him.
But you could even say better the whole
point of a kenyan is a seal look from
Yenim. What if there is no yenim?
Because is literally the only one in the
whole world. So everything by definition
becomes his cuz that's the whole point
of Kenyan. There's a rashi andaf I
believe in ba mitsia when the Mishna
says about kenyan dalamus. So how do we
understand when something is in your
daladamis it becomes yours but rashi's
lion on the mission over there is very
interesting that the way the kazal
structured the tak of kenyan is that
that's rash's lion. I think I saw this
in the base iron over there in Bitsia
that if there's a dare he in your
daladamis no one else can take it that
is the takana of dalamus because if no
one else can take it becomes yours this
could be the understanding of why is
because if I can't practically use
something I can't be maleic you I have
no authority of control over it so it's
no longer mine anyway that seems to be
the Tyus is telling us over here that
things that you can't control I can't
actively be mealic you and therefore
it's no longer mine so that could be the
over here in Tyus Ty is saying if you
can't control something it's no longer
yours. So I'm just suggesting there's a
deeper level here that if I can't
control it, I can't be massic the other
person which is the whole point of a
Kenyon and therefore the Kenyan
definitionally kind of fades away. But
anyway, that's the reason why Rabu Zets
in our case of Armisha by Kaducas
Msbayak and not kaducious because
kaducious which is a monetary kind of an
ownership would go away once the is so
what's the rationale formul to argue
wherever it is it's still Hashem's
to defend this kind of an idea that
saying
that that's the case of our Mishna
And therefore
even such a case of
ting.
So you see the is the same as
but we
also
somebody says is going to be for
and it gets lost or stolen
to replace it.
No you're not wherever it is it is.
So now the Gar is posing this
and they each seem to be saying the
opposite that we just quoted. San
Francisco had like because
despite the fact that he was
brother-in-law in but he was also a
Talmud of therefore we could say after
he heard he took that on as
it depends on how you
because if you said then the is on him
but in zoo with dka on this particular
or bird.
Could it be that when you say you're not
to replace that exact
says
says that
what he see from the if you say you're
to actually replace if something gets
stolen or lost. So how come you're not
going to be to replace if it gets stolen
or lost
that is only talking about
you are not responsible to replace that
exact thing
the mission says
if someone says this is an orb and then
we lose those things
however ever
because it's on me. So I have to replace
it and
there
because it's not in existence anymore.
So I have to replace it because I have
this obligation to go ahead and fulfill
that.
But let's say it's existing. I just
can't get to it. So
wherever it is it is
everybody meaning everybody's mask
and even if you said a lie you're not to
replace it even if it was etc because my
time
because there's no other way to do it
requires an expression how would you say
it my without saying on me so who you
talking about who's the one who has to
take that so plain maybe you're saying
about this other guy. So then who is it
talking about? So it has to be a lie
just structurally for the mitsus of an
therefore in of itself doesn't indicate
that I'm to replace it if it's
let him say I am in my or
so I didn't say the word but yet I'm
still the also
this is in the par of
what's the telling
And therefore
turning over
I might think the same thing by the as
soon as you go ahead and this money for
the it should becomeish and the one
who's doing the is no longer for us
that
it stays and therefore it's still your
to take care of it until it actually
gets to the yad of the gizber and the
bam mdish. So this Bryce is definitely
connected that says you're not for it's
okay. So this must be whatuna had said
when said you're not
not but you are
we change what said
is more than because limited only to
things that are not misum
what do we learn
You got to send away the mother bird.
You take the bon for yourself.
So how would you read this pic? You'd
think you have to go find a bird's nest
to do this, which sounds a lot like the
by the way. Tell him Lamer comes to Ty
and says when you chance upon it, when
you happen to find one
as in
even if it's only one egg or one little
which tells us
in front of you that's
means he found it.
How do you know that there's also a
mitzvah? If you find the bird's nest in
a tree,
how do you know that you're going to be
even in these kinds of things in the
sistns and pits etc.
Now once bottom line all of these
different nests are all
what's it coming to include
just like by that the nest is not in
your hand meaning it's not ready for you
just
any other kind of opportunity that's not
in your hand meaning readily available
to do so
so these kinds of doves or birds that
are inside these bis these towers
or the geese and hens that nested in the
orchard are all
and therefore it's
or from are all going to be because
they're now
it has to be
so why do I need to have such a it's not
in your And I should know it already
from the fact that it's
lefy. Why does F be in front of you?
What's the extra from there? Because
it was once but then afterwards it got
out. And likewise,
if you find I guess a floating nest on
the water, Rashi suggests it was
actually
so it's on a tree still, but the tree is
on the water.
You're telling me if it's called a derek
and we know that the sky can be called a
because you can have so anything that's
called including the shay which is
called
says but no it's not true because derri
but it's not really called a derk if
you're in the air which incidentally is
the basis for the rugged vert that you
don't have to say to fill when you're in
an airplane because it's not a derk when
you're in the air as based on the scamar
the other are not masim but that's a
famous rugver that has to be mentioned
let's say you find a nest on the head of
a person what's going to be now who in
the world is going to have a nest on top
of their head well if you take a look at
the sim
it talks about the people from in India
who would sequester themselves away from
all of civilization and they would sit
there and have [clears throat] dirt
nests on their head which accumulated
and you could potentially have a case of
on a person's head. So what's going to
be so Omar said back
it's considered like part of the ground
and now the papuno ask
where is there remainu before the tyra
reports his birth where do we find him
in the tray of masna bosar and the gatri
of bashagum which is 345 is the same as
moa and now a classic gmorra hmony n how
do you have a rem h of masna hino par's
boracious estramin
says hast And lastly,
as part of the list of ingredients of
the shear,
this is where we're going to call it.
And we'll see you next time.