Chullin Daf 132

All right. B Wednesday's daff as we pick it up four lines from the bottom of dashar. Of course, the kavos is referring to the fact that we're not taking matis from the if you're kahuna you don't have to pay for it. Matanta that would give matonis to a kahhanis meaning a basen who's married to a Israel. Even though if it was truma she would lose her status and not be able to take the truma but matanas which don't have kadusha to them are muted to a non-ayen and therefore since when the ven includes also a khen what are you going to do with the mission in that but is burned completely but is looked at like where only the k is separated and put on but the shim is eaten by khan but if the word in the tyra when it says kayen includes is also a then you shouldn't eat the because if it's then it should be burned up completely you moving over to from your own peckle meaning from what you're telling me I can even answer you back because the Torah is very specific that's limiting it to the male kahan by saying and that's why only that gets burned up but the is going to be eaten and not burned because the davayan putting them in the same sug as a nonen whose carbon would be eaten and only the cayenne gets the meaning. We're gonna learn from the which is the a specific reference to the but so he looks at the repetition of cayenne is is coming dka to include a all right so that's it for the now let's talk about the kahana that kahana ate matanis because his wife was a basayan and the ran speaks out that even though the matanis were given to him because of the ish kagufi when someone would give him the matanis even though he's not a cayenne it would make it as if it was given to a papa and was also was you guessed it rammer that we don't take from a ley of that if you're matn what did he say that if a female ley a levia gave birth to a that is from which is we learned in so you earn by and when we say kim here we mean it's a kind of a hybrid animal from two different kinds of species but they're both behemoths like a goat and a sheep and a is a because they're both behemoths but a which comes from both a goat and a deer. That's from there's only where the father is the the father is the and the mother is a so that's where there's whether or not for the zera of the father and therefore there's a portion of this animal which is coming from the which would be in the case is and would be whether or not the word is even a partial. So based on this bishel that the k is going to be putter when the father is the deer from matis because let the kayen take half of the mata on the other half the bum can say to the kayen bring me a that that were not for the and then you could take but since the mother's a and the father is the deer this offspring is either a complete se for notish for zerov or If we are going to be and therefore the raon are going to include this vlad as part of the matonus because they hold it is but you only have to give half the other half which is of the bum should be ped from giving it unless you could prove me otherwise there were not and it's a full-blown and to that when said that the it means only but from the mission in the second And Kate said, "What is that?" And the mission over there says and it's d and the are going to be like the dham and the of both. And here's the punch line. Now, if you're telling me that only half of the matonist need to be given by the doesn't say that it really does mean half, but according to the all of the not just half because we learned could have just said and likewise could have just said which Sounds like it's in all highly what's going to do with the imal to make that between the sh and the you don't have to both kinds of animals but the only one is going to be know that idea that you can separate the two which is that only one of them is going to be enough to bear what does he do as we'll see obeys. It's a special that the to give the mat is on the not on the let's say you have a bakar that gets mixed up with a hundred other animals. So bisman if a 100 people are shing all of them pit es we're going to potter all of them from the matanus meaning this bkar is now one of a hundred animals there's 99 regular animals and each one belong to a different person and each person then sheh's one animal so every single one of these people can say I'm the one who had the bakar and therefore I'm from matanis and we have a har and even though it's 99 to1 that won't be because arrive and you're going to ask me about and The kurik bays on the very last page draws a kilik between the hanogas is that would be but the kaducas is still there. Kadusha is not but so there should be a b. But that sa of the kadusha is never going to be but therefore we still recon with it and it potters the mishn if one guy all hund animals we're only going to potter one of them and he has to give the other 99 if a guy for a ken or for a because the animals of are and someone who becomes a partner with a kayen or a you have to mark the animal so people that doesn't belong to Israel because it's very confusing Right there is a Jewish owner over here but because of that partnership it's going to become potter. Now there's an important caution that all the rein are bothered by is what's the difference between the between a or a kayen and the Israel that we all the mat but just beforehand we were saying that if you have a behema that's like this k you'll be for half of the matanus why don't we just say here also half of the matanus when you have a with aid and tyus has a lotion you have to know what he means but tiss the whole of this animal but here where you have this. So even though we're handling half but that half is in Gansen and therefore it will be a more of a and you're not going to be pay half of the money. So that's a that has to be worked out exactly between this and now let's say the kayen sells an animal to Israel and says I'm selling you the whole animal except for those matanas that are in it because the mat still belong to the kay for the is giving those parts that are already his let's say if a guy tells a butcher sell me the kishkas of the cow that should give the to the butcher the he doesn't have to deduct the value from that purchase price. If it was bought by weight and the was amongst that weight then you got to give it to the and the over here the butcher is going to have to be manaka from the purchase price. Now let's go back to that first about the getting mixed up with the other animals where one is putter so it pers all of them for a moment. So my love let a go to each one of the different bum of all these animals that say if that animal that you have there is a is mine and if it's not a so then so at least give me my mat you have that which you have to give to me turning over we're talking about the we're talking about where that already came to the cen and he sold it to is when it had a mum so the animal belongs to the isel even though it's a bakar and therefore it's not hey now it has a and it's not going to have that same doesn't matter it already has a mission then said it straight and from why you talking about the here at all that seems unnecessary by telling us about the is being mash that when the animal belongs to a or to a is going to be but when it belongs to Israel the would be which would mean he has to give the matanas to a kayen. But thisish wouldn't have come from the Mishna if it would only talk about a kayen and the guy without the in question. Now how do we know that a is going to be from it would sound like that's even a meaning if the is to sell animals to other he would have to now give matanas to another kayen. So if a kayen ising animals for commercial purposes he's got to give matanas to other kayanim. But if they're for himself then he's going to be putter. And now story time that hostav was a he was poor. So came to him for you know what you should do? Go be af butchers who are because you're going to be a very desirable. You're going to these who would normally have to give him a ton because you're a cayenne. So this poor cian went ahead did it found Israel did some business with him and made him a partner. But revman made him give all the matanas anyway. So he said back to behav told me that I'm going to be putter from giving matanas of zilapic go and take those matas from your if you don't I'm going to take out your ear. I'm meaning I'm going to bring you so many ries as if you never even heard it to begin with. You are so what happened? He went and said my time why you'd do this that is a is going to be put from the matanis for two or three weeks but because for the first two or three weeks his business has not yet fully established and people don't know that he is actually a butcher but once that period of two or three weeks is over and now he's presumably already established with his gashef he's muy now in the matanas sole zava of so let's at least treat my over here that he shouldn't be for the first two or three weeks so often didn't set up a store but here he hung out of shingle he made it very clear that he is a and therefore he should be right away mat a who does not separate matas for another kind Israel pretty stark he'll be Whatever that means of those bad have been under that for 22 years. Now why is this significant how many years it was? Maybe you're going to say because after 22 years we don't keep somebody in any longer. It's not true because the Bris says that we lift a after a certain amount of time. That's going. What's an example of a mitzvah? He doesn't make a suka or makes some he doesn't want to do it then. In other words, you do whatever you got to do. There's no reason to release any kind of on these from because we could beat these guys up until we kill them. It's interesting that one of the things in this list is who says there's a mitzvah to build a suka the mitzvah to sit in the suka. And this of course is part of that discussion of the that any kind of mitzvah that's mafurra even though it's a hex mitzvah it might have similar to the mitzvah itself. One of them being there's an interesting line from Rashi here where it says kiss because they're not so expensive. So if the guy's not doing it, we should beat him up until he's masked him and he does it. Freak the rash. Where'd this come from? Shimisar and kiss. Why is that even relevant? Whether it's expensive or not shouldn't be the issue. Rabbi Gross quoted from the whole is a punishment for somebody's mida. How could you not do a mitzvah? But that mara is only when it's like to you're not doing the mitzvah. If a guy has an excuse because it's very expensive, it's of course the wrong thing to do not to do it. But it's not because of the mida. It's because of the fact that he's too cheap to spend all that money. But here, if it's kiss and you're still not doing it, then you deserve to get hit. But anyway, we have this kasha. Why did Rabavar of Sheila have to tell us it was 22 years of their garisa? The point of Rababar of Sheila was after 22 years we're going to be able to them without giving them any kind of like that example of who a butcher by taking the animal's whole leg. That's the the bone of the which was an expensive part I guess of the animal was he would take the clothes. You can give is to one and you can give the ka to one. You could split the right and left side of that jaw to two different kahan. In other words, you shouldn't divide a single kick of the matanus to two different kahanim that you should give it entirely to one kayen but you can involve more than one kayen in the matanus the points out from here that you can do the same thing with you can give the to more than one kayen and there's a sh in the pisk whether or not that's the is it true they would divide each bone into two which the garra says no problem because over there talking about an ox that's a big animal you could divide because it's not a bazillion to give these large pieces to two different kahhanim. But if it's a smaller animal then you cannot divide it up. You got to give it all to one cayenne each particular kick. All right, we'll stop here. Tomorrow we'll pick it up again with the Omar Raba Barbana.