Bechoros Daf 26

All right. We have been discussing what happens with the with the se with the hair of this animal if it falls off. I mean we know of course if you shear it it's going to be user and once it's after being a moment it's totally mut. But the question is let's say the hair becomes separated from the animal while it was still. So that's going to be according to the only time where there is a shila about the wool of a bar that became detached is only if it is after the mum said that there's a mum there. But before the even said there's a there's nothing to talk about that's at the very bottom of let's ask in the following even though later on it develops a and then it gets still it'll be and we're going to see the assumes there's no between or if it falls out by itself but anyway the garb the time of the t the only reason why the bryers it is because it was a time when it got pulled off which is mashma moving over to mad olive habal would be totally is not the expression refers to any animal that didn't have a not yet from the is like as if it's a T because it's awesome. All right. This whole dinnerish though maybe it's because the B says even though later on it develops a mum and it gets it'll still be if you have a you pulled the wool off of it without soal is so this is talking about where the animal dropped dead on natural causes not being mal wasn't talking about a case where it died, but rather where the hair fell out on its own and then you stored it away on the and then that's version of the and now another my father who was one of the that argue with he asserted this hair but he was masking in this case when the animal was gan that it'll be mut This is an expression. It's like said that when the hair of this falls off you should hold on to it because it could be that it'll become that will be but if it just drops dead will be okay. So that's the bryan. This last idea of how the works out is what the tanakama holds because the tanakama holds that this wool that comes off from a even if the animal develops a afterwards that wool will remain which is mashma that if it was at the time when it fell off it would become and since the doesn't mention any it sounds like everybody's mim that will be m it's for and then the tanakama says that a are going to be on a case where the animal dies and not so this is exactly how explains the so shouldn't you therefore assume that the is whether or not gave the before it became detached so can't we just assume that is about this issue itself that even didn't before the hair got pulled out but it's still going to be after the not like had said so you see the lish is going to be from That was the punch line of this whole that's not really what they're arguing about. There's actually three different shittas about what is the issue between and that are arguing about the case when the died but they also in a case of when the why they're specifically talking about the mace only to show you how it could go for it's the other extreme that when the dies even the hair will be a arguing by the case That's when you'll be m the varied is specifically in the case of mace that's when the are going to the hair but everybody's mimish that there's never any possibility for it being m the hair unless the mum said there was a real mum there that are arguing about a case where the animal was and not where it was just mace and how do I know that because the which is that says that as the mission in the fifth parag says that hair falls out while the animals alive and you put it there for storage because it says if this hair is detached but it's still connected in a way that's like hanging there after you can take a look at this whole fleece if It looks like it's part of it then it will be will beer. So money who's that talking like if we hold this as what case we're talking about by what case is it talking about? Is it talking about where you did it or where it was mace? Well then bane bane raon it'll always be me must be talking about where the animal does die must be saying that whether it's or that's going to be his that if it's and if it's always we should have learned the opposite meaning it should have said according to it's all about that misa that's what's going to Mut mikar toshish because it was already detached before the animal dropped dead. But what does this mission tell us? That it's going to be mut if it's seen as part of it. And if it's not seen as part of it, it's going to be so. So if you really look into it, you can't work out because it won't work like a like must be that it's going like that and are arguing about a case where the was and let's speak it out. We're talking about where the bkar died naturally. Well then must be talking about in the must be saying either that's so it's always going to be where it's not seen as part of the must be that the mission is saying and it's according to in the end of the mission like the version of Yehuda that makes the between the that's if it's seen as part of the or not. So this whole end of the Mishna really is going like once you actually think about it and therefore we're going to like because we see that not only the Mishna in but even our mission is going like we have a new according to so here you have an meaning has no and so obviously it's been but really the is asking what's going to be the status so that's what the Gar is going to explain over here just because you're pulling out the wool anybody say not what's What's going to be the became on its own detached? Now let's break down why we're specifically asking about the caparos. Since both a katas is obviously coming for kapara and asham has its own particular specific aversis for kapara le mashulu the bum are not going to have a reason to postpone bringing them as carbonas and therefore there's no reason for us to mid raon and have a zera to asser this wool that came out on its own and the bkariser nami we're not going to have any kind of question because mashu since there is no kind of incentive for kapara we're afraid that the b are going to push off bringing these carbonas because they want to get as much wool as they can but Hi, what's going to be the did by ana kan turning over time it bays toker lava kaparo see and doesn't come for kapara cuz it's an isa do we're talking about mashila you might postpone it to get as much wool as you can and therefore shoulder any wool that becomes detached on its own even though the wool came off when it was a even though it was even though it came off when it was a tum since there is a kapara for a mitzvah essay maybe the bum won't postpone it and therefore it'll become needed to make it if it comes off while before you were so arrive from the Bryce it'll be but it sounds like the Bryce is saying only because you took it off but it sounds like if it came off on its own it will become and certainly that's going to be that you're not going to want to postpone bringing it because it does give you some level of but because that would also become even if it came off on its And that could be the way we learn it. But why do we talk about sounds like amazed by itself? We went with the expression of that it came off on its own destroy. show you the raon and therefore and then the end of the mission said if it's dangling it's disconnected it's going to depend on how it looks if it's part of the fleece what does that mean any wool that's root is turned around by the head of that piece of strand of hair meaning it becomes folded into itself any wool that's not level the same length as the rest of the fleece It's not any fleece that's completely level. They're all different lengths. So, some of the hairs are always going to be dangling from it anyway. And well, that will call it. And I'm going to stop a little early just because I got to catch this flight. I'll pick it up with the fourth paracitm tomorrow.