Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Bechoros Daf 21
4 views
Categories:Education
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right. Today is Friday and we're
going to pick it up now. Seven lines
from the bottom of
so now this is going to be in reference
to messer behema where the is only maer
animals from that same year right as we
know from the first Mishnaash that rash
is the sha for messer behema because
every single year you reset the clock of
which animals could be muser for other
animals. So now we're going to talk
about a situation where where an animal
was able to give birth to multiple
generations within the same year giving
it now a whole flock that you can now be
master from. So the case is the
this one little nanny goat one little
kid had three females and then those
three females each
one of those three female offspring
each had three more equaling a total of
nine. So add those nine to the three
mother animals now we have 12. So now
all 12 go into that deer that pen to be
and adds to that.
I saw that all happen within that year.
So since we know it has to be within the
same year in order for there to be and
be able to be miss. So this of course is
now going to be to the between and about
when you buy this goat from a guy and it
now had a zer according to it's a vad
but according to bishu it's a suffic
because maybe the animal gave birth
already or had tenf earlier now frank on
this bryce
why did have to give me a case where
these triplet daughter goats now each
had three more making a total of 12
one of those triplets could have also
only had one of those goats the other
one could have had two each cuz then
you'd have a total of 10 and that would
still prove the same point that all 10
could be as one group and for the okay
since one of them needed to have
triplets
gave that the simple case for all of
them so you can't be mad from that well
why do I need any of them to have three
each one of them can have two
and then let one of those mother animals
have another one along with them so then
you can get to the total of 10 you still
don't have to have triplets so moving
over to my flame
Maybe that's the because a goat that is
can't go back and have more of that same
year within that same year of the ten
and we're equating here an actual lea to
the tenf because they're essentially the
same idea but you don't really have to
say that
even if you want that a goat that is can
go ahead and have more that same year
but
if it has a fullterm birth is not going
to
Because a fullus is definitely going to
be more traumatic to the animal
physically than just the tino. So this
price is not neg since we're talking
about actual birds over here and not
just now getting back to that price. So
that I saw this happened. So
what's been adding more than what the
tanak already said to which the says
you remember from yesterday this whole
gamar is now going to parallel
yesterday's
verbi if you remember said yesterday
that the a that is matan won't want to
mate for 30 more days and therefore it's
a tight that they're not going to have
any more valad for the rest of that
tufa. So if you hold of Zeri's hala that
it's not going to want to mate for 30
more days then on a case where the three
mother goats themselves on the final day
of their sixth month it will be telling
whether or not you hold to determine if
they can be in the same year or not
it's not going to want to mate for 30
days but
whether or not you can have less than a
full pregnancy.
That last day, do we look at it as a
full day or not? How do we count it?
And a fourth mahal that is going to be
new for us for today is
can this man an animal that is not yet 8
days old can go into the deer? That's
going to be an independent shila.
Turning over to we learned this idea
that the man can be from the following
we look at just like
even though it's not 8 days old it's
already for its carbon
and you actually bring that carbon later
on it's also even before it's 8 days
older
correct the garb
instead of learning from me from
let's learn from regular which you can't
make them heishman they are not old
enough and for the garb have it makes
more sense that would tie together micer
to bkar we have the following
uniquenesses that only exist between and
messer as opposed to kachum which is
tamuras is a reference to how you
are p animals are similar is the fact
they're even though they are both could
be bal they're going to have the same by
tum And that a bkar and a messer beha
animal once they've developed a mum can
be eaten without padia meaning a bar the
kay will eat it in the case of messer
the bum will eat it as opposed to any
other kinds of kajum but the mar says
may have leaf I'll give you uniquenesses
between micerma and regular kajum shain
zadesha
z meaning that both messer and kachum
are both for males and females whereas
is only for males kadesh is that both
messer and kachum are not immediately
kadesh but as opposed to a bkar which
comes out of the already kadesh matanis
that neither mser or kajim are matnus
kahuna and they're eaten by the bum klam
is eaten by the bum and messer beha is a
subcategory of schlamim as opposed to a
bkar that's given to the cayenne and
lastly it's posh meaning micser and
kochim are neg to all animals firstborn
and non-firstborn as opposed to bkar
that's only a firstborn not a pit so I
got four and four there's no logical
reason why put me together
it's why he learns from now this we've
been talking about the whole time what
is it
it's this kind of a discharge that the
roy the shepherds of of tlosa would say
that there's some sort of some
suppression in the womb.
it's bubbling blood something some other
kind of discharge
and you should show this to a to
determine whether or not it was the
remains of an aborted fetus or not or if
it's just
very interesting question how would
happen to know he's never trained in
these things when we say we don't mean
we mean an expert because sometimes you
got to go to the professionals to
understand this zoology or whatever it
is
this that we say that only after 40 days
a fetus is considered a fetus before
that call it a it's not really a person
yet of so how does that work when it
comes to animals because when we're
looking at this tino we're saying that
this was potentially a but how long does
it take until it kind of changes status
into a
soay
this is actually what was talking about
so it's got to be 30 days that's not
true
is not talking about when the vlad is
going to be viable or when it's looked
at that that's talking about when the
female animal is willing to be again
with the male animal and therefore we
don't have a for that. Now getting back
to the idea of our Mishna if you're
buying an animal from a guy and you
don't know whether it had already given
birth
but what's gonna be the ifid buys
another animal from another. Now, of
course, if the id was around to ask, we
could just ask him because
but we're assuming that the is not
around. And now the question is, is it
going to have the same status in about
the animal? So,
the first one born to the guy who bought
the animal is definitely going to be
because if it had already been had the
animal given birth in the first
possession,
he would have bragged about this. Why
would he brag about it? that is either
he's bragging because this animal is not
giving birth to aar and therefore you're
going to be off the hook from giving aar
or because he's saying how it's a
healthier animal because it was able to
give birth. So he would have bragged
about it deals with the issue of
whether or not a would be if he's
talking about the health of the animal
and we want to extrapolate from that
about but he argues and says no the
first one born to the is going to bear
because maybe the seller thinks that the
is just buying it and therefore he's not
going to brag about its ability to have
given birth already and
the first animal that's born to this is
definitely it's not a ma Because if the
animal had not yet given birth since
there's a potential is here
the seller would have certainly been
right they take care of each other
that that new animal that's born to the
is going to be because the price says
this is in reference now if the didn't
tell the he sold the parent or the
offspring on that same day we don't have
to worry about it because he would have
told him well well then
maybe this is because because it seems
Now we have a saying that the animal
should be and for the nos
it's on the seller to be the
but here it's always going to be on the
lake to find out whether or not the
animal had already now before we stop
I'll just share with you an entertaining
shila
that asks over here which is a pretty
big stretch to say it's but he says it
over here regarding being people to do a
he tells a story about two seminary
girls who were speaking lashar about a
kala that if if the knew about what this
girl is really like, he would have never
been masked him to the and a rebbitson
was sitting on the bus listening to
these two girls speak. So she turned
around and said, "Oh wow, girls, thank
you so much for telling me about this
girl because my son is the and now I'll
make sure to break off the shik. I
appreciate you being my dear me this
information." And the girls were
horrified. Oh my gosh, maybe we
exaggerated. No, no, he's he's I'm sure
she's a really good girl. Don't break
off the shik. And then the rebbit
admits, "No, no, I'm just lying. It
wasn't true. I wasn't I'm not the mother
of the here. I just was pointing out to
you how terrible is and if Zilberstein
asks did this rebbitson do the right
thing or the wrong thing al the sheer
alley I know us he ultimately pus it's
totally fine what she did because she
did it for all these good reasons to
prevent them from doing is okay we'll
pick it up with the mishem for shabaf