Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Bechoros Daf 12
0 views
Categories:Torah
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right. Today is daf the Wednesday of
we are picking it up from a new Mishna
the top of your balishna
this that we know that you can beam with
a the is pretty specific
you can't do it with a cow she says
the animal can't be
it's not going to die on its own because
of a traus
like
she says which is a suffic
Now, it's important to point out as
Rashi will on the Gumra that of course
you can always use if it's of equal
value to the that we saw multiple times
already in the gar beforehand. But this
mission is talking about where it's not
worth as much as the that you could swap
it out with the se and do the pigeon
with the se. That's when that se is a
but not an egg.
But verbi
since the mother animal over here is a
because in this kim animal there is a
but still
suffic by a koi because a koi might 100%
be considered a kaya and totally not be
okay for the pigeons.
Let's say the bum gave the to a without
doing the pigeon. So now the ken has
this animal that needs pigeon. So the
isafish
the kayen can't just call it a day and
keep the he now has to be a otherwise
he's going to have that same on the
parish on the of makes the point that
this
is different than the lion we have by
the bum. And it could be that there
really is no is for the kayen to
actually keep the kamar in its user
status. He's just not allowed to be na
from it but he's not technically doing
anything wrong by not being paid or that
discusses that issue money who's the t
of our mishna and for the gamorra it's
the tana that's named after a yakwaki
song benbag.
So we're the two by the carbon
all of the kinds of things in our
Mishna.
So
all these different things but now let's
see if we could take it to its logical
end
just like it has to be it has to be
meaning and it has to be only one year
old. So to that we dash in tiffa ta the
double lotion of ta that reeba that were
marba animals that are not zer to
include it in a caum or an older animal
to also be used to do the pigar practa
if you're telling me that we're using
tift for the reafili
why stop only by the three things of
older than one year even all the other
things that were meaning
should also be to allow them to be used
for the pig and for The garan
then the whole heckish two carbon pes
would have no purpose. But now the gumar
is going to give us four shilus that'll
take us through today's da three on one
on om bay boy mahu lift ben pakua a ben
pakua which is a living fetus inside of
a gash animal. We know the is it does
not require a so the sh can you use such
a benu to bear
mayor
mayor Benita according to mayor who
requires by
it is a full-blown and you can use it
for like why wouldn't you be able to
according that doesn't need its own
what's going to be the shila is itraul
is it like meat in pot rashi's over here
dummy. So it's already like it's and our
Mishna said that you can't use for
since it's running around karina bay and
perhaps another way to look at this sham
could be the we talked about even when
we learned by Benua that do we say that
according to that you don't need a ben
pakua is that because it's considered
like it's gash or it doesn't need
there's a big difference there if it's
gashan then it's aut but if it doesn't
need you're not necessarily going to
call it aut so marza
You can't bear with
why do you say
pesak? Because why? Because you learn it
from carbon pesak that just like a pen
pakua can't be used for carbon pes. So
too you can't use a penua for well
those other kinds of things which we are
not shpping over from carbon.
to which Marzucha says just like we said
beforehand
the double of says that even an animal
that doesn't have those meaning it could
be or something that's older than one
year old
then
why can't be even to say you could do
the with it
so they stick with their mleus we have
no masa to this e boy and now we move on
to our second shila e boyid
now a nidme is an animal that is mutant
It does not look like its parents. The
mother and the father animal are both of
one species, but the vlad looks like a
different one. And what's exactly the
shila? And let's break it down.
According to our Mishna, there's no sh
because
if you can do a with an animal where
both parents are from different species.
So where they're both of the same
species, for sure that should be okay.
I hold you can't use a killay animal for
opinion. So what's the shila? Because on
one hand you could say park maybe it's
only the kion that you can't do the
pinion benid
so bring arrive from the following bry
a cow has a goat or one could say it's
not really a goat it just looks like a
goat but what looks like a goat came out
of a cow is in python you can't use this
kind of a to bear
it's mashma though that if a sheep gave
birth to something that looks like a
goat then python you could use it
because it was only a problem that you
couldn't use the para because a par
could never be used for pigon
But the shelves could so
it can't bear because he's even you
could do it with a so certainly with
aid.
So you see according to that could be
used for to which the says because
and the reason why the BC is not is
because the Bryce didn't need to tell us
of coming from an a because that wasn't
the point of the Bryce when the Bryce is
coming to tell us the itself by the cow
because
we don't go buster its own appearance
and its own surah
and say therefore that this product of
the cow that looks like a goat is a
goatil buster eay go buster the mama
eaglehoo and this animal's mother is a
cow so that's the point of the bryera
it's not there to tell us that a rul is
going to be somehow kosher tshma let's
bring a ride from this bry tunnel
a killay is an example of klay
so the mother's a sheep and the father's
a sheep and it gave birth to a so the
obvious question if the father is also a
sheep then it's not kayim if anything
it's nitmu you're mislabeling this kind
of creature cuz it came out looking like
a goat but both parents are sheep that's
not kim that's not a hybrid that's
nidomar what the bryson means to say is
what's to a case of kimon
which therefore the raon treat it like
kim that's going to be
so this is and the says because the is
similar to kim we're going to treat it
like so in what ways treated like
that's going to be pussle for because
it's like so
from the same that
may you could also be nidma just as
easily. So you're not learning it from
kion you're learning from the pusk
itself as the bry says shv by carbonus
it has to be either a sh or av which is
o is in the says or a goat and we data
nid so you see from the fact that we're
not being the fact that it's dion but
from the itself in the if you want to
say the nidm compared to aim
that's also not using the fact that it's
to aim because
the tyr said
it's not a unless its mother is going to
be the sh and it's also a which is a
nidm. See it's not because it's bar
because of the pik itself. Ella laer
must be that the raon are comparing a
nidma to a klay regarding the pur of
messer but also that's not true because
it has its own pa
the bryce is telling us of petamar that
just like klay can't be used for petamar
so too nidma can't be used for petamar
so then finally we've arrived at Aria
that nidma won't work for petamar but
thear says it's not a riot because leila
leiser really this bracelet that's
comparing nidmma to kime is for hilaser
ah we had a pik that was going to be a
mite already No
some of the simum of its mother it had
and therefore
that the messer is learned from Bakar in
the sense that
just like a nidma that has some of its
mother's characteristics is also so
messer comes to Bryce and tells us that
it's just like that
it's going to be put and it'll be nismay
from micser and again no masa from this
shila and now our third shila ibu
can you be paid
with for example that you were with cash
and now it's no longer so now this
disqualified payment that's no longer
heish can I use it for so I'll leave it
in general the is according to and
therefore you could certainly be paid it
withd because as we're going to see soon
in the gam if mukdash would taka not be
able to be used for praar It's because
the itself is so that can't be going
like but
and now what's the sher
maybe the is can't be on this which is
already
since that of the is not going to move
over to the animal that's doing the pad
right it doesn't absorb all the isurum
of the petar itself the is afu isuru
Maybe that misipedia just takes away
from the there's no transference
happening and therefore you can even
use. So now the is going to actually be
push of braider of kahana
is it so of that which is written by
that
you can't use
because the context of that is talking
about that even
just like so once the terra saying that
have a and we know that can't be used so
and
turning over
even who holds that is still you can't
use it with because it's
so for our first two sh we had but this
third one is very clear you cannot use
for and the fourth and final shil of the
day
can I now bear with an animal that was
bought with peris meaning pairs that
were grown during the year which now has
So now talk to about the Shiloh if it's
definitely
because
the Tyra says that they're yours to eat
but since you're not allowed to eat the
you certainly you certainly can't use an
animal to be
suffic
that animal of he keeps the in that case
the question is if it's bought with
perishabius would that be okay
Because according to it's not nega
because according to it's even before
it's so the point of its pad is not to
take away but just because it's m and
kayen and because of the fact that a
suffic
anyway you'd never be giving that set to
the cayen you don't need to do the pad
on the kamar so according to whether or
not has no practical but
that does make it that you're being so
since we could say that he's doing the
and it stays is his therefore there's a
notes
like and not therefore should stay is
going to be
so it is to be
with a because that will bra but you
could be paid. So now that we've settled
our we can go with other
in itself is not going to have it's not
going to have the and therefore it's
just like any other kinds of you have to
give to the
and since the actual parts of the animal
are going to be burned you can't use for
that
cannot be a
why and since the gets to eat these
You're not being over the requirement of
the Torah. Let's ask from the Mishna in
the ninth per of
if someone eats from the dough of your
because it's a kind of truma which is
but why according to should this be in
the first place
since
you'd have to burn it therefore it can't
really be in the first place because
which says it's different by the case of
that the is even going to during
that
says
more of a why don't we learn from the
that is not going to tell you that
there's no problem when you have a so by
the by the also shouldn't be a problem
which is
by the case of where is for and it's
only burned if it happens to become so
since is generally not burned the fact
that this has a kaducious is not going
to say it's a problem of
by the case of the it's to burn on the
soar is always going to be for the
kaducas of the animal as a is going to
be a and therefore this animal cannot be
aar and the mishnad said
let's say the bum gave the to the kayen
without doing a pia so the mission had
said that the kayen can't keep it even
for one moment until he is
as in its place. So
we learned in the taught that
if had that in his house
and the cayenne says give it to me and
I'll take care of it. So don't listen to
that
unless you know that the does it in
front of you and the speaks out if the
doesn't do it you got to do the
yourself. So
this is essentially saying that the
might use them without being pied to
them which is user. But why should have
to tell us this? Cuz
maybe I would have thought this is only
when we have that this particular
cayenne is suspected of wanting to break
the rules here but we don't have to be
worried that he's going to take the
kamur without doing the soam comes from
and says no the cayenne will decide that
it's mut for him to use this pakamar
without doing a so therefore you're not
allowed to give a nonredeemed pet to a
cayenne unless the cayenne does it right
in front of you. There's a bit of a
shiloh. What's the incentive of the
cayenne here to use it without the
padia? Why doesn't he get this from the
Israel? So, that's hard to think about.
Okay, we're going to stop here by the
Mishna. Tomorrow, we get to finish the
perrick and start the next peric. I
getting mad.