Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Acharei Mos-Kedoshim - 7th Portion
8 views
Acharei Mos-Kedoshim - 7th Portion
Categories:Torah/Tanach
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Join me as we learn Chumash for Shabbos
Parshas Acharei Mos Kedoshim. This is
the Torah reading of Acharei Mos
Kedoshim when read combined, chapter 20
verse 8.
We spoke about the previous Torah
readings about the forbidden
relationships and many different
mitzvahs that one is not allowed to do.
Uh abrogations of the mitzvahs I should
say. And uh today we continue with the
punishments for the forbidden
relationships. As we mentioned, as we're
going to see as well, as Rashi is going
to explain to us that every one of these
relationships, though many of them were
already mentioned about it's uh
that it's forbidden in the previous
Torah reading, but still in all the
Torah reminds us again about it cuz this
time it comes with a punishment. Every
time the Torah tells us about a
punishment concerning any of the
abrogations, it comes first with a
warning. So there's a warning one time
it tells us about the actual abrogation
and its negative commandment. And then
the next time it tells us with the
punishment as well as we should see in
the following verses.
Verse 8.
Ushmartem es chukosai.
You must safeguard my rules. Va'asisem
osam and you will do them. You'll
fulfill them. Ani Hashem Mekadishem. I
am God who sanctified you.
Verse 9. Ki ish ish asher yekalel es
aviv.
For any person who were to curse his
father
ves immo or his mother, mos yumos shall
be put to death. Aviv ve'immo kivlu
because he cursed his father or mother,
damo bo his blood is his own fault. He's
liable for his own death.
Rashi.
Aviv ve'immo kivlu.
Lerabos lach armisa. This includes even
after their passing. Though we mentioned
previously when a person curses
somebody, that was only during the while
they were alive. However, a person's
parents, he is obligated to respect them
while they're alive and as well after
their passing. Dumb of boy, what is the
blood? What punishment does he get?
Skila zu skila that means to a stone the
king called Mark him Shiner the main
bomb. Anytime it says their blood is
their own fault, then would be the
punishment of skila.
Where do we know this from? Lamad me
avia Danish number of in your game
wasting the main bomb. We learned this
by the oven you don't know where it says
that their blood is their own fault and
the to punishment there is
stoning. Come by dummy bearish. A nanish
sauce
who got him lots machine yard. It's not
that he's being punished so to speak on
his
on the things that he did wrong and his
abrogation. It is his own fault that
caused his death.
Verse 10. The Isha Shaina fish assist.
And a man
who commits a Jewish man who commits
adultery with another person's wife.
With the wife of his fellow.
I shall you never say
or the adultery or he commits adultery
with the wife of his fellow Jew.
I Asia Asia 3 A with the wife of a
fellow Jew. Most you must they are put
to death. Who's put to death?
The adulterer and the adulteress.
Each one of these words teach us about
another law. The issue why does it say a
man probably cotton? This excludes a
child. I shall you never say
probably cotton. This excludes the wife
of a child.
Lamad no from here we learn. Shayna
condition that when a child made
consecrate a marriage it's not
considered valid. Shayna I'll Asia after
cuz on which type of married woman that
I make you liable for. I shall you never
say probably when it says your one's
fellow means a Jewish person which
excludes if the person was married to a
non-Jew. Lamad no from here we learn
condition that the marriage is not
considered a marriage is not valid when
one is married to a non-Jew. Therefore,
it's not considered adultery if she was
married to a non-Jew.
Most Yuma San Aifnei Eifes, Kol Misam
Wur Bataira, anytime that it says liable
of capital punishment in the Torah,
stam, which not explaining and saying
which one it is, Aina Ela Chenek, it is
only considered strangulation.
Verse 11.
A man who lies with his father's wife,
Ervas Aviv Gila, he is thereby uncovered
his father's nakedness. Most Yuma Sum
Shnayim, they both are liable of capital
punishment, they both are put to death.
D'mayim Bam, it is their own fault that
they are being killed.
Verse 12. V'isha Sh'yishkav Es Kalasa,
so too a man who lies with his
daughter-in-law, Most Yuma Sum Shnayim,
they both are liable of death penalty.
Tevel Asu, they did a despicable act.
D'mayim Bam, they're liable for their
own death.
Rashi,
Tevel Asu, the word Tevel, Ginai, means
a despicable action. Lashon Acher,
another explanation like we explained
before, the word Tevel comes from the
word to be mixed up because in this
case, M'bulbal Zera Av U'zera Ben, he is
mixing together the seed of the father
with the seed of the son, and therefore
it is something of disgusting, which is
liable of capital punishment.
Verse 13. V'isha Sh'yishkav Es Zachar
Mishkavei Isha, so too a man who lies
with a male, the same way one were to be
with a woman, To'eiva Asu, they did an
abom- they committed abomination.
Shnayim, both of them, Most Yuma Sum,
they are put to death. D'mayim Bam,
their blood is their own fault.
Rashi, Mishkavei Isha, what does it mean
to be like a woman?
The commentaries explain that the Rabbis
give in the Talmud the example, Machnis
K'v'cheil B'shifchei Faras. When the
then when people used to um
paint their eyes, they would take a if
you want to call it like a Q-tip or a
stick and then they would then stick it
into a bowl or a little
vase that had in it a tube I should say
that had in it the makeup and then they
would take the paint and put it under
eyes. So that's what it refers to the
marital relations.
Verse 14.
And a man who takes a woman and her
mother
and he has relations with both of them.
This is considered bad counsel from the
evil inclination and therefore an
abomination.
With fire they should be burnt.
The essence in both of them.
And thereby
there should be no such type of counsel
in your midst, such type of behavior
immorality amongst you.
What
does it mean him and them?
Can't be that you should say that you
should burn his first wife. You should
have said he had her cuz she was married
permissibly and
love and she was not forbidden from to
marry. So who are the two people that he
has to be that have to be burnt? The
wife and her mother
which is mentioned here stay in the
Israel are talking about two women who
married him who had a relationship in a
prohibited way.
For example, she knows that he marries
women from three generations or that he
was with women with three generations.
His wife
his wife and his mother-in-law and the
mother and the mother of his
mother-in-law.
So if you hear you have he is liable of
capital punishment, his mother-in-law
and the mother of his mother-in-law. But
his wife she was permissible.
However,
there are other rabbis that explain this
differently. The only
one that To to death here is him and his
mother-in-law.
Why then does it say as hen in plural
them? As ahas me hen the word as hen is
a made up of three words. As ahas me hen
him with one of them. Ahas lotion you
have on you hen ahas. In in you have on
you in Greek the word hen can also be
one to means the one that he was with.
Verse 15.
So to a man who lies with an animal
No issue must he be put to death. What's
about him to raise a Jew and the animal
has to be killed?
Rashi continues and says what the animal
be do wrong that has to be killed. If a
man does not have to be in my heart that
if the man if the man sinned what did
the animal do wrong? Element of nature
of a lot of them take on a lot of
because this animal caused the man to
sin. He was part of the act.
Because of therefore the Torah says the
circle the animal has to be stoned.
Cover him a lot of them from here we
have learned even more so to a human. If
an animal that does not know what's
going on the Torah says it should be
killed. The human should deal have
committed a lot of that knows that the
differentiate between good and bad. Good
and bad
and he causes bad to his fellow. Love it
a lot of to cause him to do something
wrong.
So too how much more so he will be
punished. So too we find this in all
other places. We are for example
similarly I be the Adam and the column
of you should destroy all the places
that the non-Jews served idolatry there.
Over there we can also learn the same
type of law. My you learn in the main
shame in if a tree that can't see and
hear I'll see I'll show both that color
be a lot of because they were used for
idolatry I'm rather the Torah says harsh
a lot of the highly destroy eradicate
and get rid of it. I'm a lot of them a
lot of them a lot of them because
somebody used to do this or causes his
friend to go from the way of life to the
way of death from the way of good to the
way of bad. A lot of them come of a lot
of them how much more so they have to be
eradicated.
Verse 17. The fear 16.
A woman who also approaches an animal in
order to fornicate with it.
Varactus you must kill the woman the S
of Aima and the animal moist you must do
they're both liable of capital
punishment. They both will be put put to
death may and bomb it is their own
fault.
Verse 17. The English you got to say
say. A man who would take his sister
bass of Eve.
And whether it is his father's daughter
or a bus in my or his mother's daughter.
And he sees her nakedness. The he Sierra
as a bus and she sees his nakedness.
Hess said who this is a disgraceful act.
The niche result. And they will then be
cut off the any of the Yemen from all
the members of their nation. Airbus a
case and you love because he uncovered
his sister's nakedness and therefore I
bring that he said he must bear his sin.
What does it mean has said to generally
know the word has said it means
kindness. But in this case as we know
the has said here in Aramaic you can
have a word that you say it in the
positive verb really means the opposite
effect of it. And therefore what says
has said to in this case it means Harper
it's disgusting. It's an abomination.
Uh for that it's a it's an
embarrassment. He said it's a lie. He
said he lied. It is something which is
disgusting for her midrash say the
midrash says. And a different
interpretation in Tamar you may ask how
you can get kind of a case say how is it
possible that kind should marry a sister
for such a terrible thing because they
were born both with twin sisters and
that's who they married.
Has said a second a monkey God did
kindness with the with the people of
humanity leaving me say love me me men
who to be able to build a society
humanity from them should never rest it
says into him some 89 oil and abundant
the world was built in kindness. The
kindness that God allowed Cain to have a
relation with his sister which brought
about the rest of humanity.
Verse 18.
The
issue and a woman who lies and a man who
lies with a woman
while she is undergoing her menstrual
flow
and
he has been covered her nakedness.
He
has uncovered her fountain. The heel
says make her the mouth and she
uncovered the fountain of her blood. And
therefore
they will both go out from their people
meaning they'll die prematurely and
childless.
Rashi
18. The word era
What does that mean? She revealed.
So to whenever we talk about nakedness
means that they revealed something which
is usually covered. Therefore
the verb that comes part of it ever
and this era ever it'll comes part of
the noun
because they come from the
brotherly you have the verb and there
comes to the word ah.
Revealing of the nakedness, what does it
mean in this case? Does it mean that
they just allowed their private parts to
be exposed or is it also mean that they
can acted in marital relations?
Verse 19.
The sister in law
and you must not uncover the nakedness
of your mother's sister
and of your father's sister you must not
you must not uncover.
Because
they are a very close relative and
therefore by revealing their nakedness
you must bear their sin.
Rashi 19.
The
sister in law
The Torah repeats this
Then the warning is over here forwarned
that it is a not allowed whether it's a
sister from the father or mother from
the sister from of the father and the
mother from the father or whether it's
sisters that only come from the mother
regardless of how this person may be
their sister they are prohibited to have
a relationship with them.
However, if the the wife of his
father's brother
There's only a prohibition pertaining
the wife of the father's
brother from his father's side. How do
we know from the mother side? That we
learn from
this is only a rabbinic inference that
we learn from two different words but
not something which is clearly stated in
the Torah.
Verse 20.
A man who lies with his aunt by marriage
He
uncovered his uncle's nakedness
therefore had to me so they then
liable for that transgression I did him
you miss him they will then die
prematurely.
20 I should use this day I say Rashi
This this verse is coming to tell me it
didn't we already say about these verses
and these already Lords were already
included in the previous ones but this
verse is coming to tell us that whenever
it talks about the punishment of chorus
which means that they will die
prematurely it's not only that the
person
himself will die prematurely but also
meaning that part of the punishment
means that their children will die
prematurely or they'll die without
children. The word I did him that they
will die I did him means the life lot
without children that means they'll die
without having children for they might
be cuz we have that a similar word that
Abraham tells God, "Va nochi halacha
din, I am going without children."
Yesh li banim, what happened if he
already has children? Ke Avram, then
they're going to die in an early age.
Ein le banim, if he doesn't have
children, mates bo le banim, he'll die
without children. Lakach shana bishnei
kraisai lo, therefore the Torah uses the
same terminology twice in these two
verses. Aridim yamusu, aridim yu, that
they will die at a young age, or are
they will be dead at a young age,
meaning are aridim yamusu im yu bishas
aveira, they will die in a young if he
has children, then they'll die
prematurely if they were there at the
time of that he did this terrible act.
If not, the punishment lo yu laif, he
doesn't have children, kish yamusu lefi
lefi shekeiv
they will he won't have children when he
dies because they will be he'll bury
them alive bury them while he is still
alive. Aridim yu, what does it mean they
will be? So, im ein le banim bishas
aveira, if he doesn't have children now
at the time of the act, yu kol yamav
kemish the rest of his life will be the
same way, they will not be able to have
any children.
Verse 21.
A man who takes
a man who takes his brother's wife,
nida hi, it is a repulsive act.
Ervas achiv gila, it was a revealed he
uncovered his brother's nakedness.
Aridim yihiyu, they will die
prematurely, they will remain without
children.
Rashi, nida hi,
Over here, nida doesn't necessarily mean
menstrual period like it sometimes
means, but over here it means that this
this actual act is something which is
disgusted and should be banned.
The rabbis explain
this is teaching us that just like when
a woman has her menstrual period, one is
not allowed to be with her, so too in
this case, it it compares the two cases
and tells us the same way over there it
was clear that they cannot be together.
So too in this case they one should not
be together as well.
Verse 22, "You shall therefore watch all
my statutes as all my laws. They are
statutes as all my laws. They are
statutes
Verse 23, "You shall not go in the ways
of the nations around you. You shall not
go in the ways of the nations around
you. You shall not go in the ways of the
nations around you. You shall not go in
the ways of the nations around you. You
shall not go in the ways of the nations
around you. You shall not go in the ways
of the nations around you. You shall not
go in the ways of the nations around
you. You shall not go in the ways of the
nations around you. You shall not go in
the ways of the nations around you. You
shall not go in the ways of the nations
around you. You shall not go in the ways
of the nations around you. You shall not
go in the ways of the nations with them.
Verse 24, "You shall not go in the ways
of the nations around you. You shall not
go in the ways of the nations around
you. You shall not go in the ways of the
nations around you. You shall not go in
the ways of the nations around you. You
shall not go in the ways of the nations
around you. You shall not go in the ways
of the nations their possessions. You
will take their possessions of their
land.
I will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you.
I will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you.
I will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give it to you. I will
give it to you. I will give it to you. I
will give it to you. I will give it to
you. I will give it to you. I will give
it to you. I will give I don't have to
say between the two different kinds.
Between a cow and a donkey because
that's very obvious that they're
different.
What's the verse telling us?
Something which is allowed meaning that
it's pure, that it's permitted to eat.
Something which is impure that you're
not allowed to eat.
Through one that was completely
slaughtered. I'll summon that both of
its
trachea and esophagus were slaughtered.
One of them that only some of it was
slaughtered that therefore it's not
considered a kosher animal. What's
the difference between a majority of the
of the actual windpipe that was cut to
how much only a half
only by a thread. And you say what's the
big deal? It's only a thread. Therefore
God says no, this is where the
difference comes because though the laws
you say what's the little big deal a
little bit here a little bit there. This
is where this distinguishing comes that
God said this is kosher this is not,
this is pure, this is not.
I should have dealt with the dummy
lesser to make it prohibited on you.
This is what the words mean to be
impure.
Verse 26. The holy nation and therefore
you must be to me holy because
because because
I am holy I am God and
I have distinguished you from all the
people of the universe that you should
be for me
Rashi 26
If
you distinguish yourselves meaning if
you see yourselves as separate
segregated from these terrible from
these type of behaviors that you eat the
only the things you're allowed to. You
act in a way of purity. How do you act
in your mind? If you love if not
then you can join the other
enemies of society as
his friends. He
used to say meaning she liyumer adam?
How do we know that a person should not
say, 'Nafshi kotzti b'vsa ater, I am
disgusted by pig flesh.
E af shiluvish kilayim, and therefore I
don't eat it.' Or he says, 'Oh, I'm not
able to wear garments that are mixed
with wool and linen. They have the You
know, I don't feel comfortable in them.'
That's not what a person's meant to say.
Aval, what he should say is, "Yomar, I
should say, 'Afshi, I'd like to have it.
I'm tempted by it. Ma'aseh, what should
I do? The Avish b'Shamayim gozer alai
that my Father in Heaven has decreed
upon me I shouldn't have it.' How do I
know one is supposed to say that? Talmud
lomar, because it says in the verse,
Va'avdil eschem min ha'amim, I've
distinguished you from the nations
le'yosri to be for me, she'teihavdilu
mehem l'shmi that you should sanctify it
for that's case that you yourselves
should say, 'I am segregating myself for
the sake of God.' Poresh min ha'aveira,
a person says, 'I will
explicitly
separate myself from doing something
wrong. Why? L'kabel ol malchus Shamayim,
to accept the subservience of God.'
Technically, I would want to do it, but
because God told me, that's why I don't
do it. Accepting upon yourself the yoke
of Heaven. Recognize the subservience
that God gives us, that is part of the
commitment of being holy and sanctifying
oneself to God.
Verse 27, v'isha isha, a man or a woman,
near, and now he concludes with the
punishment of the divining. V'isha isha
ki yihyeh bahem ohr yed'oni, a man or
woman who is a diviner,
who speaks from their armpit or putting
a stone under the putting a stone in
their mouth of those kind of things,
mos yumasu, they should be put to death,
be'even yirgemuhu, some they should be
stoned, damam bam, their blood is their
own fault.
Kan ne'emar bahem misah, here it says
that what the punishment is, by liable
of punishment by the Beis Din.
U'l'ma'alah, previously in verse six it
said kares that they will be
cut off and that the punishment is in
the hands of heaven. And therefore, one
has to explain saying as follows, "A de
mastra, if there are witnesses and
warning to these individuals, then they
must kill it and they'll be stoned and
then it's done by the best then."
Meizid below yesra, but if they did it
uh a on purpose, advert- they did it,
you know, knowingly and without any
warning,
then their punishment is in Karis being
cut off and dying prematurely. Mishiki
gasam, if they did it inadvertently,
chatas, then they have to bring a sin
offering. V'chein b'chol m'chayevei
misas, so too all of the
times that we find that the Torah says
that they are liable of the death
penalty, she number them Karis that it
also says about them that they will be
cut off and die prematurely. Meaning, if
there was witnesses and warning, then
they will have the liable of the capital
punishment that the best then the
rabbinic court would enact on them. If
there was no witnesses of warning, but
they did it
uh knowingly and wantingly, then they
would be getting Karis, which God would
punish them that they die prematurely.
If they did it inadvertently, then they
would have to bring a sin offering.
This concludes the Torah reading of
Acharei Mos and Kedoshim.