Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Chullin Daf 19
5 views
Categories:Torah/Gemara
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right, Duff. You're test. Tuesdays
Duff. As we continue to talk about how
grama, which basically means shechting
in the wrong area of the neck. And we're
going to continue the conversation about
how high on the neck can you go, picking
it up from the very bottom of your
chosam and base. Mar bar v'ashi omar
pluga b'chiti k'sheira. If you shecht so
high on the neck that you're already
bumping into the chiti, which we touch
this these wheat kernels and they look
like wheat kernels, these pieces of
cartilage, it will still be kosher. But
shier b'chiti, treifa. Meaning if you
get all the way up to them, it's going
to be kosher, but if you cut some of
them, it will not be kosher. Moving over
to moad alef. The hilchisa mishupui
koiva ulomata k'sheira, from that slope
of the koiva, which is the very top of
the konah, and downward that will be
kosher, which is really high up. V'hainu
d'shier b'chiti. And that's the same
thing as saying that you left over some
of the chiti, meaning you actually cut
into the chiti. So it's actually the
most makel of the shitas. There's a lot
of room to shecht and this actually
dispels the famous myth about a giraffe.
We may have learned in elementary school
that a giraffe really would be kosher,
but we have no idea where on the neck to
shecht it. It's not true. You can shecht
the entire length of the neck. And the
real reason why we don't eat giraffe
meat is cuz it probably tastes terrible.
think about it. When was the last time
you ever heard of a guy eating giraffe
meat? It's probably very hard to
capture. The skin is very thick and
giraffe burgers probably don't taste
great. So Geoffrey from Toys R Us should
be safe from our shechita. I think his
name was Geoffrey. Rav Nachman achsher
mishupui koiva ulomata, the same kind of
a kulah. Omar lei Rav Chanan bar Rav
Katina lei Rav Nachman kaman, who do you
go like? Like Rabbanan u'lei Rav Asi bar
Rav Yehudah. Because our mishnah only
quoted both the Rabbanan, meaning the
Tanna Kamma, and Rav Asi bar Rav
Yehudah. And according to both of them,
the top of the shechita is going to be
the top of that tabasagadeila. The only
question is whether or not you have to
cut the entire area within that
tabasagadeila according to Rav Asi bar
Rav Yehudah, you only needed to do roiv
of it cuz rubika kulai. But l'chora the
shipua ulomata would certainly be no
good. Omar lei Rav Nachman said back,
"Ano lei chilika dana u'lei bilika
dana." I don't know chilika or bilika.
Rashi does suggest what this might mean,
but in the end he likes best to say it's
just an expression of I don't know your
tweedledee or tweedledum or your hotson
or your plots. Doesn't matter, it's just
like chilika or bilika. I don't know
what you're talking about. "Ano shamata
yedana." I know what the amoraim say on
this. Meaning it doesn't scare me that
Rav Asi bar Rav Yehudah and the
chachamim never heard these shittos
because we said earlier a shitta from
Rebbi Chanina b. Akiva that we quoted
from the braisa that were more meikel
than the Tanna Kamma and Rebbi Yishmael.
Vi amri lo Omar Rebbi Abba bar Zavda
Omar Rebbi Chanina vi amri lo Omar Rebbi
Yaakov bar Idi Omar Rebbi Shimon bar
Levi that the halacha is mashiku k'eiva
ulam mata k'sheira. Vi Omar Rebbi Shimon
bar Levi mugramis derabanan. Let's say a
derabanan deka hagrama meaning you went
too far out of the area mid rabannan.
K'sheira l'Rebbi Yishmael b. Elisha.
That will be a machlokes Tanna Kamma and
Rebbi Yishmael b. Elisha. You'll still
get your ruba k'chula. With Rebbi
Yishmael b. Elisha in a shitta that is
considered hagrama by Rebbi Yishmael b.
Elisha that most of the shitta was above
the tabaska d'ayla. K'sheira l'Rebbi
Chanina b. Akiva who is more meikel.
Well, pshita obviously that's exactly
what their shittos are. No, because
Rebbi Chanina b. Akiva
is derabanan k'ai and therefore he's
only arguing with derabanan but he's
maskin to Rebbi Yishmael k'mush mulan
dera. So Rebbi Shimon bar Levi and Rebbi
Chanina b. Akiva is also arguing with
Rebbi Yishmael. Oh, v'eima achi nami.
How do you know that's true? Maybe Rebbi
Chanina is maskin to Rebbi Yishmael. No,
because im kein heid aleha mi bo'ilei.
That would have been the lashon that the
aleha is talking about that memra. And
therefore Rebbi Chelkis Rebbi Chanina b.
Akiva k'ai or Nachman K'vasha. Omar
Ravuna Omar of Assi machlokes
b'shishochat. Now we get to some
interesting lumdus on how we view
different shittos. Omar Ravuna Omar of
Assi machlokes the machlokes Tanna Kamma
and Rebbi Yishmael b. Elisha is
b'shishochat shnei shlish when you first
cut two thirds of the kana meaning
within the tabaska d'ayla. Vi heigrim
and then you go out of the area shlish
on that last third. So again, two thirds
properly the last third was improper. In
that case derabanan savi kulo shitta
b'einan tabaska d'ayla. You got to do
the whole thing within inside the
tabaska d'ayla and you didn't. So it's
possible for Rebbi Yishmael b. Elisha
savi ruba k'chula and therefore you are
A-OK. Aval heigrim shlish v'shochat
shaini v'shlish. Let's say you swapped
the order and the first time you did it
improperly with hagrama but the last two
thirds are within the actual legal
limits of the shitta and therefore you
might think that Rebbi Yishmael b.
Elisha will say it's okay because he
still have the ruba k'chula of a kosher
shitta. No, derako psula. Why? Because
the chinuch
when the animal's life went out to be in
ruba b'shitta v'lecha. So you can't just
look at the totality of the cut but you
have to look at the process and you see
when the died. Rebbi Chisda Rebbi Chisda
is back to Ravuna ad rabba.
There's a machlokes when you do the
first third with a hagroma, and then the
last two thirds are okay. That's when
there should be a machlokes.
It's no different than if you have a
chotzi koneh pogum. Chotzi koneh pogum
is a case when you have a pre-existing
condition that there's already a pogum
area on the koneh. And the shochet
didn't have to do a full schechitah. All
he had to do was kind of extend that
opening to make the schechitah into a
full schechitah. So the end result is
completely a severed koneh like it's
supposed to be. But the process was
started because of this pogum, because
of the pre-existing condition. Rebbi
Yishmael Rebbi Yehudah says that that's
okay. But Rabbanan, it's not dami to a
case of meidei dehavei chotzi pogum
because
over there by the
it's actually in the correct location.
If you're doing it above the tabaska
de'ilah, so you're being magrim the
animal, if that's the right word. You're
having hagroma problems in that first
third of the schechitah, and therefore
when you're actually doing the
schechitah, it's not a kosher
schechitah.
Let's say the first two thirds were cut
properly, and only the last third was a
problem. Well, devar hakol she'eirah.
Even Rabbanan will say it's okay. Dehotz
nan ruba shel echad kimayu.
Mah name olam da huruba dehasam. Who
says that that rov that we're talking
about over there is lav
that it wasn't Rebbi Yishmael Rebbi
Yehudah. Dilba Rebbi Yishmael Rebbi
Yehudah Katana Lav. And not she dis
Rabbanan. But Rebbi Nachman bar Rebbi
Nachman might say you have to cut the
whole thing, and you can't say ruba
kakulei. Omer lei Abaye. Abaye says back
to Rebbi Yishmael. Otu kol ruba de'alma
Rebbi Yishmael Rebbi Yehudah Katana Lav.
Everybody holds a ruba kakulei. So
you're not going to make a machlokes
between Rabbanan and whether or not you
hold a ruba kakulei. So Omer lei Rebbi
Yishmael says back to Abaye. No, no, no.
Of course everybody holds a ruba
kakulei. Ano ruba de schechitah kamina.
Whether you apply the concept of ruba
kakulei to schechitah, that's going to
be the shaila. Dishamanu lehu de pleig.
Because I have a mesorah that the
Rabbanan and Rebbi Yishmael Rebbi
Yehudah argue about this very nekudah,
whether or not you apply ruba kakulei to
schechitah. Now lishana acharina, this
is going to be another lashon of exactly
the same thing with who said what.
Lishana acharina amrei lah Omer of Huna,
Omer of Assi.
Ushachat shnei shlish.
>> If the first two thirds were done
properly and the last third was done
improperly
and it wasn't and they kept on arguing.
Everybody holds of a cool way.
And that's what my message was that the
was about
by okay.
Let's say you cut a beyond the area
you're supposed to cut.
And then you do a proper in the right
area. And then you go out of the area
again. So there was
so there was so there was a a
What's the of the of the
By the time the animal's life left it,
it's leaving the a
that's the middle part.
That's when the animal's left.
The totality of the has two parts one
part and therefore it's not going to be
kosher.
So it's a a a a is going to be but
they actually brought the to and he said
so
he heard that said it was going to be
What I say is not kosher he says it's
kosher.
What I say is kosher and he says it's so
in the previous case of
or
he keeps saying the opposite of me.
Yeah you know you have a good point he
reconsiders.
First of all he's saying over here from
Rob.
I didn't hear anything from Rob I was
just saying it on my own
at the end of the day there is a
this neck basically is giving two
reasons to be either the part the
the death of the animal was a
or the totality of the whole is cut all
you know
either one of those would be enough to
be
a
back to like to
don't be what you're saying turning over
to
the
now you can have to be on the first
thing you said where was that I might
have
over there you said it was going to be
because
what was the reason that you said that
because at the moment of the death of
the animal could not because that's
that point not
so you're going to have to say the same
thing in reverse
at the time when the animal was dying
in a case of
is the actual important point even
though you have
but at the time of
you're going to have to should be
possible according to you and therefore
don't be over stick to your guns they
asked him
let's say you do a proper for a third
then
and then
what's going to be
the
is
meaning where where the actual cut in
the neck of the animal is a jagged cut
it still doesn't have to be complete
straight line in the animal's neck of
course the knife has to be smooth we're
talking about the actual cut so it's a
case of
or
maybe was talking about a case where
it's not a straight line but it doesn't
mean it was outside of the it wasn't a
total
so
it wouldn't be a of course it's a
and now because being a
maybe you need to have a clear
like a lotion of
uncovering and you don't have such a cut
because you're starting in one place and
you're going to another area on the neck
and you're coming back to that place I
might think that's not a good so
that it is but you don't have a
that
would work according to him so basically
you
have a a de Rav Kahana. Vi Yosef Rav
Kahana Kamei de Rav Yehuda. Vi Yosef Rav
Kahana. They're all sitting and saying,
"Shachat Shlish, let's say you do a
shlish properly. De Hagrom Shlish and
then de Shachat Shlish. So, Shita
Hagroma Shita, Mahu de Halacha?" Amar
lei, "Shita Saik She'eira." Now, Hagrom
Shlish vi Shachat Shlish de Hagrom
Shlish. So, first and third are Hagroma,
middle one is Shita Mahu? Amar lei,
"Shita Saik Psula." Okay. Shachat bimkom
Nekev. Let's say de Shita is happening
through a pre-existing hole in de Kona
Mahu. Amar lei, "Shita Saik She'eira."
As we spoke of beforehand. How about
Shachat Pugah bi Nekev? Let's say when
you shacht and you get up to de hole in
de Kona Mahu. Because in this case,
there's a pre-existing hole. And de way
Rashi learns is de hole is in de back of
de Kona, closer to de neck bone. And de
Shachit which starts in de front, now
reaches this area in de back. Therefore,
I essentially finishing de Shita for
him. Mahu? Amar lei, "Shita Saik Psula."
Okay, but also Rabbi Abba Amar Kamei de
Rabbi Elazar. Also Rabbi Elazar Amar
Kamei de Rabbi Yochanan. Amar lei Rabbi
Yochanan to Rabbi Elazar, "Mishna?
What's de difference between cutting
through an existing hole or reaching de
hole that's in de back of de neck? Why
did Rabbi Yehuda say de first Shita is
going to be kosher while de second Shita
is going to be possul?" Amar lei Rabbi
Elazar back to him, "Because Shachat
bimkom Nekev Nazkimisha Shachat Yisrael
bigomrei Yisrael." De mushul would be of
a shachting de first part and de Yid
finishing it. In which case it's a
kosher Shita. However, Shachat de Pugah
bi Nekev is but let's say you're
shachting and you reach that Nekev. Now,
de Nekev is essentially what finishes
it, but de Nekev is not a Shita. So,
that's Nazkimisha Shachat Yisrael
bigomrei de Nekev. It's like a Yid
starting de process and de finishing
it. And that's not going to be a kosher
Shita. Karei lei Rabbi Yochanan said,
"Look at me, this explanation of Rabbi
Elazar that Oiver Kahavim bi Oiver
Kahavim." Now, Avani, he wasn't calling
him a Shaigetz. He was just saying,
"Goyim can shacht all de livelong day,
it ain't going to help because it's not
a good dimyon." Amar Rava, and Rava
explains, "Shaper Karei lei Oiver
Kahavim bi Oiver Kahavim. Why? Because
Bishlamah de Chazan bi de case of de Yid
and de where de Yid starts and de
finishes it, that's why it's going
to be possul because mid de Havlei
Yisrael limshoch Ruba. De Yid needed to
do Rav of de Shita bi lei Shachat. And
therefore, key Nafkah key Yusa when de
animal's life left bi Oiver Daif Kahavim
key Nafkah. It's happening all you did
the hands of the guy and but in the case
of where half of the was already cut
before the street has started.
Cut the that makes the animal die. So
if the hole was there where he's or is
meeting up with the hole that's in the
back of the either way the is doing the
process here and therefore it should be
kosher. So
let's see you from the sides of the neck
from the
how many minutes to do you from the
sides of the neck of the bird and
let's see you from the what's the
literally means the back of the head but
the is going to explain it means the
back of the neck the nape of the neck.
So if you do the from the from the from
the
from the from the from the from the from
the
from the from the throat from the front
of the neck from the
from the from the from the from the from
the from [clears throat] the from the
from the from the from the from the from
the from the from the from the from the
from the from the from the from the from
the from the from the from the from the
from the from the from the from the and
likewise
is possible so my friend
what is the definition of an even
means the back of the head which is how
we would touch it my area I feel
you wouldn't have this discrepancy cuz
even would be possible if it's the back
of the head and or I am
the has to be done from that which faces
the back of the head
not really the back of the head and
means
that which faces the back of the head
which is the back of the neck which is
near the back of the head 20 safer call
kosher
and I don't even know how do you know
that of the means the back of the neck
the of the because the price is or
all
of
it will it'll sit within the view of me
the keep on
I am a fact that my favorite is the
price and need to bring this of the
telling us that says they turned away
from me and he you want to say that the
reason why the price needed to have this
also because I don't even know what I
don't know what means to do
so I am actually bringing this to
actually define where the mole is. The
Tushma, we need the possuk of Kipono
Elai Oref V'lo Ponim. They turned the
back of their head towards me, but not
their face. M'chol Oref L'hadei Ponim.
All right, we're going to stop here and
pick it up with the Amor Ben Rebbe Chiya
tomorrow.