Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Chullin Daf 102
1 views
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
All right, duf bay Monday's daf. Let's
pick it up from the two dots smack in
the middle of
there's a said
that the giranosha is going to be user
even in not kusher animals because it
was to the said back to that there was
no until and then the put the back there
as we said how to understand that now we
get the bry that has the more expansive
version of their conversation the bry
says
Benov doesn't say benovi
and Jacob's children were not called the
ben until so clearly this p wasn't said
before then
but rather it was written in the
appropriate place
in order to give the yidden a reason to
know why the waser this you're just
assuming that b is not an expression
until I the says
Ben Israel is Jacobim that the Ben Yakov
took their father to join Y in Mitzim
and that was before Mantra and still
they're called Ben Israel but
this was long after the Malik named
Jacob Israeli
but so then at least from the time when
Jacob's sons are called Ben Israel based
on what we said
was a given at different times
Therefore, since at that time when Jacob
was being taken by the shift to that was
neither the time of the
so you can't just say that at that point
would become that's not when the terra
was given and it's not when the mis
happened
says
this concept of as we're getting away
from now to talk about
this is the important thing doesn't
matter whether Whether these kinds of
species are kosher or not, they're still
going to be
only
the
both learning from the same.
So the Tyra says the to eat moving over
to olive
and don't eat that nephesh meaning that
dam with the buser. This is the mocker.
So verbry in the terrorist putting
together the is of in the same place
where there's an issami
and not kosher animals are also
now same but the exact opposite.
You're not allowed to eat the buser only
when it's accompanied by nephesh,
meaning you're taking it from a living
animal, but you're allowed to eat that
buser from a dead animal. Therefore,
any animal that you normally could eat
when it's dead, meaning a kosher animal,
that's when you can't take it off when
it's alive, meaning you'll have an
meaning.
So, there won't be any from a noter
animal.
Why do I even need a Pik to tell me that
would also be to not cuss animals
according to be able to say
let the be on the noter
because we've already established that
there is a bigger
and therefore there's no problem of
so in the same way we said by it's going
to be by not animal the same thing
should apply that is also because the
is also negated. So that same logic
should apply also to create an iss for
the
on the not kosher animals but didn't
need a new mocker in
is going to be on not kosher animals
because he doesn't hold that the more
will alleviate the problem of but rather
you won't be able to have that second on
the first is
we also see from this that bother and
we're going to learn from the same
The only time you have is by animal
but you are allowed to eat the buser
taken from a dead animal only an animal
that's to be eaten when it's dead.
meaning a kosher animal.
You'll also have an
like.
So here you have a Bryce that clearly
makes the in the same way from the but
now we're going to introduce a third.
The only time you're going to have an
aiser is by a behemoth. So even though
Rome really seemed to sound a lot like
the but it's not true because he's
saying that is not negated to or a knife
only to a behem and a kher one at that
time mayor. Why is limiting it only to a
that's where you only have because
and those are talking only about
this is about what the what kind of
animals are going to be on
everybody's asking that
by not kosher animals just like by
kosher animals. So it's more
but there's another
animal meaning
is how you read it may
some say we're talking about animals
and that would end up being because
according to the raon the is not only by
that's why it's ra of shisby aanina Oh,
we also see this from the mission in the
first paracaris.
If a yid ate an from it, meaning and
it's talking about a non-cusser bird
while it was alive is not going to get
malus because the isra is not to a not
kosher bird because the mission is going
like that and it's only talking about
kusher birds for
and won't be there to be mat. So, what
are we talking about?
Obviously the of a not kusher bird is
not going to make it kusher. It's not
kosher. So is not going to help. We must
be talking about a and what it means to
say is that the of that bird that's not
kosher isn't going to immediately make
it mut to be eaten by a because if the
bird continues to thresh out after it's
considered and it's going to be alive
and you're going to have a problem of a
but what do you see from this? Clearly
aai of a living non-cusher animal is
going to be ushered to a but we had just
said beforehand that the is of a is not
to a not kusher animal. So clearly the
mute of not kusher animals is also only
by and not by
he made that mission into a steer
because the mission says if you eat from
a not kusher bird you don't get malus
but the inha says that the of a
non-cusser bird doesn't make it right to
eat. So the first tells us that the is
not neg animals while the safe of the
same mission says it does
same idea
you need to eat a kaz in order to get
the malus for the soil
classified as an whenever you eat less
than the kaz you're never going to be
called eating and therefore you need to
eat a kazorth in order to get the malus
if somebody eats an a from a non kosher
bird while it is alive
because as we keep saying there is no
from a non-cosher bird and the is not
going to make it roy to eat beforehand
we dealt with what it meant about we're
more focused on that first line that
you're not going to get malus now if
you're telling me that you need to have
a kaz for malus must be talking about
somebody who ate that amount otherwise
you wouldn't get malus so the kaz if
you're telling you always need a kaz and
the mission will be telling us it's a
obviously an esophagus if you don't eat
a kaz but if you did eat a kaz why would
says he's not going to get malus
typically
he ate a kazayas of not kusher bird
buster so you're going to get malus that
even if you don't get malus
this is a mixture of not just berer but
it's berer that together equal to
also
so it's not so push you can be off the
hook from the malus so he's not going to
get malcus for eating the buster of this
not kusher animal whether it's alive or
it's dead because the isra owes only n
when he eats a kazayas of entirely
barely meet without the gidd
we're working of course the assumption
of tam so they don't have a status of
buser in of themselves let's try again
to bring a riged rav rav himself once
said about eating an entire bird in gans
turning over to bes
don't let's say you eat an entire kusher
bird while it was alive just pop the
whole thing in your mouth you're going
to be for eating that whole thing even
as a you will be even though it's
smaller than a kazayas because you're
eating a complete a so clearly
does not require a kazm. If you ate this
ker bird when it was dead, then you need
to have
and let's say it's a not kosher bird
is because it has a status of a burri
when it was alive when you ate it. Even
though it's very small, you're going to
be so to himself that said you need to
have a kaz, but he says you don't need a
kaz. So
we're talking about where you did have a
kaz, but the kazayas is a of the
Okay, so let's try again.
If you took a kasher bird that's smaller
than the eat the whole thing all at once
which we're going to have to see why
he somehow is not going to see that as
but
that is certainly considered
so the whole thing altogether certainly
be considered continues to let's say
first you just kill the bird then you
eat it therefore ice because now it's
just a nea so for noa you have to have
meaning repos are not arguing.
looks like a series of right you can
look at it as a collection of these
avarim
it's not divisible the thing is alive
but everybody's masking that if you only
eat one single a after it's been taken
off the animal you don't need to have a
kazaru
same thing we're talking about there's a
little bit of meat but it was together
with the makes the kazay does the even
exist of a bird leazer it doesn't have
enough collective buser on this entire
bird to be a kaz but
from but I can get a kazay if I combine
a little bit of meat together with its
bones and senus so yeah there is such a
bird thea this kind of klena bird which
has big bones so that's the kind of
thing that you can get a kaz when you're
the senus and the
because now it's ana but it sounds like
it's a kusher bird
said to if it's a not crusher bird it's
going to Mashu so I have to brace
talking about not kusher bird doesn't
require egg eyes kisa we're talking
about a kusher bird that is kane kisa
just it has a similar characteristics
but it is a kusher bird okay so we said
in the previous bry that rebi is going
to from any of eating an entire kosher
bird because it's not cold it's alive
but
that a person's thought can make a
difference when it comes to right we
know
will make the difference. So in this
case
let's say I intend to eat it one at a
time is that going to be divisible as a
such a case that would also
just because one has the one doesn't say
yeah
that's it can work that way if you want
to say
Let's say he wanted to eat this bird
when he was dead, but instead he ate it
when he was alive.
And he's not going to be because by
pushing off the until after it's died,
the person shows that he's not ready to
divide it into the calls. It's alive and
therefore it's not going to have a
status of because it's not
two people doing the same exact thing.
is going to be on.
That's the way it is. And we're going to
call here and we'll pick it up. The dmer
of Yan.