Chulin 84

Today's daf is and we are at the very top the first line of so yesterday we began the sixth paragul which deals with the mitzvah of the mitzvah of is mentioned in par says so if Somebody is going to capture either a or a kosher or a kosher he says the offer he has to cover the dam of the with offer. So it's interesting the last per was called pero this paric is dealt with the Torah says deals with not whereas deals with not either way the mission said that in contrast to which is And asked the obvious question why is there no mitzvah? Now obviously the question is only from because there's no such thing as a being hectish. You can have a kosher but you can't have that's going to be that it's going to be right to go on. There was no that was to go in the m the question was from there were two that were to go on the namely and so the question is if there's a mitzvah by why should the be excluded so the suggested that maybe the reason is based on something said when you do the and the said there's no way to do when it comes to the when its comes to the because where did the dam of the and go and went on the if there's going to be that means you're going to have to put the offer on the and then put the dam of the respective on top of the offer could is it so simple to just put offer on the if your intention is to leave the offer there then you're building you're adding to the dimensions of the misb you can't do that the says the dimensions of the misbeh were very very precise if you're going to put the offer there and then quickly remove it. That means the offer was never part of the misbeh which means the offer served as a between the dam and the misb. It means you were never mitzvah of you were never mitzvah of mitz. So the garra said seemingly there's no way to do it. But then the garra immediately rejected that. The garra said why not? Why can't you do the mitsy and the then scrape the dam off the mak and then do a proper koi wherever you want to do the proper koi. was compelled by that argument. And the said, "You're right. It must be that really you can do when it comes to what then does the mean when it says it's referring not to but meaning you have somebody who had a he had an and he decided to donate it to the mdash but not to bring as a carbon not that these should be but rather what he did was is he said my is worth $100 $1, take the $100, sell it, and use the money for the maintenance of the Bikash or for whatever other need there may be. In that instance, if somebody would go the while it was in the state of over there is there'd be no of why. So that's where we left off yesterday. The reason is because there's a as we're going to see on who says something regarding that mirrors something that he said regarding and that is the only time there's a but doesn't have a mitzvah. So only a that's has a but that's not if somebody because this animal is there's you can't go ahead and now have let alone eat this animal as a result it's a that's why there's no so again why does the say the short answer now is we're dealing We're going according to that such as at this point in the is willing to accept the fact that there would be a mitzvah of which would be interesting. That means every single time the did his they had to bring to scrape the dam off the I mean it's not something we ever heard of when we learn the reason is because this is not the but at least at this point in the garra the gum is okay accepting that and saying that the mission is referring to but the ask why is it that we're saying that according to why shouldn't you be obligated to redeem the animal even though it was already slaughtered. But maybe there should be an obligation to be of the animal and then go ahead and do the mitzvah of you can do is much more complicated. The only time you can be that's an animal that was made hectish with the intention of it physically going on. The only time you can be paid that is if it has a mo it becomes this is 101 is a lot simpler to be pa in fact you can always be soar's question is why not be the so that now retroactively it will no longer be a if it's not going to be you can go do the and it sounds like is you should be obligated to do it because the mitzvah maybe should require you maybe to be poed But the point is why are we saying there's no you there could be at the very least if you say you can't do that because one of the technical criteria you have to meet in order to be pedish is the thing that you're being played has to stand in front of has to stand in front of a jury and there has to be and the experts have to come in and they have to assess how much this thing is worth so that we make sure that Hecish doesn't lose out in this transfer when we're ped And being that this animal's dead is did it already. So it's not possible to do thus you can't do. So it's for that reason it's not going to be in other words the says is notis is really predicated on two things. Number one with regards to I no number two the only way you can be is with that there's no that holds of those two things there's no that holds with regards to and that you need to be says mayor is the mission mayor miss who holds that you even the problem mayor holds a good regard. So the time of the mission can't be any if the time of the mission is like which is what we spoke at right in the beginning who holds it happens to be that there's no so at this point in the when it says not is predicated on these two number one would be and two you can't There's no tan in that holds of the two. We have holds this. We have that holds that. But the can't be half and half. Who is the author of the Mishna? So says very simple. I'm the everyone knows who wrote the and he picked and he picked sides as it relates to different debates amongst the as it related to when it came to the same maybe the entire mission and again the mission is talking about that's what it means when it says is and why is because it's holds you don't need you're right after it you have to do the makes like this throughout Being that the only way you'd be able to do is if you played it first. That means you have to do a very significant action in between the and the from the it seems like there is nothing significant that needs to be done between the and the if you need to do something as significant as being that's a that you're excluded from the par of says now that you said that we can revisit the original question we began the top of why Is Kachchum excluded? And the Gomorrah said, "You're right. Kachchum is not excluded." Says the garment is maybe is excluded. What's the What's the big deal? Why can't you scrape the dam off the Oh, because scraping is also a significant act. The bottom line is is the saying at this point that if you want the Mishna to be you're going to have to say that the reason is excluded is because from the you don't have to do anything between the once you go down that road now there's a to say that is also excluded from the different it says just like has So you want to know why kachchin is excluded from the mitzvah of very simple because it says in the with regards to the mitzvah of just like never has kadusha. So too in the only time there's a mid of is if it's not if we're being maybe we should take the heckish a little bit further and say that just like a there's no species of that has a possibility for it to become. So maybe the only time an has the is if it's a species that's not subject to. So maybe you know those are the two types of birds that can become maybe those birds should be excluded from the mids of here's the punch line even when they're cuz they're not similar to is something that's never so that's never to that has a but maybe an that's even when it's shouldn't have a mitzvah of say I don't I don't think that's the proper if anything I'd make the reverse So I think it makes sense to say that the bottom line is is the Gmorra had a few roots in to the original question. The question was my time. So the Gmorra said that could be the Mishna is referring only to maybe does have a it's only it doesn't have a mitzvah of why because we're going to who holds that with regards to and anytime you're not be able to eat the meat. So that's why there's no mitzvah of asked the follow-up question. Why can't you be poed? So for that gave two either the terret is that you need to be and once instead there's no holds you don't need you're right the is not he like with regards to and he holds that you need which happens to be as relates to being could be the gar said the time of the really is and again the time of the is referring to when he excluded kach and the reason that's excluded is because it says the and there can't be anything between the and the and being that if you shed is the only way you could do is if you were the you retroactively made it that it shouldn't be a that in of itself is a reason that there's no mitzvah of then the gave a third terret the said that once you can't be anything in between maybe the refer to as well because the only way that can be is if you do a greater in between the and the maybe there's no greater and then finally the gave a fourth theor said it says just like is never going to be hectish so to can never be hectish what's the bottom line bottom line is the rabb says that there's no mitzvah of when it comes to doesn't matter if it's doesn't matter if it's which is why when we learn and we never heard of such a thing that after was brought would scrape the dam off the mak and they would do a mitzvah at some point in the gar that seemed to have been a possible reality but it's not that way because we like the all whether it's are excluded from the mitzv of the heretic told we know we saw that in in length earlier in the if that's the case you find with regards to this. So for example, what's the kosher signs of a it's the same as the kosher signs of a behemoth. So whatever is considered kosher for a behem. The same is true for even though the Torah says it by if that's the case why don't we say so just like there's a when it comes to maybe there should be when it comes to nice why is there no because it says so there's that if the rule is so why don't we say that there's a mitzvah by as told him the context over there is the says and the water the dam should pour onto the ground like water that when it comes to there's no continued he said that if you're going to tell me that d is treated like water so if someone's Why can't he be in a mikvah of my told him? It says if you have a stream or a pit where there's a mikvah literally there's a gathering of water. That's what a mikvah means. You cover there's a gathering of water if somebody tles there he's going to be taught. We learn from there only but nothing else. They told him right is coming to me maybe it's coming to but this told my whole premise is is that is called the Torah says so if that's the case how could the words of be you're right it's it should be that are not Mayan But the point is the whole premise of my question is is that D is called Mayan. So he told him trade he says over here there's two it says May and it says May and that is going back on and it's going back on. So one is coming to be mashkin and the other one is coming to. So even though there could have been a that should be treated as may with regards to mikvah but I have a in a tells me is not considered but continued. He persisted and he told maybe both and are both coming to one is coming to you if you have mashkin that are flowing. if it's in one place which is meaningful when you learn but he told him back there's really three again it says it really says the word may once but the word is going back on the three words that precede the word thus you don't have two you have three so even if you feel that you need two one for the other one But I have a third one anyways. So that even though you're right you do find in a context the referred to as and even has implications because that is the you don't need when it comes to of because we look at it like but at the same time when it comes to you can't be in you have to be in it says in the introduces the mitzvah of the ish So literally means if someone's going to catch he's going to go hunting and he's going to catch or said there's a mitzvah of it sounds like only if you hunt an animal what if you have a domesticated animal you have an animal that doesn't have to be hunted and it it it lives in your house geese chicken how do you know that there too if you There's a mitzvah of it says it could have just said is an extra word even if it's in a captured state still there's a mitzvah of then why did the mean the point is it's every says the Muslim What the is coming to say is that you shouldn't just recklessly eat meat, but rather before you sit down to eat meat, you should act as if you had to hunt this piece of meat. So if you had to hunt a piece of meat, you would value it and you wouldn't just eat it, but rather you would give it a certain. So before you sit down to a steak dinner, make believe you working in a field and you actually had to hunt this animal and you had to shed. the do the malik and the traers and the and you know act as if anyways so that the point we're trying to make is is that don't just go ahead and eat meat on that note it says in the and this is a in a we actually spent a lot of time on in the very beginning of the says when I'm going to promise. You're going to say life is good. I want to eat meat. Why? Simply because you're going to have a ty to eat meat. You have a right to fulfill that. Go ahead and eat meat. And this is a which is one of the battlegrounds between whether was or when the were in the but either way as it relates to this li this is coming to teach us a lesson again a person shouldn't just eat meat but rather you should eat meat. If you really have a ta to eat meat, then you should eat meat. Otherwise, be of whatever. Eat whatever you want. But but don't just eat meat. It's not even the punch line. The punch line is and again, right? Says it twice, two times. Eat meat, but only if you have a to eat meat. I would think, okay, so let's say you have a to eat meat. go to the store and buy meat, right? What else are you supposed to do? No. What's the next? It says there's you should never spend money on meat. If you have the animals, you have the cattle, then sh them and eat it. But otherwise, okay, let's you want to throw a big party. So maybe you should make this huge and slaughter all your animals so that you can serve a lot of meat. No. was sensitive. It said it says meaning make sure that you don't deplete all your assets over a good dinner. You said based on the affformentioned if somebody has a mono so if he wants to make dinner what he should buy is a liter of vegetables. If you have a mana, you should be eating vegetables. If you have 10 mono, you can say dog. Then you can upgrade your menu a little bit. You could eat fisher. Then you could eat a liter. What if you have 100 then you could eat baser and not just eater? Eat baser every day. Says sob has already said that if somebody has a mana, you should eat yerk. 10 mana fish 50 mana meat 100 mana meat every day which means that when he said vegetables fish and meat for the ones that don't have 100 mana he didn't mean every day he emphasized every day for the person that has 100 he should eat meat every day how often should they be eating vegetables or fish or meat says every Friday night said we have to be concerned about what the zen said. Who was the zary? Says that why did refer to about the zak? This is easy. He said because he said he said it was a was a man but he looked like a z and it was a a toy. It was a title that that went along with him for the rest of his life. He was known as the zing referring to the miracle that had happened to him when he was merely 18 years old. But either way, Zar said, I think this is meaning it's not so simple. Unless a person could afford meat, he should not be eating meat. Incidentally, said something a little different than what the B said initially said. The Bryce has said a person should not eat meat unless he has a tya to eat meat. The first of the brought was that before a person eats meat, he should act as if he had to hunt the meat. Meaning he shouldn't just eat it. So quickly as seems to be focusing less on the nutritional arguments pro or against meat more on the affordability of it. He said that if a person could afford it then yeah eat it every day. He just doesn't want people to I'm but either way commented on what Rav commented. So Rab said I think this don't eat meat unless you could afford it which seems to bear's emphasis said referring to he came from a very healthy family. So he did not and people in Islam didn't have to eat meat that often but us we're much weaker. If a person has one, you know what he should do? You read he should run to the store and buy a good piece of meat or buy food at the very least so that he'll have nutrition. He says we're even that was referring to we even borrow money. We don't even have to have a dollar in order for us to be able to go ahead and for it to make sense to buy this food. The Pik says so now a few which are what does that mean? You should have sheep. And the reason it's good to have sheep is so that you'll have wool. Those are the next words in the Pix. A person should always sell his field and he should buy. So the Pik saying that you should sell your real estate and buy cattle and not vice versa. The reason is because Rashi says that if you have so there's a lot of streams of income that come from it. You have the wool and then you have the milk. There's different things eventually the meat that you can get from it. But as far as the real estate goes either way the day What does that mean? That's what we just said. That's the explanation in why you should want sheep. It's because of the milk and all the fringe benefits that come along from having cattle. What does that mean? That first you should make sure you have enough food for yourself and then afterwards you should feed your family. Why? It sounds a little cruel. The answer is no. Because if you're not going to have food, how are you going to be able to support your family? So, as the leader of your family, you have an obligation to take care of yourself. Because if you don't take care of yourself, it's going to be very hard for you to take care of the people in your family. And finally, what does that mean? You should train your family. You shouldn't spoil them too much. carrots. You shouldn't teach your kids to eat. If somebody wants to be a So this is business advice from he should go into the business said what's in the says. So the Torah, this is inex refers to sheep as what does that mean? Because was a very lucrative business and it made its owners very wealthy. It's better to drink a cup of water from a sorcerer or sorceress rather than drink a cup of water that's lukewarm. So water back in the day we take for granted the fact that we have clean water. There's third world countries that still don't have clean water but you know we take for granted that you can hope you know besides the bugs issue you can drink water but once upon a time there was bacteria it was very very dangerous. So said that it's better to drink water from a than to drink lukewarm water. Meaning it wasn't boiled that didn't kill off the bacteria. You have to read the fine print. That's only if it's a word. If you didn't add any plants and herbs and this is also only true if you didn't boil it. Once you boil, no worries. said if somebody inherited money and he wants to lose his money I don't think literally but the point is is that you get the point right so if somebody wants to lose his money so first gave you advice had to become clear now he's telling you carrot if somebody wants to lose his money what should you do he should wear very expensive clothing he should buy kin that are made of these fine glasses very easy to and he should hire workers and he shouldn't spend time with them like this. They'll say we don't just mean any expensive but we're referring to Roman linen which was apparently extremely expensive. What does that mean? Referring to white crystal, white glass. You should hire workers and not spend time with them. What's that referring to? It's referring to people that hire workers to spend time with their ax, which apparently if they don't pay attention, the can come from it can be very dramatic. Was a sometimes he would say it over in the name of his and sometimes he would say it over the name of sounds like they both said it. What does that mean? is coming to give us advice. A person should always eat and drink less than what he could afford. He should dress based on what he can afford. Not less than what he could afford, but in line with what he could afford. And when it comes to his family, he should be more than what he has. The reason is because they're dependent on him and he's dependent. What the beer in that is is a little bit not clear. But the bottom line is used to say over sometimes in the name of and sometimes in the name of that a person should always eat and drink less than what he has. When it comes to clothing, it should be in line with what he has. And when it comes to it should be Exhale. So before we go Ver and finish the D. So we have a breather of few number one. So the Gmorra had brought a mera from Aaria who said that a person shouldn't just assume that meat is good for him and eat meat but rather only eat meat to the extent that you can afford it. If you can afford it then that's okay but otherwise not. And he laid out ground rules. He should be eating vegetables. If he has he should eat fish. If he has he should eat meat and this all means shabas. If he has 100 then then he can eat meat the whole night. So husband is not so concerned about the nutrition of meat. He's not telling you to run and eat meat because you need it. He's also doesn't seem to be telling you not to eat it because it's not good for you. He said the problem I have with meat is that not everybody can afford it. So don't eat it if it's something you cannot afford. But at the same time if you could afford it then you can go ahead and you can eat it every day. There's a ch from fascinating it's the question that was asked was as follows. There was aid who borrowed a tremendous amount of money from Shim. He told him that when he becomes wealthy, that was the used in the he's going to pay back the he's going to stop paying back the loan. Either way, the mala came and he told him that I heard that you just made 50 gold coins. And he said, being that you made 50 gold coins, I think the time has come for you to pay back this law. Says, what are you talking about? because I made 50 gold coins. What does that mean? He said I have a says then when should a person eat meat? Only and then he gave a way for us to know what the definition of is. He said if you have one mana vegetables 10 mana eat fish. If you have 50 mana then you can eat. So you see from here that 50 mana is a where it's okay to eat meat which means it's considered. So see he told him that the 50 just triggered that the loan is due. I want you to pay the loan back. This shah was sent to the says and really the punch line is the first line. He says I don't believe you can learn from from he says where are you bringing me from this is all in the world of and in the world of you can't bring any riers from then he continued he said does it make sense what 50 mana was considered a shas in the times of circa and 50 mana now in Prague in the 18th century because it's the same number 50/50 that means he says it's it doesn't make sense it just doesn't make sense So in his times he was defining what every dian now has an an obligation to take that number you know accounted for inflation and figure out what that number should be 2,000 years later. But the point is is that just because 50 was a sh of when said over this me doesn't mean that today the same is going to be true. What then would be the sh of so actually did the math and he came up with a whole using currency that that was popularly used in Czechoslovakia at the time. But the bottom line is it says he writes his whole he says but the whole thing is a twice anyways this whole Shila didn't get on to first base but either way but I think the punch line in this is the first line he says and this is of course in one of his most famous truvas it's a pur chuva the he talks about kasher but in his where he went back and forth with the he told the he doesn't want to get involved in in doesn't answer that are related to was very upset says there's so much of is how can said I'm not all I'm saying is all I'm saying is is that you can't pass in from it and I'm a I have sh that are crossing my desk people need answers I'm not a what I do. I'm a my need to be written to sh that are there's no that you can take out from either way discusses it in very great detail here. He says, "I actually saw last night that in the back of the new so there's a he brings from the who brings from other who felt not like and the said that had seen what wrote in he doesn't believe he would have written what he wrote." But it's interesting that you just said it a few times and this is tucked away in a tuber that relates to today's from all places. But regardless, an interesting that's the first the second is just forward to the last thing that we saw. of the Rambam in brings the I say for a we speak out a lot from in the of he's from Rashi that he thinks Rashi had a different gear in the gamar he says that when Rashi brings this. Oh, they have it here. One mascot is and he says he believes that Rashi held that the gears that we have in our toys. There's no obligation to be your children. So if your kids ask you for something, you can't afford it, you don't have to give it to them. When it comes to your wife, that's a different story. But as it relates to your children and he says that is he thinks that knew this was the proper based on a it's one of those where but either way the say as follows. If somebody loves his wife like he loves himself and his wife more than his right but either way the first lines of the wife see you see there's an idea to be and to It doesn't say over there it says so held that this here is the same as this which is a B it's not it's a B but either way it's saw that this asks doesn't what's so a person should So if a man's wife asks him for something and he can't afford it, doesn't matter despite the fact that he can't afford it, he should give it to her anyways. Frank what? So he should steal the money like what what are we suggesting? What exactly should you do? So the yod says but the second shot is very very interesting. He says that he thinks that the word don't mean more than what he could afford, but rather it means something else. And he says, I'll explain it to you with a said he heard a story that there was a yid that had money and he went to the shook to go buy material and he was going to make a begged for himself, nice packager, and he was going to make a begged for his wife as well. Either way, he comes to the tailor and he shows him the two materials and he tells him, you know, one is a lot better than the other. which one do you want for you? Which one do you want for your wife? So, he decided that he wants for himself the better one, and he's going to give his wife the inferior one. Either way, he gets himself a nice baget. He makes his wife a nice baguette. He gives his wife the begg. He's very excited until he put on his begg. And then she realized that she got the the cheapest and she was uh she was upset and he tried explaining to her. He said, "Listen, you know, I go to shul on chabas and for me there's an element of chabas. You know, for me it's important from I should be wearing the nice I I think I deserve a better one. You deserve the lesser one. Either way, a fight broke out. That night, this is Friday night. This Yid has a dream. And in his dream, he sees the following words, the word, and underneath it, he sees the word reading from the he woke up in a sweat and he was all confused. What does yog mean? But the word is a bad word and he was very very confused. What are they trying to tell me in my dream? He couldn't understand his dream. So he went to his to be said looks at him and he says tell me did you get into a a fight with your wife by any chance? He says fight? I don't know if I would call it a fight. He said this is his lunch. He says that wasn't a fight. I mean, we did. It was, you know, but it was a little feisty, but no, not a fight. Regardless, he tells him, I'm going to tell you what's going on over here. He says the words are out of order is the words are sim. It's simlasisha. You know what they're telling you? They're telling you you're wearing a simasisha. Says, "What do you mean? It's a it's a no lady's ever gonna wear this." Says, "Yeah, because you took the better for yourself. The better one's supposed to go to your wife. You're not supposed to take the better one for yourself. You're supposed to give her the better material and that's considered. It's for you. That's the lesson. You're you should have given her the nicer material and taken the lesser one for yourself." Says the that's what the Gmorra means. The garra means not money that you don't have. But if you have a sh I take this one or you take this one, hers should be she should be the one that gets the the better one. You should take the lesser one for yourself. I was thinking maybe they say a different based on so you know when you talk about the your wife said there's a few very important this is another one of them. This is like the over there says that used to give to the so was a and he was a in the city of they were very wealthy there and he used to tell them take good care of your wives so that they'll you become a because if you're wife you're going to become if that's the case maybe that's the terret how you let her be your wife where you going TO GET THE MONEY THE terret is if you take care of your All right. It's going to bring it's going to bring. So maybe you don't have to worry about it. Third order, right? Yeah. Let's uh let's move along as far as the third article. So we just started yesterday. We ended as we spoke at earlier in the D. It's interesting that is the T says as it relates to it's just the opposite. The other says so relates only to relates only to it's particularly interesting because if you look in the mitzvah the of and the of are really one and the same meaning they're both rooted they're both rooted in the same idea. What's the says? You're not allowed a mother and a child at the same day. It's coming to inculcate in us. At the same time we have to have some element of compassion even to the animals right says what's the idea of he says it's going according it's in line of the the theme of that's why you make because there's an old is not a mitzvah but there's an theme in the mid that's even though you're allowed to kill an animal but at the same time we do it in a sensitive way because so at the same time even though we're going ahead and we're slaughtering and there's blood spurting all over the place but at the same time at the same time some level of sensitivity we have to have that's the idea of when he talks about the mitzvah of and this is a mitzvah steroid. It's appropriate to cover the nephesh. If we're going to go ahead, you kill an animal, this dumb all over the place, and now you start eating from the meat of the animal. It's a little bit insensitive. So the you think so what the Torah says is you're supposed to cover the blood first and it's just it's a certain sense of sensitivity that even though what we just did was an act of it was an animal that was crying for its life. It doesn't matter. We we're it's okay. It's fine. But at the same time we do it with some element of ramanus. There's an element of regardless the mitzvah of is related to a mid of so that we should be ourselves at least to a degree from a mid of the same is true with regards to the mitzvah of I'll tell you a beautiful and that is that we refer very often to the end of the well-known story where kahana went from I read all of he encountered and he caused and ended up dying because of the that he caused was but there's a there was a precursor to that story the rest of the story if you will and that is the says as follows there was a person that wanted to be a and he came to and he told this is the great he tells him I want to my friend Raf told him don't be a he told with made was to and he was sitting next to Shant Rav got up. This is Shante. He cracked his neck bone. He literally killed him. So Rav saw that his tongue killed this meister. So he said he quoted a over there refers to the and it says that when this is what we need what's the soy what's the soy that's the mountain ax that we had in the d last week this is the that's one of the 10 kosher animals that are mentioned in parish one of the seven kosher So he said what was he trying to say just like this act of once it's trapped nobody has on it. So to and he was trying to tell that you were right for killing this. You know why? He goes a and the reason he's a is because once they get a hold of the no one's going to have on the once the the the gets involved and as a result he has a not a but you're right for killing him. But what did he what was the Pic that he quoted? He picked the says the Mar got cross soy. Why he picked this? Why the I mean there's a whole bunch of animals that we could have picked. Why did he pick the soy? says because what's the it's the and the is but at the same time most hold there's no mitzvah when it comes to the so there's no says as opposed to all other says the idea of it's an idea OF SHOWING SOME COMPASSION TO THE ANIMAL THAT YOU JUST KILLED. You cover its blood. You show a little bit of sensitivity before you sit down and eat it. As it says in what's that they were trying to find, we say this in the medish over there says that when they killed But over here they just let his blood go. Says what's the point that they they didn't do. It was a sign of that they were such a that they they did it. Unfortunately were the ones who killed they were such a that they let his sit there. They didn't even have the mid of the to go ahead and do but says you see from here that is that's the of it. If that's the case, which are we not on? The one that we don't do. Which is that? That's the of last week's stuff. It's the mountain ox or the forest ox. Either way, says the that's why he picked that's why they were like a trap. You could have picked any man any cuz in this what's emphasizes this idea that we don't have any on it showed me an unbelievable which is as it relates to this thing and we'll end with this the says the says So is sensitive to the but when it comes to the Russ says the who is that referring to referring to it says in the was sensitive to the animal. He said that even though you're an animal but not be a why not be a like says it's an idea of of who was that what did say half said what wanted mothers and children theory IS SENSITIVE NOT TO EVEN animal was sensitive to the but he was and then it occurred to me this morning that what does the say after the whole miracle. So finally smack with the truck. What was the we're going to have a what's our it's time that was the day was supposed to be a war. So what's it's today we're that's today. What's it's the it's the one day where we're going to go now wanted this is not just you read how many times you hear the word. You know what this is? There's a kind we sensitive we had was the but I think what's the real what's the real the real is is that wanted to at the end of the story we was to us what we said yesterday the what we realized was there's no such It's no such thing. Yeah, you can you can you can chaper with us. You can take us from here and take us there. There's no question there could be there could be and there could be inquisitions and there could be explosions and there could be a holocaust and there could be and there could be and there could be a lot of ands and everything but at the end of the day it's and even though we don't always see it that's the real wanted but was is that we all saw with clarity that it's the real is the