Chulin 68

Today's dishes and we are at the beginning of a new perk the fourth perk of another festa perk perash today's being learned. So the topic of the beginning of perkasha is specifically the of the ben. So one of the that you find in the world of is that although it is so part and parcel of the fabric of yiddishkite that you're not allowed to eat meat of an animal unless it had a proper there is a very very notable exception to that rule and that is in the event that a would she a female animal and that animal was carrying an it was carrying a fetus. The is that the of the mother works for the fetus as well. And when this fetus is born, the is that you would be able to eat from it without it having a proper the to this is a in one of the many that talk about kosher animals, non-cooser animals. It says And the Gmorra and this is in tomorrow's D is going to say that the beginning of the Pik mentions and then towards the end of the Pik you have the word and we dion as if to say that if there's a bea inside a behem and you did a to the larger behem to the mother that is going to work for the child as well. Now in terms of all the details that is the topic of the peric and I think really without any further introduction we begin another classic per soasha is classic was classic is classic the proen we're going to learn afterasha is also going to be classic but not all classic proen were created equally autrafus is very shastic very in the world of kashras the pictures a lot of the fascinating halakic controversies and pmics that came about as a result of it see the last three raid bites per paya is classic more from a lasha perspective so think type of per tucked away here either way there was a behemoth that was about to be slaughtered she says and at that time it was also in labor. It was delivering its baby. And at that time, the uber that was inside the mother took its hand, its fore leg, and it left the of the mother, the but then immediately it went right back inside the mother. So for this fleeting moment, the quote unquote hand of the uber had left the mother, but then it retracted. you're going to be allowed to eat. Tomorrow we'll have a detailed discussion. Does that mean you're allowed to eat the doesn't mean you're allowed to eat even the hand in the event that the didn't just take its hand and leave the body of the mother. But its head left even if the head went back inside the mother. It's as if this was born. And if it's as if the was born then is it's no longer going to be. So what's the general point of the of the Mishna? The introduction like we mentioned is the idea that in the event that somebody shacks a mother and there's an inside the of the mother is going to work for the child as well. That's posh that that only works to the extent that we assume that the mother didn't yet give birth to this child. If the child was born, well then it's no longer considered an uber. And if that's the case, the of the mother is not going to work, says the Mishna. What would be if there wasn't a proper conventional lea? But at the same time, one of the of the left the mother would that can be considered a lea so that now the of the mother wouldn't work anymore from the or would it not? says the mission depends then the is because the is not considered because that already would be considered a mission continues it says what would be in the event that somebody would go inside the of the mother to the cut one of the is that after you the mother that would be. If however somebody would go into the gof of the mother, not into the but into the g some other part of the go and would break one of the internal organs of the mother and then you would check it would be what's this all about? Because we know there's an and means not only are you not allowed uh eat a live animal. What it means is that if somebody would go and cut the a of an animal and then she the animal itself, it would still be user to go and eat that a so says the Mishna that within the world of the of the mother working for the and that is that in the event the person would go and would break off one of the aarim of the uber as long as the aa remains inside the inside the mother then if you do the the would be mat here the is that you would think it's and based on that it shouldn't be okay that it's going to be fine but it's only true if the a that was broken was an a of the if somebody would go and break one of the internal organs of the mother and leave it there I don't care that you left it there once you break it it's already considered at that point it would be in fact as it relates to the second part of the mission we rules. Anytime there's some break that's part of the goof of the mother then even if you do a later it's going to be because it's but if it's not part of the goof of the mother rather it's part of the goof of the mut it's going to be because then the mother is going to go and work for the uber as well. So not the easiest Mishna in the world and you could see how maybe not the easiest gumas in the world are going to follow. But what's the general gist of the Mishna specifically the ratio of the Mishna because that's going to be the topic of today's daash there was a that was in labor it was mash is that the mother is going to work for the Uber as well the premise of the but during the Uber was mighty one of its avar says the Mishna if it was uber y If the a was the that's going to be a very important word in the and then it took its hand and withdrew and brought it right back into the and is because is not considered a if it's not considered is going to apply in the event that it took its head out then even if it brought it back in. So at the time of the the entire behem was inside the mother I don't care because once it was and we view it as a if it's a now ready be is too late right just the picture in the event that the was born and then you would somehow take the be and surgically put it back into the mother of course you wouldn't have be it has to be prior to the once it's already considered a and at that point this would not be You descend the name of Ra as it relates to the very very very first said in the name of that although the Mishna says you know what means it means the it means the part of the minus the yacht the part of the Uber that never left the the body however that a itself that proverbial yad that left that is going to remain at my time. What's the reason? It's based on a whole another source. And by the way, this source may come as a shock if you've never seen this says sounds familiar. That's the very last. It's the P that begins. It's the P that underpins almost the entire and that says although literally it means all the different but learned a whole another from here and that is once leaves it's at that point it becomes from the words that in addition to the there's something else going on here and that is The Tyra is telling me that if Ber has a meaning Ber has to be eaten in a certain area based on some we'll see many applications to this or if Ber is in a certain area then it's allowed to be eaten same thing in different words then in the event that it leaves that the is there'll be in the for you to go ahead and eat it say where do you and see it in this. Isn't the talking about Yeah, but the P also uses the word and we're very bothered. Doesn't matter if it's in the Doesn't matter if it's in the B. Doesn't matter if it's in the or in the supermarket is never eat. Why the T emphasize soda? The answer is because S is considered outside, right? Out of bounds. And what the terrorist is coming to tell me is that in addition to there's an idea of what does that mean? If there's a and it's outside of the there's going to be love in the now why does it say as it relates to that? Okay. two independent Latinas that even in the of the wanted and the wanted these two to be joined by the hip we want them to be in the same exact and the reason is because learned that this is the tra how so just like a tra once it's a tra always a tra even if it has raforo Fesh or Fufa doesn't matter it's still going to remain user as a trade from parakeers and on today's from the but just like there's an idea by a tra once a tra always a tra so too as it relates to this is of once it leaves even if it comes back it's still going to remain said that although is That's only true as it relates to the meaning we don't view the as to say that you don't have the anymore of you don't have the that the of the mother is going to work for the child. You do have to have to because the is not considered stating that there's another problem over here because being that there's an of and that of is so says I want you to know that as it relates to the itself it left its and being that it left its you're not going to be able to eat it even if it was now where did it leave its mita what is the so it's the of being able to eat the uber without is the gof of the mother. It's so to the extent that it left the it left the mother it's considered and it's not going to be okay. So according to when the Mishna says means that but as it relates to the itself that not related to a completely new now in the raid we're going to talk more about at the very end of the is going to talk more about it but we're going to see includes it in a lot of for example Rashi quotes it right here on this part of We know there's a that underpins the entirety of the is going to say that leaves it. So that leaves that leaves being that the says it has to be eaten in those once it leaves if you would go ahead and eat it even if it came back you'd be this. This is a a very general laugh. In fact, there's a discussion in the whether it would be malus on this lab or not. Says it's a sh at first glance because it's a lab that includes a tra but also this new which itself has all these disparate applications. But the bottom line is that based on this other itself is going to be one other point which I think is critical for of the we're about to learn and that is that the is really that the is going to be even if the animal was meaning that's posh again it doesn't have to be posit but it's going to emerge that it's posh and it's very helpful to be aware of this at the onset that even without rav that's poshet that if one would she the mother while the yad of the uber was outside of the mother even though we day that doesn't constitute a so that the but the itself is out of bounds and because the is out of bounds you for sure wouldn't be able to eat the and that's without is that even if it's still going to remainer and the reason is and just like once you're always is going be the same as well. So really when says that the isser and the reason it's because the said the said so that once unra it's push even the yad should be motor the animal is because there was never a and the yad itself even though it was once outside but now it's back in at the time of the was in it should be okay. It's that there's something called that once the hand is at that point even if it was going to remain. So you can't tell me that the will be. So if it was then everybody would agree that is that the would be the reason it's only that's saying that the isser is because it was the only time is going to be is if you say that's already based on this new either way the now really for almost the entire is going to fire away on fact the is going to ask three cautious on the first one's going to be from our Mishna the latter two are going be from Bryce's and then at the end of the dicar is going to bring about the is going to be the great so at the end of the today which will continue into tomorrow's what we're going to have here is well but on the one hand on the other hand we learned in our laugh when the says doesn't mean that even though it was but being that it At that point it sounds like even the meaning you don't say forever says maybe when the Mishna says means it's not a cashra I can tell you that it means but the itself is going to be but the says if it's referring to if we mean so why does the say even if it was it should be what's when it's it's not considered a if it's not considered a so there's no reason that the shouldn't be whether the is outside or back inside really as we just said has no bearing on whether it was a where if the is outside or if the is inside as it relates to the a itself if the a was outside so even though is considered a lea but if it's out of bounds at the time of the as we mentioned that important point it's out of bounds if it's insights now it's inbounds now it's going to be okay but if you're going to tell me that the is going to be so what then is the Mishna talking about the Mishna is talking only about the if it's talking only about the if the means everything so the reason it the mut is out the yad because if it wasn't the yad would be also but if you're going to tell me that the yad is anyways also and the only thing that is is the itself for the itself says you're right according to even if you whatever is going to be because again the isser the only that's itself and the so because the mission wanted to say that if the Even if it was it's still going to be the entire is going to be why because is considered like the mission said so poetic symmetry you wanted to tell me that's a very big to tell me that it's still considered you could have thought that maybe if it's you undid what you did no kamashan it's no So you mentioned in the say if you me even though from aic accuracy perspective it's actually super imprecise because it doesn't have to be even if it was still going to be. So why does it say in the says the it's very posit but the is also motor the is anyways. So why does it say it? It says it in the ratio. I got the safer. In other words, I needed it in the safer once I need it in the safer. So I mention it in the ratio as well says the safer. So you tell me you need the safer, right? You need it so badly that you're even tweaking the to the okay. So what's this grace and the you need that's literally leading the way in this whole Mishna? Obviously the kadesh is the it's a very big kadesh that once it's and by the way even if it came back in it's still going to be okay that whole is not aish at all I know from a this Mishna is a now the background to this Mishna is it's a long Mishna and the Mishna talks about the laws of not shockingly and it mentions two types of there's what's referred to as and there's what's referred to as the means and the Mishna says that if you look at the way the Tory describes and the way it describes it's different language is referred to as referred to as means the firstborn child it's very straightforward has a very specific connotation specifically what it means means is that it has to be a child that the father of the child is of would feel pain and feel some emotional connection to. It's for that reason Kazal said it's possible to be a that's going to be the firstborn but not and by the way it goes in the reverse as well. What we need is we're up to the part of the Mishna that's discussing it says the what's an example of but it's not in the event it was a child that was born and it it was a second born child but the first child that was born was a nl. So in this context means it was like so it wasn't born full term which once upon a time was considered a great s has a very specific place in the event that a baby was born after a so even if this nafl had at one point had his head leave the goof of the mother it doesn't matter that was not considered a leo and as a result it's the one afterwards that's going to be considered the right. So this is an example that second child of a that's not a right the first child the nal is considered the thus the is not but being that the first one was only not a so therefore the second one is now why is it the first one that because it was why is it not a because it's not being that it was born so the father is so it's the one afterwards That's the o we really need the next example in the event that the first child that was born was a bent. However, it was and it was already m so it never delivered healthy. So is that as it relates to that first child is considered aim. Therefore the is not the however being that it was so the father was never it was never considered racial it was never considered and therefore the one that comes afterwards is the so again it's the second one that's the not why because the first one was the not the either way says the as it relates to that second example we have a child that was born it's considered it's theim But it's not. The example was it was it sounds like the only reason it's only considered but not so that the second one is the example of the is because when it was the was but what would be if it was then the one that comes second wouldn't even be considered. Why? Because when it was it was already a and at that second when there was a le it was and as a result it's not going to be considered anymore the second one. What's the bottom line? You see that once it's at that point that's the equivalent thereof to being you're telling me that the reason it said is I'll do the safer the whole safer to me is one big I'm don't know why you need to tell me the whole safe in the first place to tell me that why is consider I know that from the is a good follower you'll tell is telling me maybe that is considered a when it comes to a human but our Mishna still needs to tell me that is considered a laid as relates to so I need the and I'm telling you the and the reason I would need to know this by and by is because the could be I can't learn from the impra and the reason is because there's no praise there by bemo So it seems that a behemoth doesn't have the same as a woman. So when a behemoth is delivering a child as soon as it's because there's no prior so the is already going to be exposed and therefore it's considered that it would be considered late. But a mother being that she has a prior and therefore the whole is not as exposed. So therefore in the event that it was only it's not considered so and therefore it's not. So you can't necessarily learn from. So therefore I needed the despite the fact I have the Mishna over here in what about in the reverse and additionally I need the inven because the of a person is moreash than the of a obviously the is moreash. So obviously the parts of pim of the of is moreash. So says if you're going to tell me that what that theor of this mission is the and I what do I need the for don't I know from the no I know it but I need to know by as well and I can't learn from I can't learn from but the problem is I have another Mishna that says that once it's considered a even by and that Mishna you don't have to go so far for that Mishna is right here says in the event that a behemoth delivered the amniotic sack. So a little bit of the shillia, right, that's where the baby is, exited the gulf of the beh. And the reason is because we're concerned that maybe there was a part of the animal in the that once it emerges considered a we don't know what's there, but we're concerned that maybe there was something there. And as a result, therefore, you're not. Now, what part are you concerned might have been there? It's the that's what's over there. That means because there's a maybe the was in the so therefore there might have been a once there's a this whole thing is not going to be okay. The reason that we're concerned about this is because just like when a woman delivers a shill we assume there's always a little bit of the baby there. So too when a animal delivers we can we assume the same thing. What's the bottom line? You see mur that even by is considered what is considered a radio. So why do I need to say of ourish now the is going to be very wordy? The is going to recap the and then we'll do it like if you're going to tell me when it said was so I understand why we have the I know from the I know at the very least from the later. So why are you telling it to me again over here? But if you're going to tell me that is being mentioned and I don't really need the well if that's the case for the love is only and I know it already from what do I need it for in the first place? This was very long-winded. Let's just recap this again. Rav said that the says what it means is that the itself is but as it relates to the itself the is going to be awesome as the obvious said if that's the case then why did the mission say if you hold not like the reason Mishna said was because means not only is the mut but it means the yat is also and the yat is only mut it's if it's out of bounds it's going to be but if you're going to tell me that means only because the and is anyways going to be so the said the said that there would be a little bit of maybe the is that you really didn't have to say because as relates to the and that's the only thing that's but the reason we mentioned is because in the we wanted to say the we wanted say so in the ratio we're also mentioning what's the reason we wanted to say because the says is considered a it's very important to know that that's true but the is is that the whole is extra every part of the isra is these are all things we know already from elsewhere first the second but at the end of the day we know it already so you can't tell me you're telling me because the whole is so again now we're back to where we were with the kash But now we could ask it a little bit like does that if you hold so I know why the because it's to know that not only even the and by the way once I said I'll tell you the whole because I'm contrasting the and the of the but according to Rav with Allah is the anyway is going to be even if the is going to be so the only thing in the is the and as it relates to the makes no difference there's no in so if that's the case the of the is so what are you going to tell me you mentioned that the only time the makes sense is if it's but the safe itself doesn't have a a mock really so I don't need a clear in the ratio I don't need in the immortal words of the if that's the case that doesn't make any sense why you mention in the first place says why says no the reason it said why do I need says we're gonna something said right just in basic signon of the if the gor would say that means was addressing this point means we'reing to we have said something somewhere else something similar to this and we're going to that thing that said to this point what did say somewhere else he said it's here where this is going to be is so what's the defines what the is The mak is the area that's flush with the base. So it's mish the point of where the animal leaves the g of the mother. It's not outside and it's not inside. It's mish the it's the gran that's exactly what it is. That area of the mak whether or not that would be mut or that would be user would depend. This is all in the world of Rav. Whether or not the animal left the hand outside or brought the hand back inside again as it relates to the animal itself even if it was as it relates to the even though it was. So the for sure is going to be the hand is for sure going to be you know where if it was if it was that area of the if the animal was if the remained outside then the is going to be the yad's going to be a yad's going to be awesome even if you bring it back inside but not only is the yad going to be but the kak is also going to be considered a if however The Uber brought its hand back inside although the hand itself is going to remain author but the is already going to be and that's what the mission is saying even the that's what you need it for meaning but even is with regards to the everything is going to be off but you want to know not the right what's the right what would be the logic behind it why does that area that's flush whether it was even though holds that once it's or even if it's going to remainer based on the trade for that it's going to be forever but rack acknowledges that in the event that it was right it remained outside it's even more so so to speak meaning if the keeps his hand outside at the time of the so then the is almost for two reasons it's because it's and it's also going to be because at the end of the day it was out of bounds even of that even to the fact that it's going to be if you brought it back in that is only one reason it's going to be awes is is that any that area is not considered to have been the reason it's not considered to have been because it's still it's on the grain I mean that it's literally on the go so we don't view it as being but at the same time as it relates to Having the as it relates to having the of beahma as it relates to that that already is considered to be a little bit too outside. It's exposed a little bit. So it's not considered. So here's the point. If at the time of the there was a animal that was physically outside and that's considered out of bounds. So if we're reckoning now with there being uh an animal outside, so not only the entire yacht, but whatever was by that mak that also has to be taken out because that's also considered to have been outside. If however there was no part of the animal that was outside at the time of the so animals inside this is all nvas had been a over here something was only that was literally that area that was by the is not considered to have been. So with the is that it's not so whatever is by the by the is also not considered to have been therefore the is going to be if however it's inside and the only reason we're ding the is based on the only reason we're ding the is based on the fact that it was once outside so what part of it was outside not the again the is not so to the extent there's a that's not that whatever was in that area is also not. So if it was the is going to be if however it's then already the is going to be because then the whole is because of the fact that it was because it was outside the area was never considered to have been outside the but the bottom line is just we're learn how you can learn the according What the is saying is everything is not considered and even the yacht itself that the behemoth was is also because even though had it been outside at the time of the would have been a problem but the came back in and because it came back in so there's no reason now for us to view this as being a a problem. Why did the Mishna say the it said it only with regards to the yad as it relates to the you didn't have to tell me it was the yad was never considered a rel of course was going to be it was ne the second that the is because if the yad was outside it would have been a now that the is inside now it's going to be that's one to learn the who has a name on the great the other had to learn the is according to when the says What it's referring to is only the not the is going to be and it's going to be if that's the case. So why did it say why you mentioned to tell me that the it's even to tell me the ad's going to be it's the means that not only is the but the is also going to be because if it was then the would have been considered part of the and just like the is that part of the that was by the would have been as well. Why did it say in the That's all. It was all mentioned. Either way, we spent a lot of time on this first uh cash on. The next two are going to go a little bit quicker because as we'll see, it's going to end up with the same exact punch line. Again, we did it a little wordier. Round one like this. The next two times will be a little bit more says I'll ask you another and this is from a which as we'll see very much mirrors the Mishna not the Mishna wordier than the Mishna not surprising but very much mirroring the Mishna mash be that was mash again it was the shash and the behem is literally delivering its baby in the event that the stretched out its hand right the beginning of our mission and afterwards the it's going to be now what's obviously what the discussion is going to be but for now it's the first part of the what would be if the mother and afterwards was what does that mean afterwards it was meaning at the time of the hand remained outside what's again that's something that the is going to discuss what would be if it was the And then the went oh the hand is out. LET HIM CHOP THE hand off. And then afterwards he the mother is that what is outside meaning the that was just chopped off is going to be Tommy. actually says it's the tomb of we view it as being that it's going to be even if you do a proper later but whatever's inside is going to remain and you're going to be able to eat it what would be if the animal was the mother and then afterwards he went ahead and heeded the so the is I'm sorry and then afterwards he went ahead and he chopped off the hand so the is the bus the rest of the mother is considered it's considered that it's touching now and as a result it's going to be right because the we know is we look at it not as if it's touching we look as if it's touching It's going to be okay. Bottom line is four different all related somewhat to the of the day. What we need is the very very first part of this. Again, the first part of the BRA, the first two cases sounds very much like the beginning of the Mishna. Meaning the was outside at the time of the says the what was the first part of the it says what's doesn't it probably mean the it was so now it's going to be motor cash this is it boom this is the cash says same ter that we said when we asked identical cash from the it doesn't mean the yad what it means do how you going to get out of this and the hand remained outside at the time of the so is even if afterwards you put the hand inside you're a day late and a dollar short you did the already at that point we now the if when we say in the first case we mean the we say in the second case we have to mean the as well if that's the case why in the world is iter there's no No one in the world that holds that if the hand was outside and you shed the mother that whatever's inside is going to be. Of course, what's inside is going to be mut. What's inside is always going to be m the sh is the yad itself that's already a so it says it's mak from the second case of the bry that when the first case of the bra said m what it meant was it means that the hand itself is mut. Well, if that's the case this is a bombashan ra. So again this price is a little wordier than the Mishna is it has that extra case that second case. So when the Mishna said means the it's not that what is referring to is the but when the Bryson said the same thing in its language it has to mean the you know why because there's another case there's a a contrasting case that can't be because for sure always going to be mut so it's referring to the you see that the is even though it was the why because it It's awesome. Say everyone agrees to that. But means you don't this is I have an eight. You know what is I'm going to do something said. Hopefully this sounds familiar. You want to know what this Bryce is talking about? It's a little bit of a but I could always tell you that this says it's not referring to the because the is always it's not referring to the you know why the is always you know what it's referring to that for that one little spot the that's what's going on over here and what the Bryson essentially saying is that if it was so even though The yad remains a ser but the kak now is going to be m because again only the yad was bas but the kak the we mentioned earlier was never bas if however it was so now the reason the is not only because it was bas because it wasn't the kak is also not considered to have been for that reason this is going to be says the one more kasha [ __ ] when he brought a along with him. And this bryson is on the P that we mentioned in the introduction to the one of the that was through the latter part of we have to read the P. It says now the was making a little bit of a dick. It says and then it says means one and means two hovves. That's what's going on over here. So it says the par if the par one par was sounds like returned you could eat. If two proates were returned now heard this Bryson was trying to make sense of this what does this even mean my laugh doesn't it probably mean as follows right doesn't it probably mean and the way Rashi explains this is that in the event that the wasle notice no rema but then again that's not so true why because the to the of the of the mother working for the child is from this PK. This is the same pos that says behav as much as the Gmorra's initial stab at making sense of this is very much from left field but really it's not cuz this is the mar to be but maybe the case is false where the animal that was mashle the uber goes and was my two process and what the rice is saying is paraso in the event that one of the processes came back you could eat that one paraso paras if both paras came back you'd be able to eat the both parces because any part of the Uber that was outside at the time of the is out of bounds but as long as it came back it's going to be okay if that's because it's always going to be the always once it goes out of bounds it's always going to be out of bounds again says my love doesn't mean which would mean that if it was process process isn't that what's going on but says what it means is para in the event that the para came back in then you're allowed to eat the says you don't have to be in order to eat right this is one of the column of the d that you're always eat and this is not this is where it's is the so you want to know where this is it's if it was then you could eat the if you were process you could eat the two but as it relates to the par itself that you would never be able to eat and as it relates to the itself that you would always be able to ask there was two over here that the Bryson made from the fact that it says and it says process and it sounds like both of them are meaning it's not just that there's a because here it says in the singular there it says in the plural the just from the way the price seems to understand it is there's a to be had from this to be had from process if the over here is that the is this somehow in between place where depending on whether it was or that's going to determine whether it's mut or whether it's going to be asser well if that's what's going on over here so you don't have to tell it to me twice you can tell to me once Cro my wouldn't it make sense one to tell me that the is and the other one to tell me that the entire a is motor now just to be clear once I know that the entire a is motor so that's any of the a that was by the kak is going to be motor don't make any sense the whole a is motor once it comes back in so you have now but true but I need to know it twice in order to know that because I only had one druss I would have thought it means the mat tell me a second time to know it's not only the it's going to be the as well. But the bottom line's from the fact that it says it twice. Shouldn't that be a says one is coming to teach me and the second time is coming to teach me a completely different it's not completely different but a different and that is what happens if a par gives birth to a baby that doesn't have split hooves and it's that if a par gives birth to an animal that is a that doesn't have it's going to on this. The only time that's true is if it actually delivers this baby and there's a par that gave gives birth to be a baby that looks like a horse or something. It's going to be but let's say it didn't deliver it. it would still be and you the mother meaning just like there's a that the mother could be the baby even though the baby never had a proper there's another that even if it's a non-cooser animal in the womb of the kosher animal how could you have it doesn't make any sense if your mother's kosher doesn't that mean you're kosher not according to shim because according to shim there's an idea of a kara that's actually going to be awesome but to the extent it was a on the mother then already it's going to be okay and that's what these to Allah are coming to teach me. There's the mention of paraso and there's the mention of proce working backwards is coming to teach me the mo and paras is coming to teach me that in the event that there was a paro it's going to be okay speaks out the is related to right were you were you not what does this have to do with says nothing The hak the racial you would have to say it's lavka again some poetic symmetry in this her by one para by two paraces but the word is going to be the bottom line is it was regarding this last and third kasha that said his which we su two additional times so we had it three times in total and we got out of three jams in the world of rah to try to make sense of how he would be able to reconcile the mishna and how we would be able to reconcile all the prices. What's the bottom line? The bottom line is this concludes 90% of the said means the is going to be means. But as it relates to the hand itself, it's going to be why is it going to be? because it says in the meaning I know it says but there's another and it's based on that other it's going to be in fact if somebody eats from it he'll be over that says the second it means not only the not only the but the itself that was is also going to behud told now why would be the one that's talking to except if you remember the names how did the start was the one that said is the one that's saying you have a both talking so who has the messiah from turns to who has the messiah from right it's not random he's the that had said over the original like if it was Ra themselves talking you would understand why Rav's talking to to right not sure because the was also the he was the one that said over the name he's talking to saying of the name but anyway turns to and he told him also that the itself is going to be so told after the rabbish I wish somebody would give me from the offer of the caver of Raven. I would put it in my eyes because of some school to roll in the dust of Raven. But but stating that as it relates to this I apologize I can't accept because anything and everything was included everything was included. Anything that has a was included in both of us when the isate by the that leaves its what's the eat and if it returns the is you're not allowed to eat it. So I learn from there that depart it's only true by the as it relates to everything else once it comes back it's going to be so said he knew about he knew about this this is a concept it's going to happen in the was well aware of that law at the same time he didn't think it was a toy and the reason is because as much as there's that if something's it's a problem but once it comes back it always undoes it. The only time it doesn't undo it is by the katas by kin. And the reason is because they're the first now where this is in the first part of parish right the last several weeks were the second part of parish but this is the first part of that talks about the day that passed away and one of the things that happened was is that there were certain that were brought and took the buser of the and he burnt it and he wasn't and the was and has a whole chocolate he said was something wrong with this animal what was Dam did it leave right he had a whole bunch of possibilities was it was but did it leave the is that what's going on over there and we see from there had it left the you brought it back in that already would have been a problem but it stopped with such a concept but as it relates to anything else over there already not so again is aware of the reason he's because he holds that once it's at that point so it's yeah but if it's then it's going to Okay. You find that when it comes to if they leave their which is if they come back in it's going to be I would have thought so I would have thought that so too as it relates to this it would be the same way it says what's the limit of said like a like we mentioned mentioned earlier just like the once becomes a Bryce is talking about and it's that it's not like it's not like where if it leaves it can come back in. No, once it leaves at that point that's the whole point of it's always going to be. But what do you see from here? You see that once it leaves it always left. you can never come back in and as a result it's going to be awesome. This is a riot and it's a and in fact the says why isn't it maybe said it's if it was not don't checkmate because maybe somebody misqued him I don't know but it's not just one last we just mentioned in this that if they left and they come back in it's going to be okay. So you would have thought would be the same way where do you have this? How do you know that if my leaves and it comes back in leaves and comes back in? How do you know it's so we have a over here that mentions that left is that you're not let to eat it and it says that extra emphasis if it remains you're not let it at that point it's going to be that was the basis of that previous price the bottom line in today's is the introduction to this whole idea of is not considered a is considered a even if it stays outside is not considered even if it comes back in is considered a what about as it relates to the yacht itself if the yad was outside at the time of the even though it's not considered everybody's agrees that it's going to be a problem there's no question in the world that is going to be an issue the big was what would be if it came back in. If it was according to it's going to be it was but now it's not anymore. So it's going to be okay. According to there's a new and by the way just like even if it comes back in snow too as it relates to this that was going to be a problem even if it comes back in seemed to be aware of this but he held that it's only true if it remained outside once it comes back in at that point the only time there's an idea that something is and then it was it remains a problem But as it relates to everything else at that point, not one other thing that the said was that even though holds that the was going to be but there's an if the was outside or inside even regarding the as it relates to the and that is the that was flush to the the was outside that's considered part of the if the ad was inside well at that point it's not considered part of the in as much as the yat itself is going to be a problem but that area that was connected the mak that area is going to be m so as it relates to raid just one foundational marim which is really more kimik but very very very much related to the first staff over here so the of is a that two months plus into school. We're all very familiar with this is the Pik that teaches us the to these are the ideas that underpin the to the of is that of but in today's we saw another completely unrelated to that learned from this as well and that is that at that point it's going to be and we saw really two very distinct applications to this one is in the makasha the other is in the world of kachch as it relates to makasha there's aesh that's learned out from the latter part of that if you the mother that has an inside the of the mother is going to work for the as well stating that being that the of the mother is the for the because as long as it's there at the time of the mother it's going to be there's a concept that if the was going to be why because it left it and ONCE IT LEAVES IT at that point it's going to be asser another application for this is baser kachcham baser kacham has a mita has to be eaten but it has to be eaten has it was themed that once leaves it at that point there's this love in the of the means that that's a eight traers 18 tra 70 all the numbers of is going to be but there's another that really has nothing to do with and that is that has a at that point why is it together with a very important part of this that's once a always a so as it relates to something that left its once It leaves the it's as if it always left the This is left becomes and it's something that you're never allowed to eat. And even if it came back in, you're still not allowed to eat it. And if somebody eats a gonna get malt, says the how do I know that because the says once leaves it, it becomes like we explained already. So the ram is the of the most in the world and the ra's telling me about which IS LIKE THE MOST BASIC IN HE SAYS YOU WANT to know why baser of whether it be that goes outside of it even if it comes it's going to be IT'S what does it say over there you know what it says because so based on that is that's going TO BE TRUE IN AS WELL. WHAT'S the mart is today's if you want to know the take a look at these are the to this truth is if you think about this for a second it's a it sounds like it's a right is somehow related to right does that ring a bell from could be not right so uh what's over there So let's think a step backwards. What's the shy? Right? Somebody asked what's the you're going to say a little bit before you say that the p to the is a it's a believe it or not that's because these are the but this really is the Mishna says outside says the I understand why if a carbon becomes to or the carbon would become it would require how do I know that this Mishna it's the carpet But it's really all that requires. So the says it's learned from the following. This is in the beginning of parish. the POS that we mentioned earlier. And explains the whole turn and he said, "Why didn't you eat this? Did it have the laugh? Maybe it's because it was maybe the D left and because it left that's the problem. It says what do you see from this? Had it left or had it been it would have been about. So the verses you want to know the makar that is something called the is the beginning of the beginning of parish meaning in other words the basic elementary answer to the what's the ised out from by the way take a look what the is in terms of that happens to be but it's learned out from this in this talked away stating that it's and brings it in that there's another and this is it's learned out from in other words there's two there's a there's a from the par of the in the beginning of and then also from just to say this a drop better carries with it a malcus it's a just like if someone eats a tree he gets malus if somebody would eat that was in this instance he would get malus as well fact the ra says that ra says So it's clear it's a lot really without if somebody would eat from a based on the he would also get malus because it's a general that if somebody eats he also gets malus so really there's two that are almost telling me the same thing I have and then I have which is the par of but both tell me the same concept and that is that leaves it is that it's and if somebody's going to eat from it he's even going to get malus just to bring out the point if you take a look theor says what would be if the and it was right it was jumping around his mom it's breathing its last breath and it was when it came back is it's going to be possible says over here which for a lot of people that learn kachum this is an introduction right because you do if you learn kachchum you start second regardless of It's being learned first. This is the second you're learning already introduce them. We want to KNOW WHAT THE IS this over here you have these two to this concept of the stating that morag the brisker of in his first piece and safer on the husb says that as much as it's mour from the sug and starts with this rash gave us these two right here. But at the same time, the two that we have over here is done what exactly the from where we learned from the between from that we learned that there's a kachums called y meaning we know there's a whole regime of kachums you learn kachum your lina and the piggle and all the different that you have. So you just learn to give you know about that. So, so all the different these are all but that's not a when he brings he says SENDS YOU OUTSIDE THE BOUNDS OF HE SAYS THIS IS VERY MUCH it's and the clearly SAYS THAT IT'S TRUE BY JUST LIKE IT'S true that these two that we have over HERE whereas is like from and if that if it has its and it goes you wouldn't be allowed to eat it. So why because it's and that you should have the same but agrees that as it relates to that's and that follows the as it relates TO THIS IS VERY MUCH NOT THIS IS VERY much it's the first that said you have to see when you go through this in the which is just as obvious and that is as it relates to the so that's true for the it's true for the it's true for the right that's the big but on the fats that went on the dam if it was subject this says the It's posh. That's only true by like the where the says this is a in that has a in the event that it goes outside of the so the is true for etc. But as it relates to the that's and that's something that's going to be true only with regards to the it's not going to be true for anything else said that it's this is the which at first glance is a little bit of a we're not going to go through the whole but just the if a would eat from an before This is one of those fun outside she would get five malus ate it was an it was before this outside five times is not allowed to eat an oil no one's allowed to eat you're not eat and if it was outside then you get two malus number one because it was outside of the kach had to eaten in a and you get another malus because it was eaten outside and you get five and the asks if it's five you're saying good say better maybe it's more than five one of the kashes is what about that's why you get malus and for me you know when you get malus for that's only true if you were allowed to eat it inside the azara Now if I ate it out of the I'm going to get malus but over here it's an so therefore it's not going to be a what was the in the thought that if there's not let it go outside of now you ate it the is that and it's when there's a and IT LEAVES THOSE HAS NO there's no bias in proverbally speaking when it comes to has no because it's but that's the second between the general that everybody knows about that comes from versus this and that is number one one is The other one is number two. Number two, one is true for all of the because the of it is that something with that leaves the of is now the other is a whole different something that has a if it leaves that it's going to be a problem. Well, if that's the case, it's only true by buser and even then only buser kachum that has and that's why the said doesn't make sense be subject at all says the girl this is the second part of the piece I want to say there's a also in parad it's on the over Claris what would be the if you had a who sat down to eat the carbon p and now the ber of the carbon p left the or left the bias where the is would it be absolut it's a whole very very every single person ever that sat down to learn this learned that the ising we know that there's when it comes to kachen ki has to be within this. If it's outside must be if it leaves it's going to be the what about the with a concept that it has to be eaten has to be eaten. So if it leaves the bay, if it leaves the maybe it should be as well says the is a very big because of where the area that it's being from is notes than the area that it's going to is more than and is more than you're in this mim of kadusha where you're supposed to eat it. If it WAS IT'S THE BIAS DOESN'T HAVE more than outside the bias. This whole of the should when it comes to the carbon is said to that when the declared over here that it could be when it comes to THE ironically the didn't mean to what the meant was because once the says that the has to be eaten with it has to be eaten within a certain area. SO IT'S LIKE FROM it's like any type of that has it's not it's if you take a look at the when the brings the general so we read the says number one it becomes forever because it says if you take a look at and this is in my in their didn't say his it's only it's LIKE THEIR DOESN'T EVEN TALK OVER SAYS THE that's not is it's comes from the and if that's the case if that's the case We're to the fact that there's an there's also a but like the intuition of the there really is no leaves but to say this where DO YOU FIND SUCH A GOOD THAT'S the over The ra doesn't even say ple. Does that mean it's not ple? I'm not sure how far means it. But the bottom line is the ramen didn't say could be the just means it's maybe from the I'm not sure but the bottom line is is that the ra was because when it comes to regular that was it's based on as opposed to when it comes to the carbon that's it's coming over here and if that's the CASE WHAT IT IS THAT'S why all the ra is that it's the said they have one more one more is not actually the it's in paricut he lists all the types of aas for which you get malus right so we know there's rain and there's uh shar lavven within the shal The Rama makes a count. He says there's 207 times you can get Malcus. If you remember, we once spoke at Ra from but there's 207 times that you get Malus. And the realm goes all 207 times that you get Malcus. Number 75. If someone is if somebody would eat from the bus of a carbon outside of the says you would get malusk brings from the on I think that's the but the brings from the on that he asks that if you go through the entire the does not mention anywhere if somebody eats a kas that was an that was aim that The only one of the that the Ram brings you would get malus for is referring to the carbon and it's a PLEAD SAID WHY WOULD THE RAM only mention carbon pes now the ra is like he did in carbon based on his mas of the p that if somebody eats from a carbon pes that left it some gonna get malus but here the raam counting all the times to get malus. So the Rama wanted a snake you get for eating of a carbon that was say why would he only bring the carbon that's the most obscure abstract example of this should have brought the any carbon that leaves it said the brisk I'm going to tell you the reason is because if you look earlier number 54 in one category any single time you have that's ple that's the ra counts that as what in the ra's of 207 Seven really count as what? If that's the case, that's push that any of that was included in number 54. It's included in so the Rama didn't have to mention THEM SEPARATELY JUST LIKE HE DIDN'T mention any separately. But there's one said that's not you know what that is. It's the carbon like it's because it's not it's not coming. IT'S NOT if that's not included in that needs its own number. That's number 75. And you want to know what the Marta that is? It's so again is there's no question in the world it has a and that is from the beginning but at the same time there's a thinking component as well to that is the first over here in perma two grace and between these two rashi brings both of them. By the way, the rub is in that rash. But two both of these are brought down and that but two one is a other one is true for all etc. The other one is only with regards to because it's all rooted in the second half of this brisk is that it's that with leaves that was only it's only the second that brings in the two one in per and the other one in Sanra