Chulin 61

Today's daf is and we are at the two dots 22 lines from the bottom of so the beginning of today's daf is going to mirror yesterday's daf yesterday's daf began with one line related to the sugy dour it was regarding the keresh that has one horn the bry said that even though The simmon of a kaya, one of them anyways is carim. The keresh that doesn't have carim only has karin is considered of the keresh is going to be and from there the digressed and told us different initially related to the keresh but ultimately digression and digression from the digression. The gumar then in the course of the d came up for breath again for a second mentioned something that was related to the suga that we're learning did another digression today's do's going to begin on that same note we're going to have literally one line that is related to what it is we're discussing and then as you can see just from looking at the gar from here until the bottom of is going to be more said says in the PK. So we know that in order for an animal to be kosher, it has to have the two of a kosher animal. It has to be maligerero and it has to be mafrice para. The pic says that in the event that you have an animal that's not maligerero, it's not maf para. And then it throws in the word hashesa. So what does mean? So usually is thought of as an adjective that's describing the it's actually a creature. So and by the way next words in the so it's but the shua like the is an animal. What is unique about this animal? It has two backs. And it has two spines and that is this very unique creature that the terror is describing when it mentions said continuing along. He said, "Was Mabenu a kenigi? Was he a hunter? Was he a ballister? Was he a archer? Was he a sniper? How did he even know that this animal existed?" Said, "This is a chuva." For those that claim because from the fact that you see that was aware of such a creature must be he wasabi because based on what he did for a living based on his profession there would be no way in the world for him to have known that this even existed because was he a kiggi? Was he a bistri? If he was a kiggi or that's how he knew about it butu clearly wasn't. So if he made it up he could not have known this. said and he turns to and he tells him. So it seems that Baravina was a Murad. He was involved in Dyagod and he used to keep writings like an Yakov almost of different uh tells him take down these two words. These are two good words, right? So if you're a a speaker or a writer, sometimes you want to be able to pull a fancy word out of your pocket. So he said this is a a good one. Put an asterisk next to these. Kiggy and blistery are going to sound gishmaka. And by the way, when you use the words, just make sure you explain them because no one's going to know what you're talking about otherwise. But either way, this is little postcript to this memor says the one. So the digression, right, you always have to follow the paper trail when it comes to the digression is going to be based on that last line. Oh, we mentioned that. Let me tell you something else. Plus, I can say Yeshua that says, it's talking about the five officers of the prefaces by saying, "Oh, we're going to present to you now five." And then if you do the math, it's easy math. That's three. That's six. So said the ones were only five. So there was six but only five of them were ari. And when he heard the word, he did what he did in the previous gamar. He turns. That's a very good word. I think you should write that word down. But just again, make sure you explain it because if you're going to use the word, people might nod their heads, but no one's going to have any idea what it is you're talking about that we just mentioned. Now, the why did we mention it? Because there was a steer in the Pik Rab used the word to explain and write down the word Aruni and explain it right. Why did we mention that? Oh, because in the previous related to we use the words and blister and wrote those two words down and explained it. But either way, we're digressing from a digression now. that you mention now this specifically we mention the says this is not like Rav said the came from meaning Rav answered the steering the on the one hand but then you do the math is really six the terret is not there are five Arkis and go write the word Aruni down the terret is there are five native pushim One of these groups came from ton. They came from somewhere else. Which group? It's the supports who holds that the a came from ton a right. It's a pretty straightforward. He says the continues and says why were they called a if anything they should be called right? They came from ton. So why they called a so the says first? when they left their place. So, uh they just left it and then ru came afterwards and they destroyed it and as a result them leaving caused their homeland to be completely destroyed because they had a ty to worship many different types of and the word is by the way would be with an alf not with an aim. But we're corrupting uh the language a little bit. So with an what do they have ava for? What do they have a desire for? They have desire for fear. And any person that would see them would be overcome with a shrek says you want to know why they were so scary. Now can't take this literally say all the but just the words of the because each one of these aim people had 16 rows of teeth. It's exactly what that means. I'm not sure I'm the and the and all the try to explain this, but the bottom line is is this is another shot of how you reconcile this apparent blatant contradiction within the Pik itself. It says and then when you count it there's six And what emerges is we have two term. The first terret says he said there were five ones. The six wasn't so the second iss but they didn't originally come from they originally came from ton. So it's five sne to the land. One is the greeners. They came from uh some far away place. They came from ton. So we mentioned the a which was our digression from our digression and now we're up to the next digression. There are many that are wow that literally to be burned standing that they're really goofy. So what does mean to say that if a person would look at the without proper he would say this there's no way this is there's no way that gave over this to there's no way that these are divine they seem to be so mundane and as a result they're something that can be burned but said don't make that mistake the huof There's no such thing. Every single thing that's mentioned in the isu and by the way that's posh that on the level every single word every single letter in the isu says that every single word in the but this is even says there's nothing that's mentioned in the that isn't critical. And then went and he gave several examples four to be exact. Here's the first it says in the so why are we mentioning this because of the right that's the segue from the previous so the says that a that were living in and their area that they lived extended all the way out to the continues and says and then the came and they wiped them out and they lived where the had previously lived and says this is an example of a that's why do we care why do we care that the a used to live there and then the came and they whacked them out is that in any way of significance yes it's actually critical to understanding the narrative of the this is a critical piece of information why because we know that Melik and Abra made a deal. What was their uh deal? They had this big peace treaty. They made up that nobody was going to fight with each other for uh four generations, right? So four generations, no one's going to start with each other who said we have a little bit of a problem because the didn't have to come and it seems there were nin and of melik that was still alive at the time. And if the Jews were going to come into and they were going to take over Gaza, right, that area where the push are living, well, we're going to have ourselves a little bit of an issue because then the yidden of descendants are going to violate the pact that they had made with Melik's descendants who said, "Here's my idea. Let the come let them take out the first who are the throw then they're gonna go. going to take away from the kafim. So yeah, the fact that the kafim defeated the avan before the Jews arrived is very important because if the aan were alive then there would be no way for the to take over the land and the reason is because they have an old deal right that's uh something that they already signed off on says I'm telling you is this not so this feels like a that's but at the end of the day this is something that's very very important rashi makes A very obvious observation actually a very long rashi which you don't usually find in the gummoras but rashi says that it's clear that didn't hold like rav in the previous garra and that is that the aim were not native because if the aim are not native pushnim then why is there a problem for the Jews to knock out the aim if they're not native pushim that means they're not descendants of aime they're not even of a melik So there should be no issue for them to go ahead and take them out. The terret says that it's mukl is held like in the previous kamar and that is that they were made of and therefore the yidd would not have been able to pick a fight with the that's why the says the first came they took out the yidden took out the kafim like this was okay says and this is the second example that gives and this is more famous this was last week's parl So who was he defeated says at first glance you would say who cares you know when you read about the wars and the life and times of you know chapter Roman numeral something you'll read a little bit about this war why is that significant why would this be in these that you would think were says I'll tell you why don't I told At the end of the gis we're told that allow to pick a fight with so pick a fight with how gonna make it through you're going to have to go through the land of let go let him conquer the land of so that now it's not the moabites that are living anymore would be able to go and they'd be able to take it away from and this is where papa famously said that the land of Am and the land of they were they became cleansed and washed. What does it mean that washed them cleansed them? He cleansed them made them conquerable by the Jews. Because had not taken over the land, the Jews cannot have taken over the land because you can't go straight to Amanoy. But once conquers the land, so now you're not picking a fight with Amanoy. Now you're picking a fight within is not off limits. As a result, a third example that gave of a that at first glance seems uh almost like why is it here? But really and this is a par. The PC says and the end of the P is so the is right that that's what the P is referring to and it says that and they lived on the banks of the and they each gave at first glance the mountain a different name. that referred to it as sir and referred to it as snear stating that is going to bring a brace that's going to tell us the rest of the story number one these names and were not made up names by the and by the respectively but these were old names in fact these are the names of existing mountains initi you know what this is teaching us that Each one of these nations went and they built their own crack. Rashi says they built it on the bottom of the slope of the mountain. So on Harmon they each built a little city. So let's see on one side on the side of the that they are on the mountain on the bottom of the slope they build a city and the is on the other side and they do the same thing and now they had to name their city al and the names that they gave their cities was names that had already existed these were names of Israel and what's the significance of this and that's really the lesson that this is coming to teach me. It's not superfluous. We want you to understand how much loved what it means even the have what they have and that's the point of this. So again it's not that they named the mountain the remained the maz but what they named was the cities that they had created on the bottom of the slopes of the and they named it after mountains and what's the lesson here's the fourth example this example takes us to something that we learned together that these are few tucked away in parishes where the puss says that yafadic when he's uh you know being boss of Egypt. So one of the things he does is he starts transplanting everybody, right? Is so if you lived in this zip code, now you can live on that zip code. You lived on the east coast, now you're living on the west coast. You lived in the north, now we're going to put you in the south. Everybody gets thrown around. And if you remember says why did this? It's this that we're about to learn. Number one, why do it? And even more importantly, why are you telling me this? Why is this important for me to know? So the says we're trying to bring out the sensitivity that had to his brothers which is a because let's be honest right and was incredibly sensitive to the feelings of his brothers and what was the sensitivity he knew his brothers were going to come and they were going to feel like strangers because they're foreigners and you know it's not sometimes to be a stranger so what does do he makes everybody move it's like this everybody feels say, "Oh, YOU'RE NEW TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. WOW, SO AM I." RIGHT? WHY AM I BRINGING you a brownie cake? You should bring me one. Right. We all literally just moved in this last weekend. So the brothers shouldn't feel like they're uh strangers. That's why goes, he mixes everybody up. It was a sensitivity classic. There are many that you would think are stating that and then went ahead and gave four examples. Why do I care that the went and took out the I'm going to tell you why. Because the not like Rob said in the previous are descendants from and the could have never taken me's descendants out because there was a pact the says theim took out the first are not descendants of that's why the Jews are able to take over Gaza otherwise this is not something that they would been able to do. The second example was like who cares why do I care that took over I'll tell you why because the other were told so went and took them out first and this is what meant when he said again another example of where this is so important the third example was that referred to the as referred to it as snear they didn't rename the mountain. They created cities on the foot of the respective mountain. One on one side, the other on the other side. And they named the cities after other. What's the message? And the last one was started mixing everybody up. Like why' he do that? Why did he transplant everybody that was living in Egypt? It was out of a sensitivity to his brothers to show the incredible of instead of taking revenge. Instead of being sensitive, he was sensitive to them. Right? That was the greatness of and that's the lim that we learn from there. I saw Rabu Margolas in he said what mean when he said harro it's a it's a harsh lion ru okay you're questioning why this pic is here you're even suggesting that whatever some form of but what does it mean so he says that it could be the is that there's a peris 16th paric And is that if there's a fire on Shabas he not let it go and be matzel things from the fire with the exception of very few things. One of the things that you're allowed to say is these you would have thought that if there was a fire on that maybe you have to let them burn that not considered they're included in the same maj like all the other have said that that is what meant when he said that. Yeah, you can let it burn. See the beginning of that's what's going on over here. Either way, as it relates to us, we now return to our regular program. It's a short that's going to go back to really the sug. We'll come back to it. Maybe we'll do it again tomorrow. I think we're going to try to milk, pun intended, on as long as we possibly can. But either way, so uh going back to the Mishna the Mishna which was began mentioned in the right. It's easy. However, as it relates to the there's no mention of an the mentions 24 that are doesn't say anything about like what the sim is what's the common denominator if there even is one of those 24 stating that says the but the rabbis came along and they gave sim in fact they gave four they said an that's in other words an that's not is a sim of a knife that has an extra finger that we spoke a little bit about. A knife that has a crop. We spoke a lot about that is able to be uh peeled. Tar is also tar. So although in the Tory itself we don't have the simony of an however the gave us four sim the told us that ano is a sim of an that has an is a sim of an that has a is a sim of and is also a sim of then the brings another sheet that is which is something that's going to be spoken about as well but the bottom line The Tory itself doesn't murish mention the of the came up with what exactly they believe are the of now the didn't make it up right the extrapolated it from the Torah somehow and the Gmor is going to begin really with the kasha and that is that to the extent that The extrapolated theirim from the terra that means the terra told it to you. So maybe the Torah didn't tell it to you in Bak. But obviously the Torah told it to didn't make it up, right? They don't have a license to do that. So it must come somewhere from the Tyra. So to the extent that it came somewhere from the didn't mention it. So that is the background of what the Gmorra is about to discuss. Is that true? to so the Tyra goes through the 24 and one of them that it mentions is the now there's a very uh well-known academic debate in terms of what exactly the Nesher is but the popular translation of the neer of course is the eagle right so we'll go with that we that the is mentioned as one of the 24 and we learn from there this is the bryer talking The eagle is unique that it doesn't have that extra. It doesn't have a zcor can't be peeled and it is a and it's so too anything that is such that it meets these four is going to be as well. So the is for doesn't have any of this doesn't have the it doesn't have this effect it's can't be peeled and it's a so too anything that's like the is going to be tong now the continues and the bry says the mentions as an example of an that's now what does the mention that the tyrin are t first of all the ty are one of two types the birds that allowed to go in the misbeh if you take a look at that it's the crop the can be peeled and it's not and it's going to be the bottom line is the bra says that let's take an example of and let's take an example of an and let's uh put them one against the other and let's see if we can come up with some pattern of what the Tyra is being sensitive to when it tells us what's tummy and what's tar. Well, I see four things that differentiate the tummy and the tar. The neer and the t respectively the neer doesn't have that spe. The nan doesn't have a zec the tyran does. The neer's cork is not nicl. The ter is cork is nic. And the is as opposed to the ish there you have it. These must be the four of relates to the is because it's for four and the are because they're four for four. By the way, what if you're one for four or two for four, three for four? You had a pretty good day if you're three for four, right? But let's say you're one for four or two for four, three for four. What's going to be then? So the is going to discuss it. This is the whole remainder of the but for now it's that the extrapolates from the examples of that there are of how could you tell me that of the mention but of I understand not mention in the but of course they're mentioned this is classic this is even more you just sit down and look at Look at the and you're going to figure out exactly what's going on. What the meant when it said that it's not mentioned in the it's all from the what the meant was as it relates to the even the right all you have to know is how words in the so if you know what mal is and then you know my par is so you have your simmon there's no liim you don't need your thumbs for this right you don't need kazal as opposed to here this already a little bit of a and as a result being that the peerish over here was something that required real difference that's all the Mishna meant so again when the Mishna started and said it sounded a little bit like the is rabbitic 100% in nature the that's not the case of course it comes from the but it requires periods from to understand and to come to it and that's all the Mishna meant when it said that but this is something that came from either way another that talks about and now we're going to start getting into what happens if an has one or two sim or three taught in a ra is one of the most famous authors quote unquote using that word loosely but one of the most famous authors of the bry an that has one sim meaning one sim of so it checks off one of the four boxes that uh make an so isra it's going to be and the reason is because it's not similar to the how so the last we said is for right the doesn't meet any of this and that's why But if you have an that has one of the of that would be enough. So if you go one for four, you're going to be that's what said in his and what was his makar he said very simple because what's to me the paradigm of the it's the 0 for four. Oh if you're one for four you're better than the minute you're better than the you're going to be taught. How do you know to learn from the nasha that only o for four is which means 1 for four two for four three for four is going to be maybe learn from the which is the paradigm of the you're going to be if you're four for four so as it relates to an that has a that went only one for four so maybe over there you're going to be zing can't be because if that's the is if you're going to tell me that if you go one for four, you're already going to be. So why would the Tyra have to mention all the that are where some of them have some of the sim of Tahra? It doesn't make sense why you would have to mention them. In other words, if you're going to tell me that the minute you have one simmon of Tyra, you're already so if you go through the list of all the that the Tyra mentions as being tame, even though some of them have one sim, two sim, three simon, the Tory has to tell you they're t because if the wouldn't tell you your t, you would think they're because they have some of the seim of the not like the and therefore I would have thought that kamashon these are unique that these are going to be if however you're going to tell me that the only time you're ever is if you do a so if you go through the list of the 24 that are mentioned well that list has a whole bunch of that don't meet the criteria none of those go four for FOUR SO WHY EVEN MENTION THEM if you're going to tell me the only time you is if you d to the that you go four for four well that whole list nobody goes four for four over there so why you even mentioning them It doesn't make any sense again if you're going to tell me that as long as you have one sim in your so therefore the mention the list of 24 all of which have some of to tell me that even though based on the rule of that they're going to be but if you're going to tell me that the only time you is that when you go four for four none of the things mentioned on the list go four for four why do you have to tell me that they're tot that the criteria is dash is 0 for four and it's anything that's better than4 is going to be I'm going to tell you 24 that are not of4 which means based on the rule of you would think that they should really bear and I'm letting you know that they're going to be either way this is the first part of this gamar. So again the gumar said as follows that in as much as the mishna said that the ofar and are not mentioned in the but at the same time it really comes from the mentions the as being the mentions as being and if you plot the you're going to see four things that uh they don't share in common and those go down as the four sim as relates to the ner has all four of of and the have all four the is the paradigm of the and the are the paradigm of the said what would be if you're not the nasher but you're not the so you're not the you don't have all four of you don't have zero sim of tyra you didn't go 0 for four but you're also not the you don't have all four of you also didn't go four for So what would be over there? So addressed it in the BRA said that as long as you go one for four at that point you're already going to be and the reason is cuz you're not at the end of the day as relates to is the basis from where this all uh emerges or is it the tyrant? It's the dash is 0 for4 in its tummy. If you're 0 for four, you're going to be Tommy. But if you're anything more than that, you're going to be taken should be. And we should say that, oh, it's all about what the tyran are. The tyran are four for four and it's tar. You better be four for four. But if even uh one time you missed, well, in that instance, you're uh going to be. So says, I hear based on just picking and choosing between the and the I have no real way of being. I can't tell you why I prefer the Malami to be the Nesher versus the Malami being the but I will tell you that it's way more reasonable to assume that we're coming from the Nash. You know why? Because the Tyra mentions 24 that are and if you go through the 24 one of them is the Nash. The Nash goes for Nasha doesn't have any simonym of Tyra but the other 23 all have simon of Tyra as we'll see. Some have more some have less. By the end of the we'll we'll have the breakdown. But for now all of them have some sim of Tyra. If you're going to tell me that an o that has one sim of tyra the should be then I understand why the would have to tell me it's but if you're going to tell me that we learned from that is you have to have all four of well none of those have all four of so why would the have to tell me that they're Tommy I know they're Tommy because they're not the tyrani must The general rule is and if you have one of that would be enough for you to be those 23 things even though they all have at the very least one of some have two some three but the point is that they are going to be asks another now this next kasha is a little bit tricky because it's going to feel a lot like the previous kasha that we just asked and it almost is why don't We learn from all those others that are mentioned in the Tyra as being tame despite the fact that despite the fact that they have some simmon of Tyra because we mentioned all other 23 with the exception of the Nasher have some simum of Tyra some one some two some three but why don't we learn from there that even if you have some simum of Tyra you could still be and therefore should be that the only time you're going to be is if you have all of the Tyra and it shouldn't be enough for you to have just the sum of the amount of this is very similar to the kasha of but it's not the same is learn it from the soar I'm not learning from the okay so you want to learn from the but learn it from the so not learn it from the that's the that's four for four so you have to go four for four but learn it from the that all have some sim of some go one for four two for four and three for four and which means we'll back in to the fact that the only time you could ever be is if you talk go for4 force again it's it's a very similar but it's not it's from the other that are and as we'll see it's going to be a little wordy now but the gar essentially is going to give the same terrors that it gave to me right what was the cash the I mean what was the ter of mit Right? That's essentially what the Gar is going to end up saying. But let's see an inside. Why don't we learn from all the other and we say why don't we say that just like over there there are many that have three of as a matter of fact is going to say of the 24 that are 20 of them have three of so why don't we say that just like many of them right it's 20 literally have three of the tyrants. So you're not let it says so too any that has even three it goes three for four it should be told me if you go two for four certainly if you only go one for four but the says ink if that's true if you're telling me that if you go three for four is that you're going to be because you're not four for four because uh right you didn't check off all four boxes well if that's the case so why do have to tell me the is an example of an that goes two for four has two sim of tyra and has two of what's the if you're going to tell me that we're knife has three of it if it only has two of then certainly you should not be allowed to eat it so you can't tell me that three for four is because if three for four is then two for four is certainly going to be tom so why says why do we say okay you're right you can't learn from the 20 that are three for four and that three for four is generally with the exception of the 20 that says it's because then why would say okay at the very least if you're only two for four you only have two of you should be if that's the case so the paris and the are two of those 24 the other two and the all go one for four so they have one sim of if you're going to tell me that two for four is certainly one for four is one for meaning one of so if you have two of you let it certainly if you have one you shouldn't be able but at the very least parisnia let's learn from Paris Parisia is one for four and it's so maybe if you have one sim of tyra you should be which is not like what said one sim is why do we learn from the paris that one sim is going If that's the case, why if it has one if it has zero it's has to be that the paradigm is the can't have less than zero and it's when you have zero that is but if you have one sim of certainly if you have two certainly only have three and certainly Ben certainly if you have four then is it's going to be in other words what the is saying is the only way to make sense of why the would give me this list of 24 some of which have one sim of Tyra two three is if the is that once you have one simmon of tyra at that point you're allowed to eat it therefore has to single out certain that have that one simmon or the two or the three right 20 of them even have three and tell me that despite the fact that they have a feel they are going to be tummy because if you're going to tell me that the only time you're allowed to eat it is when it has all four sim then this whole list really doesn't make any sense. Now the truth is is a ty over here. We're not going to go into this. This gamar is tricky enough without tus. But there is that's posit the would have to tell me the nasher. The reason it's pos would have to tell me the nasher is because it's only through the nasher that I knew what the simal tyra was. Right? Had I known what the simal tyra was cuz t told me the nasher and the told me the tyran and I plotted one against the other and I said hm interesting. Let's make some observations. Right? I see this this is cork is nicl. This is not nicl. This is dusk. This is not dusk. This has a crop. this doesn't have a crop. I was able to back in and figure out the but at the end of the day why do I need to know about all those other birds that they're I know they're because they all are not like the el the paradigm is not the it's the is for doesn't have any of one or two or three is it's going to be the now is just going to one little so the said that venigma right why don't we learn from the paris and that go one for four and the says they're they have one of the so let's learn from there that anything that only has one sim at the very least should be uh two for four three for four that we that's going to be taught but if you only have one sim of tyra why don't we learn from there that you're going to be so said if one simmon is enough to make you a ready to so Then the so why would the have to tell me says the only reason we don't learn from the paris that one for four one of is really is because I would have thought you shall learn it from the paris why don't we say that the We know the rule. The rule is that Terry tells you something once, you can learn from it. Terry tells me something twice, you can learn from it. And the reason is because if you're able to learn from the fact that the T told me is why he tells me twice, the second one should be learned from the first. So from the fact tells me something twice, that's a that I can learn from it. This is what's known for what was the mean to learn from the Paris and does I need to tell me that you can't I can't learn from the Parisia because the Paris and the Paris is to or only Tommy that does so I would say oh the Paris has one sim of Tyra it's Tom has one simmon say there but if the Torah tells it to me twice but I can't learn from it because if one simmon of Tyra is not enough and that's really uh to well if that's the case then why do you have to tell it to me twice tell to me once and I'll know the second time I'll tell you why although the parisia each have one sim of they don't have the same sim that they don't have the same sim that's why had to tell me had to tell me that this sim of tyro is not enough for it to bear and that simmon of tyro is not if it was the same sim of tyro you'd be right about this not says How's that possible? There are 24 that are Tommy and they all have some with the exception of the you going to tell me that the Paris and are somehow unique that one of them has right at least one of them has a sim of Tyra that nothing else has and as a result it's not a it's impossible it's inevitable for sure this soar says let me explain this is the of two lines ago there 24 and therefore of three of them are by all what does that mean by all it's not literally by all thear explains of the 24 20 of them have three simony of tyro and it's not just three, the same three. The has two of those three and as it relates to the Paris and they each have one. So again, there's 24 20 of them have three of the same three sim of Tyra. The has two sem of Tyra. The two sim that it has is two of the three that we said 20 of the have then you have the paris and each has one but here's the as it relates to the one of the parisia we don't know which is which maybe we have to look for this but this is but as it relates to the one of them the paris has the other one has the le and the the one that one has the other one doesn't have and the one the other doesn't. But here's the kadesh. I don't know if it's the Paris and I don't know if it's the but one of them has the sim of Tyra and nothing else has. It's not one of the three that 20 of the have or one of the two that the has or even one of the one that the other one has right the other one. So as it relates to one of them has one of the sim of the that nothing else has says oh if you have one of the that has a sim of ty that nothing else has and the telling me that what that is I would have thought and what are you going to tell me that would be true if it's the same sim of tyra that the told me twice is still not enough it's going to be but I mean that it's different sim it's not So therefore had no choice has zero. But if you would find a bird that has one, you would be allowed to eat it. Bottom line is that's how I know to learn from the when you go through the weeds of this certainly holding the right. I think the one of the reasons this is a little bit tricky is because you're juggling of and you have to remember the one two or three. Is it one tum one Tyra? Is it three Tyra? Three tum. So again, it's a little bit of a mind twister, but at the end of the day, what the is saying is very posh. What the is saying is the Nesher is the paradigm of the the are the paradigm of the the has zero simra. The has four tyra. The big debate here in the sug is should I learn from the that you're if you don't have any simra but if you have one you're already going to be or should I learn from the if I have four simra and I'm going to be the minute I don't have one and at the end of the day na from this na from that right we said learn it from the that have four simra learn it from 20 of the 24 that have three simra learn from the that has Simony Tyra learn from the Paris and does that each have one simra. But at the end of the day, the Gomorrah says it only makes sense if you learn from the nasher. Cuz if you learn from the only time you're if you have zero simra, but if you have one sim then I understand why the told me the other 23 are because they all have simra. Again, now we're more familiar with them. 20 of them have three simra. One of them has two simra. two of them have one simire but they all have simra as a result I would have thought that has to tell me that really they're going to be Tommy but if you're going to tell me that you're supposed to learn from the that the only time you is when you have four but if you don't have if you find the bird right now doesn't have all for it's automatically going to be so why is have to tell me that all these 23 other birds are of course they're because none of them have the money so that they're all going to be it's we're sort of backing into the fact that it has to be that the is the it's not the it's not the 20 that have three simra it's not the that has two simra and it's not the parisia that has one simra and that is how we know what taught us in the and that is any that has one sim of tyra is going to be one last why have to tell me Right. Tyran has four. So you're telling me that if you have three or two or one. So it's only the go four for four. You want to know why the told me the of the tell me that it's kosher for is not telling it to me cuz I need to know that it's kosher. I need to know that it's kosher on the level that if you wanted to put it on the misbehale. So as it relates to raid returning to not the beginning of today's but that is yesterday's daf going back to the yesterday's daf we spoke out to from and I think it's kadai and gishmak today to speak out another the two that we spoke about yesterday one was from parish is regarding me in the medish that says when they were born they were born they were 20 years old the second one was from that was the regarding the kipel and the incredible which was doubled down by the how a person chooses his fate before he comes down on uh this world. But today we'll speak at another and this is from as a matter of fact it's the second piece. So on the top of this says the says that on the third day of creation the land gave forth vegetation. When was that? Shabbat it happened on the third day of creation. Except the also says it says that after was born nothing had grown yet. And when was that bomali shaba that was already shabas kesh because was born on shabas says did the come out on Tuesday or did they come out on Friday says the we learn from the really the however they were they were literally by the door way of the until came he didn't farm them. What he did was and it started to rain and that's when everything started to grow and says this is the mahal when it comes to fact had a certain garden and he once planted and nothing was growing then he said one and boom everything grow BECAUSE THAT IS THE WAY parnosa comes you could do all the in the world but we learn from that at the end of the day when was the could be literally by the p of the kaka and what it's missing what it's lacking is that one feeler that's going to blow the entrance of the door open and like this all the hash are going to come the inac of course right here he says he says that begins when do we start staying in and it's says what we pass and that is on so on the last day of says when do we start saying it's said the classic said that we know is so ishua When the world was created, what month the world was created holds but is that you know what it means? You ready? You're sitting or you're standing. What it means is that was born on the first day of and that's why it was the first day of's existence. He was born on the first day of sukus. The is that holds that and what does it mean that was created on the first day of sukus that was the sixth day of creation and we know that the David was created that's when it rained for the first time how do you know that that's because even though the vegetation had already uh started to emerge on but it was sitting at the entrance way of the character So what WAS THE FIRST TIME SOMEBODY SAID what was the first time somebody said it was on the first day of and therefore says it's going to be on the first day of sukus. It's that which and his said means that was born on the first day of the first day of says. So therefore this would be the day for the year to start saying the same also holds It's from the first day of says that this brings that was born on the first day of sukus says we could have a little bit of fun says number one if you take a look at the pish from aim was one of the bales and there's a pish that we have from a on says preer pre ends with a yates ends with a sadic and ends with a rage in order is who the according to the mandama that holds that was an so we know it's a big and what exactly the fruit of the what was the forbidden fruit but there's a mandama that says that it was an says if that's the case it's so pre because what's the it's the and is what God to eat from the And you know what the Torah tells us to do? We should go ahead and we should bring an onus. Let the aster come and let the be on the astero this is what says the cause the original sin to eat from the what was the it was an asterk that's why is in the which is the aster and what's bring an to be on the now okay makes a lot of sense but Why you that when was born? He was born on the first day and we know on the first day of sukis. That's when other ate FROM THE SO TODAY WAS THE DAY THAT HE ATE FROM THE YOU'RE DOING THIS IS the day that he did it is on the day that other ate from the death it's brings another m the other is or like we mentioned the other day and this is also under it's in par that talk about One excerpt. The were told that they should celebrate the suk is seven days during the harvest season and they should take a not a interesting right. We find other relations called I mean technically is of course because that took place says very mysteriously that you want to know why we go ahead and we celebrate the and we take the shot mean what does the mean when he says So he says if you take a look on it's called and in his he says so it means that happened around this time because ate from the day that he was born and he was born. So it's brings it's so much more means today was born on the first day of and on that day he ate from the so it's it happened literally literally on this day. Just want to hit the pause button for one second. Let's just meditate on this. So we have a that brings from the and that according to that that when was bornish was born on the first day of sukus which means by the way when was the world created so going backwards right he was world so the world was created on the why is it such a So I don't know when you know what day it was uh created. So the day was created sounds like a good day for it to be created and uh first day of sukis and it's a big momentous days is it's because it's not like the in the brings that there was a minig in Europe by the would say and they would start on and the reason is because they had a mira that according to the mama that holds the world was created on which means that when was the created he was born when on the first day of and he ate from the says and HE SINNED AND THEY JUDGED HIM AND THAT'S WHY THE FIRST day goes down as it goes down at the day of judgment because that's the other and that's the day that he was JUDGED but The bottom line is you learn the world was created on was born he was born on he was born on the first day of but said from the that's not what happened but rather the world was created on was born on the first day of Oldness because the day he was born on the respectively that seem to connect the mitzvah of the ring and the to OF THE IT'S VERY THIS IS the day of it not the same literally That's when the took place and IT'S SO BUT THE BOTTOM LINE is a tremendous because it's really delays that he tried finding this and he said I couldn't find it. He said I couldn't find it. I looked high and low and I couldn't find it. He said but I did find theite somewhere else. He said I found it in the zeraki. I found it in the safe zer. This is a he says says a safer by the way that the quotes a lot he said I found it in this I found this ide couldn't believe it until I saw in my own eyes it brings it from a safer never so is the one who brings this and he says I heard about this but I didn't believe it until I saw but then I saw it I had no choice I had to believe it and I SAW I COULDN'T BELIEVE it was created on the first day of the is what's the listen what the said the it's a rabb as in the son of lived from from. So this he said that he were born the day that was born said that heaven was in the world. Why are you saying that he was only in the world from he was already alive? Because if Marishia was born like the rish say on and k and he were born on the day that marisha was born albeit several hours later. So that means heaven was in the world from rash until why isn'tus he was for first born on the first day of sukus and this is a to the holdad was an it's so that it was an because it comes out it all happened on the same day said the brings up couldn't find it in the but I did find it in the zer and then says only something he could say and that is I don't know but I saw that he gave a oni and he writes in the he went through the safer and I found in different places in the he quotes the zerushi so he says I don't know if it's in the somewhere I didn't find it or maybe authority found it really saw in the safe because it's a safe I know he KNEW HE QUOTES THE HE EVEN GAVE A ON THE SAFE AND this is classic where only he does what he could do but the bottom line is this is the is that the is was created on the world was created six days later was created and that was on on stating that brings up from the said I heard this I didn't believe it until I but then I saw it and then I believed it and that is based on a medish that says he was alive from why he should have been alive from because that first day was not the first day of it was the first day of sukus that's when was born that's when k was born and says And it's come out that that's why you find the says that we bring the because this was the time of the it's not just the time of it's in the same month. It's in the same zip code. It's the time of that because it was literally that day other was born on the first day of that was when the happened and it's because of that we bring the and the on that day to go ahead and be but just to be Messiah with one I think it's I'll be all this red and that is it's all the say that and asim of sukus is also as man of chuva during and of course the climax of that is but then on everyone knows the from who said that the says what is the day that we start counting is and then the next few days you're too busy preparing you can't doing a the first day you can go back to doing a is onus. So it's reach but he said that what's the reach it's because when does it's but when does all that become mitzvah so when is to do he says you know something I want to sit down now I want to count all my aas because all my aas all my liabilities just shifted to the other side of my balance sheet now they're all assets now they're all and you start counting I did this I did that we always speak out from the how real the concept of was says if someone eats and then he does he's going to go up to they're going to give him as if he ate from the carbon p he says if somebody goes to do carcass he's going to go up to shamay and they're going to tell him you know you're going to get cuz that remember that night you sat in bish the whole night you be I did. Yep, you did. You're a member. And you finished the maka and another maka. You're like, might be a mistake in identity, but I'm going to run with it. Right? Your lawyer's like kicking you under the table. Don't say a word. Right? But either way, you're going to go and in the world of this was so real. We've gone through this so many so many so many times. But the bottom line is that there's an idea of said he said that he does and when you do all your suddenly become mitzvah and as A RESULT YOU START COUNTING YOUR CUZ YOU'RE SO EXCITED. YES, I DID ANOTHER I FORGOT ABOUT THAT. BOOM. I GET THAT ONE ALSO BECAUSE TO THE FACT THAT YOU JUST went ahead and did it on the first day of sukus. What did he ate from THE THERE'S A MAND that holds that. What was the adas? It was an asteric. What will we to on that day? We will to a mitzvah. What's the mitzvah? The mitzvah is take that estrig which was the a that srig which was the and go ahead now and use THAT AS A MITZVAH. THIS IS THE ultimate ultimate of THE EIGHT WHICH IS THE ULTIMATE. YOU WOULD think you're crazy. You're bringing an aster you bring anything other than an asteric but the terrace is because when he does and that's the this man of sukus it's and we know did chuva and he started doing chuva right wait right right 130 years of chuva and 930 years of chuva right where we speak out to rama says why is white and is red it's because chuva so the red became white but never did chuva and that's why the red never became But other chuva and this was therefore that was to be able to do chuva. It's was the of it was the becomes of it's a day that we start counting our if we're going to start counting our and we're going to I think the place to start is with the itadas and that's where it all begins. We take the itadas which was the ultimate sin. But on that day that it becomes a mitzvah the goes from being the symbol of to being the and we make it as beautiful as possible because that today is going to be the most beautiful thing in the world. I mean where else does it say in the it says it by the aster and it's the that's what it was at its core. It's not just a like say it's more it's tifer than that the original estric that we had now all of a sudden becomes the paid. You take the of the is we can take our yeets and turn it into a pod. That's the that's exactly what's happening on the first day of and like was to us that is the day of cha I think it's pos all this ra and all this and we will stop Yeah.