Chulin 57

Today's daf is and we are at the Mishna about 20 lines from the bottom of moving along in peric elutrafus. So perakeus began that we had the Mishna that said we had the Mishna that discussed we now have the next segment of this and that is the Mishna that discusses Alu. If the following are wounds, illnesses, things that there would have been that maybe are stating that they're in the less infamous list they are says the missionar in the event that there is a neckv in the garggeras. So if the ka has a neckval is it's not going to be a trade. Why would you think it's a tra throughout only if it's that it's going to be a trai we know is never a tra. So the speak out it's because we're dealing with an and there would have been a that maybe the of an is more vulnerable and therefore just like a nek in the by is considered a tra maybe a neck of in the geras by an is considered a tra that's why the Mishna tells me that it's actually notist in the event that there's a crack that goes vertically on the garggeras that too is something that you would have thought maybe should be considered a tra it's not going to be considered is a tra in the event that a weasel hits the on its head but in an area that doesn't make it a tra. This is in contrast to the previous Mishna that said that if a would hit a bird on the head then the is it would be if it's then it's not a tra. What is the determining factor? So we saw rash already in the previous stop. If it's connected if it's near the brain then it's and if it's another part of the head then it wouldn't be an issue in the event that the ze in English the crop. We'll see a lot more about that in the d of the bird has a nevosi says not only if it has a nev is it going to be kosher but even if the ze is completely removed it's still going to be in the event that the so the intestines of the are right now protruding from the actual as long as they don't have a hole in them it's going to be caution says in the event that the bone bone of the wings. So it's not the wing itself, but it's the of the wing if it breaks or if the foot the bone of the foot breaks or if the feathers snapped. All these cases would also be examples of that you would have thought maybe are issues but are really says that it's not so posit that if the feathers are removed it's going to be kash. There is a feather that's a problem. In other words, not all feathers were created equally. Remember this says the in English is the down. So think of a down coat. That's the layer that's immediately on top of the skin of the it's actually viewed as the skin of the and it's for that reason it's not just a feather. It's the skin. Oh, the animal was skin that's already an issue is in that case it's going to be possible. Bottom line is this is the second list as it relates to the first. The second is here says the so the first part of the gar's analysis of the Mishna is going to focus on the soarist is one of the themes of the entire is not going to delve into this. that we already know from the previous Mishna because the Mishna compares and contrast different parts of the head where if a weasel hits it, one place it would be a tra. The first real is and this Mishna is the ze. It's the crop of the and in the Mishna the says is rebi takes it a step further. He says even if it's completely removed by the way you see from what the of the is what the is and that is only but if it's nit if it was completely removed in that instance it's actually going to be a tra but the bottom line is the z of the is an important part of its anatomy as it relates to tra. So what exactly is the zeph? So again in English it's the crop. This is not the crop of say the z fame. This is the crop of elutra fame and in layman's terms it's the bottom of the esophagus. So the has a vashet. It has an esophagus just like a behemoth does. And immediately underneath the vashet, there's this area that almost to the layman looks a little bit like it's part of the vashet, but it's its own little territory. It's known as the zeic. What does the use the zeic for? It uses it to store food. So apparently an has the ability to eat a lot of food in one shot. Even though it takes time to digest the food, which you would think would slow the animal down, but what the if does is it eats, it eats, it eats, and it stores it. So just like you can go to the supermarket, you can buy food faster than you could eat it, the is actually able to eat food faster than it's able to digest it. And it has this little pantry. It has this little storage area inside its anatomy. It's called the Z effect. It's right on the bottom of the vehic. As a matter of fact, we're going to see the gumar is going to discuss what exactly is the cut off point. How do you know where you have a versus where you have a oh is a tra is going to be cautious. So you have to know where the ends and where the zeic begins. But that's uh again as amateurs what the zeic is supposed to be. Either way, the first over here is going to discuss this effect once went to make a leap year in and they spent Shabas in. So was a town and when they were there they pin regarding a tarpacas like rebi regarding the zc. Now this is a little bit of an oxymoron. A tarpacas is the uterus of the animal. It's obviously a female animal and this is the uterus of the animal. The zec we just said is the crap. So they pasin by the tarpacas like rebi by the zech. Now by the way what is rebi even hold by the zcun. Even if it was completely removed it's not going to be a tra but something's a little uh unclear. It says weren't sure what exactly happened over here. They didn't know how to read these words. They had to meaning they in the event of behemoth not an in the event any behemoth loses its uterus it's considered which by the way Rashi says this is a rashi is from all places aishned how would this come to because the tells a story about reptarin Posin there was a shadow if he made a mistake and it's when make mistakes but either way that's a whether an animal that loses its is considered a tra or not considered so one was additionally like as relates to is going to be so they said two things this is the first sign in the maybe It's one that they made they pass with regards to the but instead of just saying that it's like the was just like hold is also going to be but here is an interesting as in this side but it's very possible that as it relates to revi in the Zic itself maybe they wouldn't hold that way. The bottom line is two had to understand. One side is it was like and on this side not only is it but they hold like. So this has significance in our because we have a mice that they like it was not like to the contrary they were pasing that in the event that an animal loses its tarpas it's going to be. So what did they mean when they said the about instead of simply saying that the if it was removed is we have like a marshall that just like according to it's going to be this is going to be and by the way if that's the case it's one is regarding the like if anything it's that they didn't even hold like bottom line is intricate with a very straightforward answer and that is more about the roof of the ze has a in other words a nev is not a trafo but a ne in the guide of the zeic is going to be a tra says the where exactly is the roof of the z so As the ze starts tapering, Rashi says, and becomes a little bit narrower and it merges together with the vash, that's where the gag is and the is even though it's technically part of the zeic, but if there's a neck of over there, it's going to be kash. So the crop the zeic is a little wider. It's broader than the esophagus. It's broader than the vash. But there's an area where the lanes merge a little bit where it starts tapering off. that area where it's where it starts tapering off is technically part of the so if somebody made a you wouldn't be able to have a from it but at the same time it's that area has a so that if there's a nef it would be a problem going back to the Mishna so the Mishna mentioned that in the event that it was if the intestines of the animal came out the for as long There was no negative is it's going to be a long time. This is if when the intestines were put back in the animal. So they were put back in the same way they came out. Meaning he didn't flip it around so that the bottom part would be on the top and the top part would be in the bottom. But if when it was put back in it was flipped around would be the says who we learn from created man. He didn't create a Rashi says what's a stand a base a bus created and there's a bus on them and really the needs the buses and it has to be on the right side. So we learn from the that if they would flip to the level it would literally be a tra. So as much as long as there's no nect if you put it back in everything's going to be okay but you have to make sure you put it in the right way because otherwise it's going to be a trade for something else it has to be on top of it a tiny digression used to say from the crack of the bay that is like a city that has everything inside of it. So think of a metropolis, a city where you can buy anything, right? The older versus the big cities as an um is the equivalent thereof to a city that has everything inside of it. It's a crack menu. We don't have to import any of these positions and these we have it all inside of us. And another that brings out this idea is menu. This is a that says that uh all these things the corner the pegs they're all part of us. What's us it's referring to that's the over there in that of and said that that's what the means when it says who user who made us means that he made us that everything that we need is included in us. Either way, we return to our regular program after that tiny bit of a break. That is Traus again. We're dealing with tells a story. Don't try this at home. There was an that saw a certain person who fell from a roof down to the ground. And when he fell, his stomach split open and his may his intestines came out. And this person was dying. It was a very bad situation. And what he needed to do was he needed to figure out a way to get his may back inside his g. And apparently he couldn't do this in the oldfashioned surgical way. So he had to pull a trick out of his hat. So he calls this person who just fell son. He says, "Come here. I got to do something." and he pulls out a knife and they're all looking and he shacks him but he didn't really do it. did he did it with the magic. Either way, when the person saw his son being at least that's what he thought he was looking at, he gave a crack, right? He was a decent guy and he cracked and that cracked somehow caused his may to come back into his grey and then the Aramean went that he quickly sewed him up. He stitched him up. He did surgery. Didn't even need anesthesia. This was an incredible incredible. You got to write this up in a medical journal somewhere. Maybe not. But either way, this is the ma that happened over here with this raglishna. Another example of something that you would have could or should have thought as a tra that's really not a tra is in the event that breaks a legal is it's going to be in. So there was a basket that was full of that all had broken legs. Seems like somebody took a whole basket of out of the rehab facility and ships them out. Yeah. I don't know how this happened but yeah and they all came limping into and looked at all these he was and he looked at the infamous and when he saw that everything was okay he went ahead and he said it was this is a very important and this is something that's going to be a topic in the course of the da but what's pos in this ma the Mishna So you would have thought that if you bring in to say what's the sha didn't just rely on the rabb said that before I have to check the I have to make sure that they're okay if the sagum are in place then it's going to be good and if not not so what exactly are the soi says the are this complex web of tendons rashi says on the foot area of the bird. If you look it up, you'll see that this is considered the most complex part of the anatomy of the bird. And it's right around the area of like the pula, the foot of the of the paragus of the bird. And Ra held that in as much as if the foot of the breaks, it wouldn't make it a tra. But if something tore by the that's an integral part of the and that already would be a tra meaning he can't live or whatever the definition of tra is. So said but only if are in place. So that's why had to make sure that everything was going to be okay. Again, we'll see more about the in the course of the dive talking. In the event that the bone on the hand of a behemoth, right? When you talk of of the hand, you mean the fore leg, right? So, if the bone slipped out of place, it was dislocated. It's going to be it's not considered a tram. If the the thigh of an slips out of place, it's considered a tramas. Additionally, if the bone by the wing slips out of place, it's also a tra. And the reason is as it relates to because the lung of the is very close to that bone. And if it slips out of place, a good chance that it slipped in in the direction of the rhea and it punctured the ray. So three things is also a tra and the reason that last thing is a tram said that in the event that the go of the slips out of place you don't automatically make it a tra because we just said it's not because we're concerned that maybe something happened to the okay so check do aika it's one of the themes of you could do sometimes you have a right to go ahead and do said the same thing. So on the topic of the of the now is going to digress a little bit said now what exactly this means. So we're going to give it away means that has no rhea stating that we'll see the gar is going to have to go through a few hoops before we actually get to that mas but said there's no rhea for a night and not just that it looks like a rose petal and it's in between its wings what means it mean literally that there is no lung So an o doesn't have lungs. It's not true. Cut open a knife and you're going to see it. It has lungs. Maybe what it means is that a neck of a knife is not going to be considered. Even though is a [ __ ] that's a tra in fact if has more than that. If the of the go broke even though the membrane surrounding the brain wasn't punctured is considered by it's not only if it's when it comes to a knife it is but the bottom line is what is giving me he meant in real life that it doesn't have a knife not true it's fake news it does have did he mean that ne is not a nek that's connected to me everybody knows whatever is considered a tra by is also if it's just But whatever is by him is by a knife. So what could he have possibly mean? Maybe what he meant was could be what he meant to say was that in the event that an animal falls is in a or if an animal lands in fire where the is you do as we learned a lot about in previous it could be the of the in that situation doesn't have to include the so ordinarily you would have to be a in the event that's in a or it was somehow singed by fire over there you wouldn't have to do the says it's probably what he meant and it actually makes sense to say that because I can even rationalize because there's a lot of ribs that protect the that's probably meant but the says it can't be he said that an does have a and what did he say he didn't just say oh yes it has a he added He told you what it looks like. He told you where to find it. Meaning if does it have a does not have a is making sense. He's saying it does and let me tell you what it looks like. Let me tell you where you're going to find it. But if everyone's has a that's not the suggest is if it falls you have to be the so then why is he telling you all this information about the we know the mitus of what the is from response to that must have held that period what's the way so says Ella you have to answer this by saying What they said was sometimes referred to as right we know there's a whole a real name or is the god in this case the real name is so obviously but it's pretty obvious that he wasn't a says he used to not eat chicken if he used to eat chicken he would have known that it has a but he probably didn't eat chicken that's why he knew it and then Rashi says we're just being a little sarcastic we're just having a little bit of fun this is a he didn't eat chicken if he didn't eat chicken he probably should have known there's a but the bottom line is that he didn't know inside the says the really this is going to escort us deep into said in the name of and the names matter by the way. So again, not just the rav part of but the Rahuna part of Rahuna says in the name of this great rabbi that in the event that the thigh of the slips out of place it's dislocated it is going to be kasha. Now if you remember the brought earlier on the three And that was also but it was so yeah it's good cash. You know who asks the son. He said but that came from they said they said oh in the name of the the rashish Padisa who was the great Ravhuda and rahuda said is just the opposite what's going on how could you say in the name of and everyone's saying over we know of he's telling everybody that Rafuna told his son Bri my entire son you calling me myat I'm going call you my dire son there are different rivers in the world and all rivers flow differently right no two rivers flow the same way what exactly does this mean so Rashi says that what Rahuna was telling his son was that I wasab the real You want to know why in Padisa they're saying the other way? Because Rav knew that in Padisa they were they had and they held that in the event that the thigh of the ice slips out of place they held his ple and it's for that reason didn't want to be because he knew that they were in he said ple just like rivers in different locations fall differently sometimes a is going to pass in differently in different locations. So depending on what zip code or what coast he's on, that might determine exactly how he's going to issue the but I was really what he said in Pompadisa was just preaching to the choir a little bit. He didn't want to be make and that's why they were that's why he said why he said that's why this rumor is only coming from right you notice it's not coming from anywhere else because it's only that he saidaba once met and he saw that he was being in the so what happened what happened was an had some sort of injury and when it injured itself the you have to make sure that the animal's not a tra. So is looking at the to make sure there's no issue. Now what's the basis for this idea being this is earlier on the where even though the says that if breaks a leg is not going to be considered a but it's assuming are going to be in place. So again sees it's all part of the same story and he sees that he's doing tells why you doing this that if the slips out of place it's going to be what's the assumption is that if the thigh bone slips out of place it's that for sure that if something happens to it it's going to be the lumbness of it is the max holds that The dislocation of an a is the equivalent thereof to the aing. Now the is higher up on the than is the on the bottom by the foot area. The is a little higher than that. So if who said this didn't say that was that's the heels that's then underneath it has to be so I know this is but why are we doing this with then there's no reason that if something happened to the should be a told I hear younish would come on whose foot got cut if it's underneath the joint it's going to be if it's above the joint so it's going to be possible we need is the next one additionally if the were cut they're somehow removed it's going to be a problem now this is talking about a same is going to be true as relates. So you ask me why I'm checking you ask me a kasha from Rav I Rav holds you have to check the sun then it's a mish extended it to say as well but says one second so uh told I hear your response but now I'm confused is not was he was quiet so there's this awkward silence and says I'm rabb's one who asked the cash rabb is not answering the he told maybe my is a little mistaken I assume that this location is the equivalent of it not being there and if the is dislocated so it's as if anything beneath it is not even in the g so how could it be that if something happens to the it's going to be a problem if is not a problem then shouldn't be a problem maybe I was wrong maybe at this is not a and in certain situations it can render the tra but at the same time it's not the same as even though it's higher up is still and even though it's lower is still going to be possible what you're explaining what said as if this is your own that's another way of saying yes is going to be cautious But and not just of the even then it's going to be and don't be taken back by this you find even by itself you can't compare and by the way sometimes if you cut higher up it's if you cut lower down it's possible. So all these that we're making to ask this are really the bottom line is the bottom line is it's for that reason And at the same time he could it's going to be possible again. Let's uh hit the pause button because the story is going further. So Rafuna said in the name of Raut and he told it to his son. Rabuna told him how could you say Yehuda said in the name of Ravm is possible. So he told him which meant that or's real is that the reason they were for the people in told the story he saw he was being and he said being that real is the way that so told him one He says, "You want to know why I'm being because it's a by you have to be and said I hear but then now I'm just confused because said and then he's telling me also that you have to be in the Rabbi didn't answer anything." So obviously you know maybe the is that what I thought are the same thing are not the same thing and he told him 100% says when this was the one who asked the said the terrors the was the one who couldn't understand why was being himself was to go was one of the one and he met was another one of that was famously to and he saw was sitting and he was saying the following see how the names matter. So is and he's saying that but who's he saying in the name of but who in the name of who turns to I swear from the day the left us in left us all behind and he went I remained in right he said we discussed this with in detail and we asked him what's about regarding everybody knows this even better. I'll show you how much this is so true. We could do this. Do you not? So if you see clearly holds you have to be but I told him he was quite and I told him you think this is but either way so then turns to exhales first and says and what do you hold meaning I'm telling you what I know about Rafuna I know that we handled the suja with Rahuna Rauna holds I even have a mis and a whole story how to reconcile with but the bottom line is in everybody knows this you're telling me you're parishioning over here that is that said YOU'RE TRAFUL WELL WHAT DO YOU KNOW THAT I DON'T know told him I'll tell you what I know that you don't Oh, and that's why I'm saying it meaning I know that said it. Now it doesn't mean Rahuna said it, right? But I know said it and I think this is the right gear even in again you discuss it with Rahun in detail. I can't really argue with that. But the bottom line is you want to know why I'm says by the way you always want to know what the great has to say on such had been in the city in the place where were matter this is a pun he went to binases right we learn the sigies of tra and is a good pun. But the point is uh had been in the place where the was being mash goes with the he literally would have moved a wing. He would have said a word. What does this mean? Who would that even but he would have never expressed his in that presence said in the name of that was where the slipped out of place and they brought it to the Rebi said you're allowed to eat And he was saying regarding this. So the bottom line is even was Mhhammed but would have been in the presence of all these great men. He would have never been says stating that the is not like everything that we just said. meaning we just said very strongly sounds like that is it's going to be right I mean that's certainly what it sounds like again we have different said in the name of it's a raun said in the name of it's they all went along with that but then again said that it's a tra and he heard it from in the name of and said it's a tra heard in the name of that it's a that's why where the sort of lands is that it's been present he would have said one word okay so says the rather is like ask what is the shear of a neck in the right so if there's a neva what's the sher now we know is kash but that's only where it's not punctured through and through the question over here is what would be if there's a k where there's an actual puncture says we know the as long as it's up to the there was a there was this female sheep that lived in our gagen who had this exact issue and they made for her some sort of uh you know bandage for and she was able to live. Now we know right and so you see she was able to live said you're telling me that because you saw this live that would be a that this is not a tram stating that it's a real life story of the had a where it was and they made for her for this town again some sort of bandage made of re was able to live for sure and what do you have to say it was probably within 12 months you can't bring any rise from the story even though I think we're coming out that as relates to regarding should What it should be stating that you see from this uh story with from the way said over the really this is something that should have been a tra in fact he's even bringing a from here that don't tell me that because an animal is able to live that's a it's not a traer because I know the story of where the was or the was that it was able to live but The point is a lot of names, a lot of different sim, but it sounds like with the Gomorrah lands on this is that is going to be aud said is going to be said is going to be asked his father with what they're saying. He says and then the told the whole story with Aba and both presupposing that is going to be a right because what was the whole how do you reconcile the fact that with the fact that is going to be a problem if you're going to tell me that is that is really then no it All works very very well. Says they were all of the opinion that is is that is really going to be stating that was saying that is really a traab and told him there's no way we spent a lot of time with we know this firsthand. I'm telling you it's not the way it is. What emerged was is that had heard it for so at the very least was of the opinion maybe not is in the opinion that is also held that is but said had heard that said in the name of that is he would have been he would have moved the wing he would have fluttered because he would have known for sure that it stating there says the last rather like said in a whole discussion of could a live or not live and how long could it live that really the is that is going to be a so the bottom line is I would ask my local rabbi says so we just mentioned why did we mention had a where it thigh slipped out of its place and he went ahead and he made this bandage. He came up with some way to try to keep the thigh in place. It was actually able to live but it was able to live. So the is going to digress and talk about for a second. They say about he was an ask. So what does this mean? So it's nicker from what the is about to say and for what the just said what it means that is he used to experiment. He used to experiment. He used to experiment. As a matter of fact that as it relates to in our Mishna he did an experiment to try to disprove. So what hold in the Mishna told in the that even if the feathers of the are removed is still going to be but in the event the down that's removed that's like the skin of the then it's going to be a problem the great where its down was removed and he took the t put it into a tanner and wrapped it in some sort of wrapping that was used by the the copper smiths. The point is it it kept it in a in a warm environment and it was able to regrow its wings and it was even more than what had been previously and by his experiment he was able to disprove rahudo. He was an ask but says I don't understand how he was able to disprove butudas maybe is of the opinion that a so we'll see more about that in tomorrow's stuff but there is a sh whether a is or to the contrary it's you would think logically that a animal that's a tra is right it's dwindling physically but there is a that holds that maybe holds he wouldn't be impressed by this experiment so I'm not impressed at all. Maybe would it make sense that it would be in the ailment? That doesn't make sense. Meaning you want to tell me that in another part of it even though it has this ailment, but it's feeling good about itself, it's feeling strong. But you can't tell me if the ray is puncture, the rhea gets stronger after gets the puncture. Right? It doesn't make any sense. And being that the way it was mashbas was in the issue itself isolates whatever that issue was wasn't enough to make it a bit again we refer to as we just had two stories here in the world of whereas and he once did experiment to try this but it sounds like this is a little bigger than just these two stories. So could you tell me a a good says will you find that he was an ask and says something fascinating the says go to the ants you right that's why he's supposed to read it not is an you lazy foolish trick you should go to the look at the way it goes about its business and become wise doesn't have a boss, right? Doesn't have anyone telling him what to do. Yet, it knows to prepare its bread during the summer and it knows how to gather in the time of harvesting. I learned from this p that number one, the ant is not lazy, right? So, if you're a lazy person and you want to learn the midas, you can open up the sashar and learn midas. You can learn it from like the says from but you can also learn it from the ant. But there's another thing you see over here and that is the very because if an ant wasn't then it wouldn't be so nervous about what am I going to eat you know what I'll figure it out I'll kill the guy next to me I'll take his food and that's what I'm going to eat. There's a lot of met lessons that are learned from this says the said I want to see you know said I want to see for myself I'm ask I want to make an experiment do they have kings or not he went during the summer months and what he did was is he took his mail he saw like a whole area where there were ants and he put it on top of Mullen said there should be shade not like so again there's like this ant hole somewhere one ant comes out and he sees the shade and as soon as this guy comes out he made a little simmit because let's be honest how you going to tell the difference between two ants right so he goes and he makes a little sim like this he's going to be able to identify this guy in the meantime he sees that ant was all he goes back into the hole that he came from and he notified his friends and he told them there's shade outside. So the ants apparently don't like the scorching sun. But he said, "Oh, there's a nice shade. Let's come outside." The whole palia, right? Hundreds, thousands of ants found marching out. So what he did was he quickly removed the ill that was causing the shade. All of a sudden, there's this scorching sun. So he watched to see how the ants were going to react because really this ant just uh really pulled a little prank on his guys, right? So, how's this going to go down? So, say his ant is surrounded by ants on all sides. They're looking at him. Where's the shade exactly? Come again. I don't exactly see no shade, right? So, what did they do? They attacked him and they killed him. You see from there must be there's no because if there would be they would have to you have to hire a lawyer, right? You have to have your day in court. You have to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. You get to go give somebody capital punishment. And this was their proof. How many times have we had this? So, I don't understand the the grace arrive. Maybe they had the king with them. Meaning maybe the king was there and the KING SAID OFF WITH HIS HEAD KILL. Maybe the king wasn't there. But at the same time, maybe they had permission from the king. Maybe they were in between administrations, right? So the previous king had uh so right now they're some sort of runoff ballot vote to try to figure out who the king should be. And by the way, we know from humans that when you're in between administrations, it's not good. Said said there's no king experiment similar a sign of a so if an animal can live 12 months that's a sign that this animal is a or if it can't live 12 months that's a sign that this animal is not a tra speaks out that sim that when we work with similar trades and some of the other things that we're about to mention in this in the brace of Mar's about to bring it's only when you have a suffix. So meaning if an animal has a syntal stating that in the event that there's a suffix and now already you can clare is so there's an idea similar if it lives 12 months in the in the instance of a sufficer you would assume that this animal's not a trades if you have a suffic if an animal's tra of a tra is any lettuce which means if it's a that it's not a traer If you have a suffic and you see the animal gets stronger must be it caution that a tra can't live 30 days. If it lives 30 days you have a suffoc that it's not a tra that many that live two or three years. So what's the me what's the catch once again the BC is dealing with what Rafa was dealing with what's a similar but the catch on is ra similar in the one is 30 days the other is two or three years none of them says it's true but it really there's another meaning is not like the twoas in this but there is a third time going to the in the event that an animal has a skull that was It's missing some of it. If it has one long crack or little we saw this already, right? So the shear of neck of the is the size of a this drill. So in the event that it's one or it's many if it's going to be an issue. There was a story in the place in there was a issue where somebody was by the way we're dealing not with a behavior we're dealing with a holl right we're dealing with a human being. So there was a story with a personal where his was and they came up with some sort of this is like one of these experiments and they took something that was made up of dalas. It was made of a dry gore. They took the skin and they made some sort of bandage of it and it was able to live. So you see clearly that even though it's not necessarily a sign that it's a trait, right? Why would you say that that's an issue? It's this all happened during the summer months, but as soon as the winter came, it eventually died. So what do you see from here? This is supposed to be the tanoi. We're supposed to see from here that there's a that a trad says like this. You see from here that this of is something that could withstand the summer but can't withstand the winter. That's going to be true for many. But there's also that can withstand the winter but can't withstand the summer. The point is you see from here that some do well in the summer, poor in the winter, some vice versa. The bottom line is any trait for whatever it is, it's not going to be able to make it to and it's for that reason we have a that holds that the as much as there's a and there's a that says he had a who's the regarding who said it goes both ways. That's the either way the said is that a is could have a child and not just that and it gets stronger as it gets older. There's some rain on the table. We're going to leave it on the table and bashem we will pick it up