Chulin 41

Today's daf is hulf and we are nine lines from the top of alf the last daf of the second per of this epic benbino epic per. So we're in the middle of a sugia a sug which focused primarily on a mera from the great said if somebody sees his friend's it's lying in front of he goes over to it and it as soon as he shacks even one sim that's going to make this and as a result it's going to be treated like all the that has this is going to have and we mentioned that there are two primary that underpin of number one is stating that is being that a person has the ability to make somebody else's beh make it to how's that possible? It's based on something said in the name that although it's true but then already so essentially is leveraging that was said already by traces itself back to the first generation of the great and that is that although And that's why it's possible for a person to make somebody's thing as said a second and that is that as it relates to when we say you don't have to do a complete you don't have to do what described as a mess but even if it's the ma zut a ma ku even if you do something that's just going to be a little bit of a ma that in it of itself is going to be okay says rafa being that that's the case you don't even need to do a full but rather as long as you do a which in the world of a is not considered a proper that in of itself is going to be okay number which is really something in the name of number two that if a person does even to somebody else's object he could be in it doesn't require even a little bit of a would be okay was really being what said that a person could ask me what kind that doesn't have to be a by the way we saw in the course of the doesn't even have to be a even if it's going to be a sim that in it of itself is going to be okay. Now the majority of the up until this point focused on a rahuna from a first glanceman thought this bry is checkmate rafun in the course of the script actually flipped a little bit and the actually thought that this bryer if anything might be a tremendous support a tremendous to the but regardless that was very much yesterday's what we need now is at the very end of the n was an acronym to remember the names of three and they were with in fact they weren't just with the way Rashi learns they were with as well and they say And in other words, by the end of the what we realized was that the premise of which is really it's really a big discussion and called which means this is a a very global macro type of that's does it matter if it's or does it not matter if it's this is a major a sub discussion is assuming it matters if it's because well define does it have to be a mess For example, if it's going to be a does it have to be basim or maybe aut is okay. So if it's going to be it could be or like we saw in the course of the even less than a that's a and that's exactly whereas today's picks up says at first glance it would seem that this major is really and this is a who poured the wine of so he poured it but he didn't do it in the presence of a des that the just made the this is the real and as a result it's going to be mater and they were both m And in fact, they had two reasons to be number one more of the was that were only being that this was specifically. So it's not considered the other reason which is what we need because could always say he can go over to the guy and tell him you know it's very nice you poured my wine but guess what you clearly never learned you don't have the ability to take my wine and make it bottom line is we have a if is it going to be is it gonna be multi sayser and said for two reasons. We need the second reason. The second reason that say it's going to be is because a person doesn't have the ability to ask her something that's not his in the words of the guy and as a result it's going [snorts] to not be it's going to be holds it is going to be so what he have to say argues the must Because being that the great did a miser with the wine he was the actual wine. Therefore, when there's a in other words, it would seem to be and in other words, the tan seems to be the raul of and seem to be the shittita. of Amron and but says the Gar and we have to speak out of Rash before we even see the next words of the Gar and according to Raf there's no way out other than by saying that his was in other words the ones that hold will have to concede that it's not true according to everybody it's true according to the But said they said in other words so and are going to concede this point which is fine. It's not the end of the world. They're pasing like the which is presumably the which is probably the and as a result if that's the way they're coming out that's uh perfectly fine. But the bottom line is observation that this Shiloh and these opinions that are being pontificated by the really traces itself back to guilty is charged. It's really and they're going according to what about they could tell you that when we said I want you to know we didn't only mean it according to we meant it according to the as well meaning that even according to the that holds who is the tanama and the over here in but it could be and by the way ki is love you don't have to run to all the kiugis this is classic censored gimaras where instead of just saying we say but the bottom line is this is true when we're dealing with when it comes to aid there's a to say that if a yid would go and he would do something that looks like to his friend's object. We would give him the benefit of the doubt and we would assume that he's not really being but what he rather is doing is just chapping his friend. So how's he chapping him? Because the friend thinks that his just became he thinks his wine just became. If that's the case, it's really not. He never really had a mind to it. So why do you do it? So we're giving him the benefit of the doubt that he's someone that's very much in which is but the bottom line is at the very least on some level we're going to be in our minds and we're going to assume that this person wasn't really what's the point. The point is that said and they said it in our right in the context of talking to the we're talking to the we're talking to the as it relates to those that's true according to It's poshion. It's going to be true. They say and even according to the that said that know if somebody's of somebody else is going to be a problem. But take a look at the it was talking about a is that power. Yeah. you have the ability of the to be able to do it in the it's not because they were talking about and when it comes to there's a difference that's going to be true and and that is that but for doesn't it's always going to be so when made his statement on regarding And when made their statement, they would getting involved in they were clearly only saying it according to but according to that's a false statement because they hold that when said regarding those cases that commenting on what was talking about and regarding those cases that was a true statement according to it's and even according to the it's going to be true not because of but rather because being that it's doing it only said it now just to be clear in the world of l doesn't make difference if a does it does it if other do it if ain't otherwise >> [laughter] >> you wouldn't be able to do it. But there is another to invoke when it comes to the which does not apply and relate when it comes to the guy and it's for that reason says the it's not was this was something that was being said we learned in our if there were two people that were holding on to a knife remember actually one person's holding onto the handle and the other person's brave. He's holding on to the blade. One of them, the other person is going to be possible. What's the So, it's a because the assumption is that only one of them own the animal and doesn't matter which one. it's going to become possible if so why is it going to be possible right you're telling me and by the way you're telling me it's not even totally in the in the everybody holds that it's going to be an issue either because you don't have the to do it or because we're going to just assume but at the end of the day you see here which is It's talking about in the where the was a m. Okay. Okay. So what's the difference if he's a m this is very if he's a m then according to the would have the ability to be because of the really is that a guy could do it which means that could also do it. The only reason we assume that the can't do it is because we're giving him the benefit of the doubt. We're telling him that oh this is probably not what he did but if he's then he's like a guy and therefore we're not going to give him the benefit of the doubt. So therefore you could always be the it's talking about where was now it's very over that really everybody should be asking and that is if you remember on the top of the already asked the asked this identical when we introduced on the bottom of the wasful a little bit two and if you look four lines from the top and gave an ter was it's talking about where he was afraid this already and the says has nothing to do with the question is almost like dead on arrival because we're talking about where he's avoasha and not just that the round two didn't even say what it said when it asked the kasha the first time it's almost like we forgot the gamur from eight lines ago how's that even possible right we forgot that we asked And for some reason we can't even be to the we set on the top of the so Rashi says something very nice. Rashi says that on the top of the we assumed full stop. If that's the case, there's no to learn the you have to say it was a once the came and said that you should know this is really a big it's really and by the way said what they said who by the way we probably like it's only true because oh if that's the case then it's to revisit the and say what the gmorra believes is a more ter and that is you don't have to make an akima that he was af as long as we assume that this person could have been a m and by why would you think he's a ming it certainly sounds like uh there's a chance this is not the first time he did this so to make that he's a m and make that actually seems more glad so the reason the is revisiting the question is because the feels in light of the it's worth revisiting because there's a a better almost and that is really the punchline of the Gumar's ter that better which is why the Gumar didn't say the terret that it said earlier the Gar is going to do this now one more time and this was again the second Tshma that we had on the top of the that we're revisiting for the same reason if someone goes ahead and he makes his friends or he mixes it his with what's the is going to so what did the say on the top of the is talking about where he was now doesn't have to say that how can be a strong we could say that it's going really if he's a m so then you don't have that here's another in the event that they warned Don't do what you're about to do because if you do this you're going to be keep and he accepted and he says I'm doing it anyways what's the what's the does this person now become a m so that when he does what he does according to even according to therefore this thing is going to be awesome maybe not maybe he's not a m yet a m means They have to establish him as a m. But just because he was maybe that doesn't make him a m. This is a question asked. He told him you're asking me a question where the person literally took upon himself death, right? Uh he has no problem literally subjecting himself to the of that's what a person does when he's because they warn him and they tell him. So that's like the biggest m ever. And as a result, there's no question in we are going to treat this person as a m either way. We're now up to it's not the last Mishna, it's the second to last Mishna, but the home stretch of. So if you look back at the previous Mishna from a high level, not the longest. So essentially what did the Mishna say? Mishna is talking about somebody that all these cases is the is going to be possible. Not just that after were two people that were and only one of them even then the said is going to be if you remember the asked the said that's it you're saying good say better it should be much worse than that it should be because we know And the Gar said the Mishna is talking about where the person made the actual har the actual hilltop the actual sea river and desert into this object of the aid desar. The other is talking about where he didn't make the actual har hilltop sea river and desert the des but it was the s it was the malik it was the god it was the angel of those things if you worship the actual mountain etc then it's only going to be possible if one would worship the god of those things well in that situation it's going to be even what's the difference said the difference is because something that's is not subject to many many of the laws of you're not let worship but in terms of the demon a lot of the are not going to apply. So being that the subject of his so it's not considered that what you just did was to it's for that reason it's not going to be if however it was to the is and as a result that's going to be considered regular which of course has now rashi spoke out of the mishnov we didn't but rashi did that if the mishna is talking about where the person is worshiping the actual and that's why it's not why it's possible. So why is it even possible? So said that you have to say it's really based on which is the we're about to learn and that is that it's true. It's not possible but this is because being that at the end of the day it looks like you're even though in you know there's a huge distinction between but at the end of the day this is very much an Indian of and being that this is an Indian of went ahead and they said that it's going to be parcel in other words the last Mishna that we learned just from a perspective taught us the following that it's possible for somebody And it could be with all it could be done in a way where you follow the five and you have the right and the right and you check the and you did everything that you were supposed to do but still the is going to be that it's going to be possible. An example if somebody even gonna tell you such a is going to be possible I'll say the next two Mishnayas are going to give us more examples of that. So really the last three Mishna of the barrack are a series of where somebody he got everything right up until but this is where he started uh veering off the Yiddish literally and here he started doing things he wasn't supposed to do and because of that came along the said that this is something that is going to be pleon says to here's the next list a person is not let a person into the sea or into a river. This is a fascinating that is hard for us to appreciate because we live in a very different world. We don't live in a pagan world. But once upon a time, it was so prevalent that people used to worship that actually made it. You can't be a and an animal on top of the sea or uh on top of the river. So you can't do open ocean front. And the reason is because we're concerned the bystander that innocent unlooker who's always don right that's just his role in uh shas but that guy who somehow doesn't know how to mind his own business [laughter] he's going to look and he's going to say you're not going to believe it I saw he was he worships the yam this guy's uh he's a he's involved in satanic cults is the person you don't want to have anything to DO WITH. SO SAID don't overlook the ocean because people might think you're actually worshiping the you're worshiping the heart. Another person into a kali. So what could possibly be wrong with that? So you shacked on top of a don't do that. You know why? Because the kal is going to receive the dam and it looks like you're doing a so you should be able to do. So was so concerned that said don't but if you want to sh into a pool of water that's something you're allowed to do. Let's say somebody's on a boat and he needs to. So he has two choices. One is practical. The other one's very impractical. The impractical option is he should just chop this animal have blood flying all over the place. He's going to be stuck on this boat for the next month and you know it'll be a little messy. The other option is do aan if you do a like this all the blood's going to end up in the yan and uh you're not going to ruin your ship right says the or another option would be to you know do it into a kali right says mishna if you're on a you could do it into a kal meaning as much as we just said we don't want you to do it into a kali but in a in a you could do it on a another into a ditch but you're make a ditch inside your house. So you're not let into a ditch. Oh, but if you want to make a ditch in your house, you could. The Gar's going to ask the obvious uh you shouldn't do it in the street because apparently the sudukim used to do this. By the way, if you look at the notim again, this is just code work. So the used to do this, we just don't want to talk about the minimum so openly. But the minimum used to do this and we were afraid that if aid is going to do it, it looks like he's giving and support for one of these pagan customs and that's something that we very much don't want a person to do either way. So there's a lot of alus over there all similar to each other on some level and let's see what the does. So the began why can you into the yam or into because it looks like you might be worshiping the desire. But then the Mishna said, "But if you want a into a pool of water, this is something that you are allowed to do." Says the what's the reason that you're not into the because the onlooker is going to assume that this person ising for the why we concerned that even if he shacks into a pool of water. So if you're looking at a pool of water, so you see a reflection, right? So maybe he's worshiping his own reflection. Right? This is a real narcissist. But maybe he's worshiping his own reflection. Maybe that's what he's doing over here. Said to the extent that you could see your reflection clearly. So you wouldn't even be able to course maybe that's what you're worshiping. But where it was murky water so you can't really see yourself. So mitad reflection that's not what's going on over here. It's not the yam. It's not the sea. And as a result, that's why it's going to be okay. Mishna then said into a ditch. Full stop. Then it said, "But if you in your house, you could just do it in the don't want to give." So the says, "I don't even know how to read the Mishna." The starts, which sounds like you can never do it. Then it says, "You could do it in your house." And then it says that it's only uh it's only let do it. How could you tell me you're in your house? You told me a minute ago you never said you have to say the is talking about where the was in the meaning even though it's a little the way you read the but at the same time said I have no choice. This is the way you have to read a when we say we mean but if you want to do it not that you could do as if to say sounds like never let me explain myself no but if you do a yeah you're showing him struggle a little bit what does kicker mean right if kicker means nowhere so I understand what the word kicker is but now you're telling me that it's only bashuker So doesn't mean anywhere. So must mean something. So what does it mean? But either way, this is the way understood told him it doesn't sound right. I don't think is a I think it's a separate thing. So if the third thing mentioned the Mishna is talking about Bash. So I don't think the first thing mentioned Mishn talking about I don't know how you read the Mishna said come let me tell you the way you read now let into somebody is in his and he wants the and he doesn't want to make a mess. So best thing would do to be into a what should he do? So he makes a little canal next to a shs into that uh canal and then the blood is going to go from that area that directly into the like this you can end up having what you have on that don't do that because being that it's at the end of the day the blood is going to end up in a that's not something we want because this was some hebi thing that the were busy with and as a result you never wanted to end up in a so again according to this way you read the is that true no it's not so true you can go directly into the because again nobody's watching anyways it's obvious that you're doing it to keep the house clean so therefore it's going to be okay but if you're going to do it and the reason number one is number two when you're keeping the shook clean so as a salt you don't have that so if you don't have that so therefore there it's going to be the way Rob understood it was is means period you're never allowed into a when the Mishna says it means you're allowed to make a but you can't DIRECTLY INTO IT YOU somewhere else and the blood goes from there into the guma and even that being that it's going to end up in the This is not something that we want to have anything to do with something more that supports what somebody was on a boat and he has no ability to this was one of the conundrums that we saw in the so if you want to the Bryson gives another idea if he wants he can stretch his hand outside the So he says and the dam is going to pour down on the walls of the and end up at Rashi says that this is not a problem of and the reason is because the person on the and from the of the clich as a result that's not what the used to do and it's for that reason this is not going to be an issue what we need really is the next part of the price never let into somebody's and he wants and he knows he can't from there goes into the don't do that and if a person does you have to be make sure this person is not really a suki or a and until you do that etc etc but this is a that says exactly what said and that is that a person is never allowed to even in his own says what's this distinction this distinction is noting directly into a but it's into some sort of some area that's to the side of the gumma and it's flowing in that's something that papayas is going to Okay. But that's only the outside of the bias. It's not going to be Oh, okay. Next. Somebody is in the he's and so this is the opposite of when you right. What does that mean? doesn't mean even but the bottom line is this is the inverse of that where somebody is going to be possible says it's okay if two people were holding on to a knife and they were one of The other one is going to be possible if somebody in those cases is going to be. So sometimes if a person shacks and actually that's when it's possible and sometimes it's going to be and that is what's the rules any carbon that can be brought it's going to be and if it's a carbon that can't be broken if somebody It's going to be so the Gmorra is going to do what it does, but I think it's to explain the mission a little bit almost as a re precap to the Gmorra that we're about to learn. So the Mishna says a very very big and that is if somebody said this could be a problem. This could be a problem. You would think what could possibly be the problem. There's no of there's no of when it comes to with the exception of so why would it be that if somebody would check there could be a problem and we're literally taking all the carbon and we're dividing them into two groups and making and we're saying these carbonas would be a problem those not the you can never predict that there's a group there if you shack the shame that it's going to be possible the the and these all sound more puzzle, right? But all these things that it's going to be. So what's so tells us this is the rule. In other words, are all things that could be brought. Now by the way is that true we know could be brought in benad and we could no could asham is not brought this kasha pes you could just wake up tomorrow and decide you want to bring a pes you could think that you could but the point is let's take for granted that all five of these things can be broken if you can bring up then you're going to have yourself an issue as opposed to the next list is not broken is not broken you can't decide to bring aar either it's not meer either it's not and it's not it's right so those things are not and if it's not then it's going to be so basically the rule of thumb is this if you and you have a mind that I'm that's if I have a mind that I'ming that's not then so What's possib is the holy of this is like the of all the surum of these three messiah is based on it's that guy who can't mind his own business who for whatever reason is so he's going to see aid and he ising an animal and this yid for whatever reason I don't know he'sing this says I'm shing this so this person is going to think that he's really shing That doesn't make a lot of sense. It probably is an it looks like you're doing and as a result it's going to be a problem. So anything that could be brought there's there's an assumption that it looks like he's actually bringing the carbon. Why would you think he's bringing? BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT HE SAID. He said, "I'm bringing this as anah." So if he's saying that he's bringing it as an So therefore there's a marion that it looks like he's bringing and if it's a marion, you're going to have an issue. Now you're going to tell me one second. Sounds like this person is like looking around trying. He knows, right? Clearly this is not an so even if he said he's shing it as an it's not an it's simply not an right and so the terret says we could assume that this person is going to think that he must have been when so either whenever or this second rashi says that this second when the person said Oh, this person might be a London also and he might think right you know the used to say you have to have a kumakov to be you also have to have a cup to be right [snorts] so uh it requires the same level of intelligence but the bottom line is is that this instant now when he said I'm that's when he made it into I I don't know if he was ever didn't have to be because it's brought and as a result now he's doing he's going to be so any carbon that's brought if the person right now is saying I'm doing a lash carbon when HE SAYS THAT THAT in of itself could be deemed as and now he's doing as a result is going to be an issue what about the carbonus that are not so over there you don't have the option of saying that maybe he just decided right now with this to go ahead and bring a katas because not say But maybe it was right. How does this person who's trying to be down the clearly? How does he not know that this person is again? What what are your two choices over here? You're bringing which makes absolutely no sense or maybe the person and he's bringing and as a result there should be a issue. So just because it's not brought the only is if you're not you can't bring it. But maybe he is. So if he's then he could bring us what's the difference, right? So Rashi in the course of the suga says that it's based on another there's an an unspoken that underpins the entirety of this and that is there's an assumption that if somebody's people know about it certainly this guy and if somebody's people know about it people know if it's aar is this thear is this not is this the maja right if this is that people are going to know about it and even tum you can only make If you have another animal, the is going to make an akinta that Mish is talking about where he didn't have another animal. So if he didn't have another animal, this guy knows he doesn't have this is the only he has right. So he knows this is his only. So he knows it physically can't be. So really the is not just that's obviously the punchline. That's the but it really it presupposes another point and that is if this person right now was this would know about it. This is the assumption that we're making. So if it's a carbon that could be brought he can know in a head that he's not but right now maybe he's bringing and why would you think it BECAUSE HE JUST SAID [laughter] IT. But if this is a carbon that's not so the only way it could be a carbon is if he's this guy knows that he's really not and for that reason if you have this is it's going to be this is a little ironic right because usually in the world of k anything that's brought in it's always kosher right it's always over here the list is the pul list because being that it can be bro so we're concerned that maybe this was really a carbon carbon is a mish maris we're going to have ourselves a problem. The current that can't be brought. That's what comes out. You can't bring if you have nothing to worry about either way. And now let's see what the is going to do. So again, this was just like the the cl that underpins everything we're about to say. So again, the first list all the things that could be. So what was the list? We know which means, right? We know so that could be broken. What was the next thing on the list? When he bring you they have a sophic have to bring can't just bring in said it's going this is this is one of the cases where was that you're allowed to bring a every single day and the reason is because if someone has and he thinks that you know who knows maybe what I ate really had and was so it's okay if somebody is uh in at the headsp space we allow him to bring the ashali every single day. Our mission is going meaning there is a mand that a person can bring an even if we don't know that he's and if that's the case we view it as being the next thing on the list was the carbon you bring a carbon what kind of carbon the carbon can't be broken but you can be whenever you want I can be today so that when pes comes I'll be able to bring it and by the way not only can I be maf today I can even be mak today now if I'm today it's going to be a because we know is treated like a but here's the point this person when he says I'm could be with that was and when he as you have a mar you're going to have a problem so from the list of things that was struggling with too was the two that were not so clear was and as it relates to the carbon in as much as you can't bring a carbon as a but you actually could be it's going to be you could bring it actually as a when the is going to be possible that's only true if the animal didn't have a if the animal had made then people has a if it has a there's no way shaft can because you know can't be brought so if it has a so now it's like so ple you don't even have a marion anymore and as a result in this instance it's actually going to be doesn't go into even if it has a right even this uh doesn't always everything he thought there was no m really there was a m or there was no And the point is is that being that it's not so obvious and nicker every time whether or not there is or isn't a mum. So m can't dictate the we're up to the second list now. The second list was if somebody shames something that's not broken then the is going to be caution because now you don't have the mar was the list said this is only true if the person but if the person was and this guy knows about it because if he's going to know so then we assume that he was actually bringing it and as a result now it's going to be apostle because again this is based on the that we gave to the gimmar all based on rashis in the course of the gimmar and that is is that the only reason it's not it's because we also assume that if the person was he would have known about it and being that he doesn't know about it so obviously he's not can't be he was now as a result there's no mar therefore it's going to be exactly that that's only true if wasn't but if he So then the person will know about it as a result there's going to be but says [snorts] even if the person was when this person what do you say I'm if he meant his that he's then shouldn't he have said and if he didn't say it sounds like that even if he's he doesn't mean that he means to nothing to said that's what he said. Maybe he said and that's what meant to say that in the event that and he said if you would say if this bothers you could be was making his could we is another example where if somebody it's going to be only true if the person doesn't We spoke the Saturday then we assume that maybe he was again what's the whole point with the shame can't just be we assume that for sure he's not really doing a it's all based on the fact if he had [clears throat and snorts] or if he had the ability the capacity to make a the person would know about it meaning if he has the capacity it'll be possible. Yeah, 100%. And that's exactly what said the only time listening tomorrow is going to be if therefore it's going to be possible even if he has but shouldn't he have to say and if he doesn't say it sounds like I'm just doing it when made a comment he meant that if he has and he shame That's when this is going to be true. So again, we took care of the two lists and now we're up to the rule of the rule. Now we know wherever the Mishna gives a rule, it's always coming to me. We have two rules. We have the first half of the rule and we have the second head to the rule. If it's going to be cautious. So that's first things first. is that what's coming to me but what's an example of something that I maybe would have what is that gives answer the used tool even though uh is brought in but as requires you first being a nazer. So as a result, as far as we know, he was never maber. So for sure this is not real. And if that's the case, it should be because what now you just all of a sudden out of the blue bringing could be first he was and now he's bringing his just appreciate the kash a little bit better and that is when does bring. So really the assumption over here is is that this person was nazir. No one knew he was a nazer. He finished his nazir and now all of a sudden he's to bring another says yeah. Take a look at says what's three lines from the bottom. It could be for 30 days. I mean, we're busy with the Yentas in today's D, but the bottom line is in 30 days, all the neighbors that peak through the blinds, they don't necessarily know what's going on. So, you can get away with not taking a haircut for 30 days, right? Can't get away with it. But, uh, I think this guy's got to pick up his game a little bit. if his next door neighbor didn't was a nuzza for 30 days and you have like the town's uh gossip monger and you have no idea that this is going on I think you're fired but the bottom line is guy comes to sh for and he didn't know that his neighbor but regardless the says there is such a and that's how this would be possible either way the next part of the was that if something is then is going to be cautious says what's that coming to me it's coming to me meaning even though it's an even though it's an but at the same time is is what just bro this is only true if he doesn't have a wife if he has a wife so that the is if he has a wife we're going to assume that he's uh bringing it on her behalf meaning he's not the but she's the and he's bringing it for her and as a result it's something that's possible therefore it's a marine and therefore it would be possible but the says I mean if he means his wife shouldn't he have to say just because you say if you met your wife you would have said that's what it's referring to isn't this posh so what exactly is the kasha so if you take a look at rashi the lot bottom line rashi says That isn't it posit that in the event that this man would have a wife and he would say that the would be then it would be possible meaning in as much as if a person it should be not possible because you can't just speak but it should be that if you have a wife and you say then it should be possible and if That's the case why have to say it should be so posit so posit but Rashi says the reason is asking the is because is repeating something that he already said because when the said and the clarified he's talking about he So once made that comment on the so why do you have to make it every single line in the going to make the same comment you made the comment once on the we heard the and we're going to understand that if it's by tomorrow it's going to be true by let us as well it's not so much why I have to say what he said but once he said it by it's going to know it with regards to your lettuce as well. says, "No, it's not true." He had to say it. But even after he said, I wouldn't have necessarily noted here cuz I would have thought that even if he has a wife and he said, "I'm bringing it." We're still not going to assume that this is real. We're going to look at this as the [laughter] And you know why? Isa because if he real he had a child, this should have been a everyone would have known about it. Everyone would know he had a child. that we don't say that and the reason is because it could be the mother miscarried a child and mean that the mother miscarried a child everyone knew about it and being that everyone knew about it just because we don't know that he had a child doesn't necessarily mean that he's not really able to bring on behalf of his wife and if that's the case as much as but it's only true if he doesn't have a wife and he didn't say but if he has a wife and he said there the is that there is a marion hence it's going to be possible I so that should be a that there's no marine and that of really underpins the whole second part of the people would know if he's know here too shouldn't we say the same thing says no apple was done and as a result nobody really knew about rashi by the way has a whole another gear so I had to learn the last few lines of And on that note, so as it relates to raid, we're going to do what we did yesterday seemed to have worked and that is we're going to attach a raid bite again from Alf from the last maker. It's really a continuation of the raid by that we attach to and that is talking about the Malik [snorts] specifically the idea that the Malik is the inab and like springs he's what we mean when we say it's referring to the carbon that are that are literally just one interesting and then we'll uh hand it over to seven and a half years ago and that is that I once heard from a Schwarzman he told me that he remembers he was a young and one of the asked he said heard the question and he jumped up and he said You wanted me to be between two and there is a [laughter] What does it mean? Which sounds like THE almost either way we'll hand it over to seven and a half years ago. One and that is related to what we spoke about at the end of yesterday's dap. So yesterday we spoke a little bit about we mentioned the where the says that there's a and there's a and there's a in that and there's a and is who as we saw yesterday in addition to being you know one of the the he was one of the three that came to the beginning of but in addition to all of that is also the s of every nation has a s the so all these and all these in his dream when the living inherit when it's don't have a mal but when we're in it's every is governed by who's who's our mal it's the malik he's the one that protects us. In addition to that is also the the is the either way spoke a little bit about just one unbelievable from and that is that just like when a person dies If he leaves over physical assets, his children, his inherit those assets. If a person had a and then he dies, his children. So for example, somebody was king after he dies, his son would become the next king. Is a it's a position of of power, of authority, and as a result, it's something that goes over the also went over. So after Haren passed away Allah became the next because that's something that also goes over the there's a concept of yusha not only for money physical assets but there's something called by as well the wrote a contress it's sim and it's all about [clears throat] as it relates to these so just one excerpt from [snorts] from this sim that's to me an unbelievable kadesh and that is that if a died and his son was now becoming the you had to do on the new and he says I don't understand what do you have to do mash for to the extent that he becomes the so why do you have to have mashik and the truth is that didn't need mash unless somebody was contesting the such as and but if if somebody's contesting the so you have to go ahead and and just to show and and to make it clear that this person is the next king. So they went ahead and did but ordinarily but when it comes to a see even though was going over there was of what's the extent that goes over why is that something that you have to do says that it says as follows that doesn't have doesn't have he doesn't lose his status as kangle once a kangle is always a now we could ask him to take a long vacation he could become a you know amiratus but at the same time he never loses his status as as the says and just like so too the meaning is going to be as well. So once somebody gets he can't ever lose his kadusha says if the doesn't lose his kadusha is from the fact that then we need to say that just like it's so to the as well it's in other words not only have kadusha on this world but after 121 When a dies and he goes up to he retains his because and just like is true even so to the retains his kadusha even in the says the what does it manifest itself so dies and now he's in he's still we don't And it's brought down in different places that the laugh is the primary. But it could be there otherhan that also have the ability to do the who are they any person that was a world has the ability to go up to and be a well says if that's the case that's the in why he says cuz what's the is somebody lived on this world he had money now he dies doesn't have the money anymore the money's gone >> [laughter] >> his boss was. So what happens? Somebody needs to come in his place now and take over. Say his children. There's a parish of this is a say to us of how it goes over. But Yusha is predicated on the fact that the person that died because he died is no longer the owner of this item. Thus we have an ownerless item. So what do we do with it? No, there's a s of nlas. There's a s of yusha. But to the extent that the mace would be able to take his possessions with him to the next world, THERE'D BE NO IS THE THAT HIS BLESS WAS NOSTALGIC. HE'S NOT the says when it comes to physical things, a person doesn't take it with him to the next world. But the takes his with him into the next world. In fact, in the next world, IT'S BUT IT COULD BE ONE OF the from this world as well. If that's the case, it comes out that he never gave up his vitals to Kodo when he died. If he never gave up his vitals, it can't go over bea. In other words, there's an element of kuna that goes over busha, but there's an element of kuna that cannot go over bush. The element that the can take with him to the next world theor that's a that's a [laughter] that's a take with him that goes over. So there's a concept of underella. Yeah. That dies that doesn't go into the next world. But the that's the of the to the has on the next world if he has it in the next world it was never his bless from it as a result it doesn't go over if it doesn't go over that's why needs mashik he doesn't need mash to attain the he needs to attain the kadusha because being that the kang that died never relinquished that kadusha he takes it with him in the next as a result. It's an unbelievable idea that when it comes to you have a fullfledged but when it comes to you don't have you don't have a full-fledged yusha because yusha is predicated on the dead person no longer having what he had a person's gashmas his money everything that he accumulates on this world he has it's very nice but once he goes into the ca they close the coffin the talis it's all over you have a whole peration what happens to the money all that happens because the guy is not around anymore he doesn't have it but a person's mitzvah is you know that the guy takes with him that's all his that he has with him in the next world I mean that is one of those assets that a person can take with him into the next world as a result they can't be on the shabusha but on the shabite there's And that's why you need even for I saw in the one of the places the mentions is so he says that the but has the ability to do the in this is really is in the begins. What's the first mitzvah mentioned in the mitzvah? You should take from the best and the brightest and the shiniest of all your parents. You should put into a basket. You should come to the coin and you should tell me says I took a very close look at this par that's a far look that this is a rem to a person who comes up into the says We know that is always a but is always a says the real that a person is going to have is when he's that a person can attain in this world this not real this is a mshel of what really is But says the the real that's that a person is going to be when he goes to the and that is going to give it to us. It's a mat from but it's a mat that doesn't come easy. It's an oxymoron. It's a mat that you worked for. A person comes down to this world, his job is to work, to fight his inclinations, to fight his but ultimately if he if he is is left standing then to this and in that world you're going to take you're going to take all the good things that you did. You're gonna escort it with you. You're not going to take everything but the real things the other stuff that that remains. You're not going to take everything. What are you going to take from the the mitzvah the person is going to take with him? And he goes on he touches after see it inside the punch line that we need. You're going to come to the this person who was to reach these major he's going to stand in front of the Malik and the is going to look at him is this person is he worthy of being that brings every single day and that's going to be the determination And I forgot to bring it with me, but God brings from the talk about the and the epitome, the pinnacle of pleasure that could have is to be to be that that's going to be brought as a are off the charts. But either way, he says, and we'll end with this. You're going to come to the but what does it say? What do you mean? It's one it's says it's not always going to be it could be it's going to be but not necessarily doesn't have to be and he goes on he brings it from this etera etc regardless this of the that it could be the bas just like his kadush hook to the kadush I'm walking the kadusha is talking so to the god those going to be when does it mean his what it means is he could be it doesn't have to be where he explains in the beginning that that's referring to the could be it would be a different coin