Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Chulin 28
1 views
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Today's stuff is holding that
and we are eight lines from the bottom
of that
on the base on the Yehuda mission of
Ben
today's stuff is being learned as a
for the other Yeshaya Ben Brock today's
stuff is also being learned for nishmas
Jamila but symbol. So yesterday we began
the second paragraph of school and it's
called
it deals very much with ideas related to
shrita specifically
it's a death that requires an asterisk
from the standpoint
that it's
very informative and foundational as it
relates to the
the source
>> [snorts]
>> to
what exactly
is shrita has to be
involves many
that govern it and what we saw in the
course of the was five potential
in the to
exactly what the definition of shrita is
additionally at the latter part of the
of
the
talked a little bit about what's the
to
if in other words all five
that the brought for
involved a him the question is there's a
lot of
as it relates to in as well as the two
of
only one but what is the to
and the brought a
it says to a
the
will be
him to if what's the purpose of this my
brother
and the
said my the
of if the of if
so [snorts]
in the
latter part of the daf, we shifted our
focus from schitas beheima to schitas
oif,
the gemara now is going to very much
pick up on that note. In fact, the
entire daf, mechila v'tzoif, is going to
discuss different halachas related to
schitas oif. The very first part of the
daf, the source to schitas oif min
ha'Torah, and by the way, is there even
a source to schitas oif min ha'Torah?
So, the gemara omra v'Yehuda mi'shum
Yitzchak ben Pinchas, ein schita l'oif
min ha'Torah. There is no obligation
mid'oraisa
to shecht an oif. How do I know that?
Because the pasuk says, in the parsha of
kisui hadam. So, kisui hadam is the name
of a perek in maseches chulin. The
halachas of kisui hadam very much
intersect with the halachas of schita.
The Torah says that in the event that
somebody shecht a chaya or an oif,
if the dam is going to spill on the
ground, v'chisa b'afar. There's a
mitzvah d'oraisa to go and to cover the
dam. Interestingly, it's not a mitzvah
that one has to do with the dam of a
beheima, it's only nogaya with a chaya
or an oif. But, either way, the pasuk
says, in the context of kisui hadam,
v'ish asher yosid se'id chaya oif asher
yochal, v'shafach es damoi, v'chisa
b'afar. You know what it sounds like?
It sounds like you don't have to shecht
the oif, as long as it's v'shafach, that
in and of itself is going to be okay.
Shouldn't the lashon of the pasuk have
been v'shachat? Said Rabi Yehuda in the
name of Rabi Yitzchak ben Pinchas, you
see from here, ein schita l'oif min
ha'Torah. But, the gemara says,
if v'shafach is a de'ik, and this is the
makor to ein schita l'oif min ha'Torah,
chaya nami, then there should be no
schita when it comes to a chaya either.
The same pasuk that says v'shafach
regarding the oif, says v'shafach
regarding the chaya. But, the gemara
says you can't say that. You know why?
Because iskash l'psulei hamikdashin. So,
we'll see more about this in the course
of the daf, but we have a hekesh between
a haya and a beheima that's psulei
hamikdashin. A beheima that's psulei
hamikdashin means a beheima that's
kodesh
that has a mum, so then now if you
wanted to be poited, you could be
poited. And the pasuk says regarding
such a beheima that you're allowed to
eat it in the same way you eat the tzvi
and the ayil. Meaning, kodesh has a lot
of halachas that limit the way you're
allowed to eat it. But that's only true
if it's not psulei hamikdashin. The
Torah says in the event that it has a
mum, so then you could eat it the same
way you eat the tzvi and the ayil. But
we learn from the comparison of the
psulei hamikdashin to the tzvi and the
ayil that just like psulei hamikdashin
requires shchita. Why does it require
shchita? Because it's a beheima. Beheima
always requires shchita. So too, the
tzvi and the ayil also requires shchita.
So the Gemara says you want to know why
when I could a darshin v'shafach hadam,
to teach me b'shvicha b'alma saggi when
it comes to a haya, the same way we
darshin it when it comes to an ayil,
it's because when it comes to a haya, we
already have a positive source that says
it requires shchita. It's the fact that
it's iskash l'psulei hamikdashin. But
the Gemara says if that's the case, oif
nami iskash l'beheima. Don't we have a
hekesh between the ayil and the beheima?
The braisa that we started the daf with,
that we saw on the top of the amud.
D'ksiv zos Torahs habeheima v'ha'ayil.
And if a beheima requires shchita, that
should mean that an ayil requires
shchita as well. The Gemara says true,
but oif v'shafach hadam, which I do. I
understand I have a hekesh between the
beheima and the ayil, but don't I also
have the meitah v'shafach hadam, ayil?
And that overrides the hekesh. But the
Gemara says if that's the case, then why
don't you say v'shafach hadam, ayil to
override the hekesh between the haya and
psulei hamikdashin? You're going to tell
me because there's a hekesh m'man
nafshach. In other words, my chos shai
d'leya ayil, shai d'leya haya. How do
you know to say that v'shafach hadam,
ayil is coming to be m'ma'et
that shvicha b'alma saggi when it comes
to an despite the fact that you have a
heck is those terrorists have a hammer
of life. Maybe say that the Shofar is
done is coming to be the Maya Chaya
despite the fact that you have the heck
is between the Chaya and the Holy of
Holies. So the Gamara says I'm going to
tell you why it's stubborn the solid
minute. It's more stubborn that the
Shofar is done like is referring to the
life
than it is
referring to the Chaya. And the reason
is because if you look in the possuk,
the possuk says the Shofar is done like
right next to the dimension of the life.
As you all say Chaya or life as you say
you all have the Shofar. Now the Shofar
in Shofar is referring to the Chaya and
the life that I mentioned prior to it.
But it says it immediately after the
life. And indeed it says immediately
after the life it's more stubborn to say
that the Shofar is referring to the
life. In other words,
Rebbe Huda Rebbe Yisrael Pinchas said in
Shofar in the Torah. You know how I know
that? Because it says the Shofar in the
parsha of Kisei Adam. And the Shofar
teaches me the Shofar Masachi. I if the
Diyuk is the Shofar that it says in the
parsha of Kisei Adam. The parsha of
Kisei Adam is not only true for life
it's true for a Chaya as well. So just
like this is a Makor that in Shofar in
the Torah it should be a Makor that in
Shofar Chaya in the Torah. And we know
that's not the case. The answer is that
as it relates to Chaya there's a heck is
that teaches me that the Shofar is
the Shofar of the Holy of Holies.
Doesn't this also have a heck is those
terrorists have a hammer of life? Yeah
but you have a Miyut. Okay so how do you
know to apply the Miyut
to life maybe apply it to Chaya. They
both have a heck is going up against the
Miyut. So my the answer is because it
says the Shofar next to the life. It's
the proximity. It's two words closer to
life than it is to Chaya. And it's for
that reason we put it on life we don't
put it on the Chaya. Siman is noble down
below this is a siman for three cashes
that the Gamara is going to ask now on
Rebbe Yisrael Pinchas base. For the
first cash show I'll show you
if somebody shacked an animal that
requires Kisei Adam and it's noble
below.
However the shacked wasn't a proper
shacked it ended up being in a veil law.
Or
if somebody did
or he did equal so that a lot is
possible
you are part of your exam you don't have
to do kiss you down only time you do
kiss you down is in the event that you
did a a proper street but to the extent
it wasn't a proper street that done then
there's no kiss you down
if you going to tell me there's no such
thing as street that anyway when it
comes to an life so
you street that also you buy key How
could it be a lot that the only time
there's a mix of kiss you down by an
life is if you did a street that if
there's no mix of street that the cloud
when it comes to an life says the Gamora
great kiss you down me sad but I
who said that that mission that says
or I know you
part of the
is talking about the mix of kiss you
down by an life talking about the mix of
kiss you down by a
a higher for sure has a mix of street
that and that's what this a lot is going
to be in a good touch now another kiss
you down from a price of a street If
somebody
something again that requires kiss you
down but it's all
now the person over here needed the
blood so because of the fact that
he needs the blood he has a self a
little bit of a a situation on the one
end is a mix of a
kiss you down the problem is he doesn't
want to do the kiss you down he wants to
keep the blood for himself so what
should he do
I have a lot of
kids that do I say if you're trying to
work around it
just don't do a real street that If you
don't do a real street that like we
mentioned from the mission a second ago
there won't be a mix of kiss you down
and if there won't be a mix of kiss you
down it's like this you'll be able to
keep the down now my love life isn't
this price of probably talking about an
life why do we assume that the
maybe unique because here this person we
know wants the down the down of an life
was used sometimes actually says to
protect against certain
that grows in big data center a most of
a lot but the point is that's what
people sometimes used to use them for.
So probably it's
kissuy of dam oif because that's
probably why the person would want the
dam. And you see clearly that if you
or if you
in that instance is not going to be an
issue but the says
there is sometimes a usage that people
have for the blood of a
they used it for certain dyes. Again,
this braysa like the previous mishna
could be is talking about it's talking
about a of course has a
and here of course there would be that
if you did a
it would not require to my third
because
from the mishna
paragraph mishna that we know well in
the event that a didn't
with a
and he did it with a
that's not the way you're supposed to do
it you're supposed to do it with a
but he did it with a knife
is
>> [snorts]
>> that
it's not kosher in the world of
in the world of
but this is going to be to the
which means in it's
what's the
if you're going to
if you're going to tell me there's no
name of the
I
understand if this was
so he rendered the a
why did he render it a because when he
did the he had to go through the
I guess and that in and of itself is one
of the
money
but at the same time why is it in a
why is it
to this
we should say that the
at the very least was my
to
to say to say that it's not going to be
that was the background to this
the background is a that we learned
together last week and that is the
discussed a little bit why is it
is
why is it a why is it a
he did a
it's a treifa. But should there not have
been
at the very least a treifa? And the
Gemara had two mahalchin. Why? One was
because when a person is molik b'sakin,
he's dayris.
L'manda amar malika had to be done dafka
in a pushing way as opposed to being
molik umavi. Additionally, the Gemara
had a tzad that maybe it's because of
chalada. So the Gemara already addressed
why it's metama begodol base olia. And
the short answer was it's because it's
not ois chalatin with
one of two of the five halachas from
Moshe Rabbeinu. So additionally, if
you're going to tell me there's a
hilchos shchita min ha Torah when it
comes to oifis, I understand why molik
b'sakin is metama begodol base olia cuz
you tripped up either on hadrasa or on
chalad. But if you're going to tell me
that there's no shchita min ha Torah
anyways, so what's the issue? There's no
halachas that govern the way you have to
kill this oif. So if that's the case,
what should be the problem? So again, I
understand it's a treifa. There could be
a concept of treifa. But in terms of
nevela, that's something that makes
absolutely no sense. And the Gemara says
this is such a good kasha
on what Rebbi Yehuda said in the name of
Rebbi Yitzchak ben Pinchas. This is such
a makor that yesh shchita min ha Torah
that the Gemara has no choice but to say
"Who the amar ki haitana?" That enochi
nami, this Mishna is the way ki Rebbi
Yehuda mi shum Rebbi Yitzchak ben
Pinchas. How could Rebbi Yehuda mi shum
Rebbi Yitzchak ben Pinchas be choylik
with a Mishna? He can't. However, he has
a tzad of the mesayalei. Who's this tzad
of the mesayalei? It's the following
braysa. The tanyu Reb Lo Achai ben Rebbi
Yoi.
Ma tam l'lo amar? The pasuk says
regarding psulei hamikdashin ach kasha
yeochal asat tsvi
ba'aso ayil kein toichlenu hatomei
v'hatohor yachdav yoichlenu. So again,
this is the drasha that we mentioned at
the beginning of the daf that we said
the Gemara is is to go into a little bit
more. So the Torah over there is talking
about a behema kasham. It has a mum.
It's psulei hamikdashim. You don't have
to treat it anymore with all the
stringencies that you have to treat
kasham. So, for example, you could eat
it bishalah. Right? There's a lot of
kulos that suddenly you're going to
have. Hatamei da hatar yakhtov. And when
the Torah tells me this halacha, Torah
gives me a mashal. The dubna maggid's
mashal. Ach kashir yeiyochal es hatzvi.
Das ayil kein to'chlen. The way you eat
the tzvi and the ayil and the yakhmur,
right? This is the way that you are
allowed to eat this as well. And the
gemara asks, "Reb Elozar ben Kappar
berebbi talking, "Chimalo madu mitzui
ayil miyata?" A mashal always has to add
a little bit of havana
to the nimshal. What exactly is this
mashal teaching me?" Said Reb Elozar ben
Kappar berebbi, "Nothing." Hareish
habola lamei? The tzvi va'ayil were
written in a way like it's coming to
teach something. Over the emes is ben
nimshal lamei. It was put in here not to
teach, but to learn. Mi talmidei yotzei
mikulo. This what's going on over here.
That really it's coming to learn
something. What's it coming to learn?
Makkes tzvi va'ayil psulei hamikdashim.
Coming to be makkes tzvi and the ayil
psulei hamikdashim. Makkes tzvi and the
ayil psulei hamikdashim beshchita. Does
it require shchita? Makkes requires
shchita. Right? How do you know that? I
mean, first of all, it's a behema. And
by the way, it's the pasuk right before
that that says "Vezavachtem mikol behema
mitzayid." The grace of pasuk in parshas
Re'eh perek beis is one pasuk prior to
this one. But either way, we learn from
here "Af tzvi va'ayil beshchita." So, do
the tzvi and the ayil require shchita as
well? Okay. We really need the next
line. The oif, as it relates to oif,
that was not iskash to psulei
hamikdashim. Kasham in the shchita
midivrei Torah ela midivrei soferim. So,
Reb Elozar ben Kappar berebbi said that
in this pasuk over here, "Ach kashir
yeiyochal es hatzvi." "Kein to'chlen
otomei da hatar yakhtov."
That pasuk teaches me what I need to
know as relates to shchita min haTorah.
Behema, that's five mikra'os halachos
leMoshe miSinai. That we know already.
Even [snorts]
shchita min hatzavar could be as
mikra'os. So, the ikar halacha of
shchita that is possible when it comes
to a beheima, or at the very least it's
yesterday's daf.
As it relates to chaya, and as it
relates to an oif, said Rebbe Elozar
Kapor bar Rebbe, it's tut zich all in
this pasuk over here. From the fact that
we were makish psulei um mikdashim to
the chaya, hareizei bal olam mitzvinim
tzo lamid, to teach me that what? That a
chaya requires schita just like a
beheima, and also to teach me that only
the chaya requires. From the fact that
we're only makish
the chaya, and the Torah was not makish
the treif. Right? The Torah could have
said you could eat the psulei um
mikdashim the way you eat the chaya, the
way you eat the chicken. It didn't say
that. Why? Because the Torah wanted me
to know yes schita l'chaya min ha'Torah,
and no schita l'oif min ha'Torah. But
the bottom line is, you have [snorts]
here a Mefureish Tana that holds ein
schita l'oif min ha'Torah. Who the am
arki it is? Any kinami, the Mishneh
Molech bisakin is mefureish that there
is l'oif min ha'Torah. But Rebbe Elozar
Kapor bar Rebbe Omer, he had his shtikel
Torah, his drasha, to teach me ein
schita l'oif min ha'Torah. So let's go
to Maimonides the Bal Ha'Maor Rebbe
Elozar Kapor. Is there a name that we
could put to the face? Meaning, can we
name the Tana that holds
that
yesh schita l'oif min ha'Torah. So the
Gemara says yes, we can. Rebbe Hiya is
Rebbe. The Tanna, we learned in a
braisa, this is from the Yesodei
ha'Torah braisas in the world of the
first part of Maseches Chulin. Rebbe
Hiya Omer, Rebbe says, it says
v'zivachtem b'chol nafsho, asher lo cha,
kasher tzivicha. And if you look in the
psukim, I mentioned this in the
introduction to the Masechta, there is
no mention anywhere of how schita is
supposed to happen. We had some remasim,
right? That was in yesterday's daf. But
there's certainly no mefureish pasuk in
the Torah anywhere that tells me hilchos
schita. Milamdim, you know what you see
from here? Shenitstavah Moshe, Moshe
Rabbeinu was commanded Torah sheba'al
peh, al ha'veshet v'al ha'kaneh,
regarding the esophagus and the trachea.
Additionally,
it's
one and it's Rubashkin
when it comes to be him and then you
have to have two. But what's the bottom
line? You see over here that it's
motion.
That's what we need.
Yes,
the bottom line is we just concluded the
first part of the day which mentions a
month Biggest turn up started off with a
memory from Yehuda, but it ended really
very much
turn on my
brother
and brother. My brother turn on whether
or not yes Rita men are tired. That's
the star mission
in
that's also [ __ ] as Robin the price of a
cashier to be seeking was not only on
the be him or but it was also on the
other
brother brother learned from the fact
that we equate to the
doctor the higher and not the
we learn from the sheet of
a minute of a sheet of a
life minute
there's one very important
here in the city that we need to speak
out before we go right there. And the
rush is really
right at the beginning of the day on the
bottom of
as she says that even the man that holds
that life minute it does not mean that
you could put a bullet between the eyes
of the
and go ahead and eat it. There is a
concept of the veil of
when it comes to an
just the concept of Thomas base of
tells you that there's an idea of the
veil of when it comes to an that's a
unique type of the table says as it
relates to
this him of is in the context of Thomas
so we know for sure that there's
something called Thomas the veil of when
it comes to an
what do you mean I thought it was a
in sheet of a life minute just
that when you kill the if you don't have
to follow the shulchan aruch of the five
that govern the way shita has to happen
but at the same time the Mesa the Riga
of the if has to happen in the simanim
either the corner and the vashet but
where is what a narrow way you have to
do a shita here you could do a
you could do an
you can violate the Russell and
Well
well
all those things are not going to matter
but at the same time it's a double
portion that there is a concept of the
when it comes to an if because otherwise
the whole partial of the
would have no market and we know for
sure that
they talk about the concept of the
so how you kill the if is for sure
governed by some
the child of the
in this the school SCHOOL
IS THAT THE GAME or no as long as you
kill it by the
so it's an interesting thing you would
think the whole
of the
is the fact that there's a
on
what's the difference if you kill it
[snorts] by the you kill it in the heart
you kill it in some other way the is no
the is
even if
the
there's still an idea that the Mesa has
to happen the simanim the child is do
you have to be sensitive to all these
different nuances in terms of the way
it's going to happen at the first
actually
the in shita life either way
we now turn our attention
to the second part of the today's stuff
is made up of three parts so part two so
the mission had said that when it comes
to a
two simanim when it comes to an if one
simanim
that's what the mission says
a huge on my own in terms of the
definition of it might have
said I
corner that when it comes to it, get to
pick, right? This is uh
your free will. You want the corner, do
the corner. You want the veshet, I'm
more of a corner guy. I'm more of a
veshet guy. That's fine. You can pick
and choose which one of the simanim you
want to go ahead and check with.
Veshet for like corner. No such thing as
being a corner guy. You have to sever
the veshet. The only way you can take
out the is through the esophagus.
I know it's veshet like corner. You know
I know that.
It says that you can
pick whichever one you want.
Veshet for like corner. You know why?
Cuz my he touched means
and the veshet [snorts] is more than the
corner. Now how do you know that the
veshet is more than the corner?
Then the corner.
>> [snorts]
>> So Rashi says, I'll tell you how you
know. Because in the world of treifus,
if there is an
ass a veshet, if there's a tiny hole,
even the size of a mushroom in the
veshet, there's a problem. When it comes
to the corner, we know even if
corner is whacked out, it's still okay.
After they cut
if you just go and you put it over the
edge, that would be a an a fine shita.
But what do you see from here? You see
that the corner is much more critical
than is I'm sorry, you see the veshet is
much more critical than the corner.
Because that
can't live with a tiny puncture in the
veshet, but it can live just fine if
it's missing half its corner. So I say
matters the veshet is more
that's the
of the simanim. So
I said that I see it before
cuz I think when the mission says
it means me lotion me you had. So
according to
it means one. Therefore you get to pick
or you veshet or you corner. According
to
it means me you had which is the me you
had that's easy. That's for sure going
to be the veshet. It says the simanim.
Shachat hatsa in gargares pigima the
oif. Maybe it's just me but it feels
like there's been a lot of simanim here
in Chulin, Maybe we're just making a
bigger deal about them, but there's
definitely been a lot of simanim here.
And this is a siman for a whole bunch of
toshmas that the Gemara is going to ask.
It's going to be malavus all the way now
to the bottom of the yam. It's up to
Gemara Maseches Akasha on Rav Nachman.
Rav Nachman is the one that said "Oif
veshet oif kana." The chiyus is in first
place as much as not that way. Where is
that shochat as a veshet? The price is
talking about shchitas oif. If somebody
shochets the veshet for
nishmas the gargeres, and then after he
shocheted the veshet, the gargeres, also
known as the kana, the trachea, slipped
out of its place. So, the trachea
actually says it's mechubas to the
lechi. It's mechubas to the jawbone. And
it slipped out. So, first he shocheted
the veshet, and afterwards the kana was
dislocated. She'era, the halacha is it's
going to be kosher. Nishmas the
gargeres. If first the gargeres slipped
acher shchitas veshet, then he shocheted
the veshet, so it's going to be
possible. Possible The reason it's going
to be possible is cuz it's a treifa. So,
if it happened before the shchita,
that's a problem. If it was nishchita,
and then afterwards it was minishmita,
obviously that's not in the shochat as a
veshet. If nishmas the gargeres
minishmita, would we have to shochet
when he shocheted the veshet? And then
he found the gargeres was shmuta. Any of
the day as a safek. Im kodem shchita
nishmita, im l'acher shchita nishmita.
Zeh haya maiseh. Believe it or not, was
a real-life story. Maiseh shehaya
kachaya. The amud kol safek bishchita.
This is not surprising. Psula is going
to be possible. Right. Ches kesain is a
vuach. Even chaya, etc. etc. But what's
the Gemara's kasha? What's it doing to
Rav Nachman? The evil shchita begargeres
lo ikatonai. Why is this price is so
busy about shochat as a veshet?
The same shaila would have been if it
was shochat as a gargeres. SHOCHAT ACHER
MIN A SIMAN. WHY ARE WE MAKING A BIG
DEAL about the veshet? Oh, must be cuz
shchitas oif has to be the veshet. It's
a raya to Rav Nachman. It's a kasha to
Rav Nachman. The Gemara says "No, mishum
the gargeres avida lishtamutei."
Because, again, when our farmers were
shochting
and the metzius is that it's more likely
for the gargaris to slip out of place
than for the veshet. So being that this
is the case that's more likely where you
would be shochet as a veshet finish
gargaris supposed to be the other way
around, right? So this is like a normal
way for it to happen right supposed to
shochet as a gargaris finish veshet.
This is the more likely more likely way
for it to happen. So
we talking the more normal case but
don't get so technical. There's no
question in the world if it happened in
the reverse order that the halacha would
be the same. So another one from a
braisa shochet as two simanim.
But if if somebody shochet two half of
simanim by the if he shochet half of the
cona and half of the veshet psul it's
going to be psul. Why? Because you have
to shochet either one full siman or a
reva of one siman. In this case he
didn't do the inside of the beheima.
Goes without saying by beheima if you
shochet it half and a half it's not
going to be okay. Right what's the
inside of the beheima?
Because if you shochet half the cona
half the veshet by the if at least
together you have one siman. By the
beheima if you shochet half of one and
half of the other together you have one
siman which is a problem because you
really need two. Rebbe Yehuda Rebbe
Yehuda says by the when it comes to the
if ad she yishakhet es ha veshet es ha
veridin. When it comes to the if it's
not going to be kosher unless you
shochet the veshet and the veridin. So
more about the veridin in the third part
of the daf. But what do you see from
here? You see from here that which one
did Rebbe Yehuda say you have to
shochet? The veshet. Why do you say the
veshet? You should have said one siman
and the veridin. Why do you say the
veshet? So they want to say it's between
the veshet and the veridin. Rebbe Yehuda
holds you have to shochet the veridin.
Again more about that later. But being
that Rebbe Yehuda holds you have to
shochet the veridin and the veshet is
next to the veridin so it's just easier
for the shochet to go take out the
veshet and the veridin boom. The cona
and then travel
to the veridin that's a little trickier
and therefore he said the veshet. In
Rebbe Yehuda's world it makes sense that
that's probably what the shochet is
going to do. See he's not stipulating a
halacha he's just telling you probably
the way it's going to play itself out.
Touch my third touch my shochet gargaris
in the event that the shochet when he
shocheted
>> Half of the gargaris again
the shock today
and then he waited
the amount of time that it would take to
do a shita. That's the sheer shihia more
about that in coming dafin. The gomorrah
and then he completed the shita. Shita
the law is that the shita is going to be
kosher again. So what happened? He
shacted half of the gargaris and then he
did a shihia and then he completed the
shita. The law is it's it's going to be
kosher. Okay, what's the shila? My love
life aren't we talking about whatever
the means but aren't we talking about
even an oif? And if that's the case
when
the brisa says that he was gomorrah what
did he finish? Probably gomorrah the
gargaris. What was the case? Shochet the
gargaris there was a shihia and then he
finished it for some whatever reason
that's not a shihia. But the bottom line
is we're probably talking about an oif.
Now maybe not exclusively an oif but
probably also an oif. And you see
clearly shochet gargaris is going to be
okay. This is not a kosher on Rav
Nachman. Right Rav Nachman. You see from
here oif konoif you see from here the
konoif is going to be okay but the
gomorrah says lie. The behema could be
we're talking about a behema. gomorrah
gomorrah the shita kulo. And if it means
behema it's not enough that you gomorrah
the gargaris cuz now you have TO GET THE
YOU FINISHED the gargaris and you
finished the but there's no raya that
we're talking about a behema cuz Rav
Nachman maybe that when it comes to the
oif echon means
it has to be the shochet the shochet the
shochet the shochet the shochet in the
event that you had the konoif
where half the konoif was already pogum.
Right half of it was taken out. That
does not render it a treifa. For all of
course sure and then you did a shita
a little bit of a
and you took it over the edge. Oh
gomorrah shita
it's going to be kosher. Says the
gomorrah my love isn't this a law true
even by an oif? Oh my gomorrah what does
gomorrah mean? Gomorrah the konoif. You
just feared oif the corner. What do you
see from here? That it's just corner is
kosher when it comes to an open mouth as
light as a hammer. We're talking about a
hammer. Oh my god, we're going to go
with the meaning you did the Gamora on
the corner, but you also go with the
and then it says it's going to be okay,
one final touch my kids and milk and hot
sauce life. How do you do with the hot
sauce life? Shed raw.
The coin takes his fingernail. He goes
through the shed raw, the spine. Oh my
freaking ass, he breaks the bone. But
wait, right boss, you don't take out
right boss. That was the memory from
last week. Actually my dealer
until we get to either the vessel of
let's do this carefully because this is
going to be checkmate. Kids and milk and
hot sauce life. You go through the shed
raw. You break the
You don't take out the right boss. You
get to the vessel or the corner. The
vessel or the corner. You get a vessel
or the corner when you get to the vessel
or the corner. Holy cinnamon
the right boss or in my You take off one
cinnamon and right boss or in my Uber
when it comes to the cinnamon or
right cinnamon because by the
they already we know big but they have
to take out the two cinnamon. But what's
the bottom line? You see from here that
when it comes to Malika you get to pick
and choose. You can take either the
vessel or the corner. The assumption is
if you can take it by Malika probably by
as well. And if that's the case you have
to the right by the have a tooth though.
You see it doesn't have to be the
vessel. It could be the corner or the
vessel. So we had a Malika from
the right by the have a tooth
When we say a lot of life
does it mean you get to pick? A lot of
sound like pick the one you like. Or no,
a lot of means a lot of you get to pick
a lot of says no, it has to be the
vessel. We had five touch mars that were
encapsulated in a cinnamon. And at the
end of the day the Gamora came out to
the right by the have a tooth though.
Says the Gamora a post script. My have a
lot of What's the bottom line? Pick the
Gamora my have a lot of Are you paying
attention?
I just told you you have to the right by
the have a tooth though. What more We
didn't say a lot of means I hear. WE
SAID YOU HAVE TO you have to means
checkmate. It means next conversation.
We didn't say "Tishbi."
We said "Tiufta." So, what else is there
to talk about? He says "No, I'll tell
you what. Because at the end of the day,
it's not really such a tiufta. Because
the mashani has some Maybe malika is
talking different than shrita. You know
why? The shedra mafrakas. Because malika
comes from the back. And when you come
from the back, you go through the
shedra. You go through the neck bone.
And by the time you get to the simen,
this oif has already seen better days,
right? So, at that point, the oif is
literally hanging on by a kana or a
veshet.
>> [laughter]
>> I think that that's the case. So,
really, it's kamat dead. SO, IF YOU GO
AHEAD NOW, and you sever that one simen,
so then
but if you doing a shrita, so if you
come even seven minutes later, I'll say
here you come from the other side. You
come from the other side. You didn't go
through the mafrakas.
You didn't do that whole mess. So, as a
result, maybe over there you would need
a
you the veshet dafka. And maybe you
wouldn't have the option to do a kana or
a veshet. Again, the veshet is more
critical to the life of the oif. That is
the premise of the shrita of Rav Ada bar
Ahava. The fact that you find by malika
the kana is enough, could be that's
because it's coming after the shedra and
the mafrakas. But when it comes to
shrita oif, maybe over there it's not
going to be the case. And therefore, the
Gemara says "My." Says much as the
Gemara said "Tiufta to Rav Ada bar Ahava
tiufta."
You have to know me kara me kasavra me
kasavra.
The Gemara says "You know something?
After a further review,
not sure.
I think we have to revisit this. I I
think I need a better raya than this."
The Gemara says "Tashma. I'll give you a
better raya." The hu bar Avza.
There was a duck. Rav Ada bar Ahava
lived in the house of Rav Ada. Rav Ada
had a duck. As came in as miss koya
dama, and one day, the duck walks in.
It's madish not sure. He walks in, and
this duck had blood on its neck and it
was obvious that something had happened
to it, right? It was in some sort of
injury. Something for sure took place.
I'm my rubber and rubber looked at this
duck and he said, "Take care of it."
Like what exactly are we supposed to do?
Meaning they were trying to figure out
whether this duck is kosher or it's not
kosher. Could be the type that it's not
kosher. Could be the treif. Could be
this issue that it has on its neck right
now rendered it a treif.
>> [snorts]
>> So he said, "How do we go about this?"
He said, "Schitah and niftah came in the
easy thing is go ahead and schecht it."
And after we schecht it, we'll be able
to do a bedikah and we'll see whether
there was a treif or there was not a
treif. But rubber said, "I don't like
this in this case cuz there were makam
nakav kashah. Maybe the blood is coming
from a nakav in the vashet and when we
go ahead and we schecht the the vashet,
you're going to do it ba makam nakav
like this when you do the bedikah
afterwards, you're not going to see it.
Now ordinarily we're not worried about
that, right? Because ordinarily famous
oifes and ducks are not treif. But over
here there's a huge ray so so therefore
I have to be chashish. So I'm not sure
the schechitah in of itself is going to
be okay." So he said, "Niftah came
the hadar nishchitah. Maybe let's do the
bedikah before the schechitah. Let's
right now. Let's uh
you know, give it an MRI as we speak."
But
that should only be bedikah
bifnim. You have to do the schechitah
first in order to do bedikah. That's not
going to be and rubber was sitting and
he didn't know what to do. I'm going to
have berei. So
who was rubber's son, he was there. He
said, "I have a very pashtus." He said,
"Niftah came ba kan."
Let's be baidik the kanah because the
kanah you could be baidik ba bachutz.
Rubber said, "Vashet in the bedikah ba
bachutz bifnim." But as relates to the
kanah that you could be baidik ba
bachutz. So let's be baidik the kanah
and nishchitah the kanah. And we'll go
ahead and we'll schecht the kanah. The
lashon will know it's kosher. The hadar
after we schecht the kanah laf chula
vashet we'll take out the vashet and
we'll take a look and and see if it's
okay, if it's not okay. So Rebbe Yosef
turns to his father Rava and says,
"Rava,
you're right. There's no way to shecht
the veshet or be parted the veshet.
You're stuck. But, why you thinking so
much about the veshet? Let's focus on
the konah. The konah you
can't shecht because you know, maybe
you're going to shecht the makom
nekivah. And by the way, it wouldn't
just have to be the makom nekivah. It
would have to be the makom chatzi konah
be nakav. But, that's fine. We're
worried about that also. But, I could do
a bedikah right now. Right? That was
what he said. Nivedkei the konah. Let's
do the bedikah right now on the konah.
We'll do the shechitah. The konah you
could be parted me bachutz. And then
afterwards, we'll be parted the veshet
me bifnim. And when Rava heard this, he
was so excited. Shef nachas. Oh, my Rava
Chakam Yosef b'ri betraifus k'Rebbe
Yochanan. He said, "My son Yosef is a
baki betraifus mamesh like Rebbe
Yochanan was." Al mah what do you see
from here? Bottom line, echad hakomah ay
ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay
ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay ay
konah ay veshet. And if that's the case,
now we could say it's tzeit en mah. This
time without any hesitation and any
reservation, tiyuf da de Rav Adda bar
Ahava. Tiyuf da. This brings us
immediately
into the third part of the daf. So,
going back to the Mishnah. Rebbe Yehudah
omer, Yehudah said
that in when it comes to shechitas
oifus, the only time it's going to be
kosher
achshei yishcheit es havariden.
Actually, I gave away the punchline.
Rebbe Yehudah said in the Mishnah that
in order for shechitah to be kosher, you
have to shat the verita. Right? What was
the lotion?
Didn't say a word about
what's written. So again, we're
a little out of line here. But he said
these are certain veins that are in that
area that of the
and according to you have to go ahead
and you have to sever those veriden in
order for the shita to be kosher.
>> [snorts]
>> So made a comment on who does a lot
which is going to take us to the end of
the
comment the said
of
was
like we gave away the by
but it comes to be him and you don't
have to. And what's the reason? He said
because
of his the held that when said you have
to shat the veriden he didn't mean
but he wanted to
tell you that he holding
it's not enough. No,
there's also a lot you have to shat the
veriden. He sounds like has a different
definition of shita. So
no, but
that's what he's coming to say. That's
not true. His
definition of shita is the same as
everybody's definition of shita. Okay,
so then what does he
mean when he said
if it's not
it's because we know that anytime you
shat an animal
you
also have to worry about the blood
that's inside the animal. That is a very
very common
>> [snorts]
>> in the tire. And when you shat an
animal, obviously there's a lot of
blood. So what do we do to prevent the
blood? That's coming up. We do
most notably, but there's things that
are done to get rid of the blood.
You who the held that when it comes to
an it's very hard to get all the blood
out. And the only way to ascertain that
the blood's [clears throat] going to be
out is by taking out the veritan. These
are veins that have a lot of blood
inside of it. If you're going to shaq
the veritan together with the shaq of
the animal, the blood's going to come
out and like this you'll prevent the
issue now. So the reason
is not
it's
it's it's a
Now why does it have to be done at the
time of the it sounds like it has to be
done at the time of the time. And we'll
see in the the is going to say in the
first. So why would it have to be done
at the time of the so that we'll see the
is going to say it's because at the time
of the the is hot and it's very liquidy.
Once you let the sit around then it
starts to harden and at that point it's
going to be harder for it to get out. So
wants to make sure that all the
is going to get out and the way to do
that is while the is highest to go and
to take out the like this you'll get rid
of the out. Now because this is the
whole premise of
so
it's only by a knife. You know why? So
let's see it inside
because when you roast the you usually
roast it in a one shot. You take the
chicken and you you put it on the grill.
I will be able when it comes to you're
not taking the
axe and putting it on the grill. That's
a big grill, right? So
being that you're going to cut it up the
pastrami, the corn beef, the the spare
ribs, right? You're going to go ahead
and you're going to start hacking it
into pieces. So being that you're
anyways hacking it before the
like you don't need it because that is
going to bring out the So when it comes
to the if
it's going to be hard to get the out
through the prep of the food. So
therefore you have to do it
Take
out the do it
while the is highest. As opposed to when
it comes to the you'll be able to take
it out by the because you can anyways
end up chopping it up. It's going to be
okay. Bottom line says the maybe the
time to grab you to the mission down. If
he just had a huge right if you think
about it, he said huge condition
and a huge condition and have one. The
condition
>> [laughter]
>> is only in the
condition and have one is to do with
has to do WITH
THE MORE SAYS WHAT tonight
what does it sound like? It sounds like
you have to do a
the more dictator is is that
the word
it doesn't just mean kill, right? It has
a very very nuanced connotation and it
sounds like
as a reading it's part of the
AND WHERE IS IT EVEN MENTIONED in the
mission of
it's mentioned IN THE THAT DEFINE THAT
YOU DO
IF THIS IS JUST A AND
THEN JUST TALK ABOUT IT IN
IN THE MISSION OF
in the mission that talks about rule by
in the mission that immediately follows
how the
have to do
and you're not supposed to be
in the there's the mission that
immediately is followed by the talks
about the the
this is like from the most
of here in
this is where told me that
we're going to get to the of tell to me
over there when you get up to that part
of your day actually
reading sounds like it's
so the
says
actually in reading
not that you actually in that you
puncture but the more says okay my
actual
meaning not even don't edit it right but
it is if it said actually in but it
doesn't say actually right my actual
actually in
it's because the neck of has to happen
at the time of like we mentioned earlier
because that's when the is hot and
that's when you're going to be able to
get it out so the reason said it in the
mission of
is not because it's part of the but
because it has to be done
and if it's not going to be done
it's actually not going to work so the
location location location of this
is actually very much spot on
the
reason
is from a
the the reason
the
>> This is a brice that sounds less wordy
than the mission, right? So the mission
says that
This feels more like a mission.
Okay, nice to meet you, too.
But you see that in the street you have
to do
That sounds a little more like a brice.
That reading you have to be naked at the
time
According to the
They told
Being that the whole Indian of taking
out of a reading for sure is to be
So now the
Now what's the
what's the difference? If you
If you don't
What do you see
argument
They view
that they understood
to think that you have to do it
Now this is interesting cuz this is
again
But if
this brice
because We said
said
The is
It's only
The is
We said was
that The is
was that the idea is that it's all about
taking out the done. Right? It sounds
like
are telling you that that we are
standing your house is all about the
done. Which would
support the is in the house for sure.
And probably the is
It's all about then it's
that it would be
by
only
But what's then the cash
The cash
is is that what emerge from the
prior discussion in Rav Chisda was that
Rav Chisda's saying really another from
Rav Yehuda and that is is that when you
take out the V'redin you don't have to
conform with the Alachas of Shchita and
really it could have said
and the whole significance of
is actually in
that you see not that way because from
the fact that the I'm telling Rav Yehuda
you Rav Yehuda why do you require doing
it with a Shchita as if to say have to
conform with the five Alachas of Moshe
M'sinai right why should YOU HAVE TO BE
THAT WAY I UNDERSTAND everything you
said I I got your Alacha I understand
the Shchita and I want to do the Shchita
and Alacha but why do you need a Shchita
so this Tushma is is that you see that
the
have in the Shchita of Rav Yehuda was
that you have to do a proper Shchita
which is the way what Rav Chisda said
because Rav Chisda after he explained
Rav Yehuda the way he explained Rav
Yehuda he said
FROM THIS BRACHA YOU SEE Rav Yehuda's
Shchita is not not actually meaning that
the is about Dam and even on it's only
true by
but at the end of the day it sounds like
he holds
the most
you have to say like this the told Rav
Yehuda
now they
never thought that Rav Yehuda meant that
you have to do a bonafide Shchita they
understood that he meant that you have
to do a neck of a Shchita right and the
question was why would you even have to
do that so what's the answer for
Rav Yehuda holds
as he done the
the Russian
highest Shchita but about that at the
end of the day the is the way we thought
it was but about that at the end of the
day the is the way we thought it was
after the Gamara
play Rav Yirmiya Rav Yirmiya had a
Shaila the V'redin with Rav Yehuda the
V'redin when it comes to Rav Yehuda
going to be
so Rav Yirmiya wanted to know if the
Shchita's V'redin have to conform and
comply with the Alachas of Moshe M'sinai
now Rav Yirmiya was aware of Rav
Chisda's
so he went to clarify the Shaila but Rav
Yirmiya living in Australia lives in
so
wants to know this momish this shala he
was talking in shala. The reading
[snorts]
meaning
makes a part of the
or
doesn't because of the
really actually the shala
who said okay
I'm saying
from the shala and you don't have to do
it you can even make a neck of with a
with a thorn that's going to be okay.
It's
neck from the shala but in terms of
doing the proper shala that's not
something you have to do.
By the way this is also
the shala right but
the shala shala
I'm saying
possible. If somebody two halves by the
possible then
we had this brice earlier in the
right what's the answer because at least
by the two halves equal a whole which is
really all you need but when it comes to
a
two halves equaling a whole is not even
enough you need one or at least two but
the punchline is
but
actually the shala
what's the shala
you see it's only by if it's
then it couldn't be
by from the fact that it says
this is a
that this is only true
by office which means the shala of the
shala the shala of
the shala it's about
by the way might as well already close
the loop it's also in the tight of the
words right so it's a in the shala that
it's only in the
it's a in the
that it's because of not because in the
and it's in tight it's not actually
but it's actually
the shala
bottom line shala
which is also a shala
the
so as it relates to raid,
we're going through the
early dolphin of the second paragraph of
the school and which deals about street
by even quality and obviously a lot of
by even property but just has it over
all the things we saw already in these
first two dolphin and by the way we
haven't seen anything yet just in terms
of what's coming in the next few dolphin
this is like the real street the long
distance
are [snorts]
right around the corner but the point is
that we're going through the ideas of
street I think it's good I to speak out
to others
generally as it relates to the idea of
street that
the first
in what's arguably
for sure in the conversation the most
famous chuba in child chuba maybe you
would have
this is a madura nyana it's in your area
day of cinnamon youth
the native you would have was asked a
shilo the shilo of the shilo by the way
his name was gum fruit open heart that
was his name gum fruit open heart
doesn't sound like a polish but his name
was gum fruit open heart and he sends
the native you would have the following
question we'll just read the opening
paragraph make a key ball to the video
writes to my received your letter the in
a name of my cure the lawyer done away
despite the fact that I don't know you
I should bow show show you to be that
you came to ask a question who must I
believe the master
and I could tell from your letter that
you're an intelligent person in any
measure of the child when I receive
letters like this I try to respond the
show you to say lost this was the title
of the show is a
a show you kill a sham the natural of
the cover there was a person that I
could have bought who blessed him with a
natural of the cover the issue of the
cover in the hours this person owns
villages he owns forest I should buy
your hours and in his forest tear most
cool I say you are all the different
animals of the animal kingdom roam
there. And
this
Oppenheimer wants to know if it's for
him to go
become a straight for lots of time to go
hunt.
So this person is a very very wealthy
person. He's a very impressive person.
Actually first to him as a
right so he's some sort of
guy. And he is
someone that for sport, for game, wants
to go hunting. And he sent the
to
and he wants to know is it okay for him
to hunt or is it not okay for him to
hunt. So the
wrote a response and he went through
three
reasons why maybe it wouldn't be okay.
Number one, is
this a is this a
is this a
number two
you're killing You're killing an animal
for nothing. Maybe that's not something
you're allowed to do. Additionally,
maybe you would tell him hunting is very
dangerous and there's a
and he says even though we find coolers
in the
but that's if there's a real
for example
but for a person to just go ahead and
for fun put himself in a situation where
he may really injure himself or get
killed there's something called
say again. So he tells him that there's
three issues and he goes through each
one of them and
discusses you know whether it's an issue
whether it's not an issue. Now we're
going to get back to
in one second. The reason this famous is
because the
tells him that aside from all the
issues that I see in this but
this whole Indian to me is a very big
because
the only hunters that you find in the
Torah were Nimrod and Esau. The ends
that dark even Avram Yitzchak and
Yaakov. And it's not the way of a Jew to
go ahead and hunt. In fact, he says, I'm
skipping a few lines.
Listen, this is a very not Jewish thing.
As a matter of fact, the only two Jews
or the only two people THAT YOU FIND
THAT WERE ever hunters were Nimrod and
Esau. This is ends that dark even Avram
Yitzchak and Yaakov. I'll tell you a
different nifla. Rebbe Margolis
in his Margolis Yam, in the Seder
Sanhedrin daf tzadik hey,
he asks a kasha. In fact, he asks two
kashas. There's a Gemara in perek
chelek. This is Maseches Sanhedrin daf
kuf zayin amud aleph. The Gemara over
there is talking about the story of
David and Batsheva and how the whole
story started. Omru Rabbi Yehuda amar
Rav, oilam ayomi adam atzmi lidei
nisayon. A person should never bring
himself to a nisayon. She'ari David
Melech Yisrael hevi atzmo lidei nisayon
venikshal. Because David Melech Yisrael
once brought on a nisayon to himself and
he was nikshal. What happened? Amar
Rabbi Elazar amar Rabbi Yochanan, David
turned to Hakadosh Baruch Hu. He said,
"Ribbono shel oilam, mifnei mah omerim
alekei Avraham, alekei Yitzchak, alekei
Yaakov, veeinam alekei David?"
Fascinating, right? David said, "Anu
chayin peilastani
David hakatan." Chazal wax poetically.
It's actually Gemara in Chullin daf
sameach about the anavah of David
HaMelech. Yet David HaMelech said, "I
don't understand. Alekei Avraham, alekei
Yitzchak, alekei Yaakov, why not alekei
David?" Amar Rabbi Elazar amar Rabbi
Yochanan, told him, "Inu minsuili. The
avos were minsuili. They were tested and
they passed the test. You were never
tested." Amar Rabbi Elazar amar Rabbi
Yochanan, so David HaMelech told the
Eibishter, "Ribbono shel oilam,
bechoneni venaseni." I'm ready to be
tested. Shene'emar, it's a pasuk in
Tehillim, "Bechoneni Hashem venaseni."
Amar Rabbi Elazar amar Rabbi Yochanan,
told him, "Minasnucha vevinduch musar
badach."
I'm going to test you and I'm going to
do something with you that I didn't even
do with the
Then when I tested the office I didn't
give them a heads-up. I didn't tell them
what's coming.
You I'm going to test you and I'm even
going to tell you what the test is going
to be.
David was lying in bed and then he woke
up. He couldn't sleep.
base guy got a milk he went to the roof
of the castle.
And he saw a woman who was bathing on
top of the guy.
Who was that issue? It was Bat Sheva.
So when Bat Sheva was being
she was doing it in a nasty way. She was
being covered by a gigas. There was a
big barrel that was blocking. Also Satan
the Satan came
and dressed up like a super like a bird.
Here's the punchline. David
is on his roof and he sees a bird. He
says perfect. HE TAKES OUT HIS BOW and
arrow and he hunts it and he takes the
shot. In the meantime this is the Satan
it went away. Instead
David ends up healing the gigas. AND
BECAUSE this gigas this barrel exploded
all of a sudden HE SAW BAT SHEVA AND THE
REST IS HISTORY.
NEVER FOUND A HUNTER OTHER THAN NIMROD
AND ESAU DAVID AND MALACH. DAVID MALACH
WAS A HUNTER. IT WHAT WHAT WAS HE DOING
HUNTING A BIRD? HE SEEMED AT FIRST HE
WAS HUNTING. Another tomorrow.
I got the spark who's talking to David.
He said this there's so many of various
because
you know if they are kind of was killed.
Oh you you play a big role in that.
Because you have to be punished of it.
I'm giving you two choices. Either your
children are going to be destroyed
or you yourself are going to be handed
over to your enemy. I'm a fun of
to think.
There's no question that's the better of
the two options. Says the
one day One
day he went to go
What does that mean? If you take a look
at
he went
he went hunting. Also
the something came to
dress up like a deer.
Possible right? He sees him in the
barrel of the gun and he goes after the
deer and I got some mice over there.
The only way to be who said it's not
a from you have to
You don't find this anywhere by a year.
The only hunters that you find with and
I have
about
that he went hunting.
But this is very parent that is not what
we're talking about right now. You could
not speak [laughter] to that. But
the
in this to comfort up in time. So he
tells him that really in the world of
hunting from again for a year to hunt
but in the world of
he said the first thing you need to
dress over there. So again It doesn't
matter if you don't bother me that
again.
It doesn't bother me. You know why? And
I quote
because the only time you find
is if you're going to be
an animal and you're going to keep the
animal alive.
But to go ahead and to kill
and other by the time, famous
in that instance there's no issue at all
of
says the
only time the
is if you torture an animal and you keep
the animal alive. If however, you're
going to kill the animal even though
you're being
the animal when you kill it that in and
of itself is not
the same
I have a right of
what's the right of you remember the
told the story about the
other because
the guy came to town
and he heard that he came to town he was
so excited he wanted to invite him
because was very he didn't have enough
from anybody but he invited him said
right after doing
but when I come back from doing the
I'm going to come I'm going to eat by
you and then
from all the doors that he had in his
house he
walked into the door and he sees white
mules and he says THERE'S WHITE MULES
OVER THERE
I'm out. WHY IS THERE CUZ WHITE MULES
means death it means the
this is too big of a
so he said you don't need to worry about
I'm going to go ahead I'm going to do
something to them I'm going to take off
their
the bottom line is
and by me being there won't be any issue
anymore so he said
you can't do it
>> [laughter]
>> he said I'll KILL THEM I'LL KILL them so
he says you can't
wait till the
>> [laughter]
>> why didn't he tell
when he said kill them the same that he
told them when he said I can't
he should have said
and even
didn't tell him about
he told him about
this is a
that the only time there's an issue with
is if you're going to keep the animal
alive but if you're going to go hunting
then
it's not going to be an issue of tzar
baalei chaim. But, either way, this is
the part of the chukah of the no Yehudah
that we do need. So, Yehudah said that
as it relates to hunting, tzar baalei
chaim there's no issue. Why is there no
issue of tzar baalei chaim? Because tzar
baalei chaim only is if you matir the
animal and you keep the animal alive.
If, however, you're going to kill the
animal,
in that instance, there's not going to
be an issue.
Reb Yosef Shaul Nathanson in his Shaalos
u'Teshuvos Shaul u'Meishiv, this is in
Maduras Tinyana, it's in Chelek Shlishi,
it's Siman Samech.
So, middle of the teshuvah, he brings
this chiddush of the Noda b'Yehudah. He
brings that the Avodas Akel u'Shuni, who
is even before the Noda b'Yehudah, he
also said this chiddush. And he says,
"U'lfi aniyus daati, ne'elam mehem
divrei haChinuch, Mitzvah Tof Nun Alef,
which is also divrei haRamban in his
Pirush al haTorah in Parshas Bereishis."
We mentioned this Ramban in the
Hakdamah, right in the beginning of
Maseches Chullin. And that is, we know
there's a big machlokes Rishonim whether
the shechitas chullin is a mitzvas asei
d'Oraisa
or not a mitzvas asei d'Oraisa. Many
Rishonim hold it's a mitzvas asei
d'Oraisa, u'verosh haRambam and the
Chinuch. There are many Rishonim that
hold that it's not a mitzvas asei
d'Oraisa, u'verosh haRaavad and the
Ramban. But, the bottom line, it's a big
shailah, is shechitas chullin a mitzvas
asei or is it not a mitzvas asei? On the
one hand, the Torah says, "V'zavach
kasher tivi secha." On the other hand,
you don't have to eat meat if you don't
want to. It's not something that you
need to do b'chumtzah u'matzah. And this
is a huge machlokes Rishonim. The Ramban
and the Chinuch, they both ask on the
side that there's no mitzvas asei
d'Oraisa to do shechitah. So, why is it
that the shochet, when he shechts, he
makes a brachah, "Asher kideshanu
b'mitzvotav v'tzivanu al ha'shechitah."
Why are you making a brachah if it's a
mitzvah to do mitzvos? But, if it's not
a mitzvah, so why are you making a
brachah? And the Ramban says that the
reason you make a brachah is because
tzar baalei chaim d'Oraisa. And we
mentioned this Shulchan Aruch Orach
Chaim Siman Samech, Yoreh Chaim Nun
Daled, where he says that when the
shochet makes the brachah, it's k'ilu
nomar, "Asher kideshanu b'mitzvotav
v'tzivanu l'rachem al ha'briyos."
>> They really really the mitzvah of shrita
is not the mitzvah shrita per se but
it's the sensitivity that we're doing
when we go about the shrita and that is
that you have to be sensitive to doing
away you're not GOING TO CAUSE
TSAUR THE right to the least painful way
to go ahead and kill the animal is by
doing a shrita and that's why when you
do a shrita you be my KIND OF INDIAN
THAT'S WHAT THE MITZVAH IS over Frank
the shalom nation
Frank
the shalom and how could the be
and the way we also said this How could
they come ahead and say such a that is
no by the time they rise up if you're
killing the animal the from the
I hear it's connected the
it's connected the
it's
it's connected the
first class it's a
and the
moment
I the Ryan
he deals with it a little bit
But the is is the that is
And that is there's a
from the soifer And this is in the world
It's called the
Where the the soifer where the soifer
was discussing a whole
about the soifer And the
wanted to say
based on this one
And based on what's also in the
and that is we do
in a very sensitive way and the reason
we do in this very sensitive way is to
be concerned about the soifer
says the soifer after he's
with this a little bit he says comes in
the
culture of the This whole time of the is
very
the
dog in the
my
how come when it comes to dog in fish
and
grasshoppers there's no
how you kill it with the
in
today's
my
why we not sensitive to go ahead and
kill the
in a way where it's not going to and by
the way even though we saw you have to
get to see even if you don't
but you don't have them how long is of
doing it in the sensitive way Alice at
the
time when it comes to
when you find the reason that gives a
it's a very nice thing there's a
sensitivity it's a God it's endless but
in
this kind of a
sudden
it's possible to me that this
of the higher
it's a time of the
but in
in
it's possible that
if he had an opportunity to be
to the
I think what he would have told him was
because at the end of the day this is
not area that crosses over to
the
dog in the of
in
my
and
in
I think this is an example of where the
the two
of
that even though you have this but it
was possible to both of them these two
the
that this is the way you go through to
such a it's a
makes for good rate but at the same time
when it comes to
in the
it's not something you go by
and if that's the case
it's possible to me that in the world of
if you're going to kill the animal
there's no
and I have a from the
in of in I even ask me a
I even ask me a
from you can ask me a
from the
which is also a
I hear what you're saying but at the
same time in
the manner
this is the first time
the second order is
that there's a Gamorah in the Sukkah
Sanhedrin Daf Nun Tes Omid Base. The
Gamorah said, "Omid Yud Amara Rabbi Huda
said in the name of Rav
Adam Harishon was not allowed to eat
Bosser. The Pasuk says
The only thing Adam Harishon was allowed
to eat was from the Aisev Hasadeh.
But
the Lo Chayas Ha'aretz. Right? Not the
Chayas Ha'aretz.
came, he told them ahead that the Torah
the Torah was not there to them to eat
Bosser. She Nemar it says
the Yerek
So Rabbi Huda said in the name of Rav
Adam Harishon was a vegan. Adam Harishon
was not allowed to eat Bosser. Again,
what's the Raya? It's a Pasuk in the
Torah. The Pasuk says by Yoma Elokim
That's called Aisev
That's what you're allowed to eat. It's
Dafke Noach's times where after Noach
comes out of the Teiva, Hashem tells
Noach Kol Remes Asher Hu Chai Lachem
Yiyel Achlo Ki Yerek Aisev Nosati Lachem
Achlo. Just like I told Adam Harishon
that he's allowed to eat from the Yerek,
I'm being Matir you if you want to go
ahead and you want to eat Bosser, you
can eat Bosser in the same way that Adam
Harishon was allowed to eat Aisev.
The Ran in his Chidushei HaRan
on that Gamorah in the Sukkah Sanhedrin
Sanhedrin Daf Nun Tes asks that Eka
Lemidak How could it be that Adam
Harishon was not allowed to eat Bosser?
We know that [snorts] there are seven
Mitzvos Bnei Noach. And one of the seven
Mitzvos Bnei Noach is Eiver Min HaChai.
To the extent that Adam Harishon was not
allowed to eat Bosser, so why we having
a conversation about Eiver Min HaChai?
Bom Kasha.
If Adam Harishon is not allowed to eat
Bosser, then BaChlal Mesayem On Eiver
Min HaChai. So if Adam Harishon is
allowed to eat Bosser, he just can't eat
Eiver
But you tell me Adam was already
boss, he was not already boss. If he was
not already boss, how does that sit with
the price that says seven Mrs. Noah?
And one of them was even Menachem. So
after all of this,
he says that when Adam was given the
midst of even Menachem, the midst
actually meant more than just don't eat
even Menachem. It meant don't eat the
Behemoth at all. As a matter of fact,
what's the matter
with eating meat at all? It's a gun, all
the way to go. Right? We call it a gun,
all the way to go. We learn from there
but not even Menachem. Really, in Adam's
time,
we call it a gun, all the way to go.
Man, you can eat fruit, you can eat
vegetables, but you can't EAT BOSS AT
ALL. WHAT HAPPENED? In Noah's time, they
used to say no, you can eat carrots and
I'm going to allow you to eat the boss.
When Noah was told he was allowed to eat
the boss, at that point, it would have
been a have a minute that the whole
issue of boss would have gone away. Come
on,
this still an issue of boss or be it
even Menachem. I was shocked to learn
there's no way to reconcile. There's no
way to make sense that there would be an
issue of boss and there is even
Menachem. Come on,
if you can't eat boss, for sure you
can't eat even Menachem. The carrots is
there was no issue of even Menachem in
the times of Adam.
The issue was DON'T EAT BOSS. THIS WHOLE
Indian of even Menachem was something
that really came about in the times of
Noah. Truth is, the Rambam
in Pericles of Hilchos Melachim, another
famous Rambam. We've been having some
classics in the last few days. So the
Rambam says Adam was commanded six
mitzvahs.
Adam was commanded six mitzvahs. I would
say the Torah says six mitzvahs are
dominant.
Give me your right. Yes, it's all
ending. Says the Rambam, I'm skipping a
little bit.
When Noah came around, Noah got a
seventh mitzvah and that was even
Menachem.
Boss and
dominant voice
between the six that Adam Harishon got
and the seventh that Noach got, seven
mitzvahs, what you're left with is seven
mitzvahs Bnei Noach. The Rambam says
that Adam Harishon was never Nitztavah
with Ever Min Achai. The whole Tzivui of
Ever Min Achai was given to it was given
to Noach. What's Poshesh Shana in the
Rambam? Poshesh Shana is I don't even
think it's a question. He had the Rant's
Kashya. He didn't understand if the
Gemara says Mefurash that Adam Harishon
wasn't allowed to eat Basar, what's
Poshesh Ever Min Achai? Zoch the Rambam,
you know the Teretz is? Ever Min Achai
wasn't given to Adam Harishon. It was
given to Noach. And we mentioned in the
past could be that's why it's called the
seven mitzvahs Bnei Noach. Why isn't
that attributed to Adam Harishon?
There's different Halachot to this, but
it could be because really Halacha
Holechet Acharei Agmara. And the seventh
of the seven mitzvahs Bnei Noach was
given to the Bnei Noach, it wasn't given
to the Bnei Adam Harishon. So like the
Rambam, it's very Gishmak why it's
called the seven mitzvahs Bnei Noach.
But the bottom line is the Ran and the
Rambam were both Motching the same
question. And that is if Adam Harishon
was like Hotar Le Basar, what's Poshesh
Ever Min Achai? The Teretz is you have
to say that there was no Issur Ever Min
Achai. The Ran says, what do you mean?
The Ikur Derasha of Ever Min Achai was
given to Adam. So you have to say it was
given and then it was tweaked. Ever Min
Achai is the way we have it today.
Initially it was given as an Issur
Basar. The Ran says, no, Adam Harishon
was only GIVEN SIX. THE SEVEN means the
six that were given to Adam Harishon
plus the seventh that was given to plus
the seventh that was given to Noach. But
the Tzaddah Shava between the Rambam and
the Ran is that it doesn't make any
sense that there could be an Issur Ever
Min Achai
to the extent to the extent that there's
an Issur Basar. Stating that, it's
Yadua, that really Tosafos in Sanhedrin
Daf Nun Vav Amud Bet already asks this
Kashya. Achol Tocho B'Ever Min Achai.
V'Eig Tosafos, V'Adam Min Lo Kam On. Kol
Hotar L'Adam Harishon Basar L'Achila.
How does it make sense then that there
was an Issur Ever Min Achai? Zoch
Tosafos, Hainu L'Achamis V'Lecha. That
Issur of Basar meant to go ahead and to
kill the animal and then to eat it.
That's something you're not allowed to
do. I will make some aleph. If the
animal would die by itself, shalya, it
would be mutar. But also, la fuke even
in a guy that feel enough for me aleph
as doctor says. You want to know how you
reconcile the issur bossar and the issur
of even in a guy that's not fair. The
issur bossar was lo chamas velecha. BUT
IF YOU WOULD SEE A DEAD CARCASS on the
side of the road and you would say
perfect, I have dinner for a week. That
is something you were allowed to do.
But it has to be dead. If it was alive
and it was even in a guy, then it would
be ossur. So the doctor says that you
could reconcile the issur even in a guy
with the issur bossar. You know you
reconcile it because the issur bossar
was lo chamas. But the extent that it
died by itself, there wouldn't be an
issue. But here's THE POINT, THERE WAS A
HETER ACHILAS bossar be etzem. And if
that's the case, it makes sense that it
would be an issur even in a guy. The
truth is,
it's very mashma from Rashi al ha Torah
like the Rambam. On this possuk of
Elohim, he knows to them
which is the source that Adam Harishon
was not allowed to eat bossar as doctor
Rashi. Hish lo hem behemois bechayos
lemecha.
But the Torah did not allow Adam and his
wife lo CHAMAS BRIAH TO KILL an animal
velecha bossar eat bossar.
Then already hit the lamb bossar.
They you see Rashi said lo hish lo Adam
LO CHAMAS BRIAH. THAT ONE WORD LO
CHAMAS, if you know doctor says in
Sanhedrin aleph amud aleph, you know
makes the whole difference. Rashi like
doctor says is learning that really the
issur achilas bossar was an issur lo
chamas to go ahead and to kill it. In
other words, we have a huge machlokes
Rishonim. We have the Rambam and the Ran
on the one hand, we have Rashi and
doctor says
on the other hand. And that is what was
the issur basar that was given to Adam
and Eve according to the Rambam and the
Ran.
The issur basar was an issur to eat
basar, full stop. I if that's the case,
what's Adam and Eve?
There was no Adam and Eve. According to
the Ran, there was a seventh mitzvah,
but the seventh mitzvah wasn't Adam and
Eve, it was basar. According to the Ran,
there wasn't even a seventh mitzvah. But
the bottom line is is that as it relates
to the issur of eating basar, there's no
question there was an issur of eating
basar. According to Rashi and Tosfos,
there was never an issur of eating
basar. It was eating basar
but if it was eating basar it would be
okay. That's why it was very much
a seventh mitzvah, the mitzvah of Adam
and Eve.
If you put it in more terms, it sounds
like according to the Rambam and the
Ran, the issur of eating basar
in Sanhedrin
was an issur of eating basar.
There was an issur to eat basar. IT WAS
IT BELONGS IN THE Rambam's Kedusha.
There was an
issur that Adam and Eve had and that is
you're not allowed to eat basar.
According to Rashi and Tosfos, it wasn't
an issur of eating basar. Eating basar
Eating basar is okay.
It was AN ISSUR OF EATING BASAR.
EATING BASAR
THAT'S WHAT THE ISSUR IS.
THE WORD
"BERURIM" "V'KILURIN".
The shaila is that
if it's an issur of eating basar, you
understand it. There's a concept of
eating basar as Jews we're very familiar
with eating basar.
What's this issur to kill the animals?
It's like a funny thing. Where would
this
even play itself out? What would be the
reason behind this? So the truth is
you have to take a look at the Ramban.
The Ramban
right there in the end of the first
paragraph of Parshas Bereishis. The
Ramban talks a little bit about this
Indian. He says as follows, "Eating
basar
Adam and Eve That's what we say no."
Eating basar was something that the Adam
and Eve
were first allowed to eat but in the
times of Adam and Eve was not okay. If
you read the
If you read the
those words have different meaning
in the world of here, it's so clear that
that's what's going on over here in the
The highest says let me tell you why.
Because living beings have a little bit
of a of a fish.
They're similar to intelligent beings.
They have
they have some level of free will. To
try to make sure that their life is
good.
They
feel pain. They are afraid of death.
Says the
it's for that reason we have to be
sensitive to the life of an animal. You
can just go ahead and kill an animal
because an animal is about a fish.
Right? It has my love and I have some.
They're similar to a fish and a fish.
They have some level of
a fish. Not
They know how to be
a fish and a fish. They have a certain
level of intelligent right? They have
something that makes them that you
shouldn't be able to go ahead and kill
it. Right? The says there's four levels
of life.
The fish is not a fish. But he's also
not a fish and a fish. He's level three
out of four. That's not bad, right? So
at the end of the day, he has something
going for him. Stating that Dr.
When the world sinned and because I
wiping out everything
And why was the world saved?
That
decided to keep to keep the world alive.
They gave permission to to go ahead and
to
and to eat. Key key you have a right.
Because their whole existence is only
because of man. And it's for that reason
now man has some level of dominion over
it. And by the way, if you feel the it's
at the end of this that he mentions
him. And he says [laughter]
and that's the
referring to
but the bottom line is after Ramada that
a behemoth is not nothing. That's the
Indian of
and that's why
it said in a perfect world to go ahead
and to kill an animal to eat it. That's
not something that you'd be allowed to
do. The only reason that man was allowed
to kill the animal is because the whole
existence of THE ANIMALS ONLY BECAUSE of
man. CUZ IT WAS READY TO DESTROY THE
WORLD AND IT WAS
SO NOW
THANK YOU JUST SAVED ALL THE ANIMALS.
NOW YOU HAVE SLEEP OVER THE animals and
if you want a steak dinner, you have a
right to do it. That's something that
you're going to be allowed to do but up
until THIS POINT YOU WERE NOT ALLOWED TO
KILL AN ANIMAL. YOU WOULD NOT SOMETHING
YOU WERE ALLOWED to do. Why? Because
they have a
now it's not the same as the
but
the
similar to the
they have a level of
between awesome as I said they were
and it was because of this
it was because of this there was an idea
that if you want to go ahead and kill
it, you wouldn't be allowed to kill it
but then it was like this I'm going to
end with this.
The
in another place talk about this idea
much more
and this is
a nice
in what's quickly becoming maybe our
favorite show
the for sure
and that is the of
so on the
which was the topic of
so the says that a person had to go
ahead and the hoods ready for this one
catch him one on one
if a person's going to go ahead and he's
going to
up the hood
if someone's going to an animal
and
don't
what does it mean up the hood
cuz she
literally as if he's a
If somebody an animal
WE VIEW HIM AS IF HE'S A
drama doubles down a little bit
the dumb dumb the time dumb
me my separation go back to the
beginning of time. What happened the
beginning of time man was not allowed to
kill an animal.
After the marble I allowed you to go
ahead and now treat the dumb of
everything but a human being can I
commercial
but if you're going to go ahead and
you're going to check the animal you're
going to be
where does it say anything in the world
about killing an animal BEING A
GO BACK TO MY SEPARATION
GO BACK TO
KNOW. I'M GOING TO DO IT AS you say I'M
GOING TO DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING TO
DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING TO DO IT AS
YOU SAY I'M GOING TO DO IT AS YOU SAY
I'M GOING TO DO IT AS you say I'm going
to do it as you say I'm going to do it
as you say I'm going to do IT AS YOU SAY
I'M GOING TO DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING
TO DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING TO DO IT
AS YOU SAY I'M GOING TO DO IT AS YOU say
I'm going to do it AS YOU SAY I'M GOING
TO DO IT AS YOU say I'm going to do it
AS YOU SAY I'M GOING TO DO IT AS YOU SAY
I'M GOING to do it as you say I'm going
to do it as you say I'm going to DO IT
AS YOU SAY I'M GOING TO DO IT AS YOU SAY
I'M GOING TO DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING
TO DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING to do it
as you say I'm going to do it as you say
I'm going TO DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING
TO DO IT AS YOU SAY I'M GOING to do it
as you say I'm going to do it as you say
I'm going to do it as you say I'm going
to do it as you say I'm going to do it
as you say I'm going to do it as you say
I'm going to do it as you say I'm going
to do it as you say I'm going to do it
as you say I'm going to do it as you say
I'm going to do it as you say I'm going
to do it as you say. Which you have to
have but the tour and very often he
brings the bands.
And explains them dumb
this is Noah the hit
and allowed Noah to kill all the
zulassung with the exception of man
this is what the Torah says and
if you're not going to kill the animal
in the way that I commanded you to kill
it, is that a play ON SHRITA?
IT'S AS IF IT WAS NEVER MUTER.
IT'S MY FOOLISHNESS IN THE TORAH. THE
TORAH SAYS THAT what the Ramban means to
me is paraphrasing the Ramban. What the
Ramban means to He brings up What the
Ramban means to say is that the original
issur of shfichas damim was not only for
people. The original issur of shfichas
damim be'adam was true for animals as
well. Noach's animals became muter for
the reason that the Ramban explained.
But the extent that you're not going to
do it in the right way, so now you're
getting involved in doing shfichas dam.
The truth is if you go back to parshas
Noach, listen to these psukim.
Noach says to him from the table. And
Hashem tells Noach he'll be able to eat
all the animals.
Additionally, the
as dim chen
>> [clears throat]
>> So once you're going to kill a person,
I'm going to go after him.
Even if an animal kills a person, I'll
go after the animal.
Because shofech dam adam b'adam domeh
l'shofech. K'vetzalmo Elokim asah adam.
What shaikh is? What does one have to do
with the other? What does
the fact that you can eat animals have
to do with shofech dam adam b'adam domeh
l'shofech? Noach comes out of the
teivah. Deibishter tells Noach, "I have
good news and bad news. The good news is
steak dinner, right?"
The bad news is if you kill a person,
shofech dam adam b'adam. What does one
have to do with the other? So drashni,
the ach as dim chen.
Even though I just told you you're
allowed to kill a beheima,
or if you go ahead and you kill another
person, the smichus is because once upon
a time there was an issur shfichas damim
not only on the person on behemus as
well. No
that he's allowed to share he's allowed
to go ahead AND KILL. YOU WOULD HAVE
TAKEN IT A LITTLE BIT too far. Come on
you're not going to take it too far. But
what's the bottom line? The bottom line
is what's move over from the
and the
and by the way
and the
and really this is an idea that's move
that
is an element of
that related once upon a time very very
much to the behemus. That is possible
what the beer is and she and
really
this is
that the issue of
that
talking
that
wasn't
IT WASN'T
WHAT'S THIS
IT'S THIS
THAT'S what's going on over here. In
other words we have a
and what's the what's the
what's the
or was it or was it
issue
does this fall into the
issue
or does this fall into the issue
what
do you take this
and you plug it into from the
and
the
and the
it's
from
and
the
it's
what will be the issue
that's the
and the
issue
of
there's an idea there's an idea of
even when it comes to an animal but the
is I think maybe
what emerges from this raid is a huge
khiddush.
Because the Rishonim and the Torah Or
said it so clearly, a saying
that that issur of once upon a time that
existed, that the not allowed to kill
behemoth could exist even bizmanenu. You
would have thought that as soon as the
mabul came, it got washed away with all
the waters.
But you see not that way. The Torah says
again
that even though hittul
behemos ba'alei chayim
zulas ha'adam avolem lo yi'tasu behemos
kemo shetzivicha ke'ilu lo hutru
venish'aru be'issur harishon
she'asartiha adam keba'alei chayim umisa
veha'iyata ke'ilu shoifcho DAM RIGHT
NOW. THIS IS THE SHITTAH OF THE DAM
SHOFECH. THAT'S THIS INDIAN OVER HERE,
DAM YI'CHASHIV, because there's an
element of shfichas dam. If that's the
case, maybe this is another noifekh that
we have to add to that teshuvah of the
Noideh BiYehudah. When the Noideh
BiYehudah was discussing to Gumpel
Oppenheim, and he wants to know is it
okay to hunt or is it not okay to hunt?
And the Noideh BiYehudah said you have
to hashmin tzalei chayim and you have to
hashmin bal tashchis and you have to
hashmin venishmartem me'od
lenafshoseichem. And what about the fact
that the only two hunters I ever found
were Nimrod and Eisav. And Rabbeinu
Gershom says bam ha'aretz from David
haMelech in two places, on Eitz Chaim 30
k and on Eitz CHAIM 27. NOTWITHSTANDING.
>> [laughter]
>> BUT THE BOTTOM line is the Noideh
BiYehudah was coming to unravel every
element and every keneh could possibly
come up with, pro and con in terms of
hunting. Is this something that's okay?
Is this something that's not okay?
Could be. Could be there's a hashmin
that to the extent that you just want to
go ahead and you want to kill an animal
for fun, and you're not doing it kashrus
and not even doing it
like Hashem told Noach you want to do it
this is something that you'd be allowed
to do. Maybe maybe there's even an
element in R' Yochanan ben Zakkai ben
Zakkai of shfichas dam going back to
that issur harishon that we know existed
post Matan Torah. Now, you know it from
the Rishonim in Parshas Acharei Mos, the
Rishonim of Vayikra perek yud zayin,
which tied into the Ra'avad on Chullin
daf yud zayin, but either way,
in Beis Medrash play chiddush,
and we will stop here.