Chulin 110

Today's daf is and we are 10 lines from the bottom of so the Mishna on the bottom of turned its attention to another subcategory within the and that is the of so is the udder of the animal. It's the part of the animal that has milk. When you milk an animal, you're milking the udder of the animal. And the udder poses a particular challenge as it relates to kashra specifically. And that is because the udder is meat. It has in it milk. Thus the question is is it okay to eat the of an animal or is it not okay to eat the of an animal? Mishna said on the bottom of that if you want to eat the cow what you have to do is you have to tear it open first remove the milk and then afterwards it says the let's say you did not tear open the cow and remove the milk overall of you're not going to be over anything now the lion of the is very what does over mean doesn't mean it's mut doesn't mean overall of there's no malus for example but at the same time And in that said in the name of the first was the first lines of that it's even to eat the despite the fact that you didn't tear it open. So I mean you're supposed to tear it open but in the event that you cooked it or you roasted it without actually tearing it open is it's going to be then brought another said in the name of that just means on the level but at the same time if you cooked or roasted the without tearing it open is it's going to be to eat and in the he of Shabas the Gmorra that supported the first of the and that is that if you cooked the or roasted the without tearing it open is it's going to be the so it sounds like even though there's an idea of you're supposed to tear it open because of the that's inside the but this is only on a really level stating that if you didn't tear it open and you cooked it it's going to be okay and the truth is at first glance it's Why is it okay? The is the that's inside the is says in the not let it cook together. If you cook together you're not going to eat the bus of so why is it okay to go now and eat the if it was cooked together with it? The short answer is because that even though but of is okay. The Torah says and the we're going to see it in the coming that the only time it's if the came from an animal that's from a live animal. So if you milk a live animal, you cook that milk together with meat. That's if the animal however is in a state now where it can't be your mother anymore. It's dead. Even if it had a what's called messa or that is not is always going to be you want to eat not eating you're eating of a so even though this inside the is always going to be which is on the outside looking in as it relates to the of so whenever we're discussing we're anyways not handling of because by definition is which means that it's not subject to the laws of now the truth is that even though it's not is so from standpoint it should be stating that said that when is that's if you take the and you mix it together with the baser and you cook it that's the time that the even but that's not what's happening with is the milk that was inside the other of the animal when you shed did it. You're not taking and now pouring it into your cader. That's your tas. No, what you have over here is is something that naturally had the milk inside. The never left the never made the and it's for that reason we're even having this conversation. So again is a discussion. And it's a Mishna the it's known from the more as being one of the more difficulties in the but you know the as it relates purposes I mean what's the sh is the terror says because the is anyway and even though that's only that departed the animal but this is that never left the animal it's still inside the other tho it could be would be different what the gumar seem to say the takeaway of of the second half of yesterday's daf is this and what Ra held as it relates to which seems to be that as long as you cook it or roast it and today's daft there'll be nuances between bish and that's beyond the scope of what we do but for now if you roast it for sure and maybe even if you cook it that would be enough to say that even if you didn't tear it open even though the is still inside on such a never made it's going to be okay to eat it either way on that note the begins with a classic wife's name was Y told everything that the Torah said is the Torah was also m in other words you not let it eat blood but at the same time you're allowed to eat liver we're going to see in tomorrow's daf tomorrow's d is going to be #chop liver that's really the topic of tomorrow's daf it's all about liver from a kashra standpoint how you kash your liver how you prepare it how you salt it and the reason is because the liver is saturated in that. Now, at the end of the day, you're allowed to eat liver. So, being that you're allowed to eat liver, told even though the said you're not allowed to eat blood, but if you want to be, you could eat liver. Liver hasn't aid to the said that. But at the same time, there is a way where a person can experience so to speak, and that is actually says what does mean? either means or it means that after she has a baby so she's a need for a certain period of time. We don't have these anymore but after one week or two weeks depending if it's a boy or a girl all the d that she sees is not anymore. It's so it's like but it's it's really the isser but if somebody wants to know what a khazer tastes like this is the part of the gar that's famous eat the eat the brain of the shibuta rashi says that's a fish and this shibuta's tastes like kazer gusa which is a non-coosher bird lishna you can taste it you can eat the kosher bird is ish ter said this is awesome But that's and that's a little bit of you're not let marry a non-Jewish woman but the parish of talking about a non- kosher woman said I understand I see a theme here that even though the Torah said a lot of things are everything that the Tory said is aer if you want you can find it with a you can find it with a so your question was I want to find me. Where can I find that's going to be kosher said go roast for my wife the because by roasting the inside of it that's how you're going to be able to taste could you go and just roast but says doesn't the Mishna say that you have to tear it open first that's talking about if you're going to cook it I didn't say cook it I said roast it there's a One of the rices that brought earlier on the said that it's only okay to be and speaks out on top of that this doesn't mean cooking it means roasting. So it sounds like that even roasting is only okay to roast that same again that was only yesterday mentioned that the that's found in the cave in the stomach of the animal that is and even if you cook it it's still not okayish so that's why the mentioned as well but really held that it's not okay to cook the but it is okay to roast the th you see a between bishel and as we mentioned in the intro as it relates to but told his wife you want to know what tastes like there's a way to be of even but you can't eat a cheeseburger but you and the has inside of it and it's okay to roast it like the first of the on the top of the gar had a And again, this is all based on what we spoke at in the intro that even though the has and on such a never went ahead and made we're going to come back to this but first the is going to continue to discuss. So we said is what said the first was that Rav said it's okay to eat the says tear it open but if you didn't tear it you could eat it it's fine. The second in raw is that it's not okay. you're supposed to go ahead and tear it off and there was a so the is going to struggle now to understand what was in the second the second version was had heard in the name of that it's not okay to go ahead and eat a roasted or or a there's a says before that it is okay from he met so he told him I mean I'm wondering where did get this from the had in the second that I mean it's a mistake because it's but this mistake must have come from somewhere. So did anybody ever tell something that may have misled him? So says he says told go talk to went to he says tell me do you know where got this from told I never told anything about this but but I do know the rest of the story. What happened was Ravik Matzah the god of our rav came to a place he saw an open field and he felt that you have to put up a fence to protect it and he went ahead and he and he built the fence what is this Rav once came to that was a city over here there was a woman talking she tells her friend the bisra tell me you I'm looking for a recipe I have a quarter pound of uh of chicken and I a buster and I want to put milk inside of it how much milk am I supposed to put in the what the people in that's such they don't even know that is so says he remained there and he taught them the laws of and not only did he teach them the laws of he even went ahead and told them that is going to be really held in he knew the first he knew the he knew that so what's this heard a bas that said it's awesome. This was the rest of the story told him it was a for that were being very lax in the laws of and he felt he had to be and the way he was going to be was going ahead and and being so in the laws of that even was going to be so for a functioning it's okay to have but he felt for them this was important that's why he told me says this the affformention was kahan's version of what's the beer in Rav's who said is also If there's a bracelet that says had a different version he said comes meets he says do you have any information about why there may be this messiah that said he tells him go speak to in the first verse told him that issued this for a very lax in the second version told him I was talking about the what I was the one who told Dal. So what you heard Rob say he actually heard from me and Dal was talking about the of an animal that's nursing and being that the animal's nursing says there's a lot of milk. So being that it's a lot of milk, it's that type of that's going to be awesome. Polish and I told it to and he said was the one who told it to was a was a big he says and thought for sure Rav would understand on his own. He didn't think he had explained. He thought Ra would understand on his own that the only time is off service is the and as a result all this confusion happened but again Rav for sure only said one thing he said like the Bryson that supported Rav either is this that heard the name of Raaler one of two things happened either was a a special that he gave for a specific or what happened was he was talking about the and didn't fully understand it when he heard it from who heard it from just one interesting thing before we So according to the first version was cames comes to this called and he sees that they're being very in the laws of and he went ahead and he was musings from the of was one of the and a lot of history that we have a lot of our Jewish history comes from he wrote a letter and there's a lot of fascinating history about the tano that we know from the letter of so one of the things he brings over there is the ram right you have always talking and learning they're always arguing so used to live together with the raard and lived together with and then ra decided one day that why am I in there so much anyways they have they don't need me so he decided that he's going to go to a place where there was surah and he went to surah and he crossed which has another name it's also refers to as he's just telling the story of Raph he goes out to do and he said he found they didn't even know there was this is the rest of the story the city of It's amazing. Rav actually had this passion. He felt he was in a he was in a in a mumra and then he decided that he's going to go out and he decides to go do he goes to surah at the time when ra went today surah we think of surah it's synonymous it's synonymous with tyra that's because of the influence like when the kaz went to bbra there was nothing in kaz created benbra so that's what happened the point is that he went to surah he went to masi and he was the one that brought tyra there but at the time that ra settled there there was so little there There was so little there that there was the mish didn't even know the laws of David was the boss of I thought it's a a fascinating idea that Rav you never think of Rav as being a m you think of Rav is giving you know the top and the best but Rav goes to a city like surah city like they don't even know the teaching them the laws of so unbelievable either way just regardless once came to the city of Raapi would come out. So these two they're invited in and they sit down in the city where is the and they feed them food that was made out of didn't want to eat. He didn't want to eat apparently had lost his children during his lifetime. Referred to Robin as someone who lost his children. He says why aren't you eating? He said visit you know who was serving him food is she was the she was the in the house he said she's daughter everyone knows what he was had she not seen this in her mother's house in her father's house growing up she would never serve it to you said was very he said I don't understand you go to the godladar's house it's not kosher enough he says this is who's serving you and you think is not kosher, she's serving to you must be kosha says the stating that despite the fact that was upset that Robin wouldn't eat the and came out and even told ya she could eat the stating that not everywhere in they eat in surah the meaning was not however they did eat says domy Sometimes he's referred to a either way. He was from he came to it was everybody's eating. It's a mitzvah to eat on and they were shacking animals and they took all their and they threw it away. So Ramy or same the person same person who went and he took them and he ate them they burned him before so this he says why you eating why you eating the we don't eat in surah he told me I live in city I'm from and where I come from we eat it told is that if there's certain that so even if you're from a city where the miners let's say to be but if you go to another city where the minus you're supposed to be he told him I ate it outside the city limits right I didn't eat it inside the of the city I walked outside the city that's where I ate it asked him how did you ro like how you prepare it how you roast it on he told him but he said I found pits of grapes and I used those pits to roast it. How do you know you're allowed to use those pits? Maybe it came from grapes that told it was already after 12 months. Rashi quotes that that says that these pits that are which means they're already 12 months old. There's no way anymore. At that point, you're allowed to eat it. They're not yours. You can't just pick off pits from the ground. Maybe it was I knew already that the owners were because there was already things growing on it. So I knew for sure there's no way anybody wasn't observed and he told he wasn't wearing he said so he told him why are you wearing told he has issues with his stomach and I heard from see he came from so is his rabbi so he told him said I heard from that is part Then he saw he wasn't wearing tittes. He told him he said why are you wearing tittes? He said it's not my talis. I borrowed it from and have another sign from everything. He said he says every 30 days for 30 days as this is happening they brought a person who they brought him in front of was not honoring his father. He wasn't started beating him. He started hitting him because that if someone doesn't say you can force him to don't he's not supposed to hit him but that any gives you not let a go ahead and you not let a force a person to do it and keep it. So it's you can't do this. said he said you know what I underestimated you meaning till now he was eating the when nobody ate the he went ahead he took pits that were maybe yay that didn't even belong to him he's not wearing fillin he's not wearing tites but he saw he knew I can't learn it you know he knew the that exactly he said he knows he said so is that you're not at a force. So he says, "Wow, I see you're a big he told him." He says, "You think I'm he says, you know, now I'm not even home. If I would have been with my if you would see me talking, learning with myb then you'll see what a I really am." Either way, we'll end on this note exhale. But um just a very interesting So there's a lot here obviously. You have you have you have you have of course which is what we're talking about but just one as it relates to this story and then we'll go back to the beginning of the with who was and that is he said he wasn't wearing he wasn't wearing a talis and he wasn't wearing he said the reason is because it's a because it's not incidentally and must have said you know think about it for a second just I mean put the piece of the story together this yid the who think about what a poor person he was. So this is a Y who's he he doesn't have his own talis. He has no food. He's literally taking the utters that the is is throwing away. He doesn't even have wood to make a fire. So he has to take pits that have things growing on it. Mold is vegetation growing on it. That's how he knows that that the he's put he's put him in and he comes in with a mitzvah to eat and instead of knocking on somebody's door I mean what would a person do? knock on somebody's door, you know, and he says, you know, maybe you could, you know, exactly he says, maybe you can invite me in for an he says, why wouldn't he do it? So he says, because you find they don't want, they only wanted to be and the says, this is in he says just think about this how she was. He just didn't want to have to come on to anybody. But either way, either way, one of the things he said was is that is says very longis that Tom said that that's right away. But after 30 days says always it's just that said after 30 days you should go ahead after 30 days you should already put ones. Why is it presumably because it says in the just like but if you're wearing somebody else but what's the difference between why would say that after 30 days you should be he says we know if somebody lends somebody money and they don't make up when exactly this loan is going to come due 30 days. He asked for 30 days. You can't ask him for money. You have no right to go over to him and tell him I loan you money. Give it back to me. Now you loan me the money. We didn't make up a time. I got to keep it for 30 days. But after 30 days, the loan is already due was also 30 days. And it's for that reason that being that said for 30 days I'm not worried because and you borrowed it and you know up to 30 days it doesn't look like anything other than the fact that you borrowed it but after 30 days already would go back. So why are you wearing this bean more than 30 days? Oh, looks like it's yours being that it looks like it's yours for that reason from all the things that you can take out of this literally all the things that you see here but at the same time says I'll tell you another interesting thing that even though that just like as well but says I disagree he says why because everyone knows we discussed it a few times when we learn and and other times as well and that is if somebody rents a house so is for 30 days you don't have to put on a you don't have to put on a a miz after 30 days you do have to put on a muzza what's the reason so the reason is this idea says say says are you going to tell me that it's related to no one's going to say maybe are very similar but for sure said for 30 days you after 30 days so it could be whatever but at the same time as it relates to this particular particular is going to be that 30 days your after 30 days already be says something else that was time said that even though if somebody borrows somebody else's talis so for 30 days you put them but after 30 days but you don't make after 30 days so even after 30 days you don't make a and then says that even though I hold that women who if they do they make a not like the raita which is The women who do mitzvah they make the not supposed to make but at the same time says even though I hold that and parted from doing a mitzvah makes but over here even you're not going to make the why he says because a woman even though she's parted from doing a mitzvah as but men are so being that some people are that's enough to say that if a woman does it she gets a mitzvah and she even has to make a bra but Everybody's potter. Does it mean that everybody's potter? So for that reason says you don't make a it sounds like from here that if you would borrow somebody's or maybe a little bit more common if you borrow somebody's talis you wouldn't make a says that even though but you never make being that you're from it's only because whatever but as far as making a goes you never make a stating that that's not is that if you borrow somebody's Talis you do make so it's based on something that speak in this and that is that this is that is if you borrow a talis that has no sites on it so you borrow a tallet that is a baggage of count no on the corners of the bag so if not on the corner of the bag so the is that you and even if you put on it even you're still not going to make a if however you borrow a talis that has on There you supposed to make and that is brought down. It's if you buy a talis that has on it. So then you make a not only speaks out that as it relates to the talis of a let's say has a talis and you want to use the talis there it's that you're supposed to go ahead and you're supposed to make a gives a reason there's a whole over here but either way so this if you borrowed a talis that has no titas on it which is very uncommon if however you're going to borrow a talis that has sits on it so That's not our it's not so much so it's not our that of course there's a senses it's not a question but it's where it plays itself out and either way that's just one to take away from this over here with but either way the gum began with a very interesting exchange between ya and y wasman's wife and told me told us everything had the Torah said is the Torah is also every single thing that you're not allowed to do if you want to find it. You could find that it's possible meaning we're not missing anything by the fact that we keep cuz every doer that there is you could actually find a mut and he went on to to list the whole list. It's interesting that I drab mascul quotes from rebelzer hakalier who discussed in his yus in paraso this idea it's in so paras coming up this in ya we're in yra season now so he says as follows from and he goes on This point this is in that's today's so you have but at the same time you have which is okay you have Hector what's interesting is the places called it just bothered me places refers to him as there's no little olive gibble no olive next to it soak it's not it's actually but parathetically in fact so who was again this is this is the season now this is season so who was says that it was none other than the shim He was the wasn't a it wasn't a he's theim there's a from the says that it was just said in the last week the says invol that in his purel spoke very shar about the khal he said there's a lot of grammatical mistakes And he spoke very very shar and there's a letter that we've quoted in the daff from wrote also so very uncharacteristically who spoke the kal he says how could we be mazel and these and these at the end who's the author it's it's that the is either or it's or it's the fleckless in the very first and Jew may have he has a whole lot of it's it's a it's a pill with and see inside where he brings the seven Ezra and he's malf and he has that from different things that he said was based on different members and stories either way it's a fascinating but regardless or is it but the story itself so what happened so told that everything is so the one that's most interesting is he said that the Torah said that is but if you want to know what kazer tastes like there's a way to know what kazer tastes like eat of the eat the brain of this fish that's called the and by eating that you'll be able to know what the what the tastes like in his on this right here says from this so there was a that came to him and he declared a sh and said I was able to be po Shil from this. What was the Shila? He says, "We know that the man tasted like whatever you wanted it to taste like." So he ate mun. If you wanted it to taste like meat, it tastes like meat. You wanted it to taste like coffee, it tasted like coffee. You wanted to taste like whatever you wanted the man to to taste like, that's what very good. That's what it tasted like. So this came to the he said, "I want to ask you a question. Let's say somebody was eating the man and he had in mind that it should taste like kazer." Then he ate it. Was he is kazzer? Let's say a person was eating the money. He had in mind it should taste like a cheeseburger and then he ate it. Was he said it's a great wow. So somebody's eating the money. He has in mind that it should taste like then he eats it. So he said from this I was to him that it's okay. Says why cuz what would be the reason you would say it's because you're eating something that tastes like. He says but you see in this that is not a taste that's inherently because the same is also the I saw it from the I didn't have a chance to really go through it but he discusses whether if somebody would cook would it be it tastes exactly the same so being that it tastes the same that it could be it could be that if it's you have a you can go because it's a it's fake but either way I see from this that it's not something that's inherent and every dar has it in it. So I don't know what all the other things are but the bottom line is said it's part from this that if somebody would eat the man and he would have in mind that it should taste like it' be okay. you wouldn't be either any sort of stating that stating that saying that I don't think it's all and why and why is that because there's a a so the says like this tells the he says today you're going to get but you're going to get two times right that's what we have and he told them that if you want to bake the you have to bake it today on Friday. And if you want to cook the you have to cook it today, right? Says he says if you want to bake and you want to have to cook it, why is it's not going to be okay. This is a pik and a rash in parish in the parish in his safer pit brings a kasha that he saw from the rash primadasha was that that's the other par. So the over there talks about the as well. And the Tyra says that they went and they collected the they gathered it. They they grinded it. They cooked it and they baked it. It tasted like whatever you wanted it to taste like. That even though the says that they would grind it never actually went into Even though the P says they cooked it, it never went into they never pressed it. It was all time. If you wanted it to taste cooked, IT TASTES COOKED. If you wanted it to taste press, it tastes pressed. But everything was based on what you want. So, HE SAID, "WHAT IF it was never cooked? And if it was never baked, it's a tells that is going to be shabas. If you want to bake it, if you got to bake it today, if you want to cook it, you have to cook it today. WHY? BECAUSE TOMORROW AND TOMORROW, they never cooked it. It never went into it was all. So if it was all what was the big deal, what what's the problem? say brings does the that the pramo proves from here that you see from here that if a person does a if you do that is it's considered a and being that they would pack a cook and give it doesn't matter but being that it was all double that was enough for it to constitute a and that's how YOU RECONCILE TWO RASHES in two on the one hand they weren't allowed to cook it on chabas but then again they never cooked it so if THE HOLY WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL? He said, you see for me that's not even going to be a problem. Frank has a listen to the somebody asked him. Somebody has a dog in his house, but he's a trained dog. So this dog, he was trained to the tea. So he even knows how to turn the lights on and off. the owner of the right he's yeah he's so he has to do is a little wink wink and by him being right he goes like a little the dog jumps up he reads yeah exactly and he knows how to turn the lights on and off see here's the question the question was sent brought to Is is it okay to do it on Shabas? He said at first glance he's not really doing all it is is this is not even this is so it's a kill me is always the Right? Causes a trigger. Right? All the nuances. HE DIDN'T DO ANYTHING. This is like that's all it is. This is the he wrote a whole truth on this. But this is how he starts his iner. I think that's one of the and he brings this that you see from here that if somebody does with regards to it's a problem because otherwise why would the not let it cook the one? They weren't cooking it anyways. It was all so again this is a whole discussion. gets into which among but it's just a fascinating another thing parathetically that comes out from this so there's a called hero was written by yphawren he was Lawrence the famous son so arawren safer y it's on a it's on different so this particular volume is on the lit real real loveish. So in the introduction to the cyer he brings that he sent certain shas when he went through in the three things that he discussed in the he sent certain shas to he sent certain shas toki. So one he asked was like this he brings this this we just spoke out brings this primo who asked that what was the problem to cook the cook it anyways the whole thing was so he said you see from me that cooking is going to be a problem but he asked from where says that if someone cooks on shabas there's no problem or if somebody would cook in the sun. You take it's so hot outside that he takes a raw egg and and it starts cooking outside. So is going to be potter with awesome but the point is not and the reason is because when it says in the bish is it means it has to be told you have to cook fire but if you're not cooking with fire so then it's not going to be so heal he says I don't understand that if you would have cooked on with the you would have been over this is all on level right obviously It's not told us he said if it's not told why would it be this wrote back it's not only told him but this is already said this and then he wrote in parenthesis this is what as it relates What has to be told? That bishop rises fire. What does that mean? What it means is that is the only if you do it in the way that you're supposed to do it. He says today people cook with fire. Nobody cooks in the nobody scrambles their eggs you know outside when it's a hot day. And as a result it's not Derek Bishell. So if it's not that's not going to be the bish that the is going to be but when the were in the mid was so that was the that's going to be a bishes either way again there's so much here so many layers as it relates to the and that is is that if when someone had a that the munch should taste like baser so the man remained the m it just tasted like baser or if someone had in mind that the munch should taste like. So the mun remained the mud, it just tasted like so that would mean just think about it that if someone had in mind that the mud should taste cooked. Nothing changed in the mud. It just tasted cooked. If that's what happened, what's the problem to do this on chabas? There's a problem to make something taste cooked on chabas. If someone had a m that the mun should taste cooked, what happened? The mun cooked. That's it. Now all of a sudden you had a medium rear steak. That's what happened. or no, the man looked like the man vu kizer, whatever whatever the titer describes it as, that's what it looked like. Just when you tasted it, it tasted that way. IF THAT'S THE CASE, then why are we even having this conversation? You didn't cook anything. It It had a tomb bishel. IT HAD A TOM BISHEL. NO ONE SAID you're not eat chabas. You can eat the mon chabas and make it taste like raw meat. No one has a problem with that. The issue is bish. Oh, bish. You're cooking. BISH IS ONE OF THAT'S THE ISSUE. What's the issue? It was never cooked. It just tasted cooked. What did you do? You know what it sounds like from this pen? You know what it sounds like from this marash from this whole that when a person ate the and he had a mind that it should taste cooked that what happened was it didn't just taste cooked IT ACTUALLY COOKED BEING THAT IT COOKED YOU. Now if someone's is it visual is it not so what's the sh it's one then you can maybe it's told it's not it is the but the point is now we can sit and we can have a conversation if you're cooking right another if someone's right wrote on the shabas that's why we see on it says he wrote he did it all this that maybe it's not us because you only do that's another thing you can discuss when it as it relates to having a but that's all if you're actually cooking the mud if the mud is cooking but if the mud is remaining the way it is it just tastes cooked then what's the problem that from this and this and this whole that when someone had a that the munch taste a certain way the physical nature of the mud actually change. It cooked now you have cooked mud. So if you have cooked mud now you cook mud then it's good. probably if that's the case with our we spoke we started this said what would be he said this came to him and he asked them a fest he wanted to know that if somebody had that the munch tastes like then he eat it is he says he not so he said what what should be the problem because it tastes like if something tastes maybe it's how do you know it's MAYBE IT'S THE THAT'S all if it didn't change physically it just tasted a certain way. So you're right was able to prove that taste is not something that's inherently awesome. All right? Because for everything that has a you have the corresponding but if the way that the mun worked is that it physically changed if it physically chang then then why shouldn't you be that it would make sense maybe in other words we know the mun tasted like whatever you wanted it to taste like. Somebody ate mud. How did it work? Is the you had in mind that it should taste like a rib steak if it became a rib steak. Now you're sitting with a rib steak in front of you or was what it was what it was. It was just a question of taste. If it physically changed then we understand the if it didn't physically change then we understand the would seem to be a little bit of a of a steer over here in the either way. A fascinating question. If somebody ate the and he had that it should taste like that he ate it. Was he or was he not just to end on one? So the over here says that if somebody wants to know what told I know that if I want to taste the so there's a way to eat how the is the truth is on the topic of Jews eating there's a fascinating medish the says why is the called the reason is because even though right now the is but there's going to be a time that the is going to be motor. So there's going to be a time where we will be able to we will be able to to eat the it's interesting that in he brings this mish and he brings that he heard from abatal of the Frankfurt the mine. So I think it means who was the famous of Frankfurt but either way he brings us that he heard from the Frankfurt and that is we know that is that is doesn't become so if you have something that's learn of now so doesn't become why because it's going to be anyways so for that reason any doesn't become The B quotes in with discuss that let's say somebody has a piece of meat where there's a sh in whether you could eat it or you can't eat it and that's and then it's so do you say that it's or not what's because so it's possible he's going to come he's going to tell you it's on the side that it's motor now it's so it's maybe it shouldn't be bottle it's an brings it base he brings that under and now do you say or do you not say again why not maybe so maybe you have to look at it as a suffix maybe you're not going to have a law says He says means something that's for sure now that's going to become. So what's a classic example of but after today but tomorrow it's going to be so right now it's but you can't wait until you wait till tomorrow. Tomorrow it's going to be ready. You'll be able to eat it then you have nothing to worry about. That's a classic example meaning the is that you have today will no longer be there tomorrow but in this case but you have you have a suff or if it's so what are you going to tell me that is going to come he's going to be m what's going to be he's going to say it was always it's going to say going afraid that it was never us that's not this is that's going to become in the it's Not the waser that became it was never I mean that it was never said but I took out from this that the fact that would be something the fact that something's going to be is enough to make something IT'S JUST THE THAT BY EVERY TAKE it's not because of the mater means that becomes over here if it's going to be afraid was never but that in of itself that can come and say that this is enough to render it. So based on this that really is tucked away in the said why is the called because one day is going to be kosher is for sure not kosher today one day it's going to be kosher if that's the case it's if it's his should be not and no one ever heard such a everyone should be viewed as a double based on the fact that says the says the says that I think the whole kash is based on the he said it's true one day is going to be but you know what the together of the one day being is together is that is going to make the a kosher animal meaning right now the kaz is my par but it's not mal right there are four animals that have one of the two simon you have the gum the shuffas they're all malo But they don't have my fresh par is just the opposite. He's my fresh par. But he's not a malagra. Mashiah's going to come. He's going to be a malagra. And being that he's going to be a maligra, he's going to have all the kosher in the middle is going to be a kosher animal. He said it's not the that is going to take the lumbus of how the is going to be kosher. He's going to take the that's not mala that doesn't have two kosher sim and say it's kosher. No, the gather is that it's going to have two kosher sim off the gathers. is going to have to go and it DOESN'T AFFECT THIS. HE SAYS IT'S THE NEWER THE THAT'S going to be malar that's going to chew its cut of that is we don't have the we have today will never be it's not but then says that the truth is that even though the says that the one day is going to be but really the real the real in the med is something else and that is is that we know the say that the four animals that the lists as the non-cooser animals the the the the gun and the shaf and the ne and the they all represent the four nations. They all represent the four nations that took the into and the is the fourth one that's mentioned and it's connected the fourth golus that's the gal that we're in today that's ad and he says the real of is that is going to do chuvo ed's going to come around and the same adim the Romans that destroyed the second and the gave the such for 2,000 years with prams and whether it was the crusades or the the Spanish inquisition or the holocaust and all these different sorus that we that that's what it means. It means that they those same ones that were giving us all these says the real is it's going to be that the same people that gave us the going to come around they themselves are going to have a change of heart talks about this as well and he says that is going to be the ones that are going to give us to build this is already told the raid of the and raid that we spoke about when we Messiah is welcome.