CHAZARAH - Menachos Daf 102 | "Nothing but the Daf" with R' Eli Stefansky

[music] >> Good morning rab boys. I Who is this massive Moses Mordecai? Call me the Zoric K'zoric dummy. It's a concept. In chas that if something is about to be done, let's say about to be thrown, so I can consider it thrown. We saw it also call Omed lipodice. If you're about to redeem it, you don't have to actually redeem it, it's as if it was redeemed. Let's say we have a situation where R' Shimon says you have the blood in the cup, you could throw it, it's as if it's thrown. It's as if it's just thrown, then then you're allowed to eat the the carbon, right? You have something that right now you can't eat unless you throw the blood. Throw the blood on the mizbeach, you could eat. So we're going to view it as if it was thrown. It's not thrown, it's in the cup. And therefore what? I could get to eat it. to eat it. Now it becomes tame. It was only if I could eat it can it become tame. So I have to use the whole thing. It's as if I threw it. If I threw it, then it's edible, I could eat it. If the If the coin throws the blood on the mizbeach, the other coin could eat the steaks. But he didn't throw it on the mizbeach. It's as if he threw it on the mizbeach. Oh, if he threw it on the mizbeach then it becomes edible. Becomes edible it's tame, right? That That's what we have to have. If it's edible, it's tame. That's the answer to this sugia. So now ask the Gemara, we're like eight lines from the bottom. V'holan lina is when the the carbon, the blood, whatever it is, remains overnight. V'holan lifnei z'rika. Before z'rika. That's one of the cases we had yesterday. The carbon stayed overnight before you were able to throw the blood on the mizbeach. But isn't this a problem? The mitzvah of the mizrakeh. V'bo y'zarek. It's a mitzvah to throw the blood. And if he wants, he could. And therefore but we said that anything that's about to be thrown, it's as if it was thrown. V'katani demetamed umesaklin. But you you already established that there's no tumah, meaning that it it wasn't thrown. If it was thrown, then it would be food. If it's food it becomes tame. But you said it's not tame. That means it's not food. That means it wasn't thrown. What do you do? Kol Omed lizarek k'zarek dami not. Hakamai skinan shelo hoisa sha'as biyam l'mizrakeh. You're right. If there was a moment, one moment that he could have thrown then I use this rule. Anything that I could throw, I threw it. I don't have to physically throw it. I could have. Kol Omed l'bilo. Okay, kol Omed l'bilo bilo. Ein bilo makkes. Kol Omed lizarek k'zarek dami. I I don't use that rule here. You know why I don't use the rule here? Because he did it by shkiya. He shechted the animal a second before shkiya. He didn't have that moment. So so basically there's two cases. If he had a moment before then it's as if he threw the blood. It punkt happens to be over here. He didn't have a moment. So what's the Gemara's classic question? Classic. So then tell me the difference between these two cases. Why are you jumping to a far-fetched case? Two very similar cases. One case is that the coin threw the blood at shkiya. So there's not a second that he could have thrown it. And therefore it's not considered food. If it's not considered food, it's not tame. And case number two is no, he he threw the He shechted this animal five minutes before shkiya. So he had a five minute window. He could have thrown the blood. So it's as if he threw the blood. So then it's edible. If it's edible, it's mekabel tumah. Why why don't you take Give me these two cases? Av hoisa lo sha'as biyamai. But if he had a moment to throw the blood, metameh tumas ochlin. It's as if he threw the blood, so then it becomes edible. And then it becomes edible, it becomes tame. So at the tonna al achas z'rika, let's just show you the chart for a second. Check out. There's two cases that we said yesterday in the braisa. One is lina before z'rika. One is lina after z'rika. Yeah? You have lina. Those are the two cases. Ask the Gemara, why don't you just give me two cases that are much more similar? One is that he did z'rika. They were all lina before z'rika. Both cases before z'rika. But one he had a moment. You give me a chok now. You're saying oh, he did it at the last last moment. He didn't have a second to throw it. Okay. So give me a case where he had two seconds to throw it. And and and the halacha will be the opposite. At the tonna al achas z'rika metameh tumas ochlin. Literally the Just say within that case. B'mayim shelo hoisa sha'as biyam. One case is we didn't have a moment to throw it, so it's not tame. Av hoisa sha'as biyam. But if he had a moment to throw it, even 10 seconds, metameh tumas ochlin. Then it would be The food would become tame because it's as if he did throw it. Says the Gemara, you're 100% right. In fact, that's what it says. Hakamai gomar. The two cases on top are identical to the two cases on the bottom. Lon lifnei z'rika, lon achas z'rika is sha'as and not sha'as. Hakamai gomar. Lon kodem she'ero lizrika einai metameh tumas ochlin. If the lina was before it was available to the z'rika, it's not metameh tumas ochlin. L'achas she'ero lizrika metameh tumas ochlin. Okay, another case. V'pigul. What about we had yesterday also? If a person, a coin had a machshava in his head, he thought to himself that what I am the z'rikas hadam, let's say. Let's Let's talk about pigul for a second. Pigul, you could do in all four avodas. There's four actions that are taken when you when when you bring a carbon, you makriv a carbon. First, you shecht the carbon. Then you receive the blood, kabala. Then you take the blood to the mizbeach. And then you throw it on the mizbeach, z'rika. Z'rika is the top, that's the most important one, that's the one that gives the kapara. Okay. But in each and every one of those four avodas, you could have a thought, like in this chart, that I am going to eat this uh this animal in five days from now. I don't want to mix up the oilam, but you could also have a thought that I'm going to be makriv on the mizbeach because put it on the mizbeach is a type of eating. It's the mizbeach. Anything that has to do with eating and food and z'rika. Z'rika is also fine. That's not the point. The point is let's say let's just take one thing. He The left top top left side. He thinks in his mind that he's going to eat this animal, the steaks that come with that animal get eaten in five days from now. That's pigul. Now once you do pigul it becomes passul right away. Now the Gemara says V'pigul b'makom kochi b'makom kalim. The mitzvah of the mizrakeh. I have a mitzvah to do z'rikas hadam before I do pigul. V'bo y'zarek. And he has the ability that kubes umal alav on top. V'bo y'zarek b'kitni. This is a question the Gemara is going to ask and everybody here should know the answer on the spot. The Gemara is just going through the steps. V'bo y'zarek. And he could And he could throw the blood. V'katani demetamed umesaklin. Milav the pigul b'zrika. Uh So if you go back to the chart he had from the time he does shchita to the time he does z'rika is five minutes. So during those five minutes, he could have done z'rika. He could have. B'kitni demetamed umesaklin. How come it's metameh? I don't understand. If kol Omed lizarek, anything I'm about to do when I could have done, it's as if I did it. So it's I could have thrown the blood. And I had five minutes to throw the blood. Before I did the pigul. I had five minutes from the time I did shchita to the time I did z'rika. I had five minutes and I could have had a machshava. I could have thrown the blood. If I could have thrown the blood, it's as if I threw the blood. If If I threw the blood, what's the What's the fiyores? Then it's food. If it's food, it becomes tame. So what's Avi's answer? His machshava of pigul was not all the way at the end of the five minutes. It was in the beginning of the five minutes. As he shechted the animal he had a machshava that he's going to eat this animal in five days from now. So there's never a moment that he could have thrown the blood. As he As he shechted. When When's the moment that he could have thrown the blood? Before he shechted? That doesn't count. The animal's alive. So as he shechted, it's too late. So there's never a moment, not even one millisecond that he could have thrown the blood. Milav the pigul b'zrika. Lav the pigul b'shchita. So the Gemara says, I knew that. But I'm I'm just trying to lead you into my question. Av pigul b'zrika mai. So I'll go with you. But what happens if he did if he did the the pigul by z'rika? At the five minutes into the whole process. Five minutes after he did shchita he he did a pigul when he did the z'rika. So in other words, he had five minutes where he could have thrown the blood and he didn't. But if you say that kol Omed lizarek k'zarek dami, in that case you're massing to me that what? That it's that it's that that what? It could be mekabel tumah. Very good. In the case where the pigul was at the end, where there's a five minutes slot for him to He was able to do z'rika and he didn't. So he's able to as if he did. And if he did, it is a kosher z'rika. Kosher z'rika, then the food becomes edible. Food becomes edible it mekabel tumah. Av pigul b'zrika mai So it's the same exact question that we had before, basically. These are the two cases that we have. Yesterday, we learned two cases. A person did pigul when he was doing an animal. A person did pigul when he was doing a mincha. So what's the Gemara's question now? I have much I have two cases that are much closer to each other. One he did pigul by the shchita. That's what we just said now. Oh, no no, we're talking about a case where he didn't have a moment to throw the blood. How's it possible? When he did it by shchita. But if he did it by by z'rika, if he had the pigul thought by z'rika then he didn't have a He did have a moment. He had five minutes. So I have two cases that are so much similar. Why are you jumping to a mincha? One case is kochi where it's not food. And one case is mincha where it is food. I have two cases in shechting an animal. One is considered food, one is not considered One is mekabel tumah, one is not mekabel tumah. How? One I didn't have a moment to to to be able to throw the blood. How's that? Cuz I I my my my pigel was doing the shchita all the way in the beginning. And what was all the way at the end? Where I had five moments. Benny attacking. Mitzuyan. I don't know. He asked the same question we had before. Why are you jumping to another case? It's far-fetched. One case a guy shcheted an animal, number one on top right, shcheted an animal. Case number two, top left, is mincha. It's They're They're They're different things. One is maseches Zevachim. One is maseches Menachos. I'm thinking about it. It's two different You tell it's different areas. In maseches Zevachim, I have one and two. They're both in animals. One is a shchita, the one is a zrika. If the bad thought happened all the way in the beginning where there's not even a moment to do zrika, then it's not food. And it's not tamei. I have a pigel with zrika, but if he had five minutes in between the shchita and the zrika, then that's when it was metamei. But there was a five-minute window where he could have done the zrika b'chasrus, so it's considered food. Considered food is mekabel tumah. Mekabel tumah is zakar. So he says, "You're right, but I have a much bigger chiddush here. I much rather tell you a distinction between something that are almost identical. There's two shchitas. In the shchita, raboisai, in shchita in step number one in the shchita, one shchita is considered food, and one shchita is not considered food. How's that possible? Cuz guess what? Mincha is a shchita. The kemitzah apart of the mincha is shchita. How? Let's check this out. Look over here. The four avodahs that you have on an animal that that are on top is shchita, kabalah, hiluch, and zrika. The four avodahs they have by a mincha is kemitzah, putting it in a kli, the same thing hiluch is a lot, and aktarah. They line up with each other. The kemitzah going like this to flower is like shcheting an animal. So that's what I wanted to show you. What's the word I'm looking for? Not a distinction is a better the >> [snorts] >> the the the contrast. The contrast between two types of shchitas. Shchita on an animal, I cannot consider it food, but shchita, so to speak, on flower, I could consider it food as I do it. It's a big chiddush that it's it's sort of like a shchita, yet it's still considered food. How? Pigel with mincha is zrika. I want to tell you that chiddush. Even though the pigel happened during the kemitzah, the kemitzah of the mincha is like a shchita dam. The kemitzah by a mincha is like a shchita by an animal. Af ilu hachi, and nevertheless, metamei tumas ochlin by a mincha, I could be make it tamei. How? Chiyuv ba'al is l'shas hakosher mikor because flower before it came to the Beis Hamikdash was flower, and it was edible. So um maila, that's what we had yesterday. Anything that had a shas hakosher, had a moment of fitness before it came to the Beis Hamikdash, you you were able to An animal didn't have a moment of fitness. You were never able to eat it. The only time you were able to eat it is when you shcheted it. Then it's already too late. Then it's already It's It's It's not considered food. Fine. So that's that. That's Hakafah aleph, or we're holding already Hakafah gimmel. Says the Gemara, Amar Rav Ashi. I'm reading the shmuah to him in front of Nachman. I said this over to Rav Nachman. And he told me, "Afilu tamei lan lan mamash." You could even say in Reb Shimon, it doesn't matter. Lina is literally Lina. In other words, Lina is before or after zrika. It doesn't matter when, before or after. But afilu tamei the pigel is zrika. We already established that the that the pigel only happened in step number one by the shchita. Not true. The The The pigel could have happened on step number four by the zrika. He says, "I want to I want to tell you something. You came You started the shiur. Something that you're about to redeem, it's like it's redeemed. Something that you're about to burn, it's like you burned. Something that you're about to throw, it's like you threw. Not true. There's different distinctions. It's not It's not It's not a one rule for everything. It's not a a blanket concept. The ba'i parik amreinan. Think about it. When a guy has a handful of flower for a mincha, what does he He's about to His wife calls him up. "Reuven, I need to make pancakes." He's holding this thing that's kodesh in his hand. So what does he do? He says, "All the kedushah that's in my hand should transfer to my $5 bill in my pocket." Did he do an action? No. He said something with his mouth. M'maila, listen to this. It's very simple. Since you don't have to take action, all you have to do is say, "The kedushah from me should go to there." So then it happens by itself. Even if you didn't do it, I can hear the logic that even if you didn't do it, it's as if you did it. Why? Cuz it's so simple. But anything they have to take a physical action, I have to get up and go, and then I have to throw it at the mizbei'ach. You didn't do that. So why is it as if you did it? Yeah. It's a machsar ma'aseh. That's literally the words. Here, I'll show you Rashi. It's hard to see. Rashi's all Here. He says, "The ba'i parik amar machsar b'diya l'fi kemitzah." He uses those words, "Machsar ma'aseh." And they stick in machsar ma'aseh. Look how many osiyos there's vav, tzadi, nun. Kitzur. But that's what he's saying here. One is missing action. One is not missing action. And it actually makes sense logically. Something that's missing action, you can't say, "Oh, it's as if it happened." No, it didn't happen. Uh nafka mina of like I want to build a building. I want to build it. So it's as if it's built. No, it's not as if it's built. It takes three years to build a building. But I want to destroy the building. I just want to give it a little zetz in the corner like they're doing in Gaza, and the whole thing goes down. Maybe that That is not a machsar. It's a big I'm just throwing it out. Like Some things you do say this concept, some things you don't. If it's easy, then you say it. If it's harder, then you don't. The ba'i parik, I mean, so you want to redeem it, and it's just saying a word. That works. Eibuy have a zorek l'eibuy. You got to say If he wanted to, he could have thrown the blood. L'ma'aseh, he didn't. It's machsar ma'aseh. All right. Here's another another one. In a parah adumah, we said that you have a parah adumah, you killed the parah, you shcheted a parah adumah, and it's very normal that if somebody comes up with a larger, better parah adumah, you redeem it. So in that case, you say, kol im lo yifdei, even though you didn't do it, k'podeh dami. Why? Because it's normal to do. It's omed l'piyon. But by a mincha, we don't say it. So the Gemara made a distin- a distinction a mincha and a parah adumah. Klal amar Rav Yehoshua, kol she achal l'shas heter l'kayam. So when it work The way it works in the Beis Hamikdash, if there's food that's owned by the Beis Hamikdash, and you eat it, you use it, what did you just do? Me'ilah. And what do you have to do? You have to pay a 25% penalty. You have to bring a carbon olah thing. Let's say it's food that went from being the Beis Hamikdash, it went to being the Kohanim. Any Kohen could eat it. And then you went ahead and you grabbed the steak and you ate it. Is that me'ilah? No, it's not me'ilah. Why? Oh, because because there's no more kedushah on it. The kedushah of of the Beis Hamikdash went away. Now, a human being is allowed to eat it. Gezel. Correct. Not from anybody in particular. From the whole shevet. Yeah. So, but what about if it was available to be to a Kohen to eat for a moment? So chiyuv also, since it was available to the Kohen for a moment, so the kedushah flew away, and uh and m'maila, shouldn't be me'ilah. Klal amar Rav Yehoshua, kol she achal l'shas heter l'kayam. There's a moment that the Kohen could have eaten it. Ein mo'alin bo. There's no issur of me'ilah. V'chol shelo achal l'shas heter l'kayam. I To me, it was always confusing as a bachur. Ein mo'alin mo'alin. Mo'alin means like almost you should do me'ilah. But mo'alin bo means there's a issur me'ilah on it. Kol shelo achal l'shas heter l'kayam. The Kohen was never able to eat it. So it remains the Beis Hamikdash's. It remains the rabbonim sh'l oilam's. So mo'alin bo, there's issur me'ilah. Ba'i l'shas heter l'kayam. What does it mean there was it was available to the Kohen? Shalanah. In other words, it was mutar to the Kohen. But now it became assur cuz it's overnight. It was mutar to the Kohen b'shni became tamei. It was mutar to the Kohen b'shni yotzei. It went outside of the Beis Hamikdash, so nobody could eat. Ba'i l'shas heter l'kayam. What does it mean that it was never available to the Kohen? Shinishchatah chutz l'zmano. In other words, he had a machshavah of pigel. It's in his head. As he did shchita, he thought himself he's going to eat it outside of the allotted time. He's going to eat it in a week from now. Because the Kohen said, "I'm going to eat it in Beis Hamikdash." Even though he's not allowed to. V'shekiblu psulim. The kabalah of dam was done by a Kohen that's pasul. Abba Shaul. V'zarku es daman Abba Shaul threw the blood or threw the blood. Uchtani meireisha. But what does it say? These three things happened. Now, my love, lonah mamash. When the Gemara says over here lonah mamash, the Gemara means that even the blood was a linah on the blood. In other words, there's no zrika yet. So what's the question? There's no zrika, but you could have done zrika. It happened before the night. It went through the night. The blood went through the night. The the meat went through the night. And that's bad. It's called linah. It's overnight. But at the end of the day, he could have thrown the blood. And if he could have thrown the blood, the Kohen could have eaten it. And the Kohen could have eaten it, so it's not it's not kodesh anymore. It's not the It's not the Beis Hamikdash's. If the Kohen could could have eaten it for one minute, then it's not Why is there me'ilah? Since I could have thrown the blood, I could have kol aroei l'zrikah zorek dami. It's as if I threw it. So if it's It's as if It's as if I threw it, then the Kohen could eat it. The coin could eat it. There's no me law. It's the same It's same concept as we said before. Sorry, not me law, me law. I'm just reading inside. The boy you have a article. He could have thrown the blood. Why? But I Tony ain't my home. It says before this that it's it is because I got dummy. You have a coin who if he's able to eat this food then you don't if you eat his steak instead, you don't you're not over a meal law. If he could eat it. What happened by us? All the blood was it was not thrown on the spear. It went overnight. And that's considered as if the coin could eat it. Why? But there's no Rico. So you must say that it could have been thrown. The coin is right because I got dummy. There's blood that had a coin should have a header. Right before there's a pot of blood. There was no coin on it yet. So it's as if it went to the coin on him for 1 minute. There's no meal so what do I see? What do I see? I see that coin is right because I got dummy. I do say it in something that requires a master. Before I said oh, if I throw it that's too much. I have to throw it. So and since I didn't throw it as if I can't say coin is right because I got dummy because I have to take action. Over here you say before this even if I have to take action I do say coin is right because I got dummy because in fact if you all eat this meat, you're not a meal because it's as if he threw it already. So you might allow you. No, you did throw the the story is different. The story is not that he didn't throw the blood. He did throw the blood. There was a a complete Rico. So in other words the blood there's no meal on the blood. The only soul that we have over here is meal law. So may law yes, they they they they it was right for the coin. It was right for the coin. There was Rico. It was right for the coin and that's why there's no meal law. There was Rico so it's right for the coin. There was a real Rico not a fake not a pretend Rico how long is Rico. It was a physical Rico and and and therefore at that point it became the coins and it became the coin it it's no longer meal law because it's the coins. It's just The problem is that it went through the night. What if he didn't do Rico Saddam? He didn't do Rico Saddam. According to what you just told me, it's because he did Rico Saddam. That's why it went out went out of the his possession, went to the coins possession and therefore if he comes and he didn't take from borrow, he took from a coin. But what if he didn't do Rico? I can have a meal on So would be meal law. Hi question So now the just asks a question on the lotion. So let's let's just do this together outside. It's very simple. What happens if the blood was thrown? The blood was thrown. They threw the blood. So is it the coins right now? They threw the blood. The moment they threw the blood what happens? So when is it okay? When is it okay? Yesterday or right now? When I do Rico right now, when does it become okay? Right now. So why are you telling me sure I saw the coin sure? That in the past a lotion of the past sure I saw it should say she yes law right now there's a coin sure cuz right now I did Rico. Right now it's the coins. So that that bothers the more. The what? Let's just read inside. I call the lotion coin sure sure I saw the coin sure header look at him. The lotion that it used to have a header because she I saw the coin sure header look at him. That's not good. Why? You say coin sure yes law I saw the coin sure look at him. You should say right now it has a header. I might have a ain't law I saw the coin sure I might have a ain't law. So it's more the what? That the mission is talking about on a case where there's no Rico because if there was Rico the mission would say right now there's a header. The reason why it says that there was no Rico cuz it had back then. Sorry. Hello over here I see. Meal law So he says okay, what are you bringing me right here from this from this coin business? You can't bring me a right from a coin. The what? By tower tower so you why? Meal law do you show a lot of do you see? What? What by by meal law it's not about is it food or not food? That's what we're talking about in our that it become food not food. Is it considered food? By meal law it's a different thing. By meal law is does it have do you show or not do you show? What what what what establishes the issue by by meal law? Does it have who's does does this piece of steak have do you show on it or not? If it has do you show then you did meal law and you have to bring you have to pay 25% and bring a carbon. If it doesn't have do you show okay. So the bus and the So what happened over here? It this could have blood. Okay, so this is the you could do Rico Saddam. So the do you show flies away and the do you show can never come back. Once it flew away and and let's say they didn't do Rico Saddam. You can't say oh, let's bring it back. The do you show is gone. But my other law even if there was no Rico Saddam and it never became the coin on there's no meal law forever cuz once the do you show leaves it leaves. But do you show but when it comes to do you show is this thing susceptible to do you show or not? It's whether or not this thing is is is edible. And this right is right and not right is right is not enough for it cuz you need right now right now. You have to there's a bunch of you have to be gorgeous here. The back takes out words so I'll just read it I think the way the back says it. You see the coin is right naturally you If he literally does Rico then you made it physically food. One more time then it it's physical food. So physical food becomes Tommy. Hey the light is right. Take out all these words by mercy. The bottom line is if you didn't do Rico the master law. And so if you did Rico it's food. If you didn't do Rico it's not food. The light is not food. It does not Tommy. Okay, so now it it gets easier from here. It's a new basically almost like a new attached to the previous series like a new. And maybe I'll show them Tommy. The night is like a hater. What's the story? I a person is not sure what he ate. He ate something and his wife said what do you do? He said I ate a piece of fat the gala. Are you sure that the gala I had a piece of over there that was going to give to the guy. You crazy? He says but I don't know if I ate the right or the left. I don't know. The person doesn't know. It could have been it could have been nothing. Could have been something something gala. So what do you do? If he knew for sure that he ate his wife said you ate what does he do? Brings a hat this. But if he can't bring a hat this what does he bring Danny a awesome Tommy? A hanging awesome. What does it mean hanging? If I find out tomorrow that I that I that I didn't eat it. I I figure it out. I go I take step back. I look at the video. Well, then I don't have to bring it. I might as well the light. So basically there's three options here. I say there's three options. Either three either if you find out that you did not eat you get the beautiful news you didn't eat it. In fact the babysitter she comes you go to the cleaning lady she says I took the the I know I took it. I ate it and you ate the good stuff. So either the awesome Tommy becomes a regular animal. I might as well right back to where it came from. Zero nothing. Why? Cuz he made a mistake. Or I'm telling you this cuz you'll see in the video there's three belts like in the airport three belts. Belt number one is Belt number two is Belt number two is land. You see the stove. Belt number three let's see in the video. It's worth it. Oh, absolutely. Yes. You get them home. You see the stove until you get them home and then you redeem it. You like. So what happened? They thought they saw him with it. It turns out they got a tremendous So now what do you do with the Tommy? So she number one says I may be Tommy found out that it's not that it's not he didn't he wasn't even have a year the year of either. It's cool and don't worry about it. Put it right back in the pen. They may or may not be a problem. You actually stove. You put it on the line going down to the airport. You make sure it breaks its leg. You take the money that you you sell it. Take the money you buy what the desert in the desert. Why is this Rashi? Because you can't just put it back in the pen. It took a person He's mom is worried that he didn't have a government says Rashi. I don't have that. Okay, fine. He was already master to do it. You grab make it a carbon that's one of the three belts over there. She made me a couple of this like a father-in-law goes over the son of a smack in the face. So what did I do? He says I'll tell you the truth. I don't know. But I'm sure you deserve it for something else. >> [laughter] >> You know what? You didn't you didn't do this trust me. There's another that is good for. So I'm going to what? Just shut that as a regular carbon. When if you already this is done you shall put the blood must be spilled. The that was here for what does it mean it was spilled? What do you spill it? Where do you spill it? I say. In the ammo. When it's in the back you spill it in there. The you burn the meat. Why do you burn the meat cuz it's like don't don't don't bother eating it. What about Adam? The blood was already on the back. And you found out that you didn't need how about you eat them eat the meat. If there was the the received the blood in a in a in a cup you keep on going you found out now that he didn't need keep on going spray the blood on them is back. The often get it. This has to do with what? I'm a circle is already done to me. The what? You have blood in a cup. You didn't throw it but it's as if you threw it. You threw it then it becomes like it's edible and You guys that you do say the concept that it's as if you threw it even though you have to take action. So the not a riot. You think the reason is you know what's the reason? What happened there? The blood went into the clay. Oh, that clay not because I'm [clears throat] I'm able to throw the blood it's as if I threw the blood. No, the clay gives it special powers and says if it was already It allows you to be the clay. Only the with the clay with this the question I asked you guys before. If you say the concept anything that's thrown thrown so therefore let's continue the logic anything that's about to be burned is burned. So I have The nicer I have left over meat that I'm going to have to burn or a part of the one that I burn I need the ashes. I might be able to how come the the that if if a person tell me touches the part of the becomes Tommy. Why? I let's just consider that just a bunch of ashes. All right, hey. The what? Special love that for we said it by war we said it by so we're also a special thing for part of the mother. You're right. You're right. 100% it's it's burned but nevertheless we'll make it Tommy. So the way it works is we know you have top top level of tumor. Then under that what do you have? What do you say what do you have under tumor? What do you have under that? What do you have under that? Okay. Whatever. Okay. But there's also kind of called puzzle. It's not it's not something touches this apple it becomes puzzle. It doesn't have the power to keep on giving to me something else. It's not a reason that makes something else just possible. So neither I can't understand that you want to take this part of the mother say even though it's a bunch of ashes because of the love that we have for for I'm going to make it possible. Possible you can't use it anymore. Look at Tommy to say that it has enough power to give something else to me not be tall. And if so to the boy and if you want to say yes it does have the power. This is where I ask the question. Sorry to you have flour what do you do with the flour? You pour in a bunch of oil and you mix it. What's going to happen? I did it once in sheer last time we should have done it. You take a bunch of flour that much flour you pour in two cups of oil. You mix it. What's going to happen? You know have gloves of flour like this big. They're not a single molecule of oil touched it. It's impossible that the oil should go everywhere. In order for something to become Tommy you need a liquid to touch it. So here's a glove of flour that liquid never touched. It should be immune to Tommy. And he's asking does it become Tommy or not? And the answer should be based on our that it it does become Tommy. Why? Cuz of this. Cuz I love so much. Everything in the middle even in the gloves in the sorry the calls it to the sorry to say it's a glove of a flower money by money money by does it have but yes make it >> [clears throat] >> you have the answer right here because it should be come shiny. And now all of my that wasn't his question. His question was does it come you're telling me it become more than possible reason to shine. No boiler the riser who wants to know there's a real real Tommy. Keep coming in the bottom we're only talking about the bottom level that he's asking that it comes Tommy. He wants to know even more than that and that's why he didn't have an answer. Have a wonderful day. >> [music] [music]