0:00 / 0:00
CHAZARAH - Chullin Daf 68 | "Nothing but the Daf" with R' Eli Stefansky
57 views
- Good Morning - Introduction - 68A - 68B - Have A Wonderful Day -- MDY presents: "Nothing but the Daf", R’ Eli Stefansky’s MDY (Mercaz Daf Yomi) Shiur in a concise format - all the clarity of the full daf Shiur, with Reb Eli's unique charts and visual aids, without any extras (emails, stories etc.) Perfect for Chazarah or anyone who wants a quick, focused Daf.
Chapters
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Good morning.
We are actually continuing the they
explain we're talking about these areas.
So we're continuing with a type of a tra
we're discussing the famous called
bmpua. Benua is a fascinating here. I'll
show you. I'll remind you this
is a older video, but it's a should be a
classic.
So, what happened here? There's a cow
that was pregnant and she had aita. That
shita works on the fetus. You don't have
to chef the fetus. We're going to see if
they walked around maybe like in this
video maybe.
But the baby you're allowed to eat
without
the just tells us the the background of
the story. It's not important.
animal had a hard time giving birth
and the the fetus stuck its hand out.
Now we're talking about
the of the mother works on the fetus.
You don't have to shuck the fetus.
You're allowed to eat the fetus. If
everything would remain in the mother,
then the works. The problem is something
came out. Now it depends what part of
the animal came out. the leg, the foot,
the hand or the head. Big difference.
Because if the hand of the animal comes
out,
then that hand didn't have a
So if the hand remained outside of the
the animal and then we did a of course
the doesn't work on the hand. The thing
is the the animal brought its hand back
in and then there was a what does the
Mishna say? Let's read together.
of zero.
What's
>> the the hand or the animal?
>> The animal. So then why what's the
difference? So why does it say that the
it brought its hand back in? And if it
if the hand remained outside, you're not
allowing the animal. We have to even all
the words.
It seems like
it seems like the hand is that's how I
would learn it because if it's the whole
animal then I don't care if the the the
animal took its hand back in. It's not
going to help me. You can't if you can't
eat the hand, why does it say that it
brought the hand back in? You can't eat
the hand whether it remained outside or
brought back in according to what you're
telling me
means the whole the hand also the the
animal inside for sure but the hand
also.
But the mission makes
but if the animal stuck its head out
head is different head is like a
complete birth once an animal is born
you can't put it back in its mother and
the mother and say oh it's a it was born
finished
once it stuck its head out even if it
pulled its head back in
it's already born the mother doesn't
help the fetus
What if you take you cut a body part off
surgically, stick a knife in, you cut a
leg off from the animal while it's still
in the inside
and it remained inside, but it's not
attached to the baby anymore. It's a
it's a dangling leg somewhere inside the
mother. The works,
you got to eat it. Why? It's no
different than the lungs of the mother
mother. But here's the tremendous. If
you were to chop off the lung of the
mother and it remained inside and they
did, you wouldn't be able to eat the
lung afterwards. Why? That would be so
the Mishna gives a different example.
These are organs that if you do cut out
the animal won't die. So it's not a tra
and you take the spleen, you cut the
spleen and you leave it inside. You take
one of the kidneys, you cut one of them
off and you leave it inside.
You're not permitted to eat the the that
that kidney after you sh the mother.
Why? Because the kidney is
while the animal's alive. When I cut the
kidney, you're not allowed to eat that
kidney that minute. So just because you
left it inside the animal and you
ditched to the mother, we're talking
about the kidney of the mother, not the
kidney of the baby. Yeah.
>> Let's start over. I started over. I said
from I'm starting again. If you cut the
lung of the mother and you cut the
kidney of the mother, forget she's not
even pregnant. We have an animal that's
not pregnant. You cut one of the organs
and you the organ remains inside. At
that moment that you cut the organ,
it's
you can't make mut. There's no such
thing. If I cut a leg off a a live
animal, am I allowed to eat it? No, it's
then I sh the mother. Am I allowed to
eat the leg? No. Once it's
I cut the kidney of the mother
doesn't come out to the world. It's in
the mother's stomach. Am I allowed to
eat it at this moment? No. Oh, it's
so just cuz I shucked the mother 5
minutes later doesn't make the kidney
motor. The mckini is awesome.
>> Why is that different?
>> Oh, but if I cut the leg of the animal
and it remains inside now, it's like a
it's like a it's a it's in the animal.
It's no different than the animal
itself. It's no different than the than
the baby animal. The fetus yasim
is muted through the of the mother. So
to its dingling leg is muted through the
of the mother. It it's not it's not the
mother's a it's it's the baby's a so
there's no difference it's one or two
any a that's in there it's zakl this is
the rule
if it's part of the mother and you cut
it and it stays in there
but if it's not part of the mother then
it's this is this is today's right over
here the question that I asked you in
the
comes ra and says is
the hand that stuck out the window and
pulled it back in. You're not allowed to
eat that hand. You eat the entire animal
and not the hand
says do not eat the traa. But there's an
interesting word in the what it should
say is if you were to write it you would
write
meat that's don't eat what's
a place a field doesn't have any walls
doesn't have any
and the tells us
once the meat once the it goes out of
its makita like by us it went out of the
of the mother nessar you're not allowed
to eat it forever
You can't undo. You can't retroactive
something that's trafe. If it's tra, if
it's tra you can't say, "Oh, but I did
this and this and I fixed it and it's
not tra anymore."
Ask the gumar a question on Rav. We're
going to try to beat up Rav here and see
if he if he holds strong. And he does.
The ones who argue with Rav, they lose.
Again, what does Rav say? We have an
animal in the stomach. If the the
mother, you're allowed to eat the entire
baby. But if the baby sticks its foot
out and brings it back in, you're not
permitted to eat that foot ever. Even if
it's stuck, it brought it back in. The
problem is, let's see if it fits in the
Mishn. It says in our
the baby stuck its hand out and brought
it back in. Eat it. What do you mean?
It's talking about the foot. That's the
regular way of reading it. That thing
that it stuck out and brought back in.
You eat? No, we're talking about
the the my is talking about the foot.
We're talking about the actual baby, but
the foot you're not allowed to eat. So
say, I knew you going to tell me that,
but I had a question. But if you're
referring to the baby,
so why does the say he brought the foot
back in?
Even if the foot remained outside,
nothing changes in you to eat the
mother, the the baby, and you know how
to eat the baby's leg. Why does why does
it say that it brought its leg back in?
What difference does it make? Says,
"You're 100% right. There's there's no
difference whatsoever.
It doesn't make a difference. If it
brought its leg back in, you didn't
bring the leg back in. You're not
allowed to eat that leg, that hand."
The second case in the referring to the
head of the animal, once the head is
born, the whole animal is born. And the
doesn't help. Even if the animal brings
its head back in over there is a kadesh
by the head. It says a nonadesh by the
hand. You're right. There's zero kadesh.
We don't have to say it brought its head
its hand back in. There's no difference
if it the hand. But we want the mission
to be symmetrical. And the second part
of the mission is a very nice kadesh.
Even though the animal brings its head
back into the mother, the of the mother
doesn't work on the baby. Why? Because
once the head is born, the whole animal
is born. Once the animal's born, you
can't take an animal that's born and
shove it back into its mother and say,
"Oh, this will work." Doesn't work. The
animal's born. So the zero kesh on the
hand. Now, let me ask you a question. If
there's zero on the head, does it does
it make sense? No. Zero on the hand,
zero on the head, then what's going on
in this mish, why do I need a mishna
for? And that's the question. Now,
there's no on the head. Why? Because I
see it in two other Mishn that same once
a head is born the whole animal is born.
So again we're discussing this leg that
went out came back in
what's in the head a head was born.
So you're not allow you're not allowed
to eat the entire fetus even if it
brings the head back out. What's the
once that came out it's considered a
birth that also we learned. Oh, so let
me just be magnum super interesting
today. I'm serious. There's two when it
comes to there's two types of there's
aar what does aar have think about it
what's what's special about two things
first of all gets everybody knows oh it
gets two time a second
that's all you guys care about
if you're not akar you care about your
older brother that he's going to get
yeah and there's another thing when he's
born you have to do
there's two very very big between the
two has to do with the mother's first
child. So sometimes you go to you see a
person has a baby. Oh mazto maz you go
to the bris whole thing and then you
wonder to yourself how come there's no
bed. Could be a number of reasons.
Either
it's a you know the wife is a kayen but
you know you know the wife very well. I
mean she's she's your sister or whatever
like I'm not a ken. She's not either a
ken. So what's going on there? How come
there's no today?
>> C-section. There's no C-section. It's
very possible that she had a miscarriage
and a miscarriage
makes the se makes the other kid that
she had a second kid to know one month
this that you go ask him someone just
asked me recently do I have to make a
pin I said don't what do you I do I'm a
d guy you know I give she go ask your
local rabbi my just like in the last two
months or whatever so
but when it comes to the to to a A
little different, very different. Yusha
who gets raious.
So we learn in the Gar means the one
that the father would have a lot of sar
if he dies. And when when a uh there's a
miscarriage, the father doesn't have
that amount of pain. Therefore, the
miscarriage doesn't affect the yusha. So
even if he's considered second foren
he's not he's considered first for the
he gets two parts.
So you can't go and say by the fight you
can't say oh but he didn't have a pin so
he doesn't get two parts. No it has
nothing to do with
so it says like this but we already
learned that when once the head comes
out it's considered a birth. So if
that's the case I don't need it in our
mishna. If I don't need an hourish,
there's zerodish in our mishna. Case
number one of the hand coming out, he
said it's not a at all. It's really for
the second case of the head. But the
head is also not a why not.
It's a riddle. How do you have a four
two times for a second portion? But he's
not a for you don't have to pay five.
The second kid who comes after the first
child was a nafl is born let's say in
the eth month in the time of the garra
some
even though the nafl the miscarriage
came out with a live head
or was a fullterm baby the first one
he was he was delivered dead his head
came out dead and time it's because in
the ninth month he came out dead. But if
his head was alive and that's the that
we see over here that a live head,
it's considered a birth. The first one
was born even though he might have died
later on he came out his head was alive.
So what do you see? It's all dependent
on the head. The head is the birth.
Why does our have to talk about the
birth of a head?
Oh, he'll tell you over there. We're
talking about a human being. Parl is
talking about humans and this
is talking about an animal and you can't
learn one from the other. Why? I'll tell
you why. Two big
you can't learn a human being from an
animal. Why? A they praise the if you
ever saw we just showed a video of a
zebra giving birth. Not mish. What an
animal gives birth. It's standing up and
it's exposed to the world. Any direction
that you look at it, you'll see the
birth. By human being, the thighs cover
the birth from certain angles. So it's
cons maybe the birth of the head is not
considered a real birth. Didn't come
into the world. Not everybody could see
it. We're not talking about inflar
which is referring to a pipe inside the
woman's body. We're not talking about
inside. We're talking about outside her
body. There's a praisor. We're talking
about the thighs.
So once the head is born, if you're
standing from the side, you won't see
anything
is not considered a birth.
And another reason you can learn an
animal from a from a human
today we know for a fact every two days
or every day
uh some of the terrorists from the they
they they suddenly a missile hits them
somewhere in Gaza what happened they
they're running around on social media
with oh look what I did I attacked a
tank I did this so they have their faces
facial recognition wherever they are
they know exactly where every single one
of them is and they're all going to go
bye-bye.
>> Why? Cuz a human being there's not a
single face that resembles another f
every face is different.
We're probably though I don't know look
look it up. I'm sure there are other
animals like monkeys whatever that have
a similar kind of thing but like like
human beings that everyone is so unique.
They hear color and the the the cheeks
and the eyes and everything is different
about every single human being. So, when
a human being is born, it's a bird. His
head. I can recognize him right away.
It's different. I mean, all human beings
when they're born, they basically look
like aliens. That's a different story.
But they're different. The animal cow's
born. You can't say, "Oh, there's a
birth. This head looks exactly like the
other cow."
So, says that that I also learned
anyways. This is no in ahead. Why? It
says,
so you have the
amniotic sack that the baby uh sits in,
spends its pregnancy in. If a little
part of that sack comes out, we're
concerned that there's a a there used to
be a baby in there. It just it got
dissolved. And what are we concerned?
We're concerned that there's there was a
head and the little part that came out
there's a head that got dissolved. So
once again we see that the head is
considered the birth
amniotic sack
because again we're concerned about the
head
just like by a woman we're considered
we're concerned about uh a dissolved
baby. So too by the animal but the point
is the head. So we already see that the
birth of a head is what what counts
and then the Gmorra goes on with the
question. And here's the question just
about P once again we asked why does it
say that the animal stuck its hand out
brought the hand back in says you're
right there's no at all what's the in
the head out head in big kesh asking not
a kdish I have two that tell me the same
thing already the birth of the head is
the birth so then what's the in our it's
not the head part so what is it the hand
it's not the hand part so what is it why
do we have it zero duration if you tell
There's a big in the hand that what
taught to say that what that you're
allowed to eat the hand once the hand
goes out and comes back in there's a
major you're allowed to eat the hand not
not like we're going to see
that's great now I have a
so that that's why even though there's
no in the head I'm saying it because of
the hand
if you're telling me there's zeroish in
the hand and there's zeroish in a head.
So what's the point of this whole Mishna
says not the point of the whole Mishna
but the point of that bringing you back
in part
there is a major here we're talking
about that you're allowed to eat the
actual animal itself the baby
and we're going to see this three times
today
he's going to say which is the place of
the cut
what happened an animal sticks his hand
out comes the owner sees his his animal
struggling in this birth. He takes a
knife, chop chop, chops the hand right
off. You have the part of the hand
that's cut by the cut. It's at the
surface at the opening of the animal.
It's not outside and it's not inside.
It's right there by the surface.
If the hand was outside, it would be to
eat. If the hand is inside it would be
it's
saying
or like my friend says
okay is
>> so hold on a second.
So now this part is not outside not
inside major that if it pulls its hand
back in you to eat it with the
big
>> that area that's on the entrance of the
animal
if it was outside if it's inside mut but
it's it's not it's not inside not
outside. If the animal was outside
completely and it came back in not to
eat if it was in noish at all is that
that part of the part. Now we're going
to have this three times in a row. So
remember you land if you only if the
animal pulls it completely back in
it
because it no it's it's it's in between.
It's and
so now we go our our Mishna
>> and it's not our surprise but it has a
lot of similarities to our Mishna
an animal is having difficulty giving
birth
it stuck it hand out and pulled it back
in
then it checked the mother.
So we have the same question. What's the
hand or the whole animal? But we're
going to try to prove it from the rest.
But if it you the mother and then it
decided to pull its hand back in. Of
course,
what's
that piece that came back in? It's not
it's not not okay.
It stuck its hand out and you cut it off
and you the mother
the the the hand that you cut off is to
why is it? It's an aa it's a it's a dead
animal that never had dead animals that
don't have a a cow that dies without is
an aa a cat that dies without is an aa a
snake
that dies without anything is not is not
why Because it's not from
if it stuck out and you cut it back.
It's an
that is inside the animal. In other
words, the entire fetus that's inside
you eat it. Here's a this
mother. Then you cut off that foot, that
hand that was sticking out. Listen to
this.
The meat touched the why.
The the foot that's outside is not part
of the animal. It's not part of the that
we said is an that is. And guess what?
Na what to Na that the highest that an
animal could be avatar
goes down one level. So if meat good
kosher meat which is the fetus touches
this aai part this foot the foot is
what's this over here?
It jumps down. It becomes
no not other food. It's food.
It touched the part and becomes
important for us.
No, it only touched
which is which says more.
that says
in the beginning
it
now we're going to go through the
motions here. What are we talking about?
We're talking about what do you like to
eat? You allow to eat the foot the the
the hand we're talking about the actual
fetus. But if we're talking about the
now it can't be we're talking about a
baby here because everything has to be
consistent. So we're talking about the
baby and not the the hand. So the whole
mission is the baby. Now what happened
in the second part
the mother then it brought its hand back
in.
We're talking about the uber. We're
talking about the fetus. What's
Why in the world would the baby become
if it brought its hand back in? What?
The rest of the baby's also.
You're right. We're not talking about
We're not talking about either. We're
not talking about the baby. We're not
talking about its hand. We're talking
about one part of it. The part that's at
the border. It's not inside. It's not
outside. If it pulls it back in, it's
motor.
So listen to this comes from
what does he bring? Usually a good uncle
from America brings toys and cash. He
brings a I have a forum. Here's a bright
basically he says these two these two
words in the paras and says twice
my friends any animal that split hooves
paras is one is two let's learn
something from it that if it stuck its
hand out the paraser
brought it back in you could eat it
and if you brought it back in you could
eat it the same Basically twice two feet
came out you could eat it. One foot came
out you could eat it.
Same discussion that we're having up
until now. Hand goes out. Hand comes
back in. You could eat what? Not the
rest of the fetus. The hand itself.
You allowed to eat the fetus, not the
hand. Asking are you?
The same question we had in the Mishna.
So then why does it say that he brought
it back in? Here's
I'm talking about that area that's not
inside the animal. It's not outside.
It's at the opening of the animal. And
if it pulls it back in, then you're
allowed to eat it after you the mother.
Yes, I get it all. I heard this before.
But
you're bringing me
there's one extra here.
Okay. use the word paras but what about
the aa itself what about the foot itself
maybe that I can learn from the word
procise
says you're 100% right you do learn two
things from the two words but different
than you want to do
I'm going to use up for what like you
said but one
check this out if a cow gives birth to
something like this
>> it's a
Camel. Camel. Very good. Israel.
A camel. But take a look at its feet.
It's born from a cow, but it has stray
feet. It doesn't have maf paras. It
doesn't go through and through. It has
exactly what a camel looks like. It has
like these two giant toes. You allowed
to eat this or not allowed to eat it. It
was born from a cow. Two cows, father,
mother. Just it came out weird. Allowed
to eat or not allowed to eat it. So
you're not allowed to eat it. But
but in utro if you eat if if you sh the
mother and it's in there and you find
like that you're allowed to eat it.
That's the second process.
The whatever
says
if a camel comes out and has doesn't
have mafance
because it was born
the mother and you have a baby in there
with no mism
and now we have the posing sheet and
this is going to disappear real quickly.
Rav was the golad in Bavan was his
contemporary lived in the same time was
an R was slightly older he's considered
a Tana is not considered a Tana but was
the galan
argues and he says if a cow while it's
giving birth it it's not important
giving birth while she's pregnant the
baby sticks its hand out and pulls the
hand back in says you allow to eat the
hand if you chef the cow mother and the
baby's inside still
says you eat the hand I argue on
so I was just thinking to myself in the
nothing but the daf those 10 seconds are
going to be cut out
but of me trying to get that drink
>> it's all your explanation of those 10
seconds
>> correct they won't even see how good the
nothing but okay so
how could you argue I'm just thinking
yeah always argue and all of a sudden
ram are together on this they don't
argue they say what if the animal pulls
its hand back this is today you can't
eat the hand how could you go and argue
on them
there's a I forgot where it is that says
that they used to go to Raph's caver and
take some of that the the the dirt from
the caver and put in their eyes
says I'm both of them they're so
the the I hold of them they I I'm going
to take the dirt put it in my eye blind
myself with it that's howish they are I
wish I could have some dirt from their
caver and put it in my eye
but what am I going to do
after
my eye
said
everything was in the the general rule
shouldn't eat meat that's from the
field. What does it mean? Whether it's
whether it's
or
that whole parish with
why did you burn that that and he tells
him did it go out if it went out I
understand why you burned it didn't go
out doesn't mean it didn't go out if it
went outside of the the B mikdash for a
second you know how to bring it back in
once it went out it's gone
So
only one time did the say on on some
item if it goes out it can't come back
in the but all other things in the like
a hand that went out of an animal came
back in it should be okay
what is it coming to tell us oh so now
the jumps to another completely
somebody has a bunch of produce he has
to take 10% of it and bring it to and
eating
and his first fruit he brings to eats it
only
if you take my fruit and you bring it
into then you take it outside and bring
it back to you you're allowed to bring
it back to there's no problem
and I think so too by the by the fetus
stuck his hand out could bring his hand
back in sh the mother the hand's Okay.
I would think like that it's okay.
No, it's like
it's not my Where do you see it in the
word? In the word this
treat like a not even
when it comes to
there's no there's no back seas. can't
retroactive do something to to to
apply a new rule to to what you have
now. Right now it's finished. You can't
undo that
to the meat once it goes out of the its
boundaries. It went out of the mother
even if you brought it back in. It's
also like
we have a question.
We just learned
where do you see that you're allowed to
bring it back in
once it goes out of
even if you bring it back it's 100%
have a wonderful day
>> merit of spreading Torah throughout the
world. Sponsor Ashir today.
mdysponsor.com or sponsor atmop.com.