הלכות סוכות הלכות ודיני אתרוג, הרב יחזקאל קרישבסקי שנת תשפ"ז

With the help of God, today we will learn everything that concerns everyone who wants to buy a Rabu Min and wants to buy an Etrog. You need to know what to look for. There are things that are holding you back. There may be something wrong with it. This is mainly the law. There are matters that are taboo. There are matters that may be waived altogether. With the help of God, in the future, as time permits, we will also talk about the subject of Etrog that will not be complex. All kinds of varieties will be discussed later. So first, when we learn about Etrog today, we need to know a brief introduction. There are two issues that are discussed. When we talk about Etrog in which Min, there are two issues. Each one has different parameters. The posuk says, and you took Asudo from Baritzor. You learn that it needs to be more so that it has beauty. So there are things that the Sages determined that if if if it is so and so, for example, let's say a black dot that is in the etrog, it is a disqualification of Odo. Yes? This is a matter of Odo and there is another matter of it can be a disqualification of lack that something is missing in the etrog. The disqualifications of this lack are taught in the verse and you took and you took for them, it must be a complete disqualification, that there must be a complete disqualification at the moment, for example, when it is said that something is missing in the etrog, then the disqualification is you took for them, it is not your disqualification, so it is a disqualification of Odo and a disqualification of the disqualification of Likhitam, so each of them has in it all and in this all Humza and in this Hum. Let's talk about Odo's disqualification, a short introduction. Yes, so Odor has in it all that Odo. It is just a matter of how I see it at the first moment, since it is about something of Odo, then we need to see it from a distance. It is not about seeing that you look closely or with a magnifying glass, all kinds of visual tools, what you see in the first view, for example, we said a black dot if you see it. In Ashkishonu it can be invalid for Odo but if you don't see it in the first Shupfer then it's not invalid for Odo then that's all that's in Ludo that's what you see in the first Shupfer in Yaduch there are materials in the matter of Odo that are invalid for Odo we rule Harmor on Terad and Shnivu rule that Odo invalidates all Shibo to begin with we rule that it is a pass that's in Ludo also in all the dream also in the year that the day of Tabris is on Shevs Odor invalidates all Shibo from the principle of the law this is the material that is in Now on the subject of the second subject of lack of the most tamo so on the one hand the totality in that it delays only on the first day of Yom Tev and on the day of the week it is a joke from the principle of the law oh it doesn't delay the matter of lack and if this year if in the year that the first day of Yom Tev comes on Shevs then in general maybe we don't need to be careful at all about the matter of lack from the principle of the law this is the totality of the totality in the matter of taking the people and the wall in which it is that even here I don't measure it in the matter of our Shupfer even if I see it only up close a even if I didn't notice but Someone will come and tell me there is a flaw here of lack then it will be flawed yes so he considered that not even in the first transparency but if it is missing it is missing it did not take the people so yes this is the background to the matter there are flaws related to the Odu and there is a matter related to takings so let's go back to the flaws of the Oduwar of the Let's say the black dot that is on food to be kneaded is a black dot that is up to the Etrog I have an Etrog and if we see a black dot in it then it will be in the transparency of its registration then it will be the flaw of the Odu and yes why why really Odu is related specifically to the Ashkofer we have so really it is not see and expands on this even more than the other poskim all bring it towards his language in Tovar R Mah from section section Chobz and it is that they would be visible to the eye when it was seen in Dua and there would be no need to see the eye of their eyes until they are tall you don't need to look carefully look for it with magnification or from close up not to see in me and not to put and so everything that is numerical is not a phazl these if so it seems to most people my son and dom in the transparency first Most people in Shkofer don't need the rabbi to see, don't need a specific person, most people in Odom, take three people, most people they will tell you I see it in the clear, I don't see it in the clear, I don't see it in the clear, I don't see it in the clear, if someone at first didn't see it and only later does he see it, it's no longer the clear, it's already the clear, second, if most people see it in the clear, then it will be the fault of Udo. How do you really hold the etrog in order to see these matters of another clear, do you look like this, like this, yes, how far will you see? I say, when you reach it, it's fake, and you don't have to look at it, what is a body? So Rava here in the last generation, they say it's 30 centimeter, 30, 40, by what is it really measured? I saw an explanation that it's very plausible, after all, the halacha is in Udo's passage, as we will soon say that there is a difference between the upper part of the etrog, as it is called the chevitam, and the entire etrog. Why is it really more severe in the chevitam, so as it is written that the tongue in the chevitam, you see it much more, yes, I will read the The language of Altera in the section above, as it is part of the above, what started from there, is that the main part of the hand that was collected in the way it looks, these eyes will be removed from the rest of the mits and in the dozen in the inuvachsuposri, a person gives inuvachsuposri, comes part of the seal, the upper part, if I hold the etrog in front of the face and up and close, it is really the seal before everything, why suddenly it is only about how much to hold the etrog, when do you hold the etrog, the Holy One, blessed be He, commanded us to do the rabbi mini and how do you hold it, do you hold it in the naanum, yes, in the naanum, we will be rewarded, who hold it, where do you hold it, do you hold it, close to the heart, close to the chest, yes, so it is not really in front of the eyes, it is a little far down, so when it is really close to the chest, close to the heart, aya, you can see at all, maybe only the part of the day, really, so even if you want to see the whole etrog, move it away, but at such a distance, as if it were a place opposite the return, at a distance of a distance, quite a large distance, where you need to look, where is the kufer there, what is the kufer there, you need to rotate the etrog in a circular motion And see if I see a black dot in the transparency of our license if I don't see it is the transparency of our license then there is no here the invalid of Odo this is the dot so then anyway this is the foundation that some who see from above transparent our license this is here here the condemned of invalids of Otto and therefore so a so come come light we really started talking about black dots a dot there is also not written black white white is not found so much so talking about black which is found if there is a black dot when it is invalid then it is written sit in your head the seal of the etrog where it also invalidates even one dot if there is one black dot in all of the woven they ask this in the first transparency most of the Odom then it will be invalid it is an invalid etrog without it being very beautiful and perfect things it will already be invalid what will be in the lower part of not in the upper part by the way before we weave on the lower part a nose how do I measure what a nose is I see that in the snout in the part of the debts of the etrog invalidates even one black dot that is seen in the transparency of our right where the nose begins so then the truth is there is a second dispute who is this messenger Aruch 33 Poskim that what is shortened, a part that is shortened, how can you measure it? It's something in the wheel. Sometimes it's hard to see. So there's a saying that says, if you take the etrog horizontally, lying on its side, then it's much easier to find out where it's affected. Where is the joint? And then I can buy a lot more from the joint. Where is it? There's one black dot that's disqualifying. If it's at the bottom, if it's just one black dot, then it's not disqualifying. There's Rashi's opinion that even somewhere in the part below the L for sharpening, it's also considered a nose. In the part below it, it's a birolocha. Maybe something a little bit that he was afraid of. There are some who are born in birolocha, but look, he didn't bring it to anyone. It's just a self-imposed seal. Where is it? There's one black dot that's disqualifying. What's the ruling on the lower part of the etrog? So here in the Shulchan Aruch, there are two opinions. Rabbi also brings both opinions. The section on the B'bof and here there's a lot of heat. Look, look. After he brings one opinion, he says that it depends. Let's say if we have three black dots or a chaz. This is not found in our generation today. The way it is found with us is this. The black dots if there are three white dots but it is mostly circumscribed it should be mostly circumscribed if it is only on half or less than half it will not be mostly circumscribed if there is a black dot and another dot and another dot head in total when I surround all three of them in width it is said then it will be mostly fun then it will be invalid the same thing in length if it is in a black dot here a black dot here and on the other side below we did not see that a circle was made regarding the length and it reaches mostly circumscribed there are black dots so it is a statue that is all we do not need to expand on this because I cannot Missal look and it is more severe this is one opinion in the length table after there is another opinion and there are embalmers on this from even there is not in it it does not have two typhoons yes even if it is a place next to each other only there is a little space between them as what they explain then it is as spotted and invalid so there is another opinion that even if there are only two black dots why is it written two and a third two his ishu what is two his ishu a commandment not seconds a blow should be said so even if there are only two dots even if they are close to each other So according to the second opinion, according to some who disagree, then it already contains the invalidity of a false appearance, a sight that is invalid, if it is two black dots, two black dots below that I see in the first transparent, it will be invalid according to this opinion, and it continues and must be made stricter as a last one, but in the case of the sthach, when another law can be found, one must rely on it today. It is not found that it is impossible to find another law. I will crawl to the bread, as the sab of the han, so from Milo to Malfi, look, and if there are two black dots below that you see in the transparent, it is already invalidating the woven cloth. The Mishnah Burak, yes, it is easy with this. He rules like the religion that brings clothing, and other recent ones who rule that it should be scattered in a large palm. Yes, but to solve, if there are about two points below that are seen in the grave, it invalidates the truth that everything is in question. We said in the bread, they are even one dot and below two dots. What will be the halakha right below near the thorn? If there are dots, according to you, look at two dots, and according to you, if there is a large fun, what will be the ruling? Then the man of the innovation of the sthach says that below it is not invalid at all, because no one looks at the side of the thorn at all, so no. Judge me at all what is going on here, that's how the peace says and that's how they ruled for Miss Badakhsh Eler is known for knitting and a few more tomorrow Bisphoris sent in Avrom's cabs that all the invalidities of the straight dots, all the invalidities of Mr. related to Odo, so only in the hutan, even one dot and in the last lower part, so as we said, there is a halakhic, it is aggravated by two, but the reason is not at all corrupt, they are even the rabbis, many rabbis, they don't even look at all, come to Elrog, they only look at the top of the entire etrog and don't turn the etrog to look down, because they acted like their own, so anyway, this is about the black dots that we said that in fact here there is material for Alterbi, we will get to that later, in fact Alter has a lot of cols in the etrogs in his Nebo, there is some material that Alter makes it easier on him completely here in the black dots, there is indeed material in Alterl, now I really want to emphasize that we are talking about the invalidity of Odor, not yet related to what seems to me, you say Odor, so I determine what Odor is, from my point of view it does n't bother me that it is a point of freedom, it is something beautiful, from my point of view I don't care about anything that this is that this is ugly, it is not beautiful In the case of Batalach, perhaps, as opposed to the following, Batalach, from his point of view, it is ugly. The points are not ugly. We determine what is wrong with Odo and what is not wrong with Odor. And I will give an example to illustrate this. We are not studying today. It may be, but in Lulav there is something interesting. In Lulav there are two concepts. I am only bringing this to illustrate. Returning to our point, there is a wrong with Niktam, which is that we took part of the leaves. We took part. And there is a wrong with Nahalak, which is that the middle leaf or the other leaves were divided. The wrong with Niktam may be the middle leaf of Niktam. What is the wrong with Niktam? Everyone today says Niktam. It is as if we took part. I took part of the leaf. It is missing. Not Niktam. It is wrong with Odor. This is how the Altera rules and this is how the Mishnabat rules. We rule that Niktam is wrong with Odor. Apparently, it is missing here. No, it is wrong with Nahalak. We divide the middle leaf into two parts. According to Habashar, the leaves are divided according to the Ram. You will also see that even only the middle leaves alone divide the middle leaves. This is the lack of the most of them. What is missing here? It is divided. I didn't see anything from the lulav. I just want to illustrate what determines what else what lacks what tricks this is that the Sages determine and therefore they determined let's go back to the etrog that a black dot eliminates a. It is invalid of ow if it is like a summary if it is above and below then even one black dot that looks transparent first and if it is below to the telf even only in two that's all we talked about only in a black dot what will happen in a brown dot is found a little Rabbi didn't understand it so we agree to the table for whom it is a brown dot does not invalidate even if I see it in the transparent one. His reasoning is that it does not invalidate even if there is one above and two below it does not invalidate at all. There are many compilers who bring in the name of Chaim Baruch that it will worsen in the heat that gives black. The rabbi does not write it even in the rabbi does not write it. The rabbis, the Question if what determines then here is a strong book to say that this is ah apparently yes there will be a verse if I still determine a disbeliever right there is a disbeliever changed it would have seemed black to me after that only magnification clarifies to me that it is brown who said it would help if it were the other way around then it would have helped if it had seemed to me oh if it had seemed to me brown and only after that magnification sees that it is black maybe it will help to go to meza because if Odo's bortopsol what is explained then from the interpretation that is what determines in any case there are other opinions if someone happens to such a story that will remain but what is clear is that if it looks brown and you see that it is brown then of course we rule that it is not considered quickly void and it is not void what will really be in brown spots if there are many brown spots if there are other spots what is the dinnam put on derby only talking about speckled in invalid spots we said that a black spot above deals with another spot below I already rule for materials that even two are already considered speckled speckled that it rules what will happen if it is speckled in kosher spots? The Rebbe didn't talk about it at all. He didn't mention this thing and it doesn't exist in the Rishonim. It does exist in the Aharonim. The Mishnah is clear. Yes, it is strict in this. There are really two places. One side. Everyone brings their halakhic pieces because it remains in the necessities. Everyone rules that only on the holiday feast is it fit. So the truth is that those who are once shorn of their scepter. If it is spotted in kosher mirrors, we won't say if it is a stick on one side that is spotted in three in most of the kev. But if there are three brown dots, sometimes there is a hole. It might be a problem that the sachk is the fit of the sacrifice. It means that they were afraid in Jerusalem of this material of the Mishnabo. But according to Alter, there is no such thing as spotted in kosher mirrors. Kosher mirrors. These are kosher mirrors. I don't care if there are many kosher mirrors. It is always fit. Now, except for brown dots, where else can it be found? Sometimes, what happens when a mishmosh comes out, a little juice comes out, and then it becomes a brown stain. Yes, maybe it is familiar to people. Juicing juice and from the mishmosh, we become brown ketems. What becomes this brown ketem? The etrog has some skins in it. When we come back, we will say When we talk about lack, we will talk about all the degrees that sometimes a cult will satisfy. We talk about these brown appearances. So the brown appearance becomes because when the green peel is thick, the green peel of the etrog has a lot of it in it. Maybe you can see it with a strong view. There is a lot of it, like small vials of oil. Oil is, that's what it's called. It's very spicy. And it's not just in the etrog. It's in all citrus fruits. Yes, it's known to the public that when you peel an orange, sometimes you can get a splash into the eye and it burns. What's there? What's there? What burns here? The same thing is in such things. This essential oil and it burns. When it's something that's spicy, and therefore if by the user or by someone who touched it with a chair with a fire, all kinds of things, he didn't do it. Not only did he clean it from the outside with a spock, which is permissible. He read it with something that penetrates and extracts the etrog, then it comes out like this juice. This juice is spicy, so it affects the area where it came out. It can make a brown stain. So the brown stain can show that too. It will show fitness. Menom and kosher mirrors. There are many brown stains from these things, either from the etrog itself or from someone who touched it and wanted to remove some point, some little thing, and then this ketem came out. So again, Altera didn't speak very much. He sings to him. It's completely kosher. The Pashtos is quite explicit in Altera that he only speaks with Menom, which is a bad talisman. That's how everyone learned from the Tarbi, but the Mishnah doesn't know if it's possible to make this law kosher. It would be a problem according to his method. What is true about mirrors in areas that we will be using the etrog is known. A writer named Chosem Sofer said that it is the otdor of the etrog that is most beloved and commanded with all the naanvim. It is worn in the lulav. In the naanvim with it, it is its otdor that has spots that are really unsolved. That's a well-known book. And we also know that from the Rebbe of Afrid Karbi that they gave their etrog, their otdor, to all the achassim to take a lulav with it and asked, after all, this is the otdor of the Rebbe. It is very expensive. And after that, we will be from all the shakushim of the Hasidic, we will be ketem. So we said that Hasber says that it is the otdor of the etrog that we will be Such ketamim, then again according to the rabbi, is a problem in general. According to the Mishnah, it is considered spotted in kosher terms, that only a mashash of a holiday is a keshaf. So really, even if he takes Hasfer, if this happens by renewing a mitzvah, it is a generation, but if it happens before a suksh, if someone bought an etrog that was not the most honest and he did not tell and went and removed things, let's define that they do not delay it being kosher anyway, it is not something he took that was wrong, he made it kosher, he removed it in a latlach, removed brown spots, and then the person buys an etrog for a lot of money, buys a kilin, and pays for a khruq that is completely clean, which passes 24 hours, 48 ​​hours, then suddenly he removes the etrog and sees all kinds of brown spots, and why does this happen? Because that person removed these things, so it is not related to the fulfillment of a mashash of a mitzvah on the eve of a suksh, so he already has brown ketamim. So here, for a few, it is really spotted in kosher terms, that only someone who has done a holiday is a keshaf. That's how Rabbi Zen says that one should be concerned about this if it happens in the world of a moed. We have a super immune system, but if it happens during the day, but if it happens before then sometimes we come, oh, to begin with, oh, he is strict about it, so it is about the sight of areas, now really, before we talk about Blit, they say, we have already talked about the shells and the kettims, so I want to move on to the topic of lack, if there is a lack in the etrog's body, it has decreased a little, it has decreased a little from the etrog, so lack, we said in the introduction at the beginning that when there is a lack in the etrog, then it is invalid, even if you don't see it at first glance, even if you don't see it from a distance, why, because if it is a deficiency, if there is a deficiency in the etrog, then there is a deficiency in its reception, you didn't take it from you, it is not reception, because it is missing, and it is invalid on days when there is a deficiency on the day of the Tabrizhan or start to worry, even on all the days of the Shar, you want to worry that it will be complete, so there are those who say that even on the days of the Shar, fearing as the tins, saying that on pieces, it must be complete throughout the holiday, so what will happen if there is a deficiency in the etrog, so how much is a deficiency, so here there are those who protest against this, and don't look, he goes with Mugenbrom, who is from prison, where there is a deficiency in the etrog, there are as many as you want. Expanding on this, there are several layers. There is the inner part of the seed where the kernels are. Then above it is the white peel. Above the white peel is a green peel. And on the green peel, on the outside, there is a very, very thin tissue. It looks green-yellow, but it is actually transparent. It protects the fruit. Now, when does it become a deficiency? It is invalid. It is invalid. When does it become the Mashanbur? It is stricter. On the part of the sister, if they only removed this nylon, only the thin tissue, it is still not a deficiency. But if there is a deficiency in the green peel, even a little bit, it is already invalid. It is a deficiency. Yes, it is divided. Actually, yes, that is how he rules. But Alter, you will see that the deficiency is only if there is also a deficiency in the white peel, towards its tongue. In section Bisa A, we have already explained that subtracting from the body of the etrog invalidates the etrog A. From whom are these things supposed? This is the thin klipo, the kliposh, the kliposh, and it has a bitter taste when it is tamed to its essence. Yes, this is the green peel that we have preserved the green peel and I It comes to white only, where it can be a lack. That is, if a little of the white is removed, then there is a defect of a defect, only what. That is, everyone says that even if the moment you see it is already white, then I don't know anymore. Maybe a little of the white has been removed. Even if you saw that you removed only the green. But if the moment you see it is already white, you already want to buy an etrog. You see a fear of a defect. You see white. This is already the problem of a defect. This is a defect. If it is a deficiency rule, because maybe something is missing from the white. When will it be? It will not be a defect of a defect. If I still see green, there is no defect of a defect according to the Magen. According to the Matravi, sometimes even if you see green, if it is missing from the green shell, it is already a defect of a defect. So it is a great severity of the Mishnav. And it can very well be found. All those who remove the Beltalach or dots or the one who rubbed it received a blow. So you always have to check. Maybe you always have to check. Maybe there is a defect here. That means that maybe this is the teaching of Zakus. Why is the public looking with a magnifying glass and examining the etrog? We said that it is a defect of another generation. There is no reason and there is no need to look with a magnifying glass at all. And you don't even have to look from a distance. Yes, in the first transparent, it really is evidenced by all the poskim in the generation. The last one they took Rog looked at if it's a distance there's 30 centimeter and even more like we said like percentages in a contract in front of the heart next to the heart where you see the top part but let's go a little further but it's about at least 30 40 centimeter that's how I agree we need to settle but there's no room for a magnifying glass here I also want to look at the flaw of a lack that a lack disqualifies even if you don't see it at first glance so according to Al you only see it if you see the white if you still see green there is no lack of a blemish even if you don't see it even if you see it until it's still green there can be a streak of lack which is disqualifying if you remove a little of the green peel here there may be a source for all those that you see them look with magnification to search before where maybe there is a flaw of a lack yes so it's the severity of the snip in the material that they feared this so let's go back to what we said earlier that there are merchants who remove all kinds of points so according to the snips they can cause a lack so let's say in general the deadline does not delay a lack and in years when you brush a type of money come out in a sabbath then they are at all The perception of lack is the principle of the law, but if you go and take with a person, you will understand Killin. This means that he wants to invest in something that is fancy, even if it is a tool and a tool, and he wants all the methods that will be learned from Adrian. So it is clear that there is here, oh, sometimes there is clearly some lack of lack, and also without it, as a rabbi, there is our lack here, to include the other side of the rabbis. If you take something expensive and it is actually worth something that is only worth a tenth of the price of it, then it is simply a matter of theft and plunder. So of course, if he said he removed it, he should say he removed it, sometimes he will keep it. Maybe there is a flaw of lack that you just don't notice. Only two days later, suddenly, a brown spot appears. There are rabbis who will notice this. Not all rabbis have rabbis who know how to distinguish and really see that a little bit of the green peel is missing, which you call invalid, but I say even without the flaw, they used to judge, so these are the brown spots. Only we actually grasped the issue of odor. We talked to the people about the perception of lack, which is actually a stain. Fitness only what sometimes it can be a lack of zaul according to the mishnabush according to al see if you see and do not see the white it is still a lack of mazhab it can already be a type of lack apart from the matter of the kosher sights that show kosher we said that the zalotar only facilitates on holiday zasez that means in this matter sometimes see actually there is here that in both things it facilitates it also facilitates that shows kosher we do not care about kosher mutters it does not invalidate never not not only in ssatsak to begin with it is fine if it is a motor and kosher mutters and also regarding the invalidity of lack if you still see the green peel oh there will be no problem of deficiency according to the alter a but if you already see the white then even if you did not see then go to the rabbi go to someone else this and he tells you sir there is invalidity of lack see the white and a small dot that you see where you see the white then it will be invalid gal see in the invalidity of lack yes so a it is really important to know now a let's move on to the subject of baltalach yes the public knows the baltalach baltalach b yes in Yiddish it rose what is it rose what is the baltalach all there are many that are Very situational. The baltalach. How is it really created? Today there are many pairs in the baltalach. But once they called it the baltalach, ask Targ. This is the baltalach. It was that the etrog grows on the tree. Yes, it grows and it grows in the trunk of trees. There are leaves. There is a leaf in the baltalach that is constantly being knocked over by the winds. Today, it is less in the baltalach. It is more even in trunks. It blows in the wind and gets stuck in the trunk and hits it. It only injures it. As long as it is connected to a tree, a tree. So what is connected to the tree, then it heals itself. It is alive and like any living thing, it tries to overcome the injury. And it heals itself. By the baltalach, by the leaves, by the trunks. It heals itself back. And then a spot of baltal remains. There is also something there that worsens the appearance. But look at this with a stick. Regarding the types of baltalach, it is not related to the appearance of a black dot and there is the appearance of a brown dot or a spot or a stain that becomes what came out of the inside. So it is a brown appearance. In the baltalach, it is not related to the appearance of a postel or a appearance of a fitness. This is related to Mara Asrag, as we will soon see according to Alter, you will see in him. Certainly according to most poskim before we move on to the second one I want to complete on the brown spot something I forgot to say a one will come and there is a question we said that even some lack invalidates there is a dispute how much how much lack invalidates there is one opinion that only with lack is kasir and there is one that even some lack we rule so that when we have another etrog then some lack is invalid so according to al see in this if you see the white according to the Mishnah even if only in green lack of koresh it is already invalid according to you see only if you see the white everyone will ask we say if that one took out did a one go svichar or one momher or one that does not have a lemash and wound and took out wanted to remove a point wanted to remove a lattal and then we become a brown stain we say brown is from the city of low fitness see even if there is a lot it is kashrevo that you will remove if it is not menu what is kosher but wait there is a lack here then why would we be kashrevo because it came out of my inside this is certainly a mistake it is not correct yes a lack that is invalid it is only when there is invalid a lack from the outside from the outside dropped a or dropped or Remove something from the shell so according to according to if you see the white even if you don't see the white but that's then there is a flaw of lack but if there is something inside that the juice comes out it's not a lack for everyone there is explicit in the sections before that we didn't go into it it's not so common that putting a needle from the seminal cavities in any case is lacking inside it is certainly not a bug maybe we will call the tongue if we find it from above that well I don't want to look for it from the scum to the mass what comes out from the inside certainly there is no line of lack for everyone anyway it's that this local oil comes out there is no line of lack if we become a stain so we already said that here there is the hard juice by the way there is a solution maybe it doesn't always help but many times it helps to not have this brown stain sometimes we feel that after someone touched or we really feel that I become smelly. Why do we smell? Because that spicy oil is coming out. Now why did we say why would we become a stain? Because it's spicy and it hurts his area a little . So there is a solution to wash it off immediately. Immediately wash it off. Oh, and then he won't take the area outside. Really, the neighboring rabbis used to be, if they simply felt that he was a citizen, they would give him some lick to clean it up. In any case, it burns, it doesn't taste good. It doesn't have to be a blessing, but yes, you can share it anyway. And many times it helps to clean it from the outside, then it can't sweep the area around it and won't get dirty with this heat. Also a solution if it happens that we suddenly feel a smell, suddenly we touched it, to wash it and then there won't be the smell of the heat that is created sometimes anyway, so it was just a complement, there is no wrong with lack at all when something comes out from the inside, yes, so we have already moved on to the subject of the baltalach and regarding the baltal, then there is a baltalmol, yes, this is the well-known ram mor on the tarva, I first lose the nefek with the ram, after that, we dig on the tarva, a batov rach in section 13, and therefore it is necessary to know Osem Chazozel, who is called Balush Ashkenaz, who calls it Balt Mol, because they are not high, the rest of the trok, so there are two reasons why the batalach should be allowed, one reason is that they are not high, that the hartork is not prominent, what is wrong with the black dot that is found with us is really not prominent, but there is another wrong, that what is written is chazozis chazoz, was what was Su Pasgan, Getz, a fungus, Gantsebela, a story that grew there The whole of Rikbon then was prominent then he says that the blatalach a why is it not invalid because it is not high if it will be high according to this reason according to the rebel that the Harmo brings if the blatal does stand out yes excited then it will be a problem then which blatal is kosher that it is not higher than the shar'at atruk on says mo and there is a mashkos I have to say on this account Mr. Asrog is considered from one of the usual to Yos Ar and so that means it is Mars it is not Marak Fuss we said it is Mar. Atruk yes there is Mar. Fuss there is Mar. Asrog the second opinion in the levels of the Taro from Sadesh Shazel Ter brings not on the part that it is not higher even that it is higher than the shar'at that it is indeed excited but since it is like that what is right together are accustomed to be Ar in that then it is fitness so really yes as we have already said there are two reasons here in Ramon why to permit the blatalach one reason that it is not prominent it is not high that the reason that it is Marsrik what is nefkmina that it is indeed excited all the blatal to you that they will indeed be excited so according to the first reason then it will be a verse if it if it will be Kam it will be Menomor Yes, like all the rules of A of A, it may be invalid according to the Mishbo that we called Memar when it is invalid then it will be invalid but according to the second reason, in the rebuke that it is Mary Asrawik it is the Marsh even if it is prominent it does not matter but look and when he talks about the Baltmol he only brings the reason that it is Marsh Sek that he did not fear even if it is high yes so even if there is a Balt that is excited it will also be kosher when many times they come with Baltlach you can see that I also say according to the Mishna it is clear you should know that not every time Balt many people want to buy an Etrog and then they Balt you start checking the halach with your finger do I feel it and then wait if it is excited then A has one opinion in the rebuke that it is already a problem it is high and the Mashbor is strict the Mishbal says that only in shadkh it is kosher to begin with just of course not excited of course we go to the Mashbor from afar in this that is how he rules where the Derv did not bring it at all Rabbi says Shabbat even if it is excited I do not care because it is Marsh and that is how it is grown but he also says according to the Mishbal you should know that it is not right what people go to stores and start To feel because once you know what the eye sees and how much you see it and you feel it then it seems to you that you feel you need to feel because he said I saw already in my youth I was a mitzvah with an important rabbi who was a companion helping to develop the dolim and the datrogim I also wanted to learn so I saw that always when he wanted to check the blood according to the mashura that he would not be excited so he closed his eyes closed his eyes and that's how he felt and checked because once you close your eyes then you no longer know where it is you ca n't pay attention so you can really pay attention is it excited by touch so for the most part most of the ballet you even sometimes two say it's a knot because when you knit your eyes suddenly you no longer feel it rolling and turning and not closing your eyes so usually most of the ballet are not excited say according to don't look according to don't look if it is excited I don't care because it shows a scan so it's okay even if it will be completely full of ballet from the principle of the law it is kosher why do people invest so much shekels that would be clean from ballet so there is a real prigodi thinking she has other opinions That is, if it is excited, then it is a problem, and if it is mottled, then it is mottled, so when it is left like this, he concludes that the slanderer is not worthy of the tongue, let him take the law of the clean one from that too, so for that, people pay hundreds of shekels today, it is already maybe thousands of shekels for a completely huge one, but as we said, according to another opinion, according to the field of the sedshen, what the Rabbi brings, then even if it is excited, I don't care, then it is actually from the principle of the law, a blatlach, it does not rule out at all, nor according to the mishna, come on, because it is not excited in the majority of percent, and therefore it is the easiest degree, in fact, we do not need to look at blatlach at all, and we need to look at what is holding back a black spot that is holding back, oh, also brown spots and spots, so sometimes there is a clear if it is mottled, it is like this, it will rule out blatlach, that they are not excited at all, on its own, if it is excited, I will break it once, yes, yes, this is the conclusion that we need to look at its location now, in connection with people, put in connection with the growth, what is a beautiful growth, does it even have a source in the Shulchan Aruch, so we have it for everyone The righteous who were in many, many communities who looked at Odo, on I really heard that Rabbi Ozner's grandson once called him on Yom Tov Sox after there were no more stores, his pitam broke, and then he went to the store and got two dugoms, one of which was a very beautiful growth, full of blood, the other was a not so beautiful growth, but it was free of blood, and then he came from afar. He comes to his grandfather, Rabbi Ozner, before the prayer and asks him what to take from each other. He immediately shows him from afar the beautiful growth, so he approaches and says to him, " But look, it's all full of blood, the second blood," he says to him, "I already told you from afar, the blood tendon is not a concern, because the blood is basically graying, but again, it's a matter of, as I said, the tehl is sterile, it's bitter 10. When we rule that it's a connection at all, then anyway, it's a matter of taste and smell, everyone uses it in their own way, because neither the growth is curable nor the tehl is curable. For now, let's talk briefly about what happens when people buy the Rogim Pitam, and in the middle of the holiday it falls, the pitam falls, in the middle of the holiday they dreamt it falls into the pitan, what the heck. What happens then we said that the invalidity of a deficiency is invalid only on the first day of the month. The invalidity of a deficiency is not invalid. That's right. We said that there is a visitation of wine, which says that all days are a visitation of a deficiency, and also in the year that there is no a, there is no a, that there is no remaining in this, the first day of the month of Sox, and there is no lack of a deficiency at all. So maybe we can ease up. So he says yes, to make it worse, to lack all the days, and also the reflection of life. He says that on pieces, there should be a completeness for all matters, but he speaks without a single matter that he has no budget, asking according to the law, if on all the days there is no lack of a deficiency. The lack of a deficiency in the Shulchan Or also sees explicitly that he says that the lack of ministers is kosher. Yes, so if I read it, it is kosher. So one person's pitam is broken. His pitam is broken in the middle of one. What is the ruling? So wait, how did I start talking about pitam? Sorry, I'm not very organized. I mentioned that I missed something very important. When there is a dot on the solution, what is the ruling? There is a black dot. We said that a black dot is invalid. It is invalid for all the months of Sox. So what will be the ruling if there is a black dot on the pitam? So, then there are two here. Steps There is the three-leaf clover and there is the pitam When I hold the shershantha in my hand It is big and the hed itself The pitam itself is quite small There are tags that are a little longer and the sena is farther away In any case So in So what is the ruling when there is a dot on the p If there is a dot on the shershantha It is certainly no problem Yes The sena is the color of wood I don't care if there is a dot But when there is a pitam Peshtas It is like the tip of the etrog That one black dot that is visible in the transparency Will change It will disqualify Yes It will be difficult to Pitan There is the palm of life Interesting that says There is a type of sudden that is woody It is like a tree The color of wood And there is once that it is a fruit And if it is woody Then yes It is easier Anyway A Didn't find them with us Usually most pitams They are not Tiz Therefore this palm of life is not so common What I did see that some businesses here say Since and if it fell on the pitam That we are going to talk about it soon So it is when From the principle of the law depends on how much is left So anyway If there is a black dot Even if it is visible in the transparency First a heretic But if all of a sudden all this part falls It is still fully kosher Even if there is the This black spot is kosher. This is an interesting innovation. Anyway, even if it is true, where would it be true? Only if the black spot is in the pitam part of the pitam, in the upper part of the pitam, if it falls there, then and the lower part remains, it will be kosher. But if it is in the pitam part, in the pitam part that is below, which is adjacent to the fruit, then of course it will not help. Help me, everyone. It will already be a black spot that is visible in this transparent, wicked people. What they say is that in the part that if it had fallen, then if it had not been found at all, it would have been a connection. So from me, there is also a black spot on it, it is also kosher. Because that is what they are wrong about. So a brown spot. Of course, we do not use devices. Yes, as we said here before, sorry. So what did I want? What did I want to say? Oh, there is advice. What they said, if there is a spot on the pitam, since if the pitam falls at all, in the upper part, then it is kosher. So if a person peels off only the spot, this spot of the pitam, then in their pitam they will not have this problem. There is no brown spot and everything, because it is there. There is nothing that comes out of the juice and forms and it will make a mark. So this is a solution. You do not need to remove this part. To be an expert in some Japanese sheki, you have to be good at removing the black dot, right? Yes, as we said, it's from the main point of the law. It's not at all kosher. Anyway, it happens to everyone. It's a question that comes up every year. Many people who have children at home give them the etrog to their wives and children to play around with, and suddenly the pitam breaks. So what's the ruling? So the Harmo says, the Harmo says, if the pitam fell and there was a stricter person who recited a song of pitam, and it's good to eat it, so it's good to eat it, so it's good to eat it, even if it stays for a second, maybe I overstepped. Sorry. What's the ruling? If it falls on the pita before you, don't ask. What's the ruling? If it falls and a hole is formed and the part of the adhuq is revealed, of course it's a no-no, but if the pitam breaks, there's still a piece of wood that comes out. So here, according to the law, it is kosher. yes. why? Because he still isn't here, there's no wrongdoing. This is how the Shulchan Aruch rules because it understood that falling into the pitam is a violation of lack. And if it is not missing because it still emits, it is kosher. But the protected Abru will see in the rulings that no one rises from a friend whose pit falls into the line of Odo. yes. We may read the language of our rabbi, according to the power of the word, that even some kind of vaccine is in it, according to the principle of the Aseru, which is suspended in the license, which is still in the whole, and if the property is registered, it is not known, but what is he talking about, what part of the pitam fell, he is talking about that it fell, the etrog fell, then he is talking about the bar that fell, he will read his language, God, but he did not even know all the pitam, but the ketsasi, and there is a completely connected etrog profession in the garden that something remains in the revealed etrog, then this is a ket, the father continues, nothing is given, and the pitam from the tray is connected to the scan, and even all the pitam and the man are Gentiles and something here, I have no problem with Udo, because that is how the Sabbath is, that even if the annual is broken and some of the pitam is left, but suddenly a whole pitam remains, which divides the rest that sticks out, I have no problem with Udo, that is what you will see as happy, section 17 of the Mishnah is clear, it is stricter, it says that if there is a fault of the ode here, then he says the father of the cup, also the kets are removed, even if there is some wood above the etrog, it is good for the ardor It is impossible for him to take others because there is a stricter in this too. Shor says that it is good for Ader if you have another that usually we can get others also all the time it seems to me then you have to look for another like that does it. He has the happy sabbaths. Look at the shach section. It would mean that even if it is true that I say that it is invalid for Odor, but if part of the apitah still stands out from the trees then it will be kosher. They are. It will not be in Odo's problem. He then continues and there are those who disagree. It is not even hung. Only that she changed the whole pitah. It is a pus that has no purpose. So you tell me not only that the pitah only that you put yourself falls. It is already there. And she has it. And even a pi that is not there. As she says, it is good for him of her words. It is possible. So he is stricter even if he only fell asleep. And it is good for Aham to be removed. That is, you have to continue. What does he tell you? Mak. If it fell only when you were asleep then how to be stricter? Then he continues. He explains, that is, if he has before him two equal etrogim, built and Hidor, there are two equal etrogim, both of which are very beautiful, both of which are clean, only in the kadlah that she changed. Then he will take it that has In the hesshana but finds that in the hesshana is not so well-known and magnificent so you will take this one without the hesshana so where is it? He is afraid of the opinion that if the hesshana fell then it is invalid and therefore taking another is only at such a stage that there are two etrogs one without the hesshana and one with the hesshana and it is two sweet as the hesshana but if not if this is not the case as we said as in the sand of the sabbath one his pitam broke but still protrudes part of the wood still remains half of the wood still remains the hesshana still protrudes out so Rabbi even though he believes as Mogen Avraham that it is invalid for an udor that falls into the pita but if part remains it is a break there is no problem with udor that does not break the hesshana it is better to take another if possible yes this is a common question yes this is what we talked about in the nogiya lasri wait okay oh we said earlier that there are people who try to cheat on the etrog and take part of the etrog they harm them they want to take down a baltal its will be a black dot yes you can take down points you can take down a baltela is it let's say a black dot that was on top and it is noticeable we will lie At first glance, it's invalid. I can maybe take the dot off and it will be kosher. Is it permissible to do that? Is it okay? So first, let's say that when people touch the etrog and take things off, then oh, so oh, what did you want? So I say that when you take part of the woven fabric, then you need to know that many times it can be invalid because of a lack. Sometimes, a complete ignorance is involved. Because if you take something off, you take something off. A small dot in a way that was not related to anyone at all. Only you wanted it to be painful. You have now done an invalid lack. It's not true that you didn't reach the white of the Tarbi. Where is the invalid lack? Sometimes, they sat there. It's invalid because of a lack of time in the material that they felt. It was a concern for these first dots. To begin with, the rabbi wasn't concerned. But what you're doing here is worse because it's kosher to include. Yes, so that's the first thing you need to know. It's important to know that there are things that can be easily taken off. A black dot. A black dot. That's invalid in the context of the rabbi. There are black dots that come off. There's a black dot. There's no time to explain that there are four types of dots. What is created by everything? But what you do need to know is that there are black dots that come from outside that came from beyond. A tractor with its fuel or a resource that creates a black spot, these things are external holes, so I have no problem. You can only remove it, many times, many times, this black spot, even though it actually came from a spray, but the etrog felt something and tried to overcome it. After all, everything that is connected to the tree is alive and tries to repair itself, and then it already becomes part of the etrog. But many times, you can remove it. So how can you remove all kinds of dirt? Now, I think it's dirt. Then I'll remove it and I'll show you that it's clean. So, it's simple. You can clean it with water. Take the sponge or the one that you give to the sleeve. You can tear off a small piece and wash it and clean a lot of things. A black spot that you thought was a spot that is called a transparent statue. You touch it like that with water and a sponge. It comes off. It's certainly possible to do. It's certainly possible to do. By the way, all the sorters do it in all the orchards. The etrog comes out of the orchard, it's all dirty from everything it's been through, all the rains and the destruction and the winds and all the things that are there. In the field in the orchard and they clean it even if it's soap, we shouldn't use soap because there are harsh things, but they have a special soap, but in any case, they take it to soak the din and clean and share it. This is certainly advice that can be done to remove things that come off easily, but what would be something that is in part of the law, and by the way, of course, according to the law, and all the things that they disapprove of, they always say, "Look" and disapprove only things that are from the self of the etrog, things that come from outside. Yes, regarding the demolition of these things, it's not disapprove because it's not from the self of the etrog, but if it has already connected, it will be from the self of the etrog. Yes, if there was a spot, it came from spraying, but after that, the etrog tried to move it and it bothered him and it burned him. He tried to overcome it, and then it stuck. We became part of this etrog. Yes, we became a 10-second wave. Oh, regarding a brown spot that is created from a bacca, there are those who want to say that you will see it, and it is not. It is not considered a problem now at all because it is not from the self of the etrog. Don't see a problem at all. And a brown spot, as we said, is a sign of fitness, but It's not at all, it's yes, from the etrog's own power because the etrog is trying to overcome it, so it's already becoming from the etrog's own power, yes, we just said that it's from the city of fitness in the face, so people try to get to the etrog and clean and remove parts, so a person does it, one nail with a pocket, one with a mecha, they say, these people remove the blood, remove the point, is it okay, is it permissible to do that, so apparently there is perhaps a satyrish handi in the Shulchan Aruch as R. Machs in section 1d it says like this if an ulsor chezuzisan is invalid, if when peeled, a contract is returned to the Mercer, the ability of the Ram adds no shnik and husuk, and don't look, and brings this from section 24 that if a whole hara if a zerb chelp in the matter of a property, nothing from the body of the ethr of a dog, a clip, a deko, then it is a capacity, even to begin with, it is permissible to prepare it, yes, so anyway, a solution to the etrog's removal fell with an etrog that has a black dot on top of the handle, which is invalid, he will peel it off, Rabbi says, even to begin with, it is permissible to make it rich by hand, yes, like this, it says as Rash Tov Rash Mets Yashar HaMor speaks well. There is a text about the invalidity of the mouse touching the etrog and all the things that are not related to the subject of its name. So he says, "He says, ' Abouli Moish Menom', which is invalid, every return, even if it is cut, is invalid. There is such a concept, even if it is cut, is invalid. This is Rabbi and Heshvan, which now has a black dot, but how in the Aksher, it is invalid because of the invalidity. Again, I know the language of Hesh Yobish Menom', which is invalid because of the invalidity of an order that invalidates all the suks, even if it is cut. Now I have taken it down, and not because of the invalidity of the order. Let's say that the decision is that every return, even if it is cut, is invalid because of the invalidity. So it is already invalid now, so Mor says, look, he brings it well. There is a text in section 8 that says, "Tarbi, such as Yobash Klomim, there is no word that says, and Yos Menom', oil, and in the invalidity of the invalidity." So there is a contradiction here, The Bessemer understood that it was a contradiction because he raised it a little and added words. He saw that the owner of the spear saw that the one who made the spear and the one who made the spear say that it was a spear is a spear and a spear and a spear. There are many verses that he understood that it does not go together and we need to try to arrange it. The Mishnabu really says that the one who inherited the spear is a spear. Trust the author who also wrote it in a way that is invalid. We are preparing. Do not look at the furnace. He did not understand that you will see. He brought both of them here as a spear. He says that it is possible to write a section 24 and even to begin with, it is permissible for you to sing it by writing it. Yes, he wrote the spear. He says that it is invalid. It does not help me to cut off the beishus. Come to the trash. It is invalid here. He said that it is possible to remove the dry one. So, oh, before I sit down, you say, according to the Mishnabar. So the first thing is that he says that only the one who made the spear is kosher. So anyway, let's buy it. So if one piece goes and removes a black dot that would have been visible in the transparent part of the spear. So sometimes, the grain is a ruling that it seems that the spear is kosher. You start with this verse of the Seviych who goes and removes it and does not tell the buyer. This is usable here. Listen, it is not. According to the Mishnah without any sense of the law of the Momins, there is also this here, come on, a bad deal is a loss, yes, of course it's not right. Now, a person will do it to himself or or do it to you, who wants to lower your blood and such things, as we say to a miner, look at me. There is a kin here. Look, there are some settlements. There are some who wanted to say that the exact one is a savior, don't look and says to peel if we cut off a son who has no property. If you cut first, then you can even start. You can do it. He says it's useless. He says that his hand will cut a pot, a place where an enemy is, where a bad deal is a loss. So in cutting, he says that it is permissible. In cutting, he says that it is then it is a loss where a bad deal is a loss. That is, if you cut in this way, this is one of the explanations. I'm not saying that you can get away with it, not a loss. But this is one of the settlements. If you want to cut in a way that there is no loss of lack, then here you can even start doing it. But if you cut, you cut, meaning that it is also a situation where there will be a loss of lack, then I want to profit at any time. That lack does not invalidate from the principle of the law only or Dvoru then he will make a lack he will cut in such a way that there will be a lack that will see the white let's say that this is how he wants to lower the point and see the white so here say a moment lack does not invalidate all Shiv Udo invalid so I ordered the Udo now it will connect for the whole time so let's see a decision or come from a invalid force it is invalid it does not help me that now it will connect in a lack because it comes from an invalid force if so in line there is a brain that allows it it is in a way that you do not do it lack in a way that is only peeled so according to this if one peels in a way that he does not do it lack then according to do not multiply the lack of alter as did not hit the green bass see the white from here hit the green so it will be advice a even if it is true it is not proven that this is the explanation in alter even if it is true right it may be a person will do his sesu at home but Suicher he is not allowed to do it as he said now they sat some invalid some lack in etrog and also in a sabbath invalid always invalid on Shabbat regardless of this so if according That is not okay even before Terev, there is a question that Dynamins, so someone who will do it alone, I don't know if it is a great expert, maybe it is recommended, maybe yes, maybe not, but of course it is not worth touching because it is a cold of a dead kollel and here, you may later make a blister for it, of course with it, and after that you make brown spots. In any case, touching the spit is not the most recommended thing to wash your temples, yes, but going to the spit and taking out the spit, you will see that it may be halachically okay when you do it to yourself, but it does not always ignite an enemy. Well, the lesson took a long time. Oh, yes, we talked about the impermissibility of more and the impermissibility of lack. There are more impermissible things. There is the impermissibility of a complex. If the etrog is created, it is created from the assembly of lemons and etrogs of something else. So it is complex. This is a post. There are a few explanations. What did you ask? You will see that the posk that is complex is not at all, who is a different species. Yes, and there is also, of course, the impermissibility of one who needs to be clean from orla and tevel and throms and all these things. The contribution of Mivo, of course, it is both impermissible and it needs to be a warrior. It needs to be raised by two Jews from Jerusalem, who are in all the [ __ ] of the canyons. It needs to be a warrior, in any case, regarding A composite etrog, so as we said, look, a posk that is composite is not a minus at all, so now comes the topic of varieties, and I don't have time to expand. I will only talk about what is customary in the Habad, which is written in the book of the Manu'gim that etrog is taken from Calabria, Italy, and since it is written on the alter and the stipulation in the Shulchan Aruch, it had a taste, the taste of the komus, the taste of the well-known Levite. We don't know the reason why he specifically needs etrog from Italy, as it is written there. The keter said, I don't remember who would repeat it every year, Ben Eliotbash. I do n't remember who played the year, Ben Eliotbash. Sox. After all, the Terbi said that when the Holy One, blessed be He, commanded in Midbar to take you, Anonim, by Anonim, they came to the rogs of Calabria, which is in Italy, yes, a Calabrian, Yaniv, Yaniv, it was a street from which they sent the saunits. Anyway, Yaniv was Kalabhari, it was the same matter that they took specifically from its name, and so the Hassofer says that just as kosher chickens are from Mesoirs, we know what kosher chicken is, yes, there is no rooster in Tir, but Odo, there was a polemic about it. In any case, all this kosher chicken in Mesoviers, also the etrog, this connection in Mesoviers, and this is in their Kalabri, where the etrogs should be taken, like this, the rabbis from Kluger, this is how they behaved in previous generations, it is written in the customs of the Belz tzaddiki and other tzaddikim who took the etrog of Kalabriat, yes, and by the way, today the circle of the Land of Israel is very much in disarray, so the Rabbi, as is generally known, but the stipulation on the show that he removed the soul from the market of the Land of Israel, has it at all, with all the plots, in any case, yes, in any case, so that he was very worried about me, the Land of Israel, did not want to take an etrog in the Land of Israel, yes, they say that, as today, the Meskhet Harashim, the Rabbi himself says that the Rabbi Kera secretly told him not to publish that there were two etrogs for Revis Rabbi A, one etrog that was healthy, which was in the rider, and another etrog from the Land of Israel, the etrog that the Land of Israel did not flee, but of course, I saw from the Rabbi who said that he felt that the etrogs of the Land of Israel are composed in any case, not something accurate, but on the basis of Kalebria, they believed that it was morchovi, that it was clean, that it was the etrogs that were needed, precisely from that, and to that extent. We are going specifically to etrogs from Italy, which have the letters of the Rabbisquidesh in part 13, part 1, who took the etrogs from Italy and scattered the etrogs from a village in Kfar Chabad, so oh, then he says, then he says, it is written in the letter that they wanted to take it specifically from there, so when they are pouring out the life of Kalbi and doing it in Kfar Chabad in the Land of Israel, they are distorting only the matter of the mount, apparently yes, Odes, the Calvary in the Holy Land, there is no Calvary itself, only that there is no Darchev. You are gaining the matter that is in the mouth of this, the matter of the mount, but a, but there was, besides the Rabbi, there was, besides the matter of the rotten, they had other reasons, not only as Kasdar was extinguished, and there is specifically its name, and also in part 1, then he says, yes, they took it from Talley, it means Oretz, a lamb of Yovon, who will return, it is a lamb of Yovon, and its name will be withdrawn specifically, so if you take it to the Land of Israel, even though it will not be a Milham, it means Oretz, a land of Kalfu, the word will be to push the baskets. Morochovim then even after they covered the village of Chabad then Chaz that there is a higher standard in the Suri Calabria and that's how they used to do it, many Hasidim only come and say that today this is all there is to it and you can't trust the matter of the Kuvad so the first thing one asks according to dry halacha according to dry halacha when a Jew comes and tells you that he did it okay he has a strong sex strong sex this is for every Jew and up until 30 40 years ago something that keeps in history even though even then there was the teshuvah of the Harachovet so they always rejoiced even about a gentile about gentiles where all the letters are anyway also tells the matter of the Harachovet today today we have seen that there are many Jews who Magdagi a Jew says he is doing okay he has a Hassaks when and according to the Locha according to the Locha it is in Sadar Gumo this is how the Hasidim always behaved in everything they would take from anyone who sold the Rogi Calabria caught with both hands at expensive prices even if he was not clean and they didn't know exactly what the Kuvad was today there is a lot of politics and I don't want to get into For all the fathoms, just say what everyone says, maybe everyone claims about the rest, but I don't want to get into that, really, there is one etrog of Yesh, there is a known etrog, Pardes, which they claim that the Rebbe took from them, and they are the most vedraim, but there is an allegation that they trust the son of the complex, where is Toldas, the complex on the complex itself, we said that this is an alter that is stricter at all, not a saw, so in itself, that Altrebi made it stricter, a complex etrog is invalid, so the example that Altrebi brought was that they took the etrog to another tree, he didn't bring something that was easier, that they took something else to etro, so there was already a garment of Yesh and other poliski who wanted to be precise in Alter, that there are also rotten types of Terbi, he simply permitted without any help, but the evil Rebbe in the letters and the Rebbe understood that you won't see meat, every etrog is known, you know, yes, Corfu etrogs, in any case, in Rabs, later in Rabsin, later we see that they were afraid of all the Rabbis, what about Toldasmorkv, we don't know, we don't have anything explicit, anyway, there are those who wanted to be precise about what the Rebbe said when they took the The edrog from Chabad will take it and look for trees in Italy that people have not touched, which Rabbi means the complex Tuls, maybe, maybe yes, maybe not. In any case, if the Tuls is green and the complex is also there are opinions that qualify, then in any case, those who take it also have a blisk. Now the other partisans claim that we do not trust the complex Tuls, yes, and therefore we should take from us, the darkness that was, he was more careful and all the makush times, which is actually with him, but he has a problem with the makush, we do not take from us, the complex, so they claim that they do not take between the complex and the Ido, there is a close supervision. So I respond to Stosserdorten and one told me about a very large Ichsher outside the country, not of Chabad, that they claim that Shas and Shalom are forbidden to take between the Morache and that only the etrogs that are completely clean and that is how they are in their résumé, and in practice they do not even come once to inspect the orchard. They have never brought a field like that. In any case, so in any case, you can always create from all kinds and symbolize everything. The way the Gedush always took Italy and now they have taken lessons from Italy and only everything that is taken like that is a decision. If there is someone who claims that it is okay, you can trust him and bless him with a blessing. Oh, I went to the sluice and blessed him. How do you take the matter of these etrogim? Let's say that we will pass. I don't have time anymore, but let's say that all the etrogim in the Land of Israel will be woven by Hazon Ish from the world. Hazon Ish, what did he do? He took one tree that he said seemed good to him. In order. One water from the spirit of the community or something else. But there is an entire book that wants to say that it is not true. People say that I passed by a tree and said that it was taken from its name. Only yes. Anyway, but about the etrogim, there was a sand that was full of doubts. So they took an exception and made a visionary zern from it. According to something he said, the Moroccan tag has a problem with the signs of Etrog. There is a name for beings inside that does not have all the rules of sprigim. And even after that, there are many communities that ask for it. It is a soul castration. Who is worth living for books? Moroccan etrogs, many of which are in the Rousse, on the appearance of the etrog inside, continue to be careful, we also continue to be careful, and for every Jew, what he does is perfectly fine, and if there is someone who takes responsibility for this, we can bless and with the help of God, we will fulfill all the commandments, a strong one, and we will be worthy, with the help of God, to observe the Mitzvah this year, when we will be secret in the holy bass, with the help of God, in the Korb, really, I wish you a good day with all the best.