Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
THE MISHKAN AND ITS KEILIM WHAT'S MISSING AND WHY
12 views
Categories:Torah/Parsha
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
This week's para para
we find the mishk and the kalin. Next
week's para para
we find the big the beodom of the
kahanim theod for the kayen
also the carbon
not the regular carbon but the carbon
the
kahan
the shila is if you take a look
one of the kaim is missing in this
week's para
which kaye
So the sh is why is it not brought in
this week's para it is brought in next
week's para the end of para why is it
not here in the para
there are two these
and that is in this week's para good
morning welcome And then there's also
the
where the was brought and that's not in
this week's para.
It's actually one place in the parid
the says the two
but before addressing this question why
the
is not in this week's para let's take a
moment to understand
the perish what does it means
now even though
there was no there was
The of the carbon wasn't on the
however after
the further aid the was on the it's
so the zer asks why is it that the
is called there was no zak the
was meant for the
next week's par says says
in other words you don't bring carbon on
all the carbon was
of this week's par
why is it called
why is it called ifian
bringing carbon there was no carbon
brought on the misbuck
Zy that
is different in TB
which is
which was zaki
zak was
what the was brought to beus to cut
apart to destroy to eliminate the haro.
The Tory calls him. The Tyra calls him
because the Tyrus that was brought on
find
like Rashia brings over there that this
was the secret. Anytime there's a mafa
to save yourself, you bring tyrus.
Just like what says the gave that
cost
when the
you bring the and it stops the
actually on that note and paresa brings
that there was a story once that a city
And they whole story they spread out
people around the town and they said not
only bringing dctus but they said the
tyrus and that helped the
I've heard that during the
corona
they did this as well also
brings this and expand
as well as Later no malik also brings
this zoyer and expands that theist
idea was to eliminate the
also on this note
of course it's sukim of zimra of z but
we Say
what we say
before
say also it's um zimra pruning cutting
that by saying every morning a person is
the same idea a person eliminates the
the same is also explained in the in the
beginning of the suda
many say
so
could also mean I'll say
others explain
I'm going to cut I'm going to eliminate
by saying
this is all the same idea back to what
we're speaking about
the
on this question why is
called
so
it's it's not the carbonus it's
the says that there was actually once a
year that the did have a connection to
the carbonus the like the say
on kipper
And then there's another terret that's
brought that the reason why it's called
is because it looks like a misbeh.
But now let's go back to the question
that we began
this week. Paruma is the para of all the
clayish the Mishk and it's so the sha is
where's the
it's aar you mentioned earlier about the
wasn't in the mishka maybe it's maybe
it's even a shila I think we spoke about
it once in yum if it's considered a kali
the k also is talking in this week's
para but The sh is what why
the is brought why is anonymous
so asked the question it's brought in
that
whose yard was just now Wednesday
asks a question I didn't find inzra
maybe it's somewhere else not
but the other is a lot of them asked the
question
the ramban
answer the following. They say like
this. The reason why
this was true is because what was the
tas of making a
to have you needed the
and also in par you needed the
and then afterwards like the ses
However, the
was not a to have a
the purpose of the was actually after
these these already
now these
what's the purpose like he says
the mishk and the kaleim was to bring
down
that he should be
even if you didn't have
he was still
if you didn't have a you didn't have a
that was a to be that should be
you didn't have a
he was
we brought him
we brought him that
The goyan goes along these lines as
well. Also from the as well says it a
little bit more.
The goyan says the same idea that the
was not active in the base in the
Mishkan.
Why was it brought say it was brought
the go says that it was brought was
forapy
but they both the is the same that the
is not
therefore it's not in this week's para
everything in this week's para from
beginning to end is to have
going into next week's para after all
the and next week's para forgotten
and the
after all that and the
then afterwards is that's not
interesting
interesting in the medishum
says clearly that the
one line just to
brought them.
There was no
till after bringing dctus which would
seem that
his makov
will soon see we'll get to it
able to bring
even without the mistra
number one why this week's para is
because the kaz is not
the
and the mar
first then rob
the garra says it's like what we said
before that it's not but not what we
said before that it's not meaning to say
without he goes on a different
says
all other
if you don't have a you can't
every day you don't have a
you can't put the you can't put the
upon him without a you don't have a you
can't put the out
with the exception of the misbeh
if there's no
ifi was you could still be you could
still bring the tyrus the me says that's
why it's not in this week's para it's
these are different there's a
fundamental difference between and all
other kale every other kay if you don't
have the kali You can't do that.
It's you don't have it. You can still do
that. And that's why it's not in this
week's par
as well says the same terrorists also
more the same idea.
But adds and he says
this that was saying the
however it has to at least be there
once. Has to be there once. You can't
not you can't start the Mishka the
Bikdash with Adam as you saw it in this
of it has to be there once
and he says that the Mishkan because
they were going from place to place
the any place you have to have at least
once that the should be there just in
the
even though he said you don't need it
anymore once it was there once in the
Bdash it was there once done. But in the
in the Mishkan has to be in each time
they built the Mishka, wherever they
went from place to place, it has to be
there once.
The Mikdash
are the you had the
there was no exact place where it had to
be. It had to be between the and the a
little bit closer towards the shakadash.
But anywhere in the could have been
there was no d that it had to be three
four or five. It just had to be closer
more towards the kakadashim. So he
declares
does it have to be exactly where the
where the was when you put it down the
first time or once you put it down once
then you can put it anywhere where it's
ker to put the okay that's just uh on
the note but back to what we're speaking
about
the reason why it's not in this week's
para because there's a big difference
between them and all other kale if you
don't have the kali you cannot
avoid
on this terret on the note of this
terret.
Important to point out
that the
says that there's a difference between
the basdash
and the mishka.
The mod is
and therefore once the
even if it goes away it's still the
place of the could bring tyrus
in the mishkish
was never kadesh says the
that the gammor says
that you don't need the
even if you don't have the
that's not talking about the only
therefore even if there's no you can
bring tyrus
you always need the
so first of It seems to be a little bit
like a steer in the
you don't have a terrorist. What did we
want to say? You know why the is not in
this week's par because even if you
don't have the you could still do the
says clearly that in the you don't have
that only in the mikdash in the mikdash
if you don't have the
you could still do
in the in the you always need the
>> because you said you needed to have it
always once
>> once
>> every time it moves it's a new
>> but
>> right but it
new ones. But I want to ask you on the
when he says that you always need the
way how it seems like he's saying
clearly is it's not just enough to have
it once in each place even in each place
you always need the misbeh
says once is enough because even if the
misbeh is removed at least the ground is
in the in the Mishkan in the midbra the
was never. So when you move all over,
even if the it started off, it doesn't
help. So you don't really have a ter why
is the not in this week's par
maybe you could answer
the and how it is
inos
we're going to get to shortly some inos
he says
that even though
You didn't have a misbeh
You could be you could bring Tyrus but
it wasn't on the floor. It was an
ecclesarus.
It was
but in other words the floor wasn't
mudes. wasn't a cleicharus
the like this what the says in that in
the midbar
wasn't a messak
it could be that without a misbeh
was was somewhere was murish
maybe you have to know caution properly
I'm just saying that would be that you
didn't need but what yeah
One of him that's
he brings from the and he says like this
the reason why the
is brought in next week's paran said the
reason why it's not in this week's par
is to tell us that it's not one way or
another it's not either it's not
or it's not to do the
he brings from the
only with um only with
meaning to say is you have to first.
So he says with the carbon shall be in
our soil you have that you have all the
the in this week's para you have the
carbon in next week's para and if you
take a look after the shall
then that's where the is
really it could have been this week's
para could have been but this says up
what the riff said
That's why it's later at the end of next
week's para after the carbonus
says a terrorist
that dictates
was malam there was a smoke that went up
from the Mishkan up to Shemayer
that the Mishka of the Mishka was to
connect
to Milo they were
to connect
the ground up to that was the smoke went
up a went up to Shamay
says like this the Mishkan also the
Mishkan connected the Mishkan of Lata
over here to the Mishka Laya
and so too he says that the MSI
Just like it went the smoke went up and
it connect the mishk connected the was a
connector of all the it was everything
and it brought everything connected
that's why it's at the end being that
the connected all the
of course it was a kal like but there
was something more than that it was the
of all of the whole mishkan together and
then with the ash of the of the misbeh
went up. So that's why it's at the end.
The Malam says the we're not going to go
into the M says that the whole Mishk was
connect is connected a person and the
doesn't fit in it's not part of the
person it's later just to conclude with
the final
and he says like this the reason why
thei
is not why the is not in this week's par
says
all the ka that were made in the mishkun
were brought bought and used in the BA
mikdash.
Of course, they had many of each kay but
the mana was the manoya brought from the
mishk into the ba mikdash with one
exception. He doesn't bring a and he
doesn't bring a reason but he says the
we didn't use in the mikdash the was in
the mishkan so that's why
it's not brought in this week's para
because all the other vital
all the other in the bda in the mesh
that we have in this week's para that
were made now went into the ba mikdash
thei didn't that's why it's on a
in a later.
Have a wonderful Shabas.