TEKIAS SHOFAR - CANCELLED ON SHABBOS BUT NOT BRIS MILLAH MAH NISHTANA?

Actually, >> thank you to all of you. This year falls out to be on Shabas and therefore the attack not to be the says to blow came and said not to blow. a person might think he knows how to blow it. He's not sure. He's not sure if he's going to go walk to ask him. And the garra says also for me this year when Shabas is the same thing as sukus as well. Also, we're not going to be mim the mitzvah of the first day. I'm the time of the the lulv as well also. However, the second day rash we're going to blow. It's not chambas fum is just like the said not to blow when rashashana falls on shabason raon. Why don't we say exon on every single rash shana no matter what day in the week rash shana falls out to be not to blow shaifer why because there's another daban that you're not blow a shaer on any shabas or any other yumptive of the yearak and clayir so just like they made a takana not to blow on shabas of a not to be on kil shabas of being they should make even if during the week not to blow because you might come to be makir you might come to fix it as a matter of fact even rash itself once you're done blowing says dam you're not allowed to blow anymore or though it's a sha it's a discussion for itself but any other shabas and yiff you're not allowed to blow shaifer so why did they make a t that you don't blow even when so the answers and that's going to be today's discussion the taz answers rab from flapush put out a kunch speaking about this task called the taza and he speaks where it's relevant all over any all over says the taz that don't want to make a takana or can't make a takana when they're the mitzvah completely they could say that when rash falls out on shabas you don't blow But to say the says blow and now come to say don't blow they don't want to or they can't be a mitzvah and when they say not to blow because you might come to carry the still a of what the Torah says in paras to blower. Why? because you're going to blow when it's however if you're never going to blow then you're being there is no such as and that's the answer really would be not to blow even however they didn't make such a because then they're being the mitzvah says the taz you find this idea by ma I couldn't hold back from saying it as a but this brings out the point also right over there in says the mil is not the says in par of and the par says in paras and we that Shabas really doing a is is being but the says you should do it even bashabas. So the shil is the taz brings the raan asks the questions tous already asks the question on the gammory the gammorra says that we make a takana not to blow on chabas and the gammorra says we make a tak not to take lul on chabastoan why don't we make a that you don't do a on shabas for the same reason that I've The knife many when the night learned with I gave a whole she just on this many gives few to roo says a mitzvah of you can't be the says mafurish to do a bris meal on chabas if the are going to say not to do a bris on Shabas, then you're being of what the Tyra says Mafurish. It's a little bit of a discussion if it's considered mafurish because the Tyra doesn't say the Tyra says to blow and if say not to blow the saying not to do what the Tyra says here the Tyra doesn't say but it's and it's considered because it says it's like the says the speak about it to explain that it's considered and therefore says the That's why the couldn't make not to do a bris on Shabas because if they're going to make such a you'll never have the key of doing a bris on Shabas we only do meaning if it's actually the right day not >> yeah that's only That's it. Very important. >> Is that is that one of those or is that's that's part of the >> No, that's >> why it's being because you can make it Sunday, Monday, Tuesday. Not sure. You're asking why is it considered being if the Tyra says that that's considered like it's in the because he's a maybe it's so the says Shabas. So when is it ever going to be negated? The Tory says to do a bris on Shabas. I want to go on to a few examples besides that it'll be of the it's also going to enhance what we're speaking about today. If if it's considered is by it's very clear if say never to blow they're being the says in the par of ribbus you're not going to take ribbus but the tyra says to a you should take ribbis the raamita raam is that these mitzvah are when you lend money to are going to take ribb to take to if you're lending wanting to go to take ribbus. The sha is what's theor says asks the question the gmorrah says that said not to lend money to a not to lend money and take ribbons from a Why? Because you're going to come Even though the Tory says to lend money to go and said being of lending money to go sight of the can't be a mitzvah completely over here they're being mitzvah completely So, so first of all, it's not being just like we saw in the that the says we could do shabas because you have it's not why not because if you take a look in the garra the garra says on this there are exceptions one exception is because we're not that he's going to come learn from the and also if a person needs it desperately. If it's says the there are times that'll be neg but then says another terrorist and this is in the in the says that are not a mitzvah. If the Tyra says to blow on Shabas to blow to blow shifer the are not going to come and say they can't. They're not going to come and say don't blow. Here the Tyra says you could take ribbas from a guy and it's a mitzvah like it's a mitzvah. The are not coming to say don't be mitzvah. They're coming so to speak. They have a side. You're going to learn from the So it's not learning from the They said not to do it which because really at the end of the day after the you're not getting the but only the says example shabas thera says which means thera is saying we're not because the toyra says to do it on shabas by by ribb This the Torah doesn't say the Torah says to take from a new issue came up. It's a little bit of aesh that at the end of the day we're being the mitzvah. There's another terret the schlaw says the following. Why is it not aasha from ribb that the mitzvah of ribbus says the schlaw the mitzvah of ribbis taking ribbis from a is only if you lend money to a then you have to take ribbis gives the m ofus thera doesn't tell us to wear sitsus if you're wearing a beggot of dollar confice then you have to put on sitsus ribbis the toyra doesn't say to lend to a The toyra says that if you're lending to a you should you should take ribb. So the not coming to be the mitzvah of taking ribb from a once you lent money to a says the mitzvah say to lend ribbus the t wasn't lend to but hey don't take ribb that would be directly negative what the takit says the says when you lend lend so the came and said don't lend money to So even though at the end of the day there will not be a of the mitzvah of lending of taking ribbons from a however the ton is not to be mitzvah. If the kazal say not to blow, the ton is against the mitzvah not to do the ton is not to be says if you're lending to a lend with ribbus said just don't lend to the The says the same and he brings it from a different example not. He speaks about the mitzvah say oft asks how could say to to get rid of earlier you have to get rid of the said earlier right that's all you shouldn't by mistake delay because you don't have a clock and you're going to run into theis said get rid of it's earlier. If you get rid of your earlier, you no longer say the Torah says get rid of your but you no longer have because you already got rid of it earlier. So how could it's right came and they told us to get rid of the earlier but at the same time while they told us to get rid of the earlier they're taking away from us to ever be oft says the same just like if you have if you have the says get rid of your comes as you don't have you're not [clears throat] but not that came and were said just be free already earlier. If you're free earlier, mainly you're not going to be as opposed to going to say don't blow the says to blow the first day of blower. If I'm gonna say not to being another area of kasha on the tazen to marry two wives. So the Shila is how is he able to ask her to marry two wives? The Tory says clearly you can marry two wives. So you have two wives. So how could how could he come and say you can't have two wives? The Tory says you have two wives. >> Wasn't he only goes over like 100 years or something like that? We we keep reaccepting it every whatever >> a thousand years. But Lisa Lamisa even for as long as the gum was isa how did he do it even for a year you can't be you can't go against what the says the says person's going to have two wives if the wouldn't say doesn't say two wives okay it's not clear but here the says mafurish So interesting the answers that is between a ton and a just like a person even if the Tory says you could have two wives a person can make a for himself that he's not going to marry two wives. It's not going against the Tyra. So of course you can't make a against the you but if the allows you to have two wives and you make a you're not going to do it. You could say is different than they can't make a against what the says but it's like yourself could But the sheram is asks this question you can make a shu on yourself but a takana what's the difference if it comes in a lot of or of takra says that you can't you could marry two wives so how could come and say what's in Tyra the side of the taz. One more one more case which brings out the sight of the taz. The tyra says awesome. is maybe a shila butisha pickling let's say to pickle meat in in milk is however it's so the sha is com say that that's com thera says says bishel is anything else is not. So how could the come and say how could the come and say what the says the coming to say that it's aer the terror says that the never said that is mut the tyra only spoke about the tyra only spoke about bishel bishel is asser what's about kisha I don't know like The cipher says the Tory left it openended for what want. But the vert is the Torah never said of Misha's the Torah only spoke about Bishop. Anything else anything else the Torah didn't speak about. And the same the same is also in regard to the other part. It says like is not. So here also you could ask the says meaning to say the says you're not going to have meat and milk but what's it about chicken and milk? That would be muty only says meat. So how does how did the come and say that chicken is so the never spoke about chicken? The said meat and milk is aer chicken I don't know made when it comes to the says blower. the can come and say don't blow upon him you don't blow but but it's at least so not this year and if we're not is not going to come yet for another year I think next year it's also shabasal is for shabas but if it's not shabas lastly and with this I conclude back to the that says it's okay to make it shabas. Why? Vid Deris and the Draats of the previous closing of Reba says the same thing with a little bit more that even Shabas there's also a even after made this the says these because of but they say that even Shabas the where's the Shabas like the Mishna says in the beginning of the fourth paragash rash says the Mishna the even shabas just like we mentioned earlier from the that it's not a what the Tory is speaking about why because these and you're allow so you're not being even of such a day. Why? Because says maybe it's maybe it's into the you know why can make it because so it comes out that Bashaby says to blow the says they but even we should be yet this year and to be have a wonderful Hey.