Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
Rabbi Weber's Parsha Shiur at Scheiner's - Parshas Bereishis
9 views
Categories:Torah/Parsha
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
So I don't know. I I don't know. And I
think it's very foolish to say that
they're all trades because how do you
know? How do you know? Um you haven't
explored them. I know yishkite is true.
You can prove that. [snorts] And
sometimes bigger religions like
Christianity bill more than a billion
people. They're grappling with the same
issue. So they came to terms with
evolution. It's not a challenge. And and
they read it into the same text. Aran
wrote about this. I think in people they
were exposed to that. Then I was
thinking about the like what is this
Canadian? But then I finally decided
this idea of cayenne killing he this is
such a horrible idea. Humanity just
begins. These are
right and are like
and
is like this who lives to be a thousand.
So how bad can cayenne be and he kills
his brother? I mean this doesn't happen
in the worst of societies now. So what
are we what's going on here? He didn't
even know what he was doing.
>> But but if he's such a sadic, how how
stupid can you be? That's the question,
right? So he But then then you're very
if you're such a
>> Didn't it say that like he kept like
hitting him cuz he didn't know how to
kill him?
>> That's a medish. But is the medish
really midrash go every which way? The
so he doesn't know if he's so smart and
you know everything. How could you not
know that you're killing somebody? And
then on top of that, Kai isn't really
punished. You kill your brother. So he
goes to Galis. You know, you go to Gaul
for killing mash. This is a this is
killing on purpose and it's killing a
brother. It's a really bad story. So is
there a shot? So I'm going to I'm
telling you this
>> daddy also raped [clears throat] his
wife too.
>> Right. So that's not in the Pik. It's
not in the P. The madrashim you know you
know um
>> goes many different ways on the same
thing.
>> Right. The only conclusion we just come
to,
>> right? That in terms of
>> in terms of uh
>> oh, we're we'll do that next week. Is
actually that's a story that is soan and
we'll do that next week. That's next
week. We'll do that next week. Did we
ever talk about that? So that is
actually is a really correct tich you
know I remember someone reading a
reading a biography of somebody who went
to an orthodox shul and he said the
rabbi got up in shul and I'm not sure
that this should be recorded but it's
okay the rabbi got up in sh and he said
there are two opinions about whether um
whether kanan um whether I'm sorry
castrated his father or whether he
satomized his father right either he he
raped his father
>> oh somizes rape
is raped, right? When you're man or or
he castrated, which means he he he he
did he really which
>> more than a birth,
>> right? No, this doesn't happen even in,
you know, I don't think that this
happens in in anywhere, right? So, it's
it's crazy. So, did it happen? Maybe,
but we'll there alternative readings.
We'll we'll we'll develop them next
week. Okay. And the Pik doesn't say
anything. The B doesn't say any of this.
Pik says he did something to him that
was was bad, but [snorts] the P what his
son did to him.
>> Right. Right. But that's next week.
Let's talk about this week because this
is really maybe and I want your feedback
on this. So before we go ahead and we
try to talk about what what kind was
doing killing he want to talk about just
the way attitudes towards killing other
people. We live in the 21st century
where the worst thing you can do is kill
another person. But for much of history,
human sacrifice was normal. We discussed
this
>> and you had it happening even in our
world.
There's
every word matters, right? So was not
our most illustrious leader, right? But
tell us
he's your leader. Now are not going to
tell if your leader is Hitler you follow
him. They're not telling you that
was not Abraham and he wasn't Misha but
he was someone worth following because
if he would be Hitler wouldn't tell you
sacrifice his daughter now say there are
some say he didn't really do it plenty
of say he actually killed his daughter
and though because he had made a vow to
that if he goes into battle and he
succeeds in battle he will offer the
first thing that comes through his door
his thinking was the first thing would
be animals cuz when you come to your
compound there were animals maybe he was
even think human sacrifice would be a
slave of his daughter he felt he had to
do it he did it even say he didn't do it
say he locked her up in the monastery
and didn't let her marry so so yak who
was a leader practiced human sacrifice
at some level come I brought in the okay
let's go ahead
okay so let's let's start with because
it really creates the discussion
Where are we? Okay.
I don't know what I say where or what I
write where, but is here somewhere.
Where? Oh, shift him seven. Okay.
His daughter is coming up. She's so
happy. [clears throat] He He won a
battle. He survived. People died in
battle.
He has She's an only child. He has no
other children.
He sees him. He rips his garments
because he realized that he had said
that I have to sacrifice her. And and
and his daughter realized this. So what
does she tell him? She says, you know,
Tati, you promised to sacrifice me. You
have to honor your sacrifice. She re she
told him, I have to die.
But he says
you as you would do. and um and
simplistically he actually sacrificed
his daughter. Now the resham go both
ways go both ways but there's a strong
indication within the most normal of
classic source like David Ezra that he
sacrificed his daughter how could such a
crazy thing happen and someone be a
leader of the Jewish people how is it
possible what you see is that human
sacrifice is very normal we spoke about
this by the aa it was very normal people
were accustomed to it okay
>> happened after period of the right
period of the so many years after but it
but it it was never eradicated it now we
in our little group we discussed the
again a supposition I've shared I share
this you should know whatever
I go to hotels in terms of residence I
share this all the time because I think
it's important and you should know I
make headway that the we've discussed it
here that the greatness of the of the
was not that was ready to sacrifice his
child and I think I I even won some of
you over a little bit right some of you
were resistant that I win you over a
little bit no you're still a little Um
the greatness is when when Abram
realized that you're not allowed to do
this when he sort of and that he didn't
>> when he stopped um it's not I know it's
not the way the community thinks I am
telling you this causes this big
problems we live in our little box you
know we my son there's a term that's
used in contemporary circles now in
college circles called echo chambers
right you talk to people who think like
you all day so you don't hear another
perspective so we live our little from
world. We go to our little from
Yeshivas. We go to our little from
Shouls and in months you do business
with your from people and you're buying
your from stores. You never talk to
anyone who isn't from you speak to
someone outside the from world. You tell
them I respect a rum because he was
ready to sacrifice his son. He'll tell
you you're crazy. It doesn't sound well
in the the outside a little from world.
It's my son saying that he he wants me
to buy him something for whatever this.
So um so um it it it doesn't resonate
well. So is it possible to read the AK
that the greatest was of being ready to
sacrifice? For sure. Is that the common
reading for sure is that the Rambam
Rambam for sure I'm not saying it's not
the right common reading but you should
know there is another reading that's all
I'm not telling you. And the other
reading is that the greatest is that was
not ready that he learned that you're
not allowed to sacrifice but he was
ready to sacrifice and and he had to
learn that this is something you do
because this was normal. If you recall,
you pointed out multiple times because
Abraham doesn't resist. Yeah, sure. But
it doesn't stop and say why you tell me
to kill my son
>> cuz he's so used to it.
>> Correct. That's
>> because everyone around him was doing
this because this is the way the world
was. So he heard a voice from saying
kill your son. You do it cuz you listen
to but the madrasha very very colorful
about that. I don't really want to go
ahead and and get involved this because
we discussed this. But I think what is
very very critical is is that there is a
very very valuable Kuskuni
whereas talks about Kbanus and the
Kuskuni says you know what do we need
this whole thing of like killing animals
and spraying blood is this you know go
say tim and help a little old lady cross
the street and and and and
packabas and deliverab and go to you
really need to go ahead and be busy
spraying blood. So what does the say
we discussed this but um it's for
tells you
bring animal bring your sacrifice from
the animals
not from animals from people
because the Canaanites we were going to
would sacrifice their children so you
have to sort of speak to people not to
do that because that that was people's
thinking so human sacrifice was built in
did it very possibly according to many
even if he didn't he he locked his
daughter into a into celibacy when it's
not what she wanted was ready to do it
um at least according to one reading I'm
not it's not the the great his the
lesson was that you're not allowed to do
them but it had to be taught that was
this needed to be taught this is um um
this is the background of the now I want
to share a wonderful safer earum that
really can change your thinking The safi
karm talks about initially the world was
vegetarian
>> and then it stopped being vegetarian
after the flood. Why really like why the
change? Right? So what were you taught
in school? Why did the world stop being
vegetarian after the flood? What are the
standard? I mean
>> make it easier [clears throat] to live.
>> So right right. So so this is the the
next ring. We'll come to
>> right
>> the common reading but
>> what
>> they blood but the common reading is I
was that we save the animals that we eat
them there's the Ramban it could be the
more I'm a more sophisticated reading
there's ao
that that the flood that and could be we
again I don't know what I discuss where
but it's a famouso and a malb that
before the flood the nutrition was good
and after the flood the world was
nutrition was poor I told of how to also
there were no seasons the world changed
>> there was no so after the flood there
were seasons before the flood there were
seasons ato so because of that nutrition
wasn't good and the truth is when there
were seasons in winter what are you
going to eat nothing grows you live in
Siberia you're in Eskimo what do you eat
so you have to eat meat so there's
atbaser um there was a certain
bloodthirstiness that if you don't let
people you know vent it they might use
it in a different way so there are lots
of reasons why that was given the karma
is a very different reading it's
revolutionary but makes a lot ofense
sense, but I want to add one more piece
to the puzzle. You know,
um I I I've never been a vegetarian. In
in the world, yes world, world, you
really don't see it. In the modern
reflex world, you see quite a bit of it.
You'd see quite a bit of it. Um I once
had shabas at meazar cook. Um so I I had
the the shabasuda with one of the
Russian yeshiva. He was a vegetarian and
a shabasuda.
>> So it's interesting. I asked them I they
say Ruff Cook was not Ruff Cook had a
student.
>> So Mr. Brewer says what you like but if
that's not what you like then there's no
reason to. Um Raf Cook had a student
called the Nazer. Very interesting man.
He was a nuzer. He never cut us here for
the rest of his life. He remained a
vegetarian his whole life. And [snorts]
he was he was a he was um his his um his
son was the the chief rabbi of Sharon
the chief rabbi he was a son he was a
very his daughter married the chief
rabbi of Israel Goran some people don't
like him some people do like him he was
a very sign
>> um the nazer's daughter right so the
nazer was a um so he was he was about
shuva and he sort of felt that they had
to recount from his whole life but he
was a vegetarian uh but he he pushed it
very much but you don't see in world
they would look at you as if you're
crazy in the modern world you see quite
a bit of it um now the says really um
the right way to live your life is to be
a vegetarian and he brings perfect proof
we'll see it inside might come up when
we the says when paras let's go back a
few paras when the Torah talks about
eating meat what does the Torah say
what's the language in par when we talk
about eating meat It's such a blatant um
statement um talks about if if you'll
you'll remember if I mentioned the
[snorts]
[clears throat and cough] translate that
phrase for me
>> if you crave if you want to eat meat I'm
not going to stop you okay
>> right that mean what does this means if
you need to eat you can eat but what is
the person really saying
>> you really shouldn't be eating where
else does the Torah use language like
that. one other place
[sighs and gasps]
>> um when they ask for it good that would
be but there's one very similar case
where it doesn't say
but it uses
>> where is that
>> by the
is a terrible situation a man goes to
war he's attracted by an enemy woman um
kazal make it clear he should not marry
her and if he marries her bad things
will come bad children, bad marriage,
bad bad everything, right? Um,
all types of bad things.
But the terror is not going to stop him
because they won't be able to stop him
because in battle
the the says very sensibly there. It's a
really bad thing. The Tyra allows it
because if you don't allow, people are
going to do it anyway. He's a soldier in
battle. He's he has no self-control.
You're not going to be able to stop him.
So let him marry this woman because
otherwise it'll it'll happen anyway in a
worse way. But it's a bad thing, right?
The says, "Why does the Tyra It's a good
question. Where every that counts, why
doesn't
you're only allowed to do it if you
really feel the need. You should really
be vegetarian. It's better to be
vegetarian." And he says, "We're going
to be vegetarian." I don't know if he
himself was a vegetarian. um in the
>> we're not going to be bringing carbon.
[snorts]
>> So Raf Cook's answer and again it's an
exception. Rav Cook says all the
carbonas are going to be m are going to
be based on um grain not not um it's
again that's not the ding and and please
do don't just listen to me. I tell my
kids don't just listen to me every week
at the Shabas you hear one it speaks you
got listen to lots of people and then
you should know when you hear different
things you actually end up becoming a
smart person because you can compare but
says that
could be but he does say that he says
he uses that closing was a great mind
some people didn't like him some people
didn't like do like him some people
don't like me
>> I'm telling you come on
>> no Oh, really? Dude, [laughter]
>> that is impossible. I don't think that
>> there's such a thing in
>> Okay, [cough] I heard something that on
one of the reasons why we eat
is because back in the day,
>> nobody ate meat,
>> right?
>> They went back, everyone was healed
>> and they went back to because the the
was forgiven. But once they did the ael
they went back and they invited the
knuckles back in their life
then that changed right we look it's
unflous because they went back
>> we're going back to puscazuma yeah
absolutely there's so much so many told
so the karm says
>> if it really meant to be vegetarian what
do we stop but you know some will say
after the flood we needed as you said
some will say there was this
bloodthirstiness that you know that that
if it wouldn't have been allowed to to
vent it would would have gone in worse
ctions. Um, IM has a wonderful,
wonderful reading and I want you to see
it inside. IM says the mabble happened
for lots of reasons, but when you go
through the madrashim there and the
madashim are based on the sukim, what
was the prime reason for the marble
happening? [clears throat]
>> Um, gazel
but what else?
[clears throat] Right. But what else?
And it's really the Pik not so clear
>> morality also
>> right but what type of morality
>> so buser right get every word that there
accounts it's not just
>> animals
>> yeah that people had relations with
animals in madrashim are full of it and
that's why only some animals can come
and other animals couldn't now again
that's not clear in the pik butishbaser
very powerful phrase
every every living thingiality
animals were having relations with
different types of animals. People were
having relations with animals and in a
crazy world crazy things can happen. I
think um right
so so beiality
how do you stop beastiality
>> which type of person is most likely to
have relate to to engage which type of
person was accused of having relations
with animals historically? People lost
their marbles. I don't know.
>> People who are crazy. Yeah. But who
else?
>> They had love for their
>> people of love. But people who also
>> look
>> shepherds. People who associate a lot
with animals. I don't know if it's true.
But you know,
>> the Arabs are known for that. No.
>> Having relations with animals could be.
Yeah. The um u but people who associate
a lot with animals, the line separating
them from animals is somewhat blurred.
Shepherds don't just slaughter animals.
They raise them. They take care of them.
They connect with them. So does do every
shepherd do most shepherds? I I would
think not. I mean, but if this is what
they say, you know, in every in every
lie there's a little bit of truth. So if
there's a stereotype, it's still a
stereotype, but usually there's a little
bit of truth to it or the stereotype
wouldn't come. There might be something
there. So if in you know amadvar
shepherds are the ones who are most
likely to engage in beiality it's
because they associate with animals and
when you spend time with them and in a
certain sense of relationship with them
yes something can happen now there's a
connection so now let's I want you to
hear the idea why did allow us to eat
meat after the m
>> take away the connection
>> bigger than the
>> to take away the connection to make the
use them as food rather than
>> right as you're both saying the same
thing to create a clear line between man
and animal so it's not going to happen
again that's the idea
>> interesting
>> and then we'll bring it all back to kay
and he but first you have to see this
carb inside remember because he was a
proponent of being a vegetarian he
himself
>> I don't know what's
>> yeah yeah
um a very you know a prominent well
respected not you know not somebody
unknown you know they what mainstream
solid. Um the right the question was do
we call the rams? Do we um
look at
successfully as well? He says you had
you had isbaser Adam was vegetarian
was allowed to eat meat but then when
got to we start assuring meat again was
allowed to eat all animals we can only
eat some didn't have to she can eat milk
and meat and suddenly there are
restrictions again he's saying we were
we were vegetarian we're meant to be
vegetarian was a sham because during the
time of the m there was a connection
between man and animal. It It's not
because people were so bad. Could be
they were bad, too. But remember, people
the world was new. People were very
concerned. I would think like some of
the liberals who really talk all the day
about loving animals could be in that in
such a circle too. You know, eventually
the line is blurred. So, [snorts]
Baru said, "You know what? um we have to
sort of fix this. Um and we'll we'll
asser will we'll will turn animals into
meat so that there's no relationship. So
you view them as food. You're not going
to have a relationship with something
that's food but really you're supposed
to be vegetarian. So when the was given
began bring us back to its being
vegetarian halfway not completely but no
only certain animals only only no all
types of rules limiting it. Um so um
um he talks about cayenne here. Now I
want to go back to cayenne and before I
offer the idea that really may be wrong.
I want your perspective on it. I want
[snorts] you to remember human sacrifice
in the ancient world was was normal
and it wasn't viewed as bad. Now you'll
tell me how could you not say human
sacrifice is bad? It's a horrible thing.
I'll ask you a question that that many
non-Jews would ask you. Um, the
crusaders are coming to town and if you
don't accept Christianity, they're going
to kill you. Um, all you have to do is
accept Christianity,
but you'll be told to kill yourself.
Also, it's an interesting discussion.
You should know there's a but um
normative thinking in Ashkinaz was you
let yourself be killed and you kill your
children. What? Kill your children?
you're killing somebody. So you're
saying that you believe religion is more
important than human life, right? You
say this same for so many other areas,
right? Shabas comes, you don't violate
Shabas to save a non-Jewish life. Even a
Jewish life is a big a non-Jewish life
is very valuable. You kill a guy, you
put to death. It's not as if, you know,
we don't value a non-Jewish life. But
chabas is so valuable which means we
believe that there are certain things
that are more important than human life.
Yiddish kite is is so critical and and
if you leave the fold it it's it's it's
better to give your life. Shabas is so
critical sins.
>> Three cardinal sins murder adultery
yourself not to kill somebody else. So,
so Nebuch,
>> so people dealt with this with the
crusaders with their children and they
killed their children.
>> Was he right there?
>> So, this is a big topic according to the
Rambam. Maybe not. According to most,
yes,
>> right? But but he had to deal with
Moheans.
>> It was something similar. The Ram dealt
with a group of fanatical Muslims. He
wrote a letter to Yemen saying, "Go
yourself but come back and and
[clears throat] live and build a Jewish
life afterwards.
>> But Muslim is a little different. Okay.
>> But but the core but even if Muslim
might be acceptable for a nonj for Jew,
it is the Rama's core idea is it's not
real. Um the idea of means being means
being but accepting a religion is not.
The Ram is not some people accept it,
some people don't. He wrote a whole
letter about it
>> famous letter
>> right
um but um
that was not the thinking and people did
kill their children that was that was
the that was the norm and I'll tell you
I would never give a shar like this but
but sh have been given I think it's a
mistake to talk about this even now it's
still too early after the war there were
children that were hidden in convents
they survived because of it
>> these are big big questions um
>> whether the parents were allowed to do
that.
>> Um
>> if you're giving a well if you're giving
a child to a but it's gim you're giving
a child to a convent what's going to
happen to the child? It's the Holocaust.
Everyone's being killed.
>> One of those kids means one of them
>> one of them Lustiger. One of those kids
became the cardinal of Paris, right? So
I mean I'm I'm Yeah, you can't talk
about it because it just grief. It's too
early. But this was a
>> kids that were under bait mitzvah.
>> Under or over? Same question. You're
still I'm giving yama to your taking
that that child away from you. I mean
you you you can't discuss it. There's
too much pain and but you have the ra on
one side
>> and you know to it gets very black and
white in people's eyes that you have to
but then just tell them your grandfather
was divorced in 1942. What should his
mother have done if she had the option?
This is right. So these are not they're
very simple when you discuss it without
making it relevant. But let's come back.
So in a world that really believe that
if you sacrifice a human, you bring
peace to the world. We really believe
that if a Jew stays a Jew and he doesn't
become a Christian, it's a good thing.
And if he becomes a Christian, it's so
bad he should give his life or give his
child's life. [snorts] Well, that's what
we believe. In a world in which people
believed in human sacrifice, it was no
different. It was the same thing. Yifak
absorbed certain non-Jewish values. He
must have made it part of his Yiddish
because he was a Jewish leader. Yif is
still considered a leader. Yif
sacrificed his daughter according to
many rishav
was grappling with it. He thought told
him to clearly his thinking was well
this might be part of Yiddish. How can
it be part of Yiddish? Well, you're
saying that sacrificing your child
rather than letting him be becoming
a Christian is part of Yiddishkite.
Letting a guy die rather than save his
life. And Shabas is part of Yiddishkite.
And again, a gish life is very valuable.
A person will be killed if he kills a
guy.
>> Jew is also, you know, I've killed
Shabas for for it's only because
>> it's only because that will be able to
keep, right? So, it's not
>> it's a right or um
so that I'll be able to
it's
>> so accord
from Jew's life
any any
>> I'm saying no it's you need a Pik to
tell you that it's it's need to be told
and you should know the um you know it's
it's not everyone accepted you know the
early battles by by the many of them
didn't fight back in Shabas because of
Shabas even though they died the
Ethiopian Jews I don't believe in Shabas
still alive that was their thinking it
It devolved. They picked it from other
sources. But so if you believe in human
sacrifice is not such a kadesh is you
see by you see the grapplings by Abra.
Now I want to come back to um this
extraordinary karum.
He karum says the great problem by the
by the period before the mabble is that
people were too close to animals. you
needed to distance them and the only way
to do that was to um
was was to sort of create a clear line
in the sand and let the let the animals
be food and suddenly you would have no
reality but they were very close to
animals.
Now let's try to understand why Cayenne
brought an a carbon from vegetation and
he brought the carbon from animals. What
was going on inside Cayenne's mind? what
was going on inside Heb's mind.
>> Um,
>> they had the the whole world's in front
of them. So, why did Kane choose to
bring an animal from a carbon from?
>> I I heard that that's the the whole
thing of teu of shotness is
>> and he sure
>> brought [snorts]
Sure.
>> And then Cen brought the
>> beautiful you keep it separate. Right.
Right.
>> K's bringing his best. Right. [snorts]
But the point is but if both of them are
the whole
I'm thinking that's the reason
>> but I want to go a little further.
What you just forgive me I have you have
to remind me of your name cuz you
>> bar.
So Barak said what type of carbon are we
bring? If indeed we become vegetarians
what type of carbon we bring the
animals.
It's a don't take you know one idea as
deep but does say there's room to say
it's going to be a carbon now it doesn't
sound like that because and but maybe
oil is different types of maybe no
that's what he says um and is a very
very significant source so
we maybe bring our because we'll be
vegetarian so the will be vegetarian so
now let's try is why did Kenyan bring a
carbon vegetarian that was vegetarian?
Why didn't he bring it from animals?
>> Cuz he didn't think it was right. He
thought it's immoral.
>> Ken held that he owned the ground and
anything that was above the ground.
>> Okay, there would be another idea. These
are all there were so many good ideas,
but I think the simplest of reading both
of them had the whole world at their
beck and call, right? It's it's them.
whole world we can talk about early
early humanity was like but the past is
is just them so what what kind couldn't
afford to bring an animal and he could
afford to bring an animal maybe these
were both people who were trying to do
the right thing kind felt they had to
bring the best to a kadeshu he felt he
had to bring the best the best is animal
he says no but you're not let an animal
was supposed to be vegetarian
>> and so cayenne was coming from a
sensible place. He was coming from a
sensible place. He was bringing the best
carbon he could bring. Cayenne said
you're not allowed to do that. You're
not allowed to kill an animal.
>> Okay. He brings it as a sacrifice to
God, not himself.
>> Still Cen said even to God if we're
vegetarian as Cook said when we'll be
vegetarian
how he felt he killed his brother.
>> We'll get there in a moment. We'll try
it all together. Okay. And again, it's
only a theory. Okay. Um
so the um Iarum says that you had this
world in which viality arose. You had a
world in which you had this problem
already and you had a world in which he
brought a carbon that was an animal. Cen
brought a carbon that was grainbased and
he was trying to do the right thing but
it was the wrong thing because he wasn't
creating a line between man and animal.
And Cayenne's type of thinking would
contribute to the beiality that was
arising already
that
>> because if you don't have a line between
man and animal then just the way men
have to respect animals right and he
didn't recognize the [clears throat]
animal is not similar to him
>> right because he compared an animal to
him you're more likely to engage with
beastiality got
>> that type of thinking I will sort of
develop a completely different line of
thinking I actually wrote an article
about this. I think it's a good one. Um,
the Nazi Jim Shimam, it's the most
extraordinary thing in the world. Um,
maybe the crulest people that ever
lived. I mean, it's it's just
extraordinary to think of what they did
to us just as human beings, just the
levels. But at the very same time, the
Nazis were the greatest animal lovers in
the world. Much of animal rights stems
from Nazi Germany, right? They um they
had laws when they deported Jews, they
had the animals collected and taken for
safekeeping. In Nazi Germany, you
couldn't um um you know, lobsters are
are are you couldn't um you know,
lobsters when they're alive. You
couldn't do that in Nazi Germany. Fog
grow was banned. Um um you there were
special rules about how you euthanize
animals. There were so many rules about
animals [snorts] and you almost wonder
and people write about that people have
a sort of morality and they were being
so cruel one way they had to sort of
prove themselves in another way to sort
of validate themselves as human beings.
But the Nazis are the ones who innovated
animal, right? Hitler himself was a
vegetarian. I mean, how how crazy is
Hitler was a vegetarian. Um
>> I heard once said that he I heard Eiffel
once said that he doesn't know a hunter
could look at a deer and not shoot him.
>> Right. Right. I I I saw that as well. Um
that line. Yeah. Yeah. Um Yeah. Um yeah.
>> So what they were saying is is Jews
they're they're below they're sub
animals. They're less they're less than.
>> So I I think the the mind is funny. So
when you start conflating when you start
conflating people's and animals you can
you can start being worse to people but
being very good to animals. So
was trying to create this line in the
sand during the times of you have
beiality. So says no I want you to
sacrifice animals so that the line is
clear in the sand. Cen [clears throat]
didn't get it. Cen was saying no animals
are very errupt here. like people and we
can't sacrifice them and kind was
criticized for that. Okay. And and said
no but kind did is wrong. What does look
at the and again is it's like learning
is a very standard region who's not um
so top line.
What what's such a big deal?
He was a farmer. You bring her from
grain. What terrible thing is this? Um,
look, go to the second highlighted
section. You have to look at this.
There's something bad about this. Um,
kind is coming from a very sensible
place. Killing an animal is not good.
But nevertheless, go to the second
highlighted section.
Nevertheless, if you sacrifice an
animal, you realize that people are more
than animals and it creates a healthy
line in the sand. It differentiates you
at you from animals. You're less likely
to commit beiality, but at the very same
time, you're more likely to value people
because if people and animals are alike,
you could have relations with animals,
but at the very same time, you can be
cruel to people. Nazis by going and
promoting animals into people were ended
up being nicer to animals but that also
let them be worse to people because
everyone knows you can kill cockroaches.
Drew like cockroaches once people and
animals are the same. So Akades was
responding to K and telling him you did
wrong. No, you have to bring sacrifice
that isn't just grain sacrifice. You
have to bring animal sacrifice.
What door did that open in Kenan's mind?
>> Human sacrifice. Human sacrifice. If you
can kill animals, why can't you kill
humans? Human sacrifice was the norm.
Yifak did it. According to many Aramina
was open to doing it.
>> It wasn't sacrifice in hell. He
>> who says maybe in his mind it was
sacrifice. [clears throat] I want to
bring another piece to the puzzle. It's
all a maybe. Again, all maybe. Um what
in in when they look at human
sacrifices, what humans were most
sacrificed? What type of human was
sacrificed the most?
>> So they stud what?
>> Children. But which type of children?
>> Which what?
>> Boys.
>> Frequently boys. I think more boys than
girls or something.
>> Girls twins. Because when twins were
born, it was sort of viewed as a sign
and come [clears throat] come with me.
Again, I this is all maybe, but the
beautiful thing about learning today, at
least for me, I mean, I and this is the
way I raise my kids and I think I think
I think despite all of the terrible
things I teach them, I think they're
going to end up okay. Um um so um
look at the bottom of the page, too.
They they you live in a time when
there's knowledge everywhere. So we know
which cultures engage in human sacrifice
and they unear crypts in which which
they see the relics the debris of human
sacrifice. Right here in North America
the Mayans the Azex human sacrifice was
the norm. But who which children did
they sacrifice? Look at 16 at the
ancient Maya site of wherever this is um
represented by every um um you know you
know there's they they've identified
second line ritual child sacrifice
placed on the ground as young boys many
closely related peers and twins [snorts]
many of the human sacrifices were twins
because stepped into an ancient mind
>> you believe
>> mangala
>> manga experimented on twins um um But
step into the mind of an ancient of of
someone who's who's a pagan who who who
just doesn't know how to think. [snorts]
Um if sends two two people twins
I have to give one back. Might that make
sense? Certainly in the world in which
human sacrifice was practiced it was
more likely that twins are the ones that
are sacrificed or one of the twins is
sacrificed.
>> What about triplets?
>> I I I don't know what they did. I don't
know what they did. And maybe Kuzi did
too. I I don't know. But here you have
evidence that at least in the you know
in an era because Mayans and AICS there
was tremendous amounts of human
sacrifice
in Cananan there was some but here it
was you know it was standard human
sacrifice standard all the time twins
especially
what was he
look at 15 look at the
Okay.
Not just a twin, part of a a large
multiple birth. So, how many were born?
I don't even know. But it was many
multiple births. And those are the
madras. Who did they met?
>> They were born with sisters also.
>> Sisters, more twins, lots of twins. The
madrash. But led there's a strong base.
So, let's try to understand. Is Cayenne
a monster? Cayenne is [clears throat]
not punished that severely. He's not
killed. He's sent to gullis and tells
him anyone who kills you is going to be
punished. It doesn't sound like someone
who kills me.
>> It sounds like someone who kills but but
he's not really fully responsible cuz he
thinks he's doing something that's the
right thing.
>> That's that's how you [screaming]
respond to
a sacrifice.
>> But let me think let's try to understand
what the phrase means. um kind respons
again either is he stupid he's talking
to
so is he trying to evade responsibility
>> sounds like he's trying to be funny like
you know cute like
>> right so that's how we read it but then
but then then he then comes actually
that again could be he is a mushkas but
could be I'm offering another approach
where he was just trying to figure it
out he comes come to a world in which
you don't sacrifice animals but animals
are almost people right I was going to
talk about the I'm going to talk about
this there's viality it seems more than
there is now new humanity is new well if
you can sacrifice animals did human
[snorts] sacrifice start yet again you
have to ask yourself whether other
people lived before kayen and heel this
would be another discussion about you
know different forms of humanity but um
in his mind maybe human sacrifice was
not so for foreign he couldn't bring an
animal. But now saying you can well if
you can't bring an animal well then
maybe a person. And then the next piece
is
it doesn't sound Did he attack he and
kill him?
Pik doesn't tell you what kind did to
>> He
[clears throat]
was up against him. How about that?
>> Okay let's look at the pukim. Let's go
to the Pik.
>> Where are you?
[snorts]
>> So the Pik is a very curious Pik and the
truth is I'm developing this as we
speak. 12
never says what he told me.
>> Right.
So now the standard reading is that some
>> for sure. But there's this
>> what are you saying?
>> It doesn't say right.
But he says something and maybe there's
I'm just opening the door again. I
didn't sometimes that I haven't fully
substantiated to the idea that maybe
there were even discussions about this.
The is something that is soft something
that it's explanatory.
U maybe they viewed when approached his
daughter his daughter heard that you
have to sacrifice him him me. [laughter]
She tells the father this is what you
have to do. this is the right thing to
do. The Pik tells us that Yitzk was
ready to be sacrificed because he
thought it was the right thing to do.
Things have changed.
Cen tried bringing a min. That's not the
right thing says I know I want something
more substantial. Well, A is a twin.
Cen is the older brother. Maybe it's the
right thing which is unnecessary
>> that there's so I I I don't have proof
for this at all. I'm coming with sort of
the kernel of an idea that I'm
developing with you. But what I am
offering is um a little bit of more
perspective on how people thought of
human sacrifice. A little bit more
perspective on why Kayen brought the
carbon that he brought and what a kadesh
was trying to teach him and maybe this
is Andre to understand what motivated
Ken. I have no base for this but I know
it's a very very difficult story. I'm
[snorts] offering the kernel of idea
that needs to be built on. But is it do
I know that it's true? Of course not.
But if if you walk away dissatisfied
with what I'm saying, I I I'd like to
know if there's a more satisfying
reading of the story. It's a very
difficult story.
>> If somebody [clears throat] likes
the idea of human sacrifice, just they
should sacrifice themselves.
>> Why would they do enough? You want to be
a sacrifice? Let's we'll we'll take you
up forever. You're sacrificing your twin
to
>> Yeah, exactly.
>> Sacrificing your twin is a way of
sacrificing yourself.
>> Well, Kayen is older. He is younger. Um,
>> we know they're not twins.
>> There's a discussion.
>> Yeah. Yeah. No, but they had their own
twins,
>> right? The older, so he should sacrifice
himself. Maybe not. Maybe. But there's
this kind. So the simple reason he said
things he said things that were
unsubstantial very frequently in the
vimemer it means things are
unsubstantial. I'm offering I didn't
come tonight to give like a really a
fully developed idea. I'm sharing a
kernel. I'm sharing a question that I
would think you wondered about. It just
doesn't make sense. Uh and I don't
really have a fully developed answer but
I have a kernel of an idea that I think
can be built up. Okay. [snorts] That's
the idea. Dujour. Next week you have
Shvraas.
>> Um next week I I won't give Shir. not
such a side during we have Tuesday my
Tuesday night sh is actually in my um
>> so maybe we can come there we'll have
the sh [laughter]
>> um you
would you like to do for me it would be
meaningful at the end
>> I was I was doing
>> no it's it's 6 minutes away
you know
>> it's no one of the it's my community is
making Montabella's make
um can I be in touch about that um maybe
for dessert
Good job. [laughter]
>> Let's go to dessert.
>> Yeah, you have to go.
>> What? [laughter]
>> Maybe uh um
>> No problem. Um
>> see I I Yeah, it would be such a nice
thing actually. Is that a crazy idea?
>> Come say Tuesday belongs to this year.
Why not?
>> Right. So
>> here, [clears throat]
>> right? I have to speak to my wife if she
likes the
>> Look, last week it was Yep. You were
here.
>> I saw you.
>> Well, there was a party here. [snorts]
>> But you started it, too.
>> Yeah. Um, okay. I'll speak to my wife
what she thinks and we'll take
something. Okay. Thank you again. And
again, try to develop this a little bit.
See if you can find sources that work
with this or against this. Um, thank
you.