Perek Yom Hakippurim: The Five Inuyim – Any Differences Between Them? Rabbi Nachum Scheiner Shiur

In the previous year, we expounded on the ini theory says these of as well as the Tory says there's even in the beginning of the eighth peri tell us that there are five. Five to eat, to drink, five. If you count six so Rashi says it's a Gmorrah. It's a Gmorrah. Later the Gmorrah says that it's one eating and drinking the eat and drink is considered one of these five. upon him. The Tory says that he's and as the Gmorra goes through there are in today's we're going to try to clarify are all five or maybe just and the remainder are even if you learn that the others are besides the other ones are also that's very clear that it's only it's a it's a a without chorus when the says chorus the chorus is only for not for the so we want to know is the is of without chorus or right here on the page in the beginning pretty big about it. He says it's only it's only and he says it's only cuz why is there only why is there no chorus by the other three the other other four why is there no chorus the teres cuz it's the if it would be then there should be there should be chorus on the sharim also void if the shuim is iso how could he be a like the Mishna says later a kala a mel how could it be a could wear can be no wear shoes how could it be a is we understand but how could be so his two ries and we'll get back to it a little bit more by later. But he says this that there's no chorus. It's not a that it's the it could be the other is really you know why there's no chorus because when the Tyra says chorus how you we didn't learn yet the letter of the gor but the gmorra says that if you refrain these a person could die the other ones a person will not die that's why he's and the other that he says that it's Because how could be a byl. So that he says the really is only [Music] even a parter. So for that said when he's at the is where they were but where is it's but back to the says that it's I theor goes through and the gar brings drious. So he says it's not. He even brings the Gmorrah says the Gomorrah doesn't say on the other. The Gomorrah says the Gomorrah doesn't say it's not like we learn it out from the So what we have so far clearly is some these are only now on a on a let's call it on a side note but it's relevant to what we're talking about The Tyanim says that really only would be you know because it's it's not it's only he says what do you mean if thera says you're now wash yourself goofy. So if you're now going to wash yourself what are we saying that it's only and that's why they were make by melat meaning to say the the the kala that we're going to be make that it's not cold goofi not the whole the whole uh the whole goof up should be still awesome. So he himself says two one he says is that you don't say it only by you don't is only by Allah here as we're going to see later on by the for sure the only even if it'll be it's only not say why because like we mentioned before the laugh who is the laugh the so that's clear that's a gor there's nothing what to talk about the garra says that there is no chorus by the other four so that's clear there's no there's no chorus so he says is only by not by says that is only here it's It's not you don't have so we're back what the says that it's only says a different he says this is awesome even if they'll say it's not only but it's only when he's a has to be a she when thera says you now say even if it would be it's not a shear of the of because there's no a person has pleasure. So it's not a she of won't be awesome in back to exactly what we're talking about says that the of the other 40 besides everything else is only it's not only the a A little further down of Zion also says that it's the Raon the is of the other 40 wearing shoes washing himself as the says that it's the and the says that's why he's no chorus. The garra says he's no chorus. You want to know why? because it's the the rash brings from the re the isuam also the same thing which obviously we saw twice brings it as well but that it's the and then he brings a that quotes that it's says one of the five is to shmear self and then it says in other words there is no the Torah as well also says that the of is only the Raon on the other four says the two that are clearly that it's the raid the saf learns that it's the risa the ram the raam in the rambom it's not 100% Mafurish but all theum clearly learn in the Rambam that it's the because the Rambam says now could mean that it's a and sometimes you can learn it's a old say clearly it's a even when the Rambams call something on it could still be cuz the rab calls things clearly that it's a daisy learn clearly without a sh it's on the note on the sheet. So there are two questions. Number one that if it's the how could be mut. So we answer it. We said go and then there's another shila. The Gomorrah says that these the Gomorrah says that which is known to the Mishna but the Gmorrah speaks about it that he's a dinner of these a certain amount of hours he's supposed to not eat on seemingly from the Gmorra that the other the other four so the Shil is if it's only like the list of said we understand if you learn that it's so why would there not be by the way the tour says there is on the we're not getting into that's a discussion for itself there is they don't wear shoes the part there is the tour says clearly there is >> parents >> what it say on the parents the did on the yeah >> the parents the parents have >> laazer so the sh is [Music] tour says that he's but the is if you learn that it's the why is again the tour says but of that it's again why is and why is >> what say >> so very good that's the third kasha very good very Good himself doesn't bring that but that said not such a if you learn through the okay and I want to just answer you also are learned from shabasa from a different so it's not a it's not mama shakasha why there's no carus it's from two different parts I want even just A second brings both. And then of course the Tyrus has a carus also. But then he says I lost all Shab different. So it's not such a asking very good because the ti himself tak wanted to really bring a that's the he say it's not a but these are too cautious if you go with the and the other imra why is no why >> why is we see that kids don't wear shoes as for you know washing Kids tend to get a lot worse. Sometimes kids are eating special because they're fasting until it's outside then they eat something. So your kids hands are sticky. You're going to wash. >> Yeah. So that will you're asking about if that itself is brought clearly discussed. That's because it's but it's not because they're not in >> on one hand you're telling them oh you're not allowed to wash the next second their hands are sticky. You're like oh wash your hands. >> So it's not a steer if they could or they can't. That's also not the discussion for now how exactly just like obviously they could eat after they have to eat. If not, it's a sak and and we're not going to go into the and the between between them, but the shil is if everything is a why should there be a difference? Why should there be a difference? Why should there be a difference in that eating and drinking to refrain a little bit? But when it comes to it's a very important on the other he says that it's true it's but the gave it over to to be and define how these shall look like the cast of Mishna. And if you're looking at me, who ever heard of such a thing very likely is like that also it's very likely in some of the that the what you're not allowed to do in however some learned the gave over to define what goes into the over there over here as well. Also the Tory says these is of in you're supposed to be aim of in of how is the in supposed to look the gave it over to define. So how did they define it? They defined not by a cuz he's a not by a mel because he's a not by a defined where the is says and then he takes it a step and he says that's also he says when the tom all the things that were a big for the kids. The kids need to eat, they need a drink, they need a sandal, they need it. Why did say by eating and not? They're all So he says like this. He says they're all but but it's the same but a bit more of an addition. He says because the Tory spells out doesn't say the but because the Tory says it's talking about as you mentioned before the others are not of came out and they said like this that is because it's more he goes with the that defined where it is and the other it's not define. So there's more there's more leeway so to speak like the the Mishna really I wanted to check it up really his terret is just this that it's not murish in the it's it's not as murish as but he also adds it and he says that the gave it to like of both of them really he could have answered without the sight of is more in the other ones are not but he adds in also that it's also so said wait a second for the kids we feel over here for the kids to have it the kids need okay that's the so that's why so so what do We have so far we have clearly if the other four I'm going to go through briefly a few other that's not so clearly what they hold Rashi says just like by shabas Rashi says just like by Shabas it's the Rabon so too over here. So it's not clear that is like a little bit does he mean to say to over here that it's over here that it's they bring another rash and shabas also that could be it's not so clear to be I'm just sharing it as a moash is a shashi holds the sha seems he seems to be almost a the himself. The beginning of the starts off that it's a and then later on the spells out and he says he says but is also not so clear is it is not clear the is not clear the is also not clear the ran beginning of a perk as a big as he goes through lan lan he brings means all these cautious that we spoke about in the beginning. Duran says merily it's the then the afterward says he ends off he ends off with a kasha on this that it's the so what does the hold does he hold that it's the riser or does he hold it's the raon in the beginning he says merly it's thea then he ends off a kasha that it's the rabon is it is it so the pagod when he lists out Theim that say that it's the he includes he includes the primagum learns that the holds that it's the like the tak says learns the in the beginning said it's the end hold it how the holds so we have Before getting to the just want to bring one more let's call it that it's the raon that it's the raon the brings that it's the raon and he says the following ladies are and is to eat and drink kipper I it's and ladies are potter the teres these also alive these chorus ladies are only exempt they are not exempt from the so they can't eat they can't drink what's about the other If the is different if it's why a ladies in the of wearing shoes it's a and there is no laugh there's no laugh because the like we mentioned where does the say in do what the say with the by chorus so that's clearly there's No, there's no ladies are not the is only by the other of not wearing shoes for an example is only. So why are ladies included in the other four? Who said who said that ladies are included? Maybe tak not baby taka ladies are not included in the other 40 because that's what they do. My biggest R is the Mishna. The Mishna says a kala a kala is allowed to wash herself. The not aa lady not a kala is not allowed to. So they're why are ladies and other now if it's if it's okay so when came and added these four you know why they said ladies are included because they added these four. So that's why just like ladies are included added another four and they said it's however if it's an so and you can't tell me that really it's only men that ladies are also included why not why can't you say that then why didn't every to say that even though the says It's part. So says from here it's a that the other four is and that's why ladies are included. Why would ladies be included in the on his on the on this he says the following he answers it's not a meaning to say the other four are a why a ladies it's a mama He says he says the ladies are part meaning to say is something to refrain from doing over there ladies and potter the mitzvah say taking lul coming up the mitzvah of lulov sitting in the suk That's all the kumva say blowing shaer eating in the suka taking dollar but something just not doing over there ladies are included and I think it could be and explain it's a what's the why should there be a difference between if it's say they have to shake their to if they just have to refrain from doing such as say you could explain has and he says why t are ladies potter from mitas mangorama why why you ever wondered why are they part from why should ladies not take lul and listen to why they're not says that Since meaning to say is they have to they're they have to take care of their husband. Imagine the scenario like this from the she's about to go sit in the suka and her husband asks her to do something. What is she going to do? If she doesn't listen, her husband asks her to do something. If she doesn't sit in the suk, what should she do? Her husband has to do something and she has to go and do a timely mitzvah. If it's not timely, if it's not keshma before this man keshma, it's a mitzvah. Okay? So, she'll listen to her husband and after she'll go do the mitzvah. But it's if it's a timely thing, she's stuck between the and her husband. It's more important that she shouldn't have to do the mitzvah as like you find says my name. The same thing is to do mitzvah if it gets in the way of you don't have to do the mitzvah. You could understand that's why only mitzvah say only a mitzvah that she has to go and do she's potter because it could get in the way of her husband what her husband wants her to do her husband needs her to do something that doesn't say that she can't at the same time be amit So that's why that's why she's talking in the other four even though it's avas. So just to conclude, we had up until now a big if the other four not are those or they what's there's no about it brings the tough that's a separate truth. And then he says, "So is it a suffic if it's a suffic if it goes into the gather of Is it a sufficon?" Very interesting. The in the on in the beginning of not not cotton yet just the beginning of the s the says the says to all the riser in says wait a second it's a and the emmesis that on this Then he brings no chorus. And then he says because and receive wearing shoes between it's embarrassing. You should be you should be since it's he says you should be that it's as we spoke it's a big says says it's and one should be that it's have a wonderful shabas.