MASECHES YOIMA: DEFINING THE URIM VETUMIM AND ITS PURPOSE

As we finish this week, I want to focus not on the last of the maka. We learned the eighth per already before kipper the end of the seventh peri and the garra speaks about the I want to focus a little bit on theim the says in parish was to put inside the to put in the also in par when when it actually happened. The says and he put in the What is the what exactly is the so right says when the says to put the inside so says that it's the shame that was stuck inside the had it hold because the had a flap in the back of It went up and in between in that flap was was stuck in the she the Ramban is my a bit more about it. The Raan says not like what the Evan Ezra says that the Vumim was somewhat of an artwork meaning to say it was part of the Mishkan included in making the Mishkon the caim the begodim included in that was also theim the Ramban goes on many rise to say that it can't be but the simple What the says is if it was part of making the mishk if you take a look in all the paras it doesn't say anywhere about making the it says to make the the it doesn't say anywhere to make theim the first time we hear about which is in par is speaking about after you made the beadim So the says put in the but whoever how do we know about who made the where's it coming from that the first time we hear about it it says put it into put it into the so the ramban says that the vumim was that was written by moenu that moher raenu knew directly from the what to write. What? Sheamus or says could be says o not could be which means just like the made the made learns like that for a that the was made by the and therefore there's no mention in the about making vatum. The urumatum was Sheamus. We'll soon see the mechanism how it was used. But first, what is the vatum? So says written and how adds on and says that it was made by the or by that got clear direction how to what to write how to make it one shame or mult >> oh very good was it one shame or multiple sh so it's a we'll get to it soon we'll get to it soon let's First understand vetumim what what was the function what happened with what did it do had it at work so the garra by us it's a gor also bit more of a kiter and then parav more goes through it they used to ask they used to ask a question and get a cha for an example in the beginning of after Yeshua was they didn't know who should go who should be the one going into me who should be the one going who should be the general who should go up. So they asked this question to the and the chuva came the chuva like the says the answer through the how how as we know it lit up the lit up. So Yehuda Ya lit up lit up. It lit up the co was and that's how it lit up. The wasim and we'll soon see tum in a minute. He was for the of and it lit up. Yehuda yala. Yehuda should be the one to go lit up. Now Yehuda, it's pretty clear. He was the she on the 12 stones had the the 12 names of the so Yehuda lit up. That's clear. But where's Yala? Where's Yala? So the terret is like he explains Yalud from Ley, the from Shim, and the lit from Ley. And where's the H? Where's the H? So there is a Him and the Yehuda but Yehuda already lit up. So where is there a so the garra that we t learn the garra says there was also the so the from so you have even though we see in the gor that it didn't say it didn't say the the shift is so where was there a so the ter is it lit up yehuda and And it's it stopped and then again the second word lit up and the hey from Yehuda but alapon the definition of means it lit up the answer lit up that's like what I said the letters on the lit up that's the that's how that's the pos the letters on the if you take a look at the over here in the and the it's pretty clear that what lit up was the letters the on the shoulder there were two stones on the right on the left half of the on one half half on the other half questions which I'll that was on the and the what lit up the urim was the letters on the stones of the on the shoulder of the kayen. That is clear that the shame was put into the That's clear. The Tory says to put to put the in what lit up what was what lit up. So that learns what was but that's the the was connected to the and therefore the says that you were only able to ask only by day because it was connected to the and just like you weren't able to ask only by day also These a discussion of Shila because Lisa if you take a look in the in the sheridal you look at the where they asked over there asked this was by night they asked Shil some want to say that it wasn't by night someone want to answer that it was a mat of so they may asked even by night but being that it's put Just like you couldn't ask him is that it lit up the lit up. However, if letters lit up like we found, it could be different letters. How do you know how to read how to read the letters? Yehuda, yala. Yehuda was pretty easy because the word yehuda lit up. But yala, if you have letters, like the ramban says, many different ways you could read it. How do you know yala? So the tum to make it whole to be clear and then the god was able to read what way he was able to read the word the letters to put it in the right way was a was a kind of aesh a lower da was a type ofish but to be able to read the letters in the right in the right way in the right format. Well, you asked before was it one shame or many shamus from the Ramban says the byim the god was and then by the says that the of the shame for and of the shame for which would seem clearly that it was one shame that had one part of it was for one part. Good. So that that is the fatim the explain this week's stuff. I want to continue on with a gor earlier in yuma that we learned a while ago. The Gomorrah says that there were five things that were missing in Bay and one of them one of them was there was no sois right away says of course when the Gomorrah says there was no it doesn't mean that there was no because if there was no there was no eight beg And you couldn't do that. You can't do that in the BD without eight. So if there was no wouldn't be able to do that. Of course there was an what the gmor means. There was no means that there wasn't a functioning. It didn't accomplish what usually did to light up the letters. It didn't answer. This is there was an however it didn't do what it was supposed to do to be this meaning to say before going anywhere understands that the is of the it's a of the big day and therefore says Tus of course there was the because if there was you don't have the you don't have eight The Rambam learns like that as well. Also the Rambam says saysam even that was in the B the second BD the Gmorra says it wasn't. Even the in the second it didn't it didn't function. It didn't answer didn't ask. We didn't ask why. So why did they why did they make the reason why they made the second is to have they ate them. So the Rambam learns like what we saw in Tyus the Rambam says there was however it didn't it didn't do what it was supposed to do to answer the says why to have eight in the Bdash meaning to say when the Gmorrah says it wasn't there there was but there was no that function mentioned. However, there are that argue rashi over there. We started Rashi says there wasn't the was the shame in they did not have the vum not like what we saw till now that we had the vet but it didn't work there was no vatum I I I think Rashi himself the ter of course there was the without but however the shame inside was not there the says the same thing also the says that there was no shame the pa was no the shame wasn't there derive on the raom the rivet is and the rivet says this that the Rambam says that he was because if not it's says the riv no there was no oh you're telling me but what we have over here very clearly if there was or not summary show the rivid learned that there was no you was the of the eight the argued the raam understands that part of the was and if there was no there was no beag in brings a to the ram that the vatum was part of the not something separate. Why? Because like what we mentioned briefly earlier of the Ramban, the Tory when giving the of the Tory makes no mention of the yes the Ramban says that it was made by it or could even be by but when listing the if you learn like the Rambam that theim is part of the okay so when the Tory is says to make the but say this but if the is something separate like the say there was no however it's not called why not because there were eight there was something besides the eight so why doesn't the tyra say that the one of the clay amigdos one of the or whatever it was. There was an maybe not but should be listed that there was something else also not just when it to put it in to say that there was that there was there however it didn't answer or was there is like even the Russian rash says the was not there is was the stuck in inside that's the say no but you had the shim that say yeah is because they hold it's part of the and if you didn't have it you're missing The cast of Mishna says that the is like this the in the if it wasn't by the what is the definition of the at that was the shame or like what the rabban says sham that was stuck inside zishna Yes, that that's the of the hold that there was no like Rashi says that shame no longer existed. It was there. We had it from that knew what to write how to write and that didn't exist in bay. However the say that there was a vatum zishna the raam learned you know what the vatum is the vatum is the stones in the the stones in the that's the you can't have a without the stones you're missing the The Rambam that says that there was vatum is because the Rambam defines vatum not like what we said before the sheis of course there needed to be I don't know if that argues on those she how the mechanism worked but alapon when the toyra says to put in the vumim to put the is the stones It's a It's a medish. The medish sword inside the medishim says the medishim is says that they had to have it. That's the also he explains to answer the he says the same that the say that it was there is because they learn it's donim that learned that there was no and the s wasn't the riashi that that the extra letters on the shift that the Gmorra of this week's DA says wasn't wasn't why the on that was in the however the add-on the shift to have more letters to be able to use the vatum to get the answers being like what the say that the is not maybe the letters are not if it wasn't written it's still cauter that say that the was it would be you have to write these letters even though it didn't function in you have to write it Just to conclude one more nikuda and mamit nimritz on the note of and on the raam that we just that we were busy with now the whole year the raam when the raam says that there was no raam says it didn't answer. She mentioned the whole was a concept of says we didn't ask we had we didn't ask we didn't get an answer the riot we we mentioned before the riots that there was no wasn't but the rivet has another question the rivet says what is the raam so to speak mixing in to this that there wasn't means that the didn't answer as the Rambam says because there was no because there was there was a lack of in the list of theor it's a separate item that there was no one of the things that were missing was so what does the Rambam say that there was no there wasn't But it it didn't function would seem from the because there is no derivish is a separate item on the list in the Gomorrah that was missing by besides no noim I'm going to say it misher you can look it up it's a risk goes through clearly with rayas and he says like this there are two separate parts in the vatum and it's two different times actually one is not having and one is not having and it brings different times but he says like this was a that like what the ra said to ask that was and And if there's no then you don't have that is something completely separate that theim answered which means even if the god was and he was able to askes if there was no or like says he was but it didn't function to didn't answer. So it's two separate things. What the says it's two separate things. There was the of the function that we didn't have and then there was a separate of it of the so two parts and even if there was a it brings in the beginning of there was still Ezra was aesh but there was still no so it's two separate things one was that they didn't have durum and one was that they didn't have now of course there was no in general but in the in the there was a that you needed was the but it was again to be clear it was that even if there was and they were able to askim they still didn't get an answer because there was no like what the Rambam says the didn't work so it's two separate that's why the Rambam says two things derive it says what are you mixing how what are you saying about that's a separate something separate on the list yeah it's something separate it did taco work together meaning to say is you needed to be that had but that wasn't what was missing in the was that even if you asked and you had everything didn't answer we should talk Have a wonderful Shabas.