Avodah Zorah 45

Today's d is and we will begin at the mishna on the top of so we're moving along in the topic of which is specifically the idea that is theor says that if somebody is from he gets malus twice he gets malus because he's over the and he gets malas because he's over the today's is going to discuss if somebody aid worships mountains hills trees what's the do you say that the mountains the hills and the trees are going to be treated like ordinary a des which is awesome or perhaps as we'll see in today's d it's going to be treated differently. The first thing that comes to mind of course is the we're all familiar with the concept of an aer was a specific type of tree but the point is trees that the pagans used to worship and the says twice once in again that had to be uprooted. Why did it have to be uprooted? Presumably because it was either way today's is going to be about that was worshiped. Does it have a as that or perhaps the pagans that used to worship mountains and hills the mountains and the hills of meaning even though they're ordinarily is but as we just said and are excluded. It's an exception to the rule. However, if there's something on the mountains, for example, if on the mountain there was an worship that just because it's on a mountain or on a hill doesn't mean that it's not going to be. So, the mountain and the hill itself, even though it itself was woripped, is going to be however is going to be. How do we know that? Because the Pik says and we learn from there that it's only that is going to be but themselves are going to be we'll see more about this in the bas says in the so this is one of the many tells you're going to enter you're going to see the seven nations that are living there that are pagans they worship you have to make sure that you lose their and the continues and says you should be their gods that are on mountains and that are on hills and that are underneath trees that the says not themselves voice. So it's only what's on it but not the thing itself. In other words, it seems like is just repeating what the Tanakama said, albeit from a different the quoting a that's the clearly has a it says that get rid of the that's on the but the and themselves are not going to be awesome. If that's the case, I'm going to ask you a good Why then is awesome? Why does the Torah say that a you have to get rid of if you're going to dash in the Pik that says You should make the same and say that but not the eight itself. So just like the and from being upon him as it relates to the that is say the same thing regarding and we know the says twice the says and we know for sure you have to say between mountains hills and a tree is a tree has to be planted. So there's human intervention as it relates to a but but mountains and hills there's no human intervention and as a result that's going to be the I'm going to explain a little bit better what's explains at the end of the day the says get rid of the that's on the mountains it's on the hills and it's underneath underneath the trees. Now on the mountains, on the hills as opposed to the mountains, but underneath the trees is not as opposed to the trees. Why not? Because we know the P says clearly that there's something called an a which is in and of itself a tree and the says it's something that you absolutely have to get rid of. If that's the case, then why did the say why didn't it say why does it say that's what was bothering saying I understand the he has a dick in the tells me that it's only on the mountains and the hills that are going to be but the mountains and the hills themselves even if they worship they're not going to be a b technically you should be able to make the same as it relates to because it says it's not going to be but you can make that why not because the terrorist says clearly is going to be what's clearly said very nice what's the one has human intervention the other one doesn't have but at the end of the day the is still a good why did the say the reason it says is because the was telling the where to find you're going to enter you're going to enteran you have to uproot I'm going to give you I'm going to give you a heads up. I'm going to give you a hint where you can find them. Look on top of the mountains. Look on top of the hills and look underneath the trees. Now, as it relates to the top of the mountains and the top of the hills, being that we don't have a PK that tells me that the mountains and the hills are user, so I'm going to take two things out of that. I'm going to say number one, that's a that's where you can find and I'm also going to I'm going to say that the mountains and the hills themselves are not. It's only what's on the mountains and the hills that are going to be. But as it relates to be that I have it before that say a so I can't to teach me that itself is the only thing I learned from it is not a but more in real time was telling the I want you to know look for the point is not a why the would say because at the end of the day forget These were be able to find either way the Mishna brings three. We have we have a we have we have and who both seem to say the same that even if they're worshiped it doesn't matter they don't become they're not treated like ordinary that's are going to be different is going to be and then we have a that explained a little bit better but as relates to the first two opinions in the Mishna they seem to be saying the same thing isn't it the You have to say that there's a subtlety that they were arguing about. Meaning everybody agrees that everybody agrees that's on top of so if there's marulis if there's if there's some up there it everybody agrees that it's going to be the sh was what if the mountain was worshiped and the mountain itself was coated with something. It was coated with gold. It was coated with silver. the of the mountain. Is it treated like the mountain so that it's or is it treated like something on top of the mountain so that it's going to be that what's coating the mountain is not like the mountain. Thus it's going to be that the covering of the mountain is like a mountain and as a result it's going to be says the everybody agrees that the is not part of the mountain. It's top of the mountain. If it's on top of the mountain, if whatever is on top of the mountain is if it was woripped, then it's that this even though it's technically coding the mountain is still going to be what then is the between they were arguing regarding an that was first planted and then afterwards was worshiped. Meaning when you think of an aer really could happen in two ways. It could be that it was planted with the intent for it to be worshiped. So you had a a tree, you stuck it in the ground and immediately it was worshiped or maybe it was even worshiped before you stuck it in the ground or it was planted. Somebody has nice landscaping, he has a backyard and one day he decides that he wants to worship this tree. Thus the ash tree and and it became a so when you talk about a it could be a sh first it was planted with innocent intentions and then later this person decided that he was going to be or you can have a a tree that was planted with the intention to worship says is regarding an where it was not is it going to be us or is it not going to be us meaning the says clearly is awesome. It's the exception to that. Okay. Le himself as so that's clearly the exception. The sh is are all ash is the exception or maybe an a that was planted with as an but if it was not of first it was planted with innocent intentions and only later was worshiped would it be holds then if it was planted first and then later they decided to worship it it's going to be holds that if it was planted and then afterwards it was worshiped it's going to be now what's the to So you could say the is that we're learning from that itself the mountains what grows naturally are going to be even if it was worship it's still not going to be and is similar to because when Hashem created the world when the voice were created they weren't created as a vazar they were created innocently some one came later he decided that he wants to worship it but it was So based on that maybe you'll argue that in Elon that's also not that's going to be that says that's where it was but if it was that's either way that's says yeah he believes in that so that it's possible to have an a that's going to be holds there's no such he says how do you know holds that meaning says you need a little bit of basis a little bit of precedence to say such aes didn't say anything. He seemed to repeat albeit a little bit more elaborately what the said so says I'll explain it and then he continued anytime there's any human intervention it's going to be anytime a t repeats himself he repeats himself for a reason right The Tana was usually right. But that's why when you learn Gamarra, there's so much ambiguity in how to understand. So if the Tana repeats itself, there's a reason for it. Said that why did you have to say twice? Because had he said it only once, I would have thought an only where it was planted. But if it was not of maybe over there it's going to be different. That's how I know says that holds that even if it was nothing else and that's now the truth is and this is segue for the next that in the that holds that is going to be you know what is because I'm going to explain a little bit better was bothered that And if holds like the really that and said what's the because it says and it says it's only what's on the mountains and what's on the is going to be but the mountains themselves and themselves are not going to be then how do you understand the next part of the it says what does sound like the eight itself is not going to be a it's only what's underneath the eight he was very bothered by that said you have to say what's you have to say that is just giving a where you can find but don't learn from there because it says in two places that are off limits so don't learn was bothered that what is the mean it sounds like it's coming the tree it's not true and a is going to be us now if you're going to tell me that there is an a tree that's what's the tree if it's not it's and is also teaching me that that there is an tree that's going to be it's only what's underneath the tree which the one that's not innocently it was only of from the way at least understood from the fact felt that he needed to explain that it's merely a it means he held in there's no such thing as an a tree that's ever going to be mut every a retreat is going to So what does it mean what's underneath the tree is the tree itself is and he had to say that it was merely a but if you would hold like that holds that is going to be then it's not because a tree which tree a tree that was not either way said that the hold of tree is going to be hold of It's going to be says I found another that also holds that and only is going to be says it would seem this was exactly Russia, right? I would think I would think make the same and say why did the coming to tell me what said the ran you should negotiation. Either way, what do you say? That last piece that we just spoke out from the fact was bothered in he had to say why do you say is the same? What's on the mountains and not the mountains? What's underneath the tree and not the tree? I thought the tree is the tree that's only if it was not. But maybe if it's not it's going to be. So we have another Tana that holds that even if it's going to be the bottom line is the explain holds that there's an tree that was right we know the 101 but not all aer only a but if it was the a tree and only later the tree was worshiped that's like voice even though it's not going to be about you don't have stating that and both are according to that hold that is what do they do with the that says that's not they agree there's something called an no one's arguing with the concept of a we're discing an that was not but everybody agrees no one in the world argues that there is a concept of an tree so the says okay so why hold that way as well know that when it says that it means all maybe it doesn't mean all maybe it means like understood only an a that was not soar says, "You're right. That would be true if there was only one, how then does he know this?" Because there's a second. It says so it says and then it says was the first but it says it twice that you have to get rid of the means burn the tree sounds like cut off the tree when you cut off the tree don't you don't have to destroy you have to consume it. You don't have to rip it out of the ground. Tadeon is a much finer term. It's a much more subtle lush. What it means is get rid of the part or a part. What do you mean a part? You either get rid of it or you don't get rid of it. Says we're talking about a tree that was and the only part the saying you have to get rid of is the part that grew after it was but the part that grew that before it was that in fact you don't have to get rid of. So it's true the that is not from I would just know the concept of and maybe it's an how then do I know if it was because it says sounds like you only have to get rid of part of the tree that makes sense if the tree wasn't it was first planted and then it grew and then it was nead and then it continued to grow. So it's that continued to grow that you would have to get rid of it. But the garra says sounds nice but it only would work if would quote the it's not the he quoted right? Didn't he bring the he didn't bring to? So it sounds like he just has a that says get rid of the make it tasty. Maybe then it's just talking about an how do you know it's talking about an says the way you have to read this had it not said I would have thought I would have this mean nice only part of it which part must be the part that grew later. So you see that even if it was not but that whole is only because I have an extra if I didn't have the extra I would have not so had it not said I would never mean it's not a that's only that I can use once I have the but I have so I have the extra what do I do with the extra So now the Gar flips it again. Who's the hold that that's talking about an but you have a second. You also have to what are you going to do with the second? What do with the second P? They said the second is coming to tell me even if it was not and where do you see it because sounds like just cut off the part that grew after it was never it sounds like it wasn't but don't agree with that what did they do says when he didn't enter there were a lot of things they had to do most notably they had to get rid of the they had to destroy every single member of the seven nations calledates. There's so many different that talk about this idea of they had to get rid of a lot of things when they entered. Did they do it? No. That's the beginning of par and I should say and had a lot of so all the everything happened because didn't fulfill this commandment to its fullest. But said that if you go through the there was a s of what the was supposed to do. The first thing they were supposed to do is they're supposed to get rid of chop down afterwards conquer and then was then they were supposed to destroy the so first knock down the des make it not usable you don't have to destroy it yet now go conquer seven years another seven years go back and destroy the des but either way is saying a he's claim that the destruction of Yor that the Yidden were commanded to do when they entered Israel happened in two phases. Phase was one was chop them down. Phase two was destroy it, get rid of it, obliterate it is explaining phase one, knock it down. And that's the lion just knock it down. Then later you want to know why this dup it's coming to be says the what's the said the says that talks about all different things you didn't had to do this first knock down the then Stop. Move on to the next thing. Knock down the stop. Stop. Sounds like forever. Says no. Not forever. Right. Oh, you have to burn. No. Meaning do this then do that. Eventually you're going to come back and you're going to get rid of it completely. But there was a sed that's what is that's what is in these he hadud know that with the as well first and after learned it from but needed the to teach me that how does he know that the way you're supposed to get rid of the aerus is don't burn them immediately but first chop them down and then only afterwards should you get rid of it says it says it sounds like lose it twice. Why twice? Because it happened in two faith used for something else was coming to teach me that you have to rip literally out of the ground. You have to uproot it. Whatever was find its source and rip it out completely. That's the shak when all it had is you know the means destroy it again even it's there should be no of it what did they do with it means give it a nickname shouldn't even refer to by its real name right the you shouldn't even call it by its real name how do you know that you have to uproot said I know from there that you're supposed to be uproot it what does that mean give it a nickname I would have thought give it a good nickname why would I think that you every has to have a little bit of what's the what would be the that you should give it a good name I would think maybe don't give it a good name but it doesn't have to be a bad You have to make what does that mean? If the used to refer to the Rashi says you should call it not everything but is a thorn. Bottom line is you're supposed to give it a bad name. So you have your is what we learn from as sh. Do we learn you should uproot it? Do we learn from they should give it a nickname either way. So going back to and regarding what to learn as it relates to that one will learn like in this one will learn like in this exhale. So just a few minutes on in so just one that actually is very much a har and it's also something that touches on raid that we've spoken a lot about over the last few months. So the first time in migillas that we're introduced to It was that gave a promotion. He made him the head of all the because of this position of importance that now had all the would bow down to because that's what the Melik said had to be done. All the with the exception of one said they came to and they told him, "Why are you listening to the king?" The king said that Hmon is a very important person. He's a he's someone that needs to be worshiped. You have to bow down to him. Why are you not bowing down to every day? He would tell them, what would he tell them? That he's aid. And because he's aid, he bows down to he doesn't bow down to anybody else. I'm not going to bow down to Paul says skipping around saw that wasn't bowing down to him and wasn't happy about it. So he decided that I'm going to take revenge, but not just from Hmon. I want to take revenge from Hmon's nation. And of course the rest is history. Hmon gets through a bribe to impose this of one day where the would have permission to take out all of what caused the of it's a there's no ambiguity. It's very very clear. Hmon was upset that who was one of the refused to be. But there was one person that refused to do it. Who was that? And when was asked why does he refuse to bow down? He said he said and I'm not going to bow down to you. when Hmon saw that and that's what decided that's what caused him to go about and get upset at now the truth is that at first glance was MK right for not bowing down to or was not right for bowing down to now as far as popularity goes the garra says after he refused to bow down to hmon became very unpopular to the point that the yidden would walk and they would taunt the says when we introduced for the first time. So it says that was and then the says so the refers to as being an also refers to as being an ishim. Now Yehudi is usually a term that's used to describe a Jew. We're Yehud. We Yhudis. But Yehudis is also from Yehuda. So was an ishudi. Was he from Yehuda or like the P concludes is he really ai? Was he really from? So the GRA says so. The Gmorra says the truth is that he had double. He had from he had and he had and the says what happened was such an important person he was so prominent he was one of the happened through and what happened was when would sit around in the so the people that were from Yehuda they would say no he's an isi and the people would sit around for they said no no no you don't take credit for it he's an ishimi meaning everybody wanted credit for why because of what a great person he was that's what however says he says not what was going on. It was really just the opposite. You know what was going on? They said and Ro goes on to explain but the point is that the weren't being they weren't saying look at my look who came from us we have as a member of our it was just the opposite the were walking around they were having tinus on Yehuda they were having ters of shiny for bearing a marai what mai do so terrible you know what marai did the mik because marai refused to bow down to harmon and because he refused to bow down to was but not rather and that caused the so they weren't saying well we WANT TO TAKE IT JUST NOBODY WANT HE belongs to your no no he belongs to your they didn't want credit they didn't want credit for him why because they felt that what Mar did was wrong and because they felt that what Mar did was wrong it was for that reason they had major ters on him why did you cause TO GET UPSET. LOOK AT ALL THE Torus we got from them. Were they right? So who was right over here? It sounds like every there's one person didn't bow down to that was Mai right for now or not. Now first night you're going to tell me that of course was right. This is 101. We're learning the is right now. You're not let worship. You can't bow down to something other than but we're going to go through the now just for a couple of minutes. I'm gonna say the says it's why would they bow down to he was says that's why refused to bow down. Rashi continues and Rashi says that when says I'm not bowing down the he's not allowed to bow down. So Marai of course was right says Rash for not bowing down to because made himself and because made himself not let it bow down they bow down but didn't because he's audi bow down to says the same thing says he calls him says a little differently than not that made himself into but rashi walked But but the Hummer walked around with it. Evanzra says, "I don't know if it was on his clothing or maybe it was on his butto and it's for that reason says to Evanzra that didn't bow down because it was asks a very obvious question. He says that why did Mai have to be in Hman's face? Why did he just make it this business to avoid him?" So he says he couldn't do it probably just practically speaking because Morai was a very important person in Akash's mouth as was Hmon and they they met they had no choice they they had a they they had a bump head it wasn't possible for to avoid hmon but in a perfect world says it's probably what he would have done but the bottom line is Rashi and they both explain that there's nothing to talk about hmon bowing down to him constituted and it's for that reason it's for that reason stating that I'm going to tell you something very interesting says we've gone through this together in the many times. What did he do to deserve the punishment of so starts with a terrible but what did the yidden do what did the do that caused this that ultimately you had this master to none other than says let me hear what you have to say they told him we think it's because they had from that's the narrative you start off makes a big suda the were there also and bad things went on the bottom line is because they had from we think that's why it happened told if that's the case why was that should have therefore caused that there would have been the other living in this was every single year it didn't matter where he was here so why don't you tell us you know It's because they bow down to the if that's the case if this was then how do we even creep out of it said looked deep into the hearts of Israel and he saw that despite the fact that they bowed down to the but it didn't come from a deep place it was just something they did superficially so too the was a superficial and that's how the were able to creep out of it so the great said you want to know why the purim happened it Now I think before we look in if you ask the man on the street what did mean he would say what do you mean that's isn't that the story it was only but it sounds like everybody else was really bowing down the but if you take a look at Rashi doesn't say that says it's not referring to the times of the poor story this goes back decades It's it was being made of and the context was made a big telling and all the year and everybody bowed down except for three people say it was Daniel must have been away somewhere no way bowed down but were the three people that didn't bow down to the you know what we're referring to when said that's what caused it was the fact that they bowed down to the obvious question why did have to Why did Rashi have to send me flying? talking about in the story and it sounds like says only it means any person probably not just every single person bowed down to if every person bowed down to with the exception of so why do you have to come on to the story of the why don't we just say that it's talking about this says the it wasn't that way because was never there was no element of by down to him. It was just an Indian of you let it bow down to a person for bows down to the you have bows down to you let it bow down to somebody for it's just discusses if somebody's wearing a you bow down to him it's a discussion two days but the point you let it bow down to a person that's actually not it sounds like it should be but it's not as long as it's for some other reason it's okay says the that's what's going on over here what's going on over here with the pur story then I'll bow out because he's read the story. It says and then bow down to back in the day that was that was something that you did for cover. So it was something you did for cover that's was going It wasn't about that can't be the reason. It must be it was it we've spoken out many times in the recently who said that even wasn't really this one of says had they tortured then they would have worshiped WOULD HAVE WORSHIPED HOW is it possible they would have done what's the ter says famously it wasn't real says They're both not real. And by the way, by the way, in the new so in the old don't have this. I don't know where this came from BUT THE NEW SAY THAT THERE'S a rash in Esther that says before that was of how you going to answer that bottom line says you have to say that the reason felt that happened not because of the of but rather the is because otherwise as the same kasha the thought that maybe the said maybe the reason the happened was because they had an off from the what was the response that only in tran why did go beyond if the story was that there were being punished for bowing down to a that was living on the other side of the world wasn't bowing down to it wasn't possible it couldn't have been that says that's probably why but bottom line is the seems to be over here exactly whether or not the wasn't so you learn Esther you learn the it's both say that the reason refused to bow down to 101. THAT'S WHAT THAT SAY GRAPPLES WITH IT a little bit. Seems to be a little bit unsure. But the truth is there's another that you have to run to. You have to make a beline to this when you go through this and that is the discussing if someone's told you this would be related to the what does it mean not out of love or fear of he couldn't care about the however it's doing it for social pressures. He's doing it because there's somebody that he loves that wants him to worship the des I'm going to make him happy. I'm going to worship or he's afraid of somebody and that's why he's worshiping. But so this person was but he didn't do it because he has any feelings. He's not he doesn't believe in that but do he's doing it of a person is that says yeah the end of the day you worship if not not says says it's NOTHING THIS IS GARNISHED is not physically bowing down means you have to. And if you're if you're not it's not what's my how do I know that we learned all going to come together says bow down to the celestial beings mentioned the You're allowed to bow down to a person. So it's a you're allowed to bow down to a person. It's this price. You could bow down not to a you could bow down to a person. I would have thought I would have thought that when you say you're allowed to bow down to a person even a person that people worship such as that's the extra you could bow down to a person but sometimes you can't. When is that? If he's a never like nobody really cared about who cared about nobody liked him. Nobody cared for him. So the bow people bowed down to it wasn't because anybody actually took this guy seriously. And still what does the B say that you're not allowed to worship even though it wasn't a real no one ever was and still you see you see from here you see what's going to say when the price says it means someone wasn't never took them seriously. So when we say we don't mean that when the worship they were they weren't because they were and if someone it's not really what do we mean we're just giving an example in history where there was a person who thought he himself was but as it relates to when they bowed down to I hope that is for that reason it's for that reason is that you're going to be potter comes out even if like the gar says over here in like both say in Esther but still whether or not the had a right to bow down to or did not have a right to bow down to it's not just any from the no less holds which means that according to when the yidden bowed down to Hmon they were being a because Hmon took himself as an according to the here on Esther and even though they were according to however that holds that despite the fact that took himself seriously he was also but it doesn't matter still it's for that reason they puppet. If that's the case, let's flip it now from perspective. According to even though he was so was right because he said I don't bow down to you. I don't care if it's still you're going to see according to however was wrong because according to it wasn't. So to the extent it wasn't there's no who said in your days EVERYBODY WAS POINTING FINGERS COMES from you comes from you it was I think it's half the came with what are you doing why are you risking OUR LIVES WHY ARE YOU risking all of CLR? You don't want to bow down. We hold. THIS IS from the moon. It doesn't matter. You're watch what are you doing? Why are you not bowing down to he comes with this on him that why are you doing this to us? So what's you know who asks the what's that according to why did not just bow down it's a according to very simple aeline straightforward question doesn't ask the cash with all the drama but it's a very simple question why did not bow down to at the end of the day it So says two says in the second you want to know because he held it there was he wanted to be that he wanted to be it's for that reason that he did it but I think when you read the reason is because we know there's only three that are that is not. So that means that for that bow down to would not have been any one of the affformentioned it would not have been because it was it wouldn't have been and it wouldn't have been either. So why then is there was a so being that it was a you're going to tell me that's the reason the problem is this wasn't even an what was he doing? This is a what was he doing? Rashi says so if Rashi says that it's not even a if it's not even anal it's not a you can't just go ahead and and give your life UP IT'S NOT EVEN so it's not what's the but I think the is very very possible I think the is based on the init that we always speak out and that is theor says that a person's obligated to give himself up stating that many say it's only It's not from you never give up your life even in you don't give up your life there's so many that are not mash that way you're going to tell me that in it could be the worst of times the darkest of days but still for a mitzvah I say you're never allowed to be moes how do you understand was teaching and when he came to kiss gave didn't care. He continued to teach until eventually he was killed. He was tortured to death. He was killed. What gave him a right to do it? He gave his life up. You know, let's just give life up. Your life is pressed. Hem gives you life. You have to you have to appreciate it and you have to guard it. You have to protect it. You don't have the right to give it up. Elm you going to tell me it was a what was he doing? He's teaching. teaching didn't have a right to give up his life did the same thing in a time of a Roman decree and papa tells him what do you mean how do you have a right to do it it was wrong open to you have no right to be teaching you have an obligation to learn maybe hatedly but when you're risking your life that's something you don't have a right to do risk his life. He gave up his life. They mutilated him. 300 spears pierced his body like a Gomorrah says. Why? To give it's very nice. We should have It's very good for Bezdon to be able to operate in its perfect utopian form. But we can get by without we have for the last 2,000 years. Why would gave him a right to do it? And it's a who gave him a to do it and say an unbelievable says the I quote say this you find such as and there are others what they did was the reason was they saw that the generation needed did it. And they were they had the places take it upon themselves to do something that you're really not allowed to do simply because they felt and he knew that if you looked it up in if he went that he convened the best they would have passed you're not allowed to teach. And that's what told him he told him You have no right to teach but is one of the 10 martyrs. He's one of he was at he was from the and he realized this was something that the generation needed the same thing knew the but at the same time he understood that this was something the needed and that's why this was something he was going to do and the same thing the same thing knew he knew we passed like he knew that and based on that you have no business not bowing down to Hmon. Bow down to Hmon or maybe like Deon Ezra says, at least avoid Hmon. Why are you antagonizing him? Why are you in his face? Mai went out of his way to be in Hmon's face. Mai was doing something that he knew he needed to do. He was giving his life up. How do you have a right to give up your life? It's not one of the it's not even something you have a right to do. So it's not something you have a right to do. Yehudi took the pulse of at the time and he realized what was going on. They were no one says they even did any over there. No one says I mean they go and read the but it doesn't matter. They were and they were also on wasn't the end of the world but felt something going on. He felt that was starting to slip away and he felt that he needed to go ahead and he needed to make a public statement to protect the integrity of Israel and invokes the power that he has this veto power as being from the as being from the and he went and he bowed down despite the fact that he was risking his life despite the fact that he was risking the life of makes this very very difficult very very very difficult decision a very unpopular decision that's the says the were pointing fingers even at the end of the migill he's only right he still they never regain full popular never came to 100% approval rating did because did something that didn't understand and they were right for not understanding it because if you open up the it says clearly that was wrong but was using the fifth it's a fifth Not everybody has a license to use. Only and only they have a right to use this exercise and the whole Yeshua the whole happened. I was thinking that you know the go says that the said that Esther is in the word asterite it's in the word of hon that the li the li of understanding golos understanding how is supposed to conduct himself in g understanding the concept of a in a world of honus that's migster and maybe maybe Just like brought to Yeshua, the Yeshua of Porim came about, it came about through this, it came about through going and doing something that he felt in his gut was right despite the fact that despite the fact it says that he's wrong. Maybe that was the precedence that eventually gave to that he felt that if that's the way you're supposed to conduct yourself in g that was the did it did it and other throughout the did it what's exhibit a for this maybe it's none other than the purm