0:00 / 0:00
Ancient Manuscripts Proved This Torah Giant Right - Rabbi Shlomo Horwitz
44 views
How could a Torah scholar determine that a word printed in the Rambam for generations was apparently incorrect—without having the ancient manuscripts in front of him? Follow us: https://www.hidabroot.com https://www.youtube.com/@Hidabrootcom https://www.instagram.com/hidabroot_global https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VbCYZjl1CYoa4ulQIK2q Rabbi Shlomo Horwitz is the founding director of Jewish Crossroads, an educational theatre project. His book, Snapshots of the Divine (Adir Press) is available at fine Judaica stores and on Feldheim’s website. #Rambam #RavYaakovKamenetsky #Torah #JewishWisdom
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
[music]
You wouldn't believe what I learned
about paras.
At the end [music] of the para, the
Torah gives us the mitzvah of it says,
"You shall rejoice [music] on your
festival." Then the Torah says, "Who's
included in that?
You, your son, your daughter, your
servant, [music] your maidervant.
who's missing.
Doesn't say [music] anything about
grandchildren and it doesn't say your
wife. But listen to [music] how the
Rambam codifies this mitzvah. It's into
[music]
and he says a person has to be happy
of good hearty
who [music] is
he, his children,
his [music] wife and his grandchildren.
Grandchildren. Where did the Rambam get
that from? The Torah never mentions
grandchildren.
This question troubled my father's
beloved Rebi, Rabbi Yakov Kamki [music]
Zatal. He said the Torah never mentions
grandchildren. He theorized that maybe
the Rambam is referring to the
unfortunate case where a grandfather
had a son who had his own kids and then
the son passes away and now the
grandfather has [music] to be Mame Benov
his grandchildren. But Ravakov said
that's not the Rambam style. He does not
codify halaka based on an unusual case
where the gammorra and [music] the Torah
don't mention it. So Ravakov takes a
bold step. He said this Rambam as
formulated
simply cannot be correct. The Rambam
never wrote Vanov. He theorized. Rather
it must be [music] a mistake. Raviakov
suggests that the original text must
have been not [music] van his
grandchildren but u veso the members of
his household [music] which fits the
puss perfectly because after children it
says servants and others who are
dependent on him that must be beneso
[music]
his household
and ravyakov says the printer must have
made a [music] mistake and changed
beneso to vanet vanav
It's an [music] astonishing piece of
intuition
and Rabyakov is going against centuries
of published [music] Rambams that say
squarely
vanov.
But listen to what happened [music] in
more recent years. Ravsi Franco
published his monumental edition of the
Rambam comparing manuscripts [music]
from around the world. Oxford, St.
Petersburg, Moscow, who knows where. The
final most authoritative [music] text
reads exactly as Ravakov had proposed
neso his household. Rabyakov [music]
relying solely on his deep understanding
of the Rambam [music] style and the
logic of the halos that he brings had
independently
arrived at the correct text. His
grandson, Rabbi Nustat, later showed him
the frankle edition of the Rambam. And
Ravakov was overjoyed to see that the
authoritative version of the Ramba
matched [music] exactly what he had
reasoned out on his own. This should be
his for Sarah Shifra Esther Yehudas for
Rafuas.