Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
They Asked WHAT?! Mental Health and it’s Real Life Implications on Psak Halacha
666 views
They Asked WHAT?! Mental Health and it’s Real Life Implications on Psak Halacha Moderated by: Rabbi Shay Schachter. Guests: Rabbi Larry Rothwachs, Rabbi Daniel Feldman and Rabbi Aryeh Lebowitz
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
foreign
[Music]
so it's a pleasure for all of us to be a
part of the third annual unite to heal
Campaign which is in support of the
incredible work and the important work
of amudib my name is Shai shefter I'm
one of the Rob Dunham at the Young
Israel of Woodmere and I was asked to
come join a panel of other rabbanim to
talk about not only the amazing work of
ahmudin which I venture to say all of us
and so many of our colleagues all over
the country have made use of when we
have situations in our communities that
arise which clearly are out of our depth
and beyond our league but things that we
need to pass on to professionals and to
organizations that really strive at uh
at helping the community members who
need their help and as we know ahmuda is
something that helps not only with many
mental health crises and many issues but
obviously those who are struggling with
all kinds of addictions and most
prominently those who unfortunately go
through a traumatic experience of abuse
in so many different ways and we have
all turned to our mudim at many
different times in our lives and in our
careers to uh to try to get some
assistance to get perspective and to try
to help people as much as we can so it's
really a pleasure for all of us to be
here I want to just introduce the
panelists who are going to be sharing
with us what I believe is a very
powerful conversation and as we know
whenever we have shyla's whenever we
have questions that arise in our
communities as individuals and certainly
as
so we have to do our best to try to look
at all the Angles and evaluate all the
different sides and try to understand
what's really beneath the question and
is there something that's beyond what's
being presented that we maybe need to
consider or need to think about
and this is something that is part of
the incredible challenge that we Face
especially in light of the mental health
issues that sometimes need to be
considered
and it's something that our uh that that
all of our colleagues try our best to be
sensitive toward and to be understanding
about and um what we're going to talk
about today is different kinds of
questions that have come up in our
communities where we have opportunities
to think not only about the strict
letter of the law not only about the
halafah itself but to think beyond that
to try to consider a number of other
factors that may be presenting
themselves in the questioner who is
presenting so uh with us today on the
panel and we thank um all of the
rabbanim for making time in their busy
schedules to be a part of this and to be
a part of helping to support our mudim
and their very very Noble and special
work so the first panelists that we have
is Rabbi Larry rothwax who is a rather
than Congregation Beth Aaron in New
Jersey and Teaneck and he's also the
director of professional rabbinics at
REITs which is so much an integral part
of teaching young about these very
issues and trying to make sure that they
understand that not only is learning
important not only is Mastery of
information important but
professional rabbinics is also important
and to have to have a perspective of how
to deal with somebody who comes to talk
to a young Muslim with a question our
second panelist is Rabbi Danielle
Feldman who is a rather also in Teaneck
in congregation or Sadia and also serves
as a rosh hashiva REITs but is very very
well known for his sparim that have
become very popular over the many years
that they've been published on a range
and array of topics both in English as
well as in Hebrew focusing very often on
issues of
and he has written so extensively on so
many of the things we're going to talk
about today and I encourage all of you
to try and find some of his articles and
some of his writings online to educate
yourselves a little bit more about the
very incredible perspective that he
shares on so many issues that we're
going to talk about and finally how they
are elibowitz who's the rava based
Festus in North Woodmere also a mahabres
farm a popular series called hakone
olama which also deals with very much is
and dealing with human complexities and
the shilohs that come up in communities
but is also the director of Smith
Outreach and uh has such a perspective
from the many many talmudim that he has
helped to guide in uh their paths and
their Journeys in the robotics so we're
going to jump right into this and maybe
just the format that we're going to have
is uh each of the rabbana will share
some
stories some anecdotes some questions
that have come up and and we should all
feel comfortable to comment on each
other and to fill in whenever there's an
appropriate need to do so so maybe we'll
begin with Rabbi rothwax who can uh
share a scenario with us and give us
somewhat of a perspective
okay thank you very much for receptor
and it's a it's a great personal honor
to have the opportunity to participate
in this important conversation uh my
personal goal is to try to stay as much
as I can just out of the way so we can
learn from our Felder believe which if
I've been successful with the help of
Hashem and in any way whatsoever it's uh
some people have entrusted me uh with
you know some very delicate questions
and dilemmas that they have they have
faced and I've had the opportunity over
the years to you know to try to assist
people from wherever they were and
trying to offer them personal guidance
and whenever appropriate halacha
guidance as well I think that all of us
today have a little bit of a dilemma
because we want to be able to really
share with the community uh some of
what's going on out there because I
think there's great benefit and there's
something very validating for each and
every one of us to know that some of the
real struggles that we maybe experience
personally within our family within our
inner circles are shared by many many
people that the community at the same
time I think we want to all make sure
that we are being respectful and mindful
of people's privacy and most importantly
make sure that individuals feel that
they can ask ashyla to a REV and and not
and not be concerned that it is going to
be uh you know shared with the public so
I think that all of us are committed to
uh to giving uh to trying to share you
know shy was by preserving their
integrity uh but at the same time you
know doing so in a way that no way
whatsoever would would uh disclose the
the identity of any particular of the
the questions so I'm going to start off
with a fascinating Shiloh that was
um shared with me years ago
um I imagine that some of the questions
we're going to deal with today uh may be
rather intense and we're going to deal
with I'm sure some very very serious
shyles this is a very intriguing
question uh not one that involves
but one that I think for myself
personally uh was was sort of like a gay
Gateway in terms of my own thinking and
appreciation of how how complex some
mental health issues are particularly as
they intersect with with halacha a
number of years ago I was involved in a
situation with as a young man who had
become Bar Mitzvah within the past year
and it was so long ago and I was not
actually at the time sophisticated
enough to be able to really comment much
in terms of what was going on for men
mental health perspective but in
retrospect I think that this was an
individual who probably had uh you know
somewhat of an obsessive personality
combined with what at the time was maybe
some sort of confused or maybe you know
complicated ideological perspectives on
on animals and our relationship with
animals and and the
the the Divergence of those two led to
the following situation and that is that
uh he did not
feel comfortable having to do anything I
can do with leather he wouldn't wear
leather shoes he wouldn't wear leather
belts he wouldn't wear like the yamagas
if I remember correctly he wouldn't even
want to sit on a leather seat it was
really extreme we're not talking about
somebody who just uh you know was a
vegetarian or was choosing you know not
to eat uh you know byproducts of animals
this is really extreme the people became
a bar mitzvah obviously became an issue
with him when he was putting on filling
he was encouraged at the time uh to try
his best and even though he didn't
particularly enjoy it and he found it to
be uncomfortable for him to push his way
through but over the course of several
months this became a real struggle for
him to the point where what he described
and certainly what he displayed was a
tremendous amount of personal anguish
wearing filming it was painful for me it
literally brought tears to his eyes
and you didn't get the impression that
this was an individual who was looking
to be difficult he was not rebellious
per se he wasn't uh as far as as far as
you can tell in every area he was he was
committed to living a life of ter
mitzvos but this particular Mitzvah
obviously a very important one uh
presented him with uh with the
extraordinary challenge
so
I will now open the floor and allow
Rabbi Lee was whenever Feldman who you
know we're not there at the time uh um
to share any thoughts that they may have
in terms of uh and again and again I I
think that we want to try to keep this
conversation focused on two things at
the same time you know what are some of
the halachic issues and what's an
approach that maybe we would take but at
the same time to realize and to
appreciate you know the the real the
human struggle here and to understand
you know how complicated and and not
necessarily intuitive you know some of
the real struggles mental health
struggles that people encounter well
I'll speak first just to frame the
question further so then I can shift
over by liberowitz but before even
addressing the specifics although it's
very relevant to trying to understand
exactly from what direction to come just
to clarify this is an issue that can
come from a mental health perspective
but can also come from ashita it can
also come from someone's attitude
towards say veganism and animal rights
and I've heard the question in that
context also so if the question is being
asked by someone who feels
philosophically that he has no right to
use leather in any form and therefore
that extends to not even wearing fill in
that would require one kind of level of
understanding and approach while it
sounds like from what you're describing
that it's not necessarily coming from an
intellectual or philosophical place but
rather it's more of an emotional
reaction that's not the kind that can be
addressed from that type of perspective
is that an accurate frame yeah that is
correct that was very much my impression
at the time and I think in that regard I
think it is what makes it somewhat
unusual I think we would more naturally
expect that it would be more Vegeta but
in this case I think it was actually was
an underlying pathology and even though
I'm not going to try to you know offer a
clinical diagnosis at the moment I think
it's it's clear to say that Wade was
presenting was that this this was a real
real struggle for this individual and
not something that he just needed to you
know try to adjust his thinking in terms
of you know his world views of
philosophies yeah when it comes from
that perspective that if one feels uh an
enormous discomfort that they are not
able to overcome so then it probably
enters into some of the literature that
we know in this group that uh ravasha
Weiss has discussed extensively for
example to parallel the question of
dalekosos where it comes up that
sometimes there are impediments to
someone being able to perform a Mitzvah
that are not necessarily
life-threatening but it creates some
kind of a debilitating condition whether
it's physical or mental and being that
we know that they can be of equal
difficulty whether they are physical or
mental so without coming to a conclusion
on this point but there is a literature
about that that we don't necessarily
assume that even when dealing with a
positive mitzvos that we have only a
dispensation when it's in the category
of life or death but sometimes when
something is really incapacitating so
then that opens up another Avenue where
that Avenue will go again it's not
something we can conclude so easily but
in some contexts it's brought from a
cavachometer from monetary expenditure
that we know that's filling as important
as it is yet it's still subject to a
limitation when it comes to expenditure
of one-fifth of your money it's in the
category of hamesh so a incapacitation
that is so absolute even it's going to
be subject to how exactly you assess it
theoretically would bring up some of
that literature
I would I would suggest uh along the
lines of what rafeldman was saying that
we know when it comes to avoiding
violating a low sassay a lot of process
give up all of their money but when it
comes to fulfilling a Mitzvahs to say so
it's only
up until 20 of your money if I'm not
mistaken in the juva relating to a uh an
almana covering her hair
um uh after uh she's no longer married
but she's in shudukum now and uh
technically strictly speaking she's
supposed to still cover her hair I think
in that context of Moshe writes that if
it's so traumatic for her or it's
something that's so difficult for her
that she would sooner give up 20 of her
money rather than do this Mitzvah that
uh that then that that would be beyond
what the daughter expects of her in in
that Mitzvah now that's not just that
that's in that specific circumstance
we're covering the hair remotion
suggests is only perhaps a mitzvah's
assay rather than for a married woman
where it's a low SASE so no one should
extrapolate about hair covering in
general but when it comes to mitzvah's
assay we typically assume that if it's
the type of trauma that you would sooner
give up 20 of your money uh then to uh
to have to fulfill the Mitzvah that it
could be that uh one is exempt from
fulfilling the mid side there are a
couple of other factors though that have
to be taken into account first of all
um it's not so clear that if it's not
just a one-time Mitzvah but it's a
constant where every moment you're
getting a new Mitzvah that we would have
that same measuring stick of 20 percent
I mean for example when it comes to the
midst of mezuzah where every second
there's a nuclear Mitzvah it could be
you have to spend way more than 20
percent of your money on mezuzah when it
comes to wearing till and also each
moment that a person is wearing fill in
is a new a Mitzvah it's not just
it's not the same to put on fill in for
30 seconds as it is to put on tone for
45 minutes
um it's not like uh love or something
like that although
discussions three missions and given
that as an example but it's not a uh
necessarily a one-time Mitzvah and uh
the longer you know some of the posts
can recommend I heard Morena of chapter
Salita
um suggests for someone who missed
putting on still in one day where you're
telling twice as long tomorrow meaning
uh even though each and every day there
is a fee of the balance fill in but each
every moment there's a Kia Mitzvah of
its villain on the flip side one always
has to be mindful of long-term goals and
short-term uh gains meaning if uh
pressuring a person to do a Mitzvah is
going to create such a traumatic
experience that forever there will be a
negative association with this Mitzvah
and then once the person gets to a
healthier place there's still no it's
going to be a trigger that mitz was
going to become a trigger for them so
then it could be that we're really
shooting ourselves in the foot by uh by
putting too much pressure to do to do
the midst not obviously as both Ruby
rothback said everybody Feldman pointed
out this is really a case-by-case basis
where a person has to really really
assess the situation what the long-term
impact is going to be what the
short-term impact is going to be what
the attitude of the person actually is
and obviously in consultation with a
mental health professional who's
familiar with the case not just the
mental health professional in general
which by the way I don't know if it was
mentioned probably rothwax is a mental
health professional in addition to his
uh rabbinic duties but a mental health
professional who is I was familiar with
the case I think it's worth mentioning
also once we're talking about us that
sometimes community members who hear
about such a question don't really fully
appreciate the struggle that the
individual is having
and don't really understand what the
question is I remember for example there
was a woman who had posed the question
as I believe with mentioned before
um so he spoke about the variation that
ramosa has about an Albano who's now in
shidil him and covering her hair but
there were a number of situations where
women came to discuss a question about
covering their hair they are married and
they just said that they have terrible
migraines terrible headaches every time
that they have anything on top of their
heads now that's a question which
obviously again needs to be a very Case
by case and not to extrapolate from but
I remember mentioning it to someone else
in the community and he said come on
just just do it what could it actually
do you put something on your head like
is it really bothering her how much
going to bother her ready she should
just do it and I think there needs to be
an effort to try to educate people that
they need to be mindful of the fact that
yes there are some people who have
conditions or who have situations that
maybe you don't experience and maybe you
don't fully understand but it doesn't
just mean that you know it doesn't just
mean that they have to suffer and that
they need to uh and that they need to
ignore or suppress that struggle it's
something that needs to be spoken about
and dealt with and obviously these
questions are dealt with and sometimes
the answer is yes you need to suffer and
you need to struggle and that's what it
is but very often that is not the case
and there is a discussion and how that
could be had I I was just wondering from
the other up on him I've had several
shaylas that relate to what's called
exposure therapy and what the limits are
and and maybe they had similar shyles
and how to navigate
um you know the this kind of uh
situation I'll just give two examples
two quick examples exposure therapy from
what I understand in our growth of
access can certainly correct me if I'm
wrong is the idea that if a person
um has whether it be an OCD or an
anxiety that relates to a particular
area a particular topic where they have
extreme attitudes or um
extreme thoughts that you sort of expose
them like if a person is terrified of
cats and can't walk on a block that has
cats on the on on the block or that they
once saw a cat on the Block that they're
uh that they then slowly slowly uh you
expose them a little bit more to uh to
the uh the source of their trauma and
they they grow accustomed to them they
get used to it so I had two cases one
where a guy was struggling with OCD and
anxiety and uh he had these very extreme
thoughts that he thought that any time
he thought negatively of somebody it
constituted a tefila that the person
should suffer and he believed that his
thoughts were actually making people
suffer because he was davening that they
should suffer and this was a result of
something that happened in childhood
that he had wished ill on somebody and
the person really suffered uh pretty
terribly shortly thereafter and the
therapy uh the way this therapist had
recommended was to say out loud that he
wants something negative to happen to
somebody and I don't know that you're
allowed to do that uh meaning uh
generally speaking it's not nice to say
you know to curse a person to say that
you want something bad to happen to uh
to somebody else another situation was a
person who had you know uh who had OCD
relating to
um to religious behavior of people
around it that he just couldn't uh he
couldn't handle when anyone spoke any
avocado or any nival pair anything of
that nature and and what the therapist
recommended was that he either say or
hear uh nibble bad words and uh through
by being exposed to them and not
reacting to them that it would be that
would be helpful to him to function like
a more normal person in his day-to-day
life and you know each case is different
but I just wonder if you've ever had
either questions about that or
um you know have any insight onto the
effectiveness of such such treatment and
what the limits of exposure therapy
might be as far as that first point
about somebody who feels that what he
says is harmful to people
so we know there is a concept of a koala
and we know that there's an Issa in the
Torah of cursing people although it was
somewhat of a debate as to whether it's
because we connect that to any real
world effect the rambam didn't think
there was any real world effect but he
did certainly believe there was still a
Prohibition nonetheless and in his view
footner has an essay about this that it
probably connects to the broader goal of
the have
and not subtracting from how people are
felt and experienced and the love that's
supposed to be directed towards them but
also especially what you're referring to
that somebody feels that they want
somebody to suffer so by definition that
certainly seems to fly in the face of
the absolute if you love anyone else as
yourself you're not going to want them
to suffer but what's particularly
striking about this is that the one
who's struggling with this is struggling
so much because he doesn't want it to
happen because deep down the the yid
inside it very much doesn't want there
to be any real world effect and doesn't
want the person to suffer so I think
that might be an opening point to
consider as far as the paths that he
needs to take in order to get to that
result now but it's very difficult in
this case is to understand exactly why
speaking it out loud is going to be
helpful to him I just can only speculate
as a Layman that perhaps being
confronted more absolutely with the
reality of it is a step towards then
actually dismantling it as opposed to a
thought which remains somewhat
unaddressed I don't know if that's the
the nature of it but overall certainly
we have a great discomfort with saying
that anyone else should suffer whether
it actually constitutes a color whether
it's a more broader kind of objection
but the fact that this individual is so
troubled specifically because of that
because in real life that's the last
thing he wants to actually happen and to
whatever extent this may help to
mitigate that and to bring him to a
place where he's not even having these
thoughts in the first place so the
worthiness of that goal is something to
hold on to how much you can accomplish
for that it's probably more in the hands
of the Professionals in this area
it struck me as a little risky also
meaning he's going to say something out
loud that he wants something negative to
happen to somebody and what if it
happens you know then it's going to send
him back I would imagine it seems right
so the nature of that I think this would
also be a case where for the rabbi to
speak directly to the therapist if
possible and to understand that how this
is supposed to help and how it's
supposed to operate and I think we've
all had the experience that there are
therapists who are more connected to our
value system and less connected to our
value system but also some who speak
more generally and more specifically so
it's one thing to say I'm scared of
something so to confront it more
directly is going to help me eventually
become less scared it's probably another
thing to say that one should be
encouraged to say horrible things
because they have an aversion to these
horrible things they should have an
aversion for those horrible things and
what exactly is the nature of that
aversion and where do we draw the line
between the appropriate aversion and an
incapacitating aversion yeah I agree 100
especially because the um in these types
of situations talking about exposure
therapy for anxieties for phobias there
is a fair degree of flexibility that the
therapist has this is not is it's not
regulated by you know you know when it
comes to medication for example well
there may be different types of
medications to address certain
illnesses generally speaking you know
the the pharmacology is what it is I
mean there's there's not all that much
flexibility when it comes to designing a
protocol to help somebody experience
less anxiety and to face some of their
fears and challenges there can be a lot
of flexibility and I think more often
than as every felon said has a lot more
is accomplished when the Rev can
interact directly with the therapist and
and sometimes there's not even a
conflict of values as much as the
therapist didn't necessarily understand
and appreciate that you know that there
was some there was some tension there I
remember years ago there was a young
woman in the community who was going
through a very difficult time in her
life and she spent a lot of time
horseback riding and she was spending
almost every day of the week and she
could reached a point where she wanted
to go horseback riding on Shabbos as
well and
she she asked me if this was something
that she could do she had been in a very
compromised state for a long period of
time and this was you know she had
reached the point in her recovery where
you know this was giving her a
tremendous amount of in many ways
so there's a particular rub a post that
he would have been very involved in
helping and guiding this family through
many of the challenges that they face
so I went to him and I asked him if it
would be permissible for her to go on
Shabbos and he didn't need a lot of
background because he was already
familiar with the case and he said 100
percent
100 and it's just a matter of the
details how is she going to get there
and we have to work that out but in no
way whatsoever should we stand in our
way if this is what she needs and it'll
continue to give her the
um
the therapist heard about this and the
therapist to my knowledge of America was
not was not Jewish and certainly not not
an observant you said absolutely not
she may not go on jobs there's nothing
to discuss here because from the third
therapist for a second this wasn't this
wasn't necessary this girl needed to
experience a little discomfort of
sitting around one day of the week and
not being able to do what it was that
brought her you know tremendous relief
for me personally that was a that was a
fascinating moment where I saw a clash
of Two Worlds but it was completely
flipped in the way we would naturally
expect and bringing rabbis and
therapists together can teach us a lot
not only about halacha but but about
mental health and don't assume that the
rabbi is always going to be the Malcolm
and the therapist is always going to be
pushing this way sometimes you know
everybody just needs to speak to each
other and there can be a lot of a lot of
benefit uh on all sides just for the
record that case of the obsessive
thoughts it was the therapist that asked
the question it was a from therapist it
was a rabbi also but asking the question
whether he can recommend that as a uh as
a course of treatment I don't know if
this was the truth that was referenced
earlier but in the I think the second
volume of ravashi Weiss there is a
revolutionary truth on OCD and I think
there is is well he I don't know if he's
speaking about exposure therapy per se
but he does uh outline certain Clum
basically sort of what was said before
lose the battle win the war sometimes
you need to really think big picture
over here and um I think you know speaks
about you know Sam sulfur who says that
if a person is wandering in the desert
on Shabbos we do not impose upon him the
the requirement to well he's lost in
desert doesn't know what day it is so
when it comes to the seventh day he's
not going he's not bound by the Allah
Shabbos
because otherwise it's never going to
get out of there and I think you get
takes to go that we as well to to to
think in these terms and to apply these
column in these types of situations but
it's very very important to remind
ourselves that we we have to be willing
to to explore all possibilities that
doesn't mean that everything's going to
be okay but uh because the alternative
sometimes as a person can really be
trapped
rehearsal Weiss is China
who uh who had uh OCD about Dominic and
he would constantly repeat words in
davening and ravashar told him to never
repeat words in any of your braces or
filos no matter how certain you are that
you didn't uh get it right and then like
you said like Rabbi rothwax said that
was his his logic that uh that you have
to keep the big picture in mind
about a shelter that has a chance at
rufua in a mental institution that
doesn't serve kosher food
um and then he could stay there because
where you wanted to remain his entire
life and be part of mitzos you have to
keep the the long-term goal in mind
so I I will say that although that chuva
is printed and it's specifically talking
about OCD
um we once had a Shyla here about
exposure therapy in particular and it
was a much more Hummer Shiloh than the
ones that were presented it had to do
with Indiana rice potentially and it was
a very very serious Shyla and I did
present it and
I'm not going to get into the exact
particulars of the answer or the case
because uh you know again it's just very
personal but but a lot of the logic that
was used there was also that same custom
server that if we don't figure out how
to use the exposure therapy to think
about the long-term goal and the
long-term healthy uh Vision that this
person can have on their Journey moving
forward then they're just going to be
debilitated for years to come and they
won't be able to do many other things I
do remember a number of years ago
when I introduced her Russia wise to Dr
pelkowitz and they were having a
conversation about a particular issue it
was a more General conversation but then
at some point they spoke about a
particular issue that
um was on both of their minds in a
certain condition and Dr palkowitz asked
a very compelling question when I have a
patient like this or when a therapist is
faced with a situation where on the one
hand you have to worry about the
psychological issue that's going on and
the mental health component of it which
is obviously very serious at the same
time as a result of this condition this
individual is now giving up on religion
and very often we find that that happens
so which one should I be focusing on
first which one takes the primary role
should I first be working only on the
mental health should I be paying
attention at the same time should I do
parallel therapies and have two
different therapists seeing this
individual
and robuster wise was very clear in his
answer and he said if you're not alive
you can't be fruit
so he he basically was telling him that
the first thing that needs to be taken
care of is you need to make sure the
person is healthy and stable and and
strong enough to be living life and
living the journey and experiencing life
and going through it in a healthy way
everything after that is secondary and
and only once a person is healthy do
they have the ability to to then be
fruit and to consider that I just add on
the flip side of that though I I we also
heard from Russia Weiss once that what
makes mental health treatments
particularly challenging more so than
physical health treatments is that
typically there's more certainty in the
treatment when it comes to physical
health that this is the treatment that
will work no other treatment will work
and this treatments as a track record of
working uh there are certain therapies
that you could perhaps say that about
but there are a lot of things that may
be suggested as a course of therapy by
one mental health professional that
maybe uh you know he the the mental
health professional may be just trying
something you know May and and has very
little certainty of whether it's going
to be effective
um and uh and and and it's not certain
at all that it's the only uh course of
treatment so I know in a certain very
Hammer arios case which I'm not going to
share the details not because I'm trying
to protect anyone's privacy but just
because I don't remember the details I
remember uh reverse device also said I
mean I would try to present someone's
privacy also but uh but I I happen to
not remember the details uh ravasha
Weiss uh said that uh we couldn't they
couldn't pursue a particular uh path of
treatment because it's not so clear that
that path of treatment was the only way
to help and what was even going to help
but this is why everything's on the case
the flip side of exposure therapy just
another type of question that we're
going to will get is in the the
management of addiction sometimes
there's an approach that's called harm
reduction uh in which a person is
addicted to a particular Behavior which
is harmful in some cases Usher as well
and I think it would almost always be
both
um and whether it's after failed efforts
to
to eliminate
um The Addictive behaviors to to break
these patterns or maybe it's just under
the circumstances the only way to help
sort of reduce the intensity of that
addiction the recommend the recommended
approach is to pursue what's called harm
reduction which is exactly what it
sounds like and that is to reduce the
either the frequency or the
or the nature of the device so that
would mean perhaps when dealing with
let's say a drug addiction perhaps
instead of uh instead of using a certain
type of drug which is potentially much
more toxic it would be to use one that
is you know that provides a high but a
little less toxic to reduce the
intensity when it comes to exposure to
pornographic material there's another
approach where again the the treatment
is not well do it less the treatment is
do it
less
you know it is because if the goal is
going to be to just go from one extreme
to another given this person's track
record and the the particulars and again
we're talking very general terms right
now that is not something that that's
going to work it's a little different I
think from the from the from the
perspective of how long it may be
different in terms of how we would view
that over there we're not necessarily
looking to introduce something that is
not already a part of this person's
struggle but rather give them license uh
to continue but to do so in a way that
will hopefully again enable them to find
their way out of the desert
I would uh just add it just a few as far
as that you can apply or Not Apply
decide how much they account for but
it's noteworthy that first of all the
point about the desert as we mentioned
just to put that in context of the
nature of the proof from there is that
traveling if one assumes that we don't
know when Shabbos is so any day is the
suffix Shabbos so if we're going to be
machner on other things that's one thing
to imagine we're in traveling means that
right now it's not because of Netflix
okay you can sit in one place for a day
but the result is going to be that
there's no severity to ever be more
Maple than any other day unless you look
at it as the whole picture you're never
going to be able to get out of there and
therefore the accumulative effect of
everything of being a master on every
single case is going to end up being
unlivable and that's a part of what
plays a role in some of these questions
but there are also other gemaris that
also contribute to being able to have
some leeway and the question of the
sugiya of hate
which is somewhat of an unresolved issue
and it draws on a lot of complicated
factors but we sometimes times
do find that we're able to draw on some
kind of a relative assessment and it's
also interesting to consider especially
as rabbanim and I think there's a big
difference between what we're
specifically allowing or instructing or
what we get in the way of and when
there's room just not to get in the way
that's something we should really pursue
sometimes especially because even when
we already asked the question directly
so a lot of the consideration is that it
was we don't want to give advice that is
harmful we don't want to be a part of
somebody else's Avera but it's also very
possible that never and how exactly to
relate to it but certainly it comes out
from achuva widely quoted true
that it goes to the goal of the what's
actually happening so if somebody is
going to fall were you making them fall
harder or making them fall less so there
is much more license to take a result
based approach especially when you're
the one guiding your are advising or
choosing not to interfere especially to
say that I can look at what's going to
be the end result of this process and
will there be more of a nephila if I get
involved or more in the field if I don't
get involved then to allow that to be a
part of it
so so we've all um dealt with various
varying degrees of addictions and
different kinds of variations of that
I'm just curious about rothwax I know
the question comes up you know many many
times in communities what do you do when
you have an alcoholic who's really been
working hard on themselves and really
been to therapy and really doing very
well and then they're confronted with
pacef
and they're sitting around the table
with people who are all drinking not
doing anything that's that's
uncomfortable but for that person it
could be extremely damaging well what
would you say what's the suggestion for
that individual yeah so so first of all
before we get to the pesos data there's
you know there's you know every other
day of the year and I'll take this
opportunity to to just remind anybody
who's listening how sensitive we need to
be uh it goes without saying we need to
be sensitive to individuals who we know
are in uh various stages of recovery but
we also have to be extra sensitive and
considering the fact that there are
people who are either in the throes of
an addiction or in earlier late stages
of recovery you can never truly be truly
recovered that's another important point
to mention and
and we wouldn't necessarily know that
um I distinctly recall uh once uh being
present at the Shalom I'm sure this
happens often but I just recall there
was an individual who was walking around
offering everybody drinks he meant well
he wasn't about a bus it doesn't matter
can I give you a client here and if
anybody said no so he's he said he said
again come on a little a little little
and um
he he went over to one individual who
said no he says come on a little guy
said no and the third time that the
person he was he turned red in the face
and he said I can't have alcohol can you
please stop asking me you know and it
you know I don't want to over dramatize
the event I don't think the entire room
heard but I saw it
um and I've seen since these sort of
encounters very very innocent so I think
we should be very careful um we're not
going to get into conversations around
now policies alcohol policies and
schools and schools
um well sure alcohol policies in schools
but it is important to to recognize that
we should not be offering and serving
people drinks if if and when it is
appropriate for people and they feel
that they're able and that they would
like to go ahead and to have a drink
let's leave it up to them otherwise I
think we should assume that and is this
is assumption based on statistics and
amudum could provide the numbers I don't
know what they are but there's a
significant number of people in our
community who are who are struggling and
we would never want to in any way
whatsoever contribute to that and then
as you've asked there are times of the
year that we completely cannot avoid the
the train wreck at all I think most
people can easily manage a Shabbos table
and certainly a poem which is a
conversation for another time
um but the pesos later you almost can't
avoid the the question
uh now it's true this is my closest
opposing about using grape juice for the
purpose of dalekosis which may be you
know one solution but what if that's not
enough for this individual and I think
of rubber Chef if I understood your
question correctly the question was not
whether this recovering alcoholic should
be drinking wine for dalucosos it goes
without saying that that's something
that is not an option but what if he
finds it to be
very challenging to be sitting there at
the table so there's two possibilities
one possibility is well we'll just we'll
just have a state by himself or go
elsewhere or can we consider the
possibility
that everyone at that table well they'll
have like we'll call a dry Seder
I mean
I'm I'm gonna I'm gonna pause now and
open that as a question
but again I think that the power to this
conversation is in the questions more
than the answers I think that if if
anybody's listening right now and that
question just makes you feel very
uncomfortable I think it's a moment to
just just reflect for a moment to
understand and appreciate
that it could be a very lonely place to
begin with to be in that stage of your
life whatever and and recovering from an
addiction that tells such a person you
know listen this is why we do it and if
it's not comfortable for you we
understand but you know this is the way
we do it it's you know either way the
question should should weigh on us my
wife was once uh we had guests in
Shabbos and she was
serving chicken and one of our guests
complimented on it she goes hey it's a
new recipe
so the guy says what's what's the secret
ingredient and she said beer
and he he spit out the chicken right
away and we we didn't know how to react
and he said I'm sorry I apologize he
said I've been in in recovery for I
don't know he said like 25 years
and I I can't touch alcohol so we were
obviously stunned and afraid that maybe
we we just set him back 25 years
thankfully he did not fully evaporated
in the oven isn't that a thing well
that's the thing he listen I guess he
was he was he was you know he was in
recovery mahajana he was not going to
take any any risks but again it was just
a moment of just it just just you just
you just don't know you just don't know
this was the person that we thought we
knew well and we obviously know much
better now we did before and he was
actually very comfortable with the
disclosure it hadn't come up before
but it took and this was not a pesos
this was just you know a Shabbos meal
and one of the ingredients was beer and
again the takeaway message is not that
we should eliminate beer and wine from
all of our recipes as much as just
understand and appreciate that we don't
really know from time to time who we're
who we're interacting with I'll if it's
okay I'll just I'll just pivot for a
moment because what this question
uh really what what it puts on on the on
the table for this conversation is the
possibility that there are times in
supporting and helping individuals in
various stages of mental health
treatment and Recovery other individuals
must at least consider the possibility
of adjusting their own
routine which for the purpose of our
conversation means you know considering
their own their own possibilities for
their own halachic observance it's a
very unusual type of Shiloh to ask but
is it permissible for uh an individual
to to do an answer which would directly
benefit another individual but I'll
share a question that I had years ago
and actually sort of resurfaced a very
recently right after yamtif that there
was there was a woman uh it was was it
was a girl a young girl teenage girl who
was in a in in in a residential program
for an eating disorder uh treatment of
eating disorders I mean particularly on
a residential level there are different
stages and once uh the individual who is
sort of graduating from one level to the
next they try to get her or him whatever
the case may be to a point where they
could have supervised meals together
with members of their family so in a
residential Center they're usually not
living with their family obviously but
the parents will come in if it's from
out of town they'll come in for a few
days and they'll have supervised meals
so the situation was like this the the
girl was in a program and they told her
going in that the food is kosher the
truth of the matter is most of the food
probably was kosher but it wasn't up to
their standards they told her that it's
not going to be necessary to serve which
never it is they weren't going to have
make her have you know bacon but you
know where all the cheeses and all the
yogurts necessarily you know with with
an OU probably not and this particular
facility was not
interested in accommodating that and I
do want to point out that in my
experience which is it is what it is
some of the eating disorder facilities
that are less accommodating in this
regard tend to provide a much a much
better type of treatment because they
just run a very very tight ship and
they're just very much on top of things
it's not come they're not looking to be
probably you know difficult and it's not
they're not they're not against Allah
religious observance they're just trying
to they have a they have a much bigger
consideration so this girl had been
there for months and under the
impression that everything she was
eating was kosher
and um her parents came in for a
supervised meal and the parents were
told don't worry we're gonna have
special food for you and um the parents
came into the room and um they were
sitting at a table and um discovered lo
and behold that those accommodations
were not offered to them
so this was a question thankfully that
that came my way after the fact that
they couldn't do anything in the moment
and they were right then and there and I
guess the Charlotte that they had in the
moment is what do we do we sort of keep
this lie going it's hard to it's re it's
I'm I find it hard to to speak the
shadow through without feeling the the
intensity and the emotion at the time
you know what do we do we've made it
this far she's doing well do we just
sort of keep the lie going or do we
hesitate and say the lady you know I
can't have this uh I can't have this
cheese I you know you know do you have
do you have anything else
I'm just curious what other abundant
feel about uh mental health how does
that fit into the picture of of Shabbos
you know we have very clear guidelines
regarding Shabbos when it's somebody's
life we have guidelines with regards to
shmat on Shabbos as the chiffon Arab
rights but what about when you have
somebody
um
what about when you have somebody who
has a mental health issue and that
collides with Shabbos how do you
approach that I think again I'm going to
jump in here because uh for the most
point I'm standing on the side when Ruby
Feldman or religious
but correct me if I'm wrong Would we not
Would we not look at every mental health
issue as we would any health issue and
try to figure out you know how to
classify the the level of of illness it
is
being of course that yeah mental health
issues can in fact create a situation
where a person is a genuine call I think
that you know we would not necessarily
have have had that same understanding
appreciation sensitivity a couple
Generations ago but now that we are
where we are not all mental health
issues are created equal and and and and
depending on the diagnosis the prognosis
the situation the treatment you know we
would you know we would have to apply
you know whatever whatever rules when
when it comes to a physical illness but
tell me if I'm wrong I would certainly
think so and I would certainly think
there's all kinds of different levels
there are conditions which certainly
pose an immediate risk to life which
should have that realization and that
consequence uh there are those which
pose a cumulative risk to life and that
I think we've addressed a little bit and
seen that there's recognition of that
impact as well and then there are things
that are incapacitating or create
tremendous tsar and that may not have
have the same level of impact on halafic
permissibility but it certainly is
significant when dealing with a number
of things that come up in Alpha Shabbos
and the question is how to assess within
each one but I think there's no question
that if we had a credible reason to
believe that somebody's physical health
and physical well-being is at stake so
then the logic should should fit even if
we're not comfortable making qualium and
we're worried about how that might be
misapplied but the soira is certainly
there and it's there in very early
sources and to appreciate what that
might mean
just from your experience I'm curious
what are the robot and feel would be
um some direction maybe for family
members or community members to make
themselves a little bit more sensitive
to try to sensitize ourselves as as a
entire Community from the experiences
that you've had is there something you
can share that maybe people who are
watching can can walk away with and
allow themselves to feel a little bit
more of a sensitivity or are there
places in religious life in in things
that we do and hug them that we're part
of that maybe we can add an extra dose
of sensitivity toward those who might be
struggling and we're not even being
mindful or aware of it
to go back to a previous point because I
think it's also relevant the question
about the drinking at the Seder so the
question was raised should we ask
everyone to have a dry seder if one
individual there needs to be avoiding
alcohol completely so that's one
question that's fair to ask but separate
from whether that actually has to be as
far as that step has to actually be
taken but the attitude that we convey
about the drinking and this would
certainly benefit us if all year round
we were aware of just how harmful it is
for people to be exposed to an attitude
that sees drinking as the be-all and
end-all of human experience and to
recognize just what impact that has
whether somebody is a recovering or like
a earthquake said and not yet recovering
alcoholic or somebody who's just
potentially at risk for alcoholism or
for any of the tremendous harm that can
come and the whole culture that has
developed that is portrayed as the most
enjoyable activity and the most
uplifting activity possible so there's a
lot we can do to change that culture so
whether it means that everyone at the
Seder is not drinking alcohol and if
grapes as an option it may be realistic
to ask everybody at the table to drink
grape juice and I think that would
probably be a tremendous statement that
would be enormously appreciated by
somebody who's there and wouldn't
involve that much philosophy compromise
but even if we didn't go that far just
if we related to those who were drinking
at the theater related to it more as a
Mitzvah rather than as something that
they are enjoying tremendously for
reasons that go beyond the Mitzvah so I
would throw out the question let's say
you had somebody at the table at the
Seder table who had Celiac and couldn't
eat matzo so let's say that individual
wasn't eating matzo would he feel the
same kind of pressure from everyone else
eating matzah as the recovering
alcoholic feels where he's not able to
drink wine is it simply that he's not
doing what everyone else is doing or is
there more about the culture that makes
this more tempting and that elevates
this beyond the midst of status and that
if it was viewed more as a Mitzvah
rather than that which else everything
else that comes with it it might be
easier for someone to say I okay so I
have a personal condition that doesn't
allow me to do that mixed foot there's
things like that that happen to people
all over and I'll sit this one out and
it won't necessarily have the same
effect also the more we talk about these
things publicly this kind of event is
very helpful that people should hear
that these things actually happen for a
long time there was and it still remains
to some degree a culture in our
community of just hiding uh mental
health issues addiction issues I think
our muddin has done a great deal of work
in terms of bringing this to light uh
even if if it just involves saying
statistics of how many people were lost
to Suicide or drug overdoses how many
young people where it used to be wow we
have a high rate of aneurysms in our
community where now we realize that and
we're able to say that no this person
had a disease they had they had a severe
depression they had an addiction and uh
and you know you the more it happens
sadly there are two ways we can learn
about it one is where a person has it in
their family and they're exposed to it
directly and they they gain a high level
of sensitivity uh toward these things
and and the other is just by talking
about it more publicly I I would I would
add as well that uh it would go a long
way for us to appreciate that there are
features of our community I think more
cultural than Alaska but you know the
the line between the two can sometimes
be blurred that may present some
individuals who are struggling at a sort
of a heightened risk if you like think
about food as an example we have a
community that is very I would say on a
communal level very obsessed with food
uh some of that is because you know
there are a lot of times that we need to
eat there's a key of suda you know every
Shabbos three times but beyond that I
think we have you know culturally our
community has adopted in a way
um has adapted rather in a way that that
you know has really
has has we we we speak a lot about food
and we talk about a lot the about the
presentation of food and all that and we
have to understand appreciate that while
that may be very uh satisfying and
enjoyable and fulfilling for some it may
be very triggering uh to others uh it's
always already been mentioned that there
are certain times throughout the year
where alcohol is an important part of
our experience as Jews we have to
understand and appreciate that that very
feature which makes our community unique
and special uh also again can be
challenging for some I think that the
the levels of of stress that already
teenagers and particularly you know
people who are trying to support their
families are subjected to in order to
have uh you know to support uh the
lifestyles that that are demanded of us
in our communities uh this the stress is
real and it takes a toll and for
somebody who's already predisposed and
already struggles with anxiety
depression could literally push them
over the edge
and in some cases does when we are sort
of when we when we deny that and we want
to be overly defensive and say no it
can't be
it can't be it's a Mitzvah so therefore
it has to be always good or this is what
we do and this is the way it was raised
and it works for me and so therefore
there can't be anything wrong with that
I think that's a it's a very it's first
of all it's a very uh narrow-minded
perspective but it's an attitude when we
hear that could be actually very hurtful
to some
and does exactly the opposite of what
conversations like this are designed to
do and that is make people feel
comfortable and sort of talking about
some of the issues and the struggles and
trying to seek help and we'll also point
out that I think our community has some
very unique protective factors I mean
the fact that we are such a strong
community and we have the infrastructure
and the ability to produce conversations
like this as an example
um and really reach so many people I
think is is showing that you know this
very community that it's you know it's
difficult and challenging sometimes to
to maintain an equilibrium within you
know provides me with the resources and
the support
um and the and the hope and the desire
and the motivation to be able to to push
forward so uh
speaking about it honestly openly
without being
defensive
and uh all questions are good questions
uh
I've seen over the course of the last 10
years alone and I think people who have
been paying attention for longer could
probably say the last 20 or 30 years a
significant reduction in terms of the
stigma around mental health issues I
don't know that we could ever you know
we should we're not there yet I'm not
sure what it means to be there but I I
think
I think we're doing very well in
particular
um the the stigma around therapy has
really really thank god
um in many circles when almost
reversed uh you know there are certain
places where like if you're not in
therapy like what is wrong with you why
aren't you uh you know why aren't you
talking to somebody
um you know I had a an experience couple
of summers ago
um where I run a program for guys who
are learning 18 19 year old guys who are
learning all day over the summer and
there's always a counselor or two
someone who's 21 22 23.
um that's uh that the boys look up to
and that they admire and one particular
occasion
um it was a Friday night and we were
schmoozing and we were just going around
the room and I was asking the boys you
know what's the nicest thing anyone's
ever done for you
um you know what can you share something
that like really uplifted you that
someone else did for you and you know
most of the boys were saying my parents
did this my rebby did this and the
counselor the one who they all looked up
to as the coolest guy in the room as the
one that he said well I my therapist I I
never would have been able to date or
get married if not for my therapist in
front of all of these kids that were
looking up to him and I was thinking 10
years ago would that have ever happened
with that you know it was it was even
surprising to me now but uh but I think
we're making making great progress
so thank you to all the rabbana for
joining and we just want to once again
uh give a tremendous
for the unbelievable and incredible work
that they do for so many individuals and
for so many of our communities and you
are a indispensable resource for the
work that the community needs and for
the help that so many individuals
um require and we're so grateful to you
and we hope that all who are watching
will help in this effort in this uh
unite to heal effort to support the work
of amudim to allow them to continue to
help our community to be strong to be
healthy and uh to continue on in the
journey serving in the best way we
possibly can thank you thank you
foreign
[Music]