I Finally Figured Out What Tucker Is Doing

It takes I guess a British gentleman. A British gentleman uh this guy who was on uh Tucker Carlson show recently if anybody saw it the latest from Tucker Carlson. He had on Sir Jacob Ree Mog a British gentleman of course to basically demolish Tucker's style and talking points. A real British gentleman talked about nation states and that we build up to be strong. It's the goal to be strong, to avoid war, and we avoid war and we avoid conflict by being strong. Uh write in the comments because I'll add some of your questions and comments in the um in I will add your comments to the stage and we will take your questions, comments, and of course impressions, requests at the end of the show. But if you saw this episode, let me know in the comments because it was really quite remarkable to watch. I mean, so to see this Drago Priest Morg responding to Tucker Carlson's idiocy and his just complete lack of awareness of the substance of the issues, it takes a real British gentleman, Sir Jacob Smog, to dismantle and demolish these just simply ridiculous talking points. And he did not hold back, but he sat in his chair quite relaxed the entire time. And anytime Tucker said something nonsensical, he did not hesitate to push back. did it politely as the way a British gentleman would, but [snorts] he pushed back and I have to say did a remarkable job. It goes to show you what happens when you know a podcaster who basically Tucker's had on episode after episode just this sort of echo chambery brownnosy thing where he just has people on who are nothing but provocative and controversial [snorts] whether they're of value or substance or virtue. Yeah, that's besides the point. And it's just been this tugof-war back and forth of Tucker saying a bunch of crazy stuff and his guest saying a bunch of crazy stuff and he's just like I love that. I love that. I so agree. I so agree. And it it [snorts] really isn't all that interesting. It actually gets quite boring when you get somebody who's just said I mean I mean you know if you think about it I mean Hitler was you know he was complicated. It's true. He really was. He was he was a complicated guy. I mean whoever it is algebra is Jewish wizardry math. So true. So true. I mean two, you know, the Pythagorean theorem, you know, B plus or minus the roo<unk> of B square - 4 A C over 2 A. I mean, how how Zionist is that [laughter] I mean that's BB by the way is BB plus orus the<unk> of B square - 4 A over 2 A. I think that's the Pythagorean theorem. I think that's what [snorts] I checked and I think Pythagoras was Jewish. I think he was very Jewish actually. So the episodes were getting quite boring and then you get AC you come across [snorts] you come across this episode against uh a guy who's clearly scholarly knowledgeable of the history and you notice I think in these episodes you notice in these episodes oh by the way got to thank you uh DVJ here appreciate that nice to see Tucker gets cooled I agree and appreciate the contribution I got to highlight that to the stage thank you guys give me money I am a Zionist after all so please in addition to the 7K I would appreciate your contributions to the show. Now, [snorts] to see Tucker actually up against someone who knows history, who knows facts, who has an authority and command of the issues, as this gentleman clearly did, [snorts] really command of the issues. When you see that, you can kind of see Tucker's tactics on full display. you know, you can see um the ducking and the weaving out of every question and every answer the second he's actually challenged intellectually doesn't go very far. And if you notice throughout the interview, [clears throat] every time every time uh his opponent uh Jacob Reese Mog would try to close a point, Tucker had to chime in and interrupt him lest the point actually be they're talking about World War II, for example. Said, "What would happen in World War II at this point in time?" What about World War I? I mean, we have to talk about World War I. I mean, it sort of caused World War II, don't you agree? I mean, what about Vietnam? I mean, like he would just throw a wrench in it to try to derail the conversation in such a way as to not let the guy fully finish a point. And that's a big part of Tucker's strategy is just throwing nonsecuadors and nonsequittors and confusing points out there to try to derail and confuse the conversation. And you see it on full display. There were and and and he sort of does this thing that I noticed repeatedly in the pattern Tucker's like style conduct in which he plays dumb plays very dumb and acts confused when he's really not confused. It's a very intentional confusion he puts on. They'll [snorts] be talking about, you know, Russia is an authoritarian state. It's a failed economy. It's an absolutely failed economy. He goes, "But I was on a train there. It was nice. I I the grocery stores are nice. I I I bought a banana in a Russian supermarket and it wasn't spoiled. It's you know where it's spoiled in Detroit. Detroit has a lot of spoiled fruit actually. Like a lot a lot of spoiled fruit. And in San Francisco there's a lot of fruit. There's a lot of gay people. There really is. It's very fruity. And all of a sudden you're in this other conversation. Wait, wait, wait. I was talking about World War II and I was talking about Russia and Russian aggression. Well, yeah. Certainly in the UK there's been so much aggression. I mean, aggression against regular people. People are being locked up. You know, Russia's not arresting people for social media posts. He goes, "Russia is throwing people out of windows." Well, maybe they like skydiving. And Russia, I mean, it's there's an extreme sports capital of the world. I mean, maybe that's in Switzerland, actually, which is neutral, and I think we should be neutral. Do you see what I'm doing? I'm just derailing the conversation [snorts] to confuse the guest, to confuse the audience. I don't want substantive points to be made. And then he says just he says like blanket empty statements that are meaningless as applied to the real world. Killing people is wrong. Killing people is wrong. Killing innocents is wrong. What I would have loved to see is just to be pressed on [snorts] his actual position as it's applied to the real world. Is Tucker anti- every single war ever? We killed people in the Revolutionary War. Or is he against the Revolutionary War? Like I want a Tucker versus Tucker. If I was ever on a show, I'd beat Tucker against Tucker. Killing people is Well, I mean, if they came into your house to hurt you, would you kill them? I It's not very Christian. It's not very turn the other cheek. The revolutionary or We killed British people. We killed British civilians. We did. And should we not have been founded as a country? Are you against this country? Are you against the founding of America? Do you do you wish Britain America was still part of England? I mean, because you hate England and England England is is sad. It's really sad. Would you want America to be sad? Do you see just it's a constant it's a constant manipulation and um [snorts] it's on full display in these interviews when he's actually against someone of intellectual prowess and competence to push back on him on substance. Tucker cannot handle substance. So he defaults to platitudes and statements ducking and weaving. It's very easy to spot. At one point there was a real tell. He goes, "Russia is not I mean UK is locking up people for social media posts. That's sad. That's very sad. I mean, Russia's not locking people up." He goes, "What are you talking about? Of course, people are falling out of windows. They're poisoning people. They're not doing that to British people here." So Tucker jumps to making the claim that Russia's not locking people up. And then when he responds and his guest responds and counters with, "Obviously they He goes, "Well, Russians aren't locking British people up. Duck in a weave. You can spot it from a mile away. You can spot it from a mile away." But he goes, "But I I was on a train there and it was nice. I went to a grocery store and I bought a pear and a banana and some goulash. Was delicious actually and I hate it." So, you know, the game is up. It's like once he's put against somebody formidable, [snorts] you can see the panic and the shifting and the strategy and the tactics of Tucker's style of intentional confusion, playing the fool, playing the idiot, pretending not to get what's being said right in front of him, what's being uh explained to him, pretending not to understand. And that's not grounds for a good intellectual discussion or a good debate. It's [snorts] grounds to reveal a disingenuous, dishonest, bad actor. I mean, is it good that the Nazis won? I mean, how do we know that? Are you better off? It's like, wait, it's it's bad that we beat the Nazis because 70 years later, immigration. What does that mean? [snorts] as if to say that at one time in history, fighting one evil force was not justified or made the country better and more prosperous and peaceful because years and years later after prosperity, we now have on the heels of that prosperity a welfare state and an immigration problem and bad policies. One has nothing to do with the other. News flash, it's good that we beat and defeated the Nazis in Europe and Hitler. And it's also true that years and decades and decades and decades later after enjoying peace and prosperity in Europe, there's other problems to solve now. And just because you have such and such like specific problems now in a different context at a different point in history does not invalidate victories of the past. Tucker's trying to create this whole idea that because there's issues today in the current contemporary political climate that somehow victories of the past, [snorts] just victories against enemies, against evil are somehow in invalidated. [snorts] So, we shouldn't have fought the Revolutionary War because years later, you know, Detroit is in trouble. Let's use the logic against the United States. I mean, we're not doing well. I mean, this country is not doing well. So, we shouldn't have fought the Revolutionary War. We killed But we killed innocent British people. And I love British people. I mean, Hugh Grant is is a great actor. He's British. I like Hugh Grant. I do. I I like the movie Girl. Love Actually, actually. Actually, Love Actually, it's one of my favorite movies. Love Actually, actually Act actually. And And I mean, Harry and Megan, I mean, Harry and Megan are the, you know, they're not the prince and Duchess anymore. They left and and they should have left. It was terrible what the Queen and the King were doing. They should have left and I respect that. I honor that and I hate it. But like fighting the red coats, I mean I saw the movie The Patriot. I did. Mel Gibson was bloodthirsty. It was disgusting. Killing people. And I like The Patriot. I really I enjoyed it. But Mel Gibson I mean I know I know he's he's Catholic and I'm not Catholic. It's just it's just getting boring. The jig is up. Jig is up. But what are you saying? I rather enjoy the conversation. I did and thank you for having me. It was quite quite pleasant. But only a British gentleman possibly could dismantle. Now, does this change anything as far as Tucker's audience goes? I don't think so. It's not as if they were operating from a position of Tucker delivering the facts in a rational, clear, consistent way. I think they're enjoying his temperament, style, his saying anything under the sort of anti-establishment banner, challenging legacy media, challenging mainstream media, this other path kind of thing. But you have to realize the biggest manipulator in the game is Tucker. It's not the legacy media or traditional media or the Daily Wire or all these other media outlets he's trying to challenge. He's the one who's being dishonest. Who's telling the truth? Who's not? Who has integrity and who doesn't? Tucker. so obviously is a disingenuous actor playing dumb. [snorts] Playing dumb. I mean, I went to Japan. They haven't had any growth at all. A and I like sushi. I do. I really like sushi. I mean, I prefer to cook it because I I don't eat raw food. I hate it. It's disgusting. But I but I enjoy it. And have you ever used chopsticks? I mean, it's challenging. I I don't want American I don't want Americans using chopsticks. [snorts] I'm sorry. Do you use chopsticks in the UK? I mean, you certainly have a lot of new ethnic food. The food is better, but [snorts] you've lost your country and I'm losing we're losing my country and you're losing your country. How is that good? And here's the funny incoherent thing that I noticed with Tucker Carlson. Well, he'll say things like, "You're losing your country to mass immigration from Muslim countries." But Tucker's always loving on Muslim countries and how great Islam is and how it's great to pray five times a day. I want to live in a country that does that. So, how can you both be against losing your country to mass immigration and open borders from Muslim refugees, but also loving countries becoming Islamized? So, he's like, "No, I mean, you have this mass migration and all these Muslims coming." No, and I love it. You're I'm losing my country and I want to lose it. [laughter] I love it. So, we're really going after Tucker here because man, is he a confusion artist and full of inconsistency and incoherence intentionally. That's the name of the game. That's the name of the game. [snorts] So, I'm sorry, Tucky, but the grift is up. We You We can see right through it. As Alanis Morset, who recently discovered she was Jewish, by the way, just, you know, great song. I see right through you. I walk right through you. Jag a Little Pill. Great album if you're a millennial. Old Millennial, born in the 80s through the 90s. Child of the 90s, Jagged Little Pill, one of the best albums, and I'll Die on that hill. One of the best albums of all time. But I see right through you, Tucker Carlson. It is so obvious. The tactics become [snorts] on full display. It's nothing but a tactical game. Whenever Tucker is having a conversation, he does. I mean, he he said something about and with the economy. He said, "Well, Russia's obviously one of the largest economies. It's larger than the UK's." No, it's by far it's not. GDP alone, GDP in the UK is much higher than in Russia. Russia is a fail state, but it's very big. Like, geographically, it's certainly much larger. It's very, very big. There are mountains there. I've never seen a mountain in London like ever, like at all. I've seen Big Ben, but I' i've never seen a mountain. Have you seen a mountain? And there are a lot of resources in mountains, and Russia has a lot of mountains. And it was like, well, I would want to shift funds from the welfare state to more military spending. You want to build bombs? You want to build bombs? It's just like this weird intentional juvenile [snorts] pretending to be dumb in order to confuse tactic that you you want to build more bombs. And this guy's making a very clear point that you deter bad actors in the world by being strong, by being capable, by having the ability to defeat your enemies without having to do it. And that's a deterrence. It's a simple concept. You want to intimidate them. Why do you want to fight? Why do you want to fight? There's such a narcissism and manipulation there. But you So you want to you want to you want to go to war with Russia? Why do you want to go to war? I don't want to go to war with Russia. That's why I want to make sure we prevent one by making sure we are strong and prepared which would be a deterrent. It's a simple concept. You want to intimidate. It's not intimidation. Just m mudd muddying up concepts. Muddying up concepts deterrence. Now look, this is above my pay pay grade talking about this. You know, I don't have a clear defined position on, you know, I'm not maybe I'm coming across as hawkish, but I'm just saying conceptually I can understand the idea that [snorts] given the examples of history in which you appeased authoritarians and dictators, Neville Chamberlain, peace in our time. We have achieved I have met with the fear. I've met with Hitler and we have achieved peace in our time. [snorts] The Neville Chamberlain claimed that and appeased aggressors. you enable them to continue their aggression, they'll take advantage. We have historical record of that. If it went the other way, we'd have a different set of understandings, a different analysis. But history shows that when it comes to people who are aggressive and seek territorial expansion, that showing strength and resolve and determination can be a very big deter rather than being consiliatory, rather than appeasement as a strategy. There's a great line in the movie The Darkest Hour. Gary Olman playing Winston Churchill said, "YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH. We'll fight them on the land and fight them on the sea." You cannot REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS in its mouth. Great line. I mean, I I saw The Darkest Tower. It was disgusting. I thought Winston Churchill was disgusting. Very overweight, very not healthy. Maybe he was doing fentinel. I think I believe he was doing fentinol. [snorts] And um yeah, I wonder if uh Tucker watched The Darkest Hour about Winston Churchill and was just horrified. I [snorts] mean, he has a speech impediment. It's just I think you have to fix that. I don't know why he speaks that way. I think he's doing too much fentanyl. You cannot reason with a tiger when your head is in its mouth. Such a great movie. Go see The Darkest Hour. [snorts] Seen it a lot of times. Great movie. There's a scene where he's on the phone with NFDR on the other end of it. >> I'm just so sorry, Winston. I can't. Please, Mr. President. Please. We could really very much use your assistance. Dunk Kirk. >> I'm sorry, Winston. I just can't. These were the chief villains of World War II. That's [snorts] what they'd have you believe. Or maybe not. Maybe. Maybe not. So, the tactics have been exposed. Um, let's move on because it's getting boring. But it takes a gentleman. We'd all be speaking German. I don't want to speak German. They make great pianos. They do. And I love piano. Do you hate piano? Why do you hate piano? Germans make the best pianos. And I know that. I do. I really know that. I love piano. It's beautiful instrument. It's actually one of the most beautiful instruments, actually. And I hate it. [snorts] Um, let's go on to another subject because it's getting boring. The whole Tucker stuff is getting boring and we [snorts] all see right through it. We all see right through it. Um, and I don't think it's going to last much longer. I feel like the jig is up, but we shall see. I feel like his own, you know, fan base, cult fan base is going to keep following him. But it remains to be seen if you're still on the Tucker train or making excuses for it or not putting those ideological guardrails up to say this guy is not a conservative and he's destructive to the conservative movement. If you can't see it already, well then you are blinding yourself. [music] >> [music]