Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
foreign
[Music]
for this special episode
Hanukkah is coming up in a couple days
people will be listening this on
Hanukkah and we want to discuss the
Hanukkah Omission no there isn't a
special small kind of tape on this topic
that I know of but this is something
which is discussed for many hundreds of
years why is there no sectors Hanukkah
so this episode you probably can make a
straightforward because we will discuss
some real Torah topics it's not just
gonna be history but a lot of history a
lot is foreign and learning about new
people like we do all the time right how
are you today
okay so you could Dive Right In why is
there no masectus chanukkah
okay so first like this
I'd like to talk about this topic as
relates to Hanukkah now
as normally
it's a topic that's spoken about
Hanukkah has a crazy amount of
literature like all other constantly new
works are being published every year
even this year I fell into this
particular I fell into the rabbit hole
of Hanukkah many years ago and the
rabbit hole of this topic and I have not
come out at one point I was even hoping
to publish a safer about it I still hope
to but we're still in progress
today I would like to present some of
the materials I've discovered over the
years I can bore you with all the
materials I have some rahmanas okay now
the general topic is the is the omission
of Hanukkah in various early sources
specifically in the mishnais where
there's no masakta devoted to the
subject although as Point people point
that sprinkled in different places
there's some mention of the khag whereas
let's say Purim a parallel it has
Magilla so the question is why is that
many answers have been given today we're
going to discuss a few and the
discussions that come lead from the
different answers one as I like to
always call in the outset there's
there's lots of collections about it
only one I'm going to mention is from
maishitz veneria we're a very useful
article later on at some point it was
even translating to English
there are academic articles that help
for this whole story but today I'm not
going to be using too much from them for
today's presentation okay the hope is to
present some solution some that have
been said and some maybe
um build off others first as a general
thing about Hanukkah on omissions
there's a lot of omissions of Hanukkah
what do I mean when you a lot of people
ask this is also a famous question that
we're not going to deal so much today
but we'll mention a little bit about is
in allenism there's no open mention of
the nase of the paksham why is that so
we'll return to passively at some point
another Omission is even
the lotion of the gemara when it talks
about chanukkah and we and it talks
about al-hanism it refers to allenism it
doesn't say the words
the famous gemara that everyone quotes
and we'll be discussing this this Bryson
so it says after it says
then it says
everyone knows
doesn't ever use the words alanisa very
interesting I'm not sure why that's so
who's the earliest when we have the
shelters which we spoke about in
previous episodes of Hein kanyevsky he
uses the words alanisum now even then
the actual nusrah you have to go you
have to wait till who has it in short
form and then you have to wait till we
shine him who bring down the whole
Muslim
another omission
is even after we have this gemara the
gemara is still strange a little bit why
it says
but what about doesn't say that Lashana
Harris they spoke that you also have to
light it talks about what you have to do
you have to say hello and say allanism
but the main thing that at least that we
do is like Maris Hanukkah so this
question already is handled by many just
to mention we're not going to go into
this specific question but this is the
big day Kahuna
whichas and Shabbos right away is Midas
from a few hundred years back and he
goes he writes on the Mizrahi the
Mizrahi wrote on Hanukkah on the smag so
this batikuna has dozens of issues going
through this the gamars and the suggest
Hanukkah
um I would say it's something close to
um
close to 50 different issues these
mephalpo in it now the safer has been
um printed once or twice you can find in
Hebrew books but more recently someone
published about 10 years ago it looks
like this
a paperback and and he his name is
Menachem Adler he's written he's written
a lot on Hanukkah and he goes through
this Hebrew of the batikuna um and the
Hebrew is incredible but and he's
argument on everything about Hanukkah a
lot of lambdas a lot of all different
things and one of the things is he asked
this question deals with it okay I'm
just mentioning it now because we're not
going to really get back to dealing with
every single aspect of the gumar another
question that people ask is
we don't say any mention of Hanukkah if
it's sort of a yunt if why not another
point that people point to is in your
xiaomi there's command nothing about
chanukkah even the badly which we the
badly does have a few blood everyone
knows many people they spend chanukkah
learning these suggests there's not this
came out nothing is there any reason for
that another Point people point to is
the pyutum of vertices there's no
mention the pack shaman
which which is very very early which in
recent years a beautiful Edition came
out looks like this with Las Camas of
many good Islands such as Fisher and
others and it helps one go if it was
beautiful
it's a beautiful beautiful Edition with
pictures with haris and one goes through
it you agav get a very muradic
understanding of what happened in
Hanukkah but you'll be surprised to see
there's no discussion of the paksham
another discussion another Point people
ask is in the desire there's no mention
of Hanukkah and and then the last point
is in the rambam
and everyone discusses baruchos and he
talks a little bit historically in his
first
Hanukkah and the second Aloha when he
talks about we lighting candles he
doesn't even quote the gemara and
Hanukkah that we just quoted which says
NASA by Nation
why he also seems to be not talking
about this thing okay anyway these are
all the emissions we're not going to be
dealing with all those missions I'm just
pointing out that the omissions of
Hanukkah are very glaring on some level
in well in many different early sources
different emissions so this is the
hadama of of the episode
okay thank you Rabbi brought but brother
not asking to say this but he mentions
he always mentions that he has this
saver is about to put out wants to put
out and it's time to put it out so
anybody well feel free reach out send
them an email I'm sure he could use it
needs time for it also but I'm sure
funding can help get these wonderful
Farm out he could tell me that I'm wrong
but that's how that's how it goes in the
book industry
definitely funding is necessary that's
for sure yeah anyway so you can become
famous together whoever wants to
participate to become famous together
with Rabbi Dr brat
um another another interesting piece of
information you mentioned difference for
him
um I know nahi Weinstein on the Swarm
Shadow podcast has had discussions with
different
um academics about different various
works that have been that have come out
on Hanukkah you know discussing them
what what information is missing what
information is not missing what's there
what's not there
um might be interesting to check out for
some of the listeners anyway okay so who
asked this question you know you touched
upon it a little bit but let's get into
the ones that you want to focus on that
discuss the park or the question of why
is enormous status Hanukkah right so it
basically is
is Rejoice of Cairo he asks this in his
arm now this was pointed out to me uh
many years back from by snare by
Professor Schneider Zama Lyman but it's
not in the Magnum and the standard
pieces of magnesium it seems that
there's manuscripts of it in a piece of
a manuscript it seems he's asking this
question so it's cute everyone knows
what's the most famous question about
chanukkah is why it's eight days it's
famous for being the besties cache even
though it's much much earlier we might
have mentioned a drop of added today and
this question also at least the first
person that talks about it openly is the
base of Joseph anyway another person
that talks about it
is the kavascript but
um dies in 1702 was a tremendous
tremendous guy and he was a very also
very interesting guy
most a lot of his material did not
survive but we have some like um like a
mate of some of them of this massive
work that he that he had on well on
collateral cooler and every type of
thing possible
and it was printed
a few pages are printed if it's called
yair nasiv it's a incred just it's four
or five pages printed in 1865 for
manuscript it's incredible what you see
what he was going to deal with in this
work that has been lost so one of the
things he talks about is
now it was printed on a journal called
base medrish that came out in 1865 at
one point it was even photocopied but
um but anyway the point is not we don't
know what he says but he asked the
question also
um now
alkan the two early sources ask the
question and then basically the the next
source that I believe that I located
asked this question is uh contemporary
of the in 1802
um he asked this question in the truvis
adisbee isif that was actually also um
printed is it printed in maybe in 1800
and he the safer also was recently
reprinted and he has a piece about this
topic and we'll get to his answer
shortly now the truth is as I mentioned
earlier all different omissions of
Hanukkah but the omission of pakshaman
created a great controversy in different
periods of time in 18
um 91 a year named heinzalex lanumitsky
he wrote an article in the newspaper at
svira questioning why in the early
sources such as if and all these things
there's no mention of the pack sheman
what what's shot in that that that's the
question that he wants to know
um
okay
and he deals with this and he's and
basically he also asks about the rambam
and basically he says it's it's a it's a
it's some he he has different
suggestions about it in his article
we're not going to go into what
um He suggests and this ended up being a
series of articles in the newspapers and
his newspapers this mamish was a
controversy all over everyone was
writing about it completes former
written about
but even a fellow from Moscow yako
reichmann even even a fascinating
correspondence of his with others he
even he wrote very sharply against him
is what's he suggesting that the the
nation of paksham and it didn't it
didn't happen just because it's not
mentioned maybe there's another reason
behind it but anyway
um now it's assumed that this little
mitsky he's an evil masker and he had
evil intentions with it it's clear that
he wasn't an evil Moscow without getting
into a conversation of what is a mass
kill if there's different types of
masculinity who spent years working and
he was consulted by many good Island
because of his expertise in mathematics
and astronomy but after he wrote this
article which was towards the end it
seems it went downhill for him and he
was put into a different category just
to mention one autobiographical account
uhurst malinski writes he writes how he
met him after this article was written
and he said he knew that the people the
responses against him were very sharp
and they didn't like him but some people
actually wrote defenses for him such as
alexanderoff who was a close who was in
close correspondence with her cook but
because of his correspondence with this
and defense of islamitsky people a
picture of him circulated on the bottom
had said that he's a Russia
anyway one other point is that the tire
tamima and his famous work the
macarbaric writes that he went to visit
varsha and he and at some point
islamitsky was also there she asked him
why doesn't go visit the native as he
had been close correspondents with the
native he said I had correspondences
with him I really want to but since I'm
on the outs and I fear that that those
against me will stop helping the native
if I visit him so I don't want to go to
him and it's clear it had to do with
this article anyway bottom line is that
he wrote this thing and and even in more
recent years this has come up that
there's no discussion of the nase of
pakshaman in early sources and watch
that but we're we're not um going to
deal with explaining possibly to be
miyash of it but it's already in the
famous controversial earlier work maare
nayim from the ready to times the base
yes if he already notes the mission in
the morning
Etc about there's no mention the
Pakistan review Daria Medina in a
controversial work of his or he's also a
controversial person
also mentions it some people say and
this is how we'll conclude what this
topic is that it's a lot of times it
depends on the tone of how one presents
the information for example in a very in
a from Missouri Journal just a few years
ago hamayan it was presented in a
different way
it's showing different kudas in this
thing and then afterwards in the next
issue people were very praiseworthy of
it and even though uh in 1891 when this
person wrote it the way he wrote it it
took it sometimes it's about to tone but
it's again it's a very complicated topic
and we're not going to deal with it I'm
just mentioning it because we're talking
about Hanukkah and the Omission the
whole time it's sort of in the elephant
in the room okay but now that adcon for
all the sorry points now let's get to
our main
um story for today
so just to clarify there are there are
two things here right the
omission of pakshamin in earlier sources
right and why is Hanukkah are you tying
these together or are you just no no I'm
just saying that that I'm lumping is
there's something very interesting about
Hanukkah that in early sources when you
find it there's no mention the pack
Shaman which is not for us and then is
that even is why is there no why is
there no masecta not only about Shaman
but everything
why not so I'm that's and that's the
main focus of today
okay interesting you mentioned my skill
from masculine levels of mass skill for
those who may listen to Rabbi Dr David
Katz's podcast once in a while in
history
for uh his descriptions of levels of
masculine but either way so let's get uh
the answer that you want to discuss
um now today
okay so the first answer that that
people give is based on a famous rambam
in person
which basically the ramam says and this
gives us Insight in how Rabino I cut
this when he wrote his Parish he wrote
when he put together the mishnah which
is the things such as
we don't find also nice why not
why because all these were well known by
everyone even the masses they knew these
so there was no need to include it in
the Hebrew of
everyone knows that everything is open
in the missionaries which is his own
story which we're going to discuss a
little bit today so things such as these
things that everyone did every day there
was no
um
it was not written out by remedy now it
wasn't put by repeat this answer was
already given in 1804 in this
we just mentioned and many others
Hanukkah is well known so it was no
there was no need to create a um
you light the candles Etc okay sure has
a problem with this rambam in general he
says just look at the mezuzah
doesn't mean they're well known these
are complicated Mitzvahs they're full of
details
not only that some could say it's more
complicated than krishma which has its
own has a lot of hokus grishma just to
illustrate this point of jakov shore the
hoffenstein's son writes his father
spent months working on just two Simone
and you could speak to people that are
Isaac in the suggests of saffron sorry
that people spend years on
some of the 3D raises a similar point
that these halachas are full of pratim
and diktokim that that people don't know
so he's so Bianca sure suggests there
must be there was some type of masecta
that was devoted to the film similar to
a masecta Sai from type safer and was
lost
and and but some of it is retained in
the masakta siphon that we have today
okay this is a suggestion of his now
with all that we could go on to the next
answer and that is
the assumption that there really was a
massage Hanukkah and it was lost
now we know that there's something
called Chevron
in the series I hope to deal with this
length because of hankeringesque is well
known Rhoda perish systematically on the
seven most actors however
many earlier did not have these masectas
and many wishes but the question is what
are the seven masectus so above and Agra
quotes from his father says
Hanukkah
now we have the seven sectors today
but the kids are it seems it might have
been lost the radar seems to say that
there were other mastectus besides the
Shiva masectas he has the makaris in
chuvasagainim interestingly enough the
vulner Going's great nephew writes and
that he heard from the filming that they
were that they were not only with Adam
there was something called
all these fiburim were lost anyway so so
this is a different answer that there
might have really according to the grad
there was such a receptor was lost okay
now this really leads us into the next
answer which is that there really is
what magillus Tinus
who says this so earlier I mentioned is
the Heber adesbians of printed 1800
who I said he's the earliest source that
talks about this question and printed
sources besides the two that I mentioned
that are only recent discoveries and he
brings down that and goes with this also
um that that there was no need to write
a message because if you open up your
masectus if you open up magilla's
tightness in the end of magilla's
kindness is against a parrot and in the
air talks about it talks about and we're
going to see more about it in two or
three minutes it talks about chanukkah
and then after it brings down Hanukkah
the essence
and it talks all about and then it talks
about it
and then it has a whole there's a few
pages in some versions of the khibor but
there's Allah
and the leave it out
so we see there's a bunch of Allah early
Miguel's kindness early safer now
interestingly enough
in 1908 there was an addition of the
Massachusetts of of magilla's tyness and
he says he says this answer also that he
didn't know that other people said and
then he says
that on the cover of this printing
Edition in 1908 that he publishes he
says McDonald's
he holds and he could mistakenly think
it's okay there actually is but turns
out it's really a parody of laytona
sticker work printed but we're not going
to get into that now what you can learn
from that anyway a few years back this
keyboard that came out in 1908 called
um a parish Amigos tyness and one of the
position was Asia Asia and Asia of RAM
I don't know why okay more recent years
Elizabeth published it and they
published the whole work it looks like
this
um
and they have some other program now
one second you said I was about the
published in censored then you said they
published it sorry sorry correct correct
I'm testing if you're listening that's
all that's what they always say right
Aaron a publishing house they published
it with including everything okay
um now we're trying to clarify one more
time probably censored it they censored
it and and did not censor they published
the whole thing okay now ruchai and
Berlin he helped he was the news lime
time he helped the author including
giving him real materials from his
incredible Library he even tried to get
funds for published for publishing by
making this author spent four years
working on this Parish it's a very nice
thorough perish on the thing and he says
this is what um bottom line is
um today this parish is available it's
available on Hebrew Books if you don't
want to buy this Edition but
He suggests that's what the grub means
the girl didn't mean that there was a
lost message
because he wrote even harder someone
goes Tinus and that's what he's
referring to okay
now even if the growth didn't mean like
this but there are clearly certain
people that understood to answer this
question based on the concept of that
mcgillah's tightness is what we're
referring to
now
and therefore since magilla's tightness
is an early work so rabbit didn't either
included him if there's if if there's a
few pages and Miguel is tightness that
if you open up your McGill's times it's
not a few pages in a stand in addition
that doesn't have perusum on the side
but it's a nice page of the most
important aspects okay but in order to
properly understand this answer and why
this answer is not a good answer one has
to backtrack a drop we're not going to
go fully fully into this but we're going
to mention like this what is McGillis
times when you learn gamara comes up
very often what is Miguel's Tinus
so basically Miguel's Tinus is our
earliest written halach text and I
stress the words written dating from
much before Aaron mishnai some say it
was so well known that even children
knew it by heart
it a collected days of when Nissan
happened
in the times of bayashani and basically
there are two parts one written Aramaic
which is a list of the various days that
one should not fast or say a spade them
on it such as if you open up
um
when you're learning the gemara over
here what is the price the famous price
of Mike Hanukkah the tunnel because
that basically that's what that's the
Army that's what's called the Aramaic
part of the ghost Titus but right away
when you look in the standard mcgills
this part of The Middle's Tinus only has
something like 270 words it's a list
Aramaic list of a bunch of days in the
in the year not to say not the fastest
but there's another part in Hebrew
includes and each one of the it's like a
gamara type
um to each one of these days and gives
explanations what's behind today it
talks all about what we know about
Hanukkah that you find already partially
in the Bryson gemara shops now so with
this in mind it's not so strange to say
that there's no need for a special
massage since the earliest text we have
is a lengthy entry of balcony with most
important things in kundalagas so why
would you have to repeat it the problem
is that although yes there's an Aramaic
part and a Hebrew part but the dating of
the two is much later than each other
and that is the McGill's tinuses from
before the mishnais and that has but it
had significant additions this what I'm
calling gamara part written in a Hebrew
was written very early at the point when
it was not permissible to write down
this was written because it's just the
it doesn't really say much but at later
point the tire was permitted permitted
to start writing so Hebrew was added
when did that happen
earlier says it was completed at the end
of the tanoin the bulk of the discussion
regarding Hanukkah there appears
Miguel's tinuses in the Hebrew part so
therefore it does not make sense to say
that rebe is relying on it because this
is only after Ramen
who first suggested this answer they
were not aware of that there's different
kufas going on in the magilla's Tinus
such as what the which Rebecca which is
some of these other do suggest now
lamisa
for just to go briefly into this a few
aquarium already used the McGillis
kindness for chanukkah because there are
pieces that are not that show that the
famous Kasha de basis already in the
middle of Tinus that it acid and it has
its answer and it's his own a long
discussion which is thick Works thick
tones written on the sugya of the basis
Kasha and but it turns out it's very
early Kasha ready from ghost dinos now
be there as a mate when One Compares the
the the Heineken girls tightness to the
badly we find many similarities but
there are also differences so the child
is which work the badly did the McGill's
Tinus now they were saying that the the
what I'm calling the Hebrew part slash
gamara part that has Hanukkah in it was
that before the gemara or after so if
you look in let's say the native earlier
represent later on they all say that
this Bryce of
um that the gemara had is written after
this part of this Hebrew part of the
girls Titus okay anyway this is um as I
said there's a this this topic of the
kindness sorry there's been a lot
discussed about it especially in recent
years in the academic world based on
incredible discoveries just to mention
there's a lady very Noam put out a
beautiful edition of them girls tiniest
based on tremendous discoveries in
manuscripts and there's also Sharma
Freeman they've written a lot about it
and many others
um but we're not going to go into it I'm
just throwing it out there
to mention it just to conclude the sugy
of magillus tyness and Hanukkah were two
interesting cute things one is
um um uh we know people talk about
America so America that um
to put them mildly in the 1860s Yiddish
kite was pretty bad
so in a book it's called um the first
Rabbi which is about a one of the
earliest rabbis um in America from Rabbi
Robert from Rice who had smiha come from
the yakish about the madrasium of
rambing so he
in a piece over here when he talks about
chanukkah
so it sounds like in 1845 he's talking
about it he's talking to his kilo there
are very few of them know why we
celebrate Hanukkah and and what it is
okay this is what he says Okay now
what's interesting why am I saying this
introduction of 1845 is that uh
contemporary of his was someone Bernard
um ELO or something like I'm probably
saying his name wrong this person was a
talmud of the Sam Cipher had Smith and
he also ends up getting to America and
um
and he gets to America and he's a I
think a Rob at some point or maybe I'm
not sure I don't know his whole history
offhand right now but I came across this
piece that he wrote a chuva if one could
use gas for your nay rice if the fight
if so to speak the flame is coming
through gas if it's permissible for your
um so this is a true for being written
in the 1860s and part of the deals with
how to learn up to McGillis kindness I
found it very interesting even though I
just said in 1845 the maps of an America
is terrible but there was a year the
talmud of the of the Sam Cipher he's
handling with them with he's handling
with the Miguel's tightness how to how
to answer up his chuva and interestingly
enough there's a in this collection that
his son put out of his stuff there's
someone else a rebandi who also he he
argues on and he has a whole arigos
again fighter handling in different
aspects with the McGill's tiny so it's
cute even though America was a terrible
situation but we have two Eden that are
handling them girls kindness and these
in these Indiana okay that's one point
and the last point now related to
McGill's kindness and this is is it
there's an interesting little-known
correspondence on the topic between that
darus and robyakov Kahana and his rears
truvis told us Yakov where
basically they're handling about
Mercedes Hanukkah magilla's Tinus so
rufkahana he was bothered why the battle
left out most of the magilla's Tinus
from its discussion in regard to
Hanukkah he compares the two and that
Darius wrote back to him about it that
he that he remembers he he that he once
wrote about it Etc but he says what
bothered him more was
the that the usual me doesn't which is
why I mentioned all the way in the
beginning and they handle better but he
says lamisa there's a lot of Mitzvahs
that are not mentioned the missionaries
such as Siva safetyra is a Mitzvah uh
and it's that family is nice but kids
are he sort of kind of writes back to
him and it's a it's a very interesting
Trooper how these two good
dailymus and some a tiny bit about the
background of what what it is this hebor
Miguel's tightness
you mentioned these two rabbis early
rabbinic figures in the United States of
America I believe again Rabbi Dr David
Katz has episodes where he talks about
both of them both are by ricegum by
Eloise that's how you pronounce his name
either
um but I think you look in his podcast
he discusses he has very interesting
content uh both of those okay so thank
you for that information
um because I'm sorry for who you've
mentioned just
um a few times already
um I think he has an answer as well yes
yes definitely does he's it's okay this
is one of the famous tourism perhaps one
of the first truesome that I ever came
across was like this the Sam Cipher says
so this Harris is brought down by
is to say over the reason why it's not
in the mission is because Robin are
kaddish was from the Zera of government
and the Miracle of Chronicles who took
away the malcols from the the
descendants of David so it was tanata
his liking in quotation marks he omitted
it from the mishnah was which was
written
these are very powerful words and I
remember the first time I came across
them I found it very interesting I went
I used to had a very close caption with
Aid
his name is and I asked him about this
because I'm sorry for and he said it
schmeck from haskala and we'll see more
about that momentarily but bottom line
is this piece of the cause controversy
like a lot of other things and it was
dealt with there were censorships how to
present this people noted this um in an
article in
in the Commerce they were in the Hebrew
coma someone wrote an article about
notice noted in the different versions
of Michelle's Channel Publishers anyway
it seems that the daughter of the
samsifers reported to have said that the
Quran General is not reliable okay so he
says so so some people would say okay
this is chalk it up to one more such
peace that is not reliable what he says
to answer about about
um why there's no machines I came across
um the three day H says he knew the
author personally because she was a
reliable person he was a dight gun and
you could rely on him
okay now La Mesa the world expert today
or one of the world experts because very
hard to say is
and he put out a beautiful work on the
samsifer called zacharius and he says
that most of the time it turns out that
this is correct and he defends this
answer okay so what's it based on it's
based on the ramban the rambana famous
ramban in the end of voracious where he
talks about the Hat of the Hashem that
basically they took it away from um it's
a famous ramban I'm not going to go into
discussing barricas the quote to Russian
but it's it's well it's well known the
mice
one of the points that they brought up
why because I'm cypher it can't be is
because in gibden he says a different
reason he says based on the ramdam that
we quoted in the beginning that since
Hanukkah is well known rabbi did not
included so it must be because I'm sorry
for couldn't have said it but I don't
know what what does that mean I remember
hearing when I was a kid that the satma
Reba every
um night of Hanukkah would say in other
terrorists and if for the base series is
cashier so this cash there's also a
bunch of Tourism so what's
many questions if he has many Mahal come
so one time he said based on the ram
number time he said this what's what's
so problematic I don't know balamisa
even if you don't want to say this I'm
sorry for says this
um says from from
um
he's the inical of Ruby Swami Kutner he
dies right before World War II
tremendous guy and he also he says his
pla um clearly and he ties it to the
ramban so even if you don't want to say
you don't like the um Cipher saying it
or schmeck from mascala and Lamesa I did
fine years later that the mice is higher
Franco uh interesting fellow to put a
mildly
um Tacoma Moscow is also putting it
mildly but we're not going to get into
that he does say it and this was the the
accepted explanation by many historians
for many years that the reason is it has
something to do with the yahas of rebi
and hashmanayam and how the name are
portrayed in hazal in a negative way not
in a negative way this is a topic that's
dealt with in the academic world we're
not going to discuss that today but well
maisa others have said it besides
an interesting
Feinstein which some people do call him
a masculine I believe he's not but
anyway
different people said this terrorism but
there's a different in the Cuda just to
mention briefly is this Terrace of some
Cypher is telling another thing and that
is what was rebbe's role in writing the
mishnam
was he an editor that just collected
previous material or he added things of
his own so um just to mentioned
he says Rabbi never brings something
that he does not agree with in the
Mishra so that goes very good
safer from the baliatives
and he says that Rabbi was mostly an
editor he gathered existing
and he chose with what to include so
comes out Cyprus turrets would only work
according to the captain of pharah but
according to the safer crisis even if
something even if he didn't want it he
would not have a possibility not to
include it in there anyway this is
um the famous territs of the Sam Cipher
that's been discussed okay now I would
like to conclude
with one last mahalak as time allows as
the clock runs down runs out on us and
that's as follows
some people say let's say Alexander
Marshall Peter says the reason Hanukkah
is written down is to show the power of
parishable and there's tons of Tyrus and
schmooz and tying Hanukkah and which I'm
having is not to go down that
um
says something similar thought
but I think it has it there's even more
to it and that's his fouls
um basically we find in the gemara a
concept known as khasuri maksara that
when it's talking when the gamars asked
a question on the mission and says
something's missing and we try to
understand it says there's a line
missing
and she really say this so many years
ago when I was in 10th Grade my high
school rebbe at the time Rabbi
lobenstein he said he heard over from
Israel it was done on purpose the whole
Hector to write the entire pair was A
Rush of verbena kadus that he saw was
going to be forgotten he didn't want him
to become accessible to all he wanted to
retain a strong part of it that should
be dependent on Parish about pair on a
messiah from the past therefore he made
it that certain parts could only be
understood based on transmission from a
previous generation how did he do that
he's specifically on purpose left out
lines in the missionaries La Mesa later
found there of footner says this by
Rico's and he says it for chronicle so
it was done on purpose to retain uh it
was that's why hanukkah's only mentioned
I found him to show us this type of
thing similar to kasuri maksa this is
where refunder says lamisa without
calling it to Hanukkah we quote earlier
from the kavascr an incredible
incredible work of his that only came
out from manuscript in recent years
called Marcus shisha he basically says
this nakudo to explain
Asylum
from just to throw out there because
we're throwing out these words also in a
mass in a musculine friend of his of
Captain allenberg he wrote many Iris on
the scribers the rashash says the same
thing in in explaining it now explaining
but I want to take this a suggestion I'm
going to say another point and I'm gonna
take it even further and that is like
this
is a famous yid that also sparked
controversy which we hope to deal with
in the episodes of empiresky soon enough
however
based on I'm going to take what he said
and go further he said like this there's
a famous he he doesn't he doesn't say
this this is the background there's a
concept called khasure which we just
said which is
that um that there's no sovereign
with this introduction
um even though he doesn't say it I'm
giving the introduction to medallionado
says
that where's everyone know Hanukkah from
babakama
that's
nice if you have a if you have a gummo
I'm going to say it in English just
because we're English people but
basically if you have a camel he's
walking in the public domain with flags
and the flags caught fire from a fire
that was in a shop and the Damage what
happens the owner of the camel has to
pay damages okay however if the
storekeeper's fire was out on the public
domain then the storekeeper has to pay
damages
then the store keeper is not obligated
to pay from here says Ronaldo we learned
the basically why the neighbors have to
be lit outside over 10th and when people
are passing by Allah
found in other places in which nice so
the rest of Allah has a side issues so
here in this mishna which was talking
about Hillcrest naziken we see openly
all these things so you have to it says
but this is printed in a work called
which it seems by is also it's very hard
to find it's not um
he's when we discuss and we'll maybe
discuss more about it but anyway this is
what He suggests so really what I'm
saying is that the khasure Tyra is
specifically in the mishnais not that
the gamara says on it but if you learn
the mishna carefully you'll see this
more to the story okay
so now I want to take this even further
and that's as follows when one starts
so if you're learning halacha and as we
mentioned in the past I have a certain
special place in my heart for the
maganav ram he brings down a Hebrew
right in the beginning of Hanukkah for
why there's a famous meaning that all
children are Macbeth and cold in every
place in all the world which is
where does it come from so I have no
idea but I know when he learned from the
Magnificent
I remember when I saw this many years
ago I know this is
and everything I I emailed of a friend a
monthly has a tremendous Farm collection
named Rabbi Sean Jacobs and he tells me
yeah he has a safe hand because advice
he even made sure to get me a copy to
send it to me in art Israel and
basically in this
turns out a few years later I start
going through the safer he's a talmud of
the mashallah Cheney and he wrote an
important Hebrew called tala Iris
quotes the sleeper is beyond rare even
the hida and in a previous episode we
just spoke about
how he saw everything in the shame I
could tell him and everything this work
he never saw but the magnavron had it
anyway it's first printed in 1641.
what's this hebor
besides for this important of that he
give the kids the poor kids the money
when they come around what's this Hebrew
turns out it's a Hebrew a masakta say
from showing from
showing how in hanira is that we say
every night all of ilka's kanakarma
rumors so I would like to suggest that
this this it's not clear how early it is
but it's for sure from
so there was a small piece that everyone
knew if you want to even go to Thai with
the rambam of the rambams Persia
Michigan was well known Fearless were
well known so everyone said our nearest
hello and in the nearest if you look at
it very carefully the safer unbelievable
what is how he shows it but and it's not
through using gametria's and it's after
using hibijibi Kabbalah through push it
learning the text
on tons of things in Phil Collins that's
she was in the safer so but sir there's
a there is a a PO a place that I could
show you even similar to a medallionado
who points to mishna in in the Baba
Karma the famous Mission which talks
about that's how we know about the
Hanukkah is here it's much more because
a few lines and there's more he shows
how everything is in there it's kadai to
look at there's at least the version on
Hebrew Books is I think maybe a few
versions on okay now I would like to
conclude because we asked so many
questions at the outset and um even
though we're not gonna we don't have
time to go through all the aspects I
would like to conclude something with a
different review of mine this rabby of
mine I would I give them unbelievable
credit it's my fifth grade Rabbi and
this Rabbi his name was Rebecca Levi
burlovsky and she was high in Berlin and
he was extremely he's my fifth grade he
was my fifth grade Rabbi and I give him
tremendous
um appreciation he helped my he helped
my appreciation with svarum grow I mean
say by the time I came to fifth grade I
was into smart and plenty but he helped
it for the next four years he helped it
a lot and he just to show the impact
this is my fifth grade Webby I'm not
young I'm not old but I'm not young it's
going back many years and he quote he
wrote up for us
um in a pen with four different colors
uniball pens a red green blue and black
with stencil machines we're going back I
don't have the paper here I do have the
paper somewhere actually he quoted
himself which until today and this shows
you the impact of a rebby could have on
a kid even in fifth grade and basically
it says in in in Hanukkah we say in
Allen he said Cipher
that that's the answer to the question
that's where it's alluding to the Nace
what does that mean how is it answering
the question because they weren't able
to light inside normally they lit inside
here they had to light outside why
because it was so common that it was so
full of Tuma and it's winter nights so
it normally should have gone out much
earlier it didn't that's the Nace of
chanukkah
and that's the issue of sign for the
base series of Kasha and that's the shot
house marumas and alanisa okay this is
some Cipher doesn't need any any uh
mascamas this is a some section now
um the Marshall so but what is this is a
Nace that that um and that's how Denise
came known what does that mean to have
the Nace came known there's a difference
I'm sorry for that a friend of mine
Amicon pointed to me it's a very
interesting sum sorry if he talks about
why the nase of Hanukkah is outside
and
as opposed to let's say uh mcgillah we
don't do it outside even though there's
a there's a connection to the passage
bias for PESA but he says because pesach
is that of course everyone needs to know
about it why because in the times of the
base I mean that she was a say sir and
not everyone know only the Hannah knew
this not everyone knew this
he says the CES of some Cipher arrive at
the safer different malchus by Shani
um says this okay and he was this Amicon
was asking all different people where in
the world does this come from lamisa
this concept that that only the kaihanna
knew it sounds like there's a famous
that also says something similar that it
was not such a well-known Nace it wasn't
as from a person though the mace of
Hanukkah was that he won the war and
everything the Nace of the shaman took
time for it to get known what's some say
for referring to
so you didn't have an answer I had I I
reached out to the rabbi hamburger I
quoted earlier he didn't have a good
answer he did send me a list of
different places because I'm sorry if it
does refer to historical works but there
is a the famous Ravid the first Riven
who's known for writing a safer Kabbalah
which is historical work so what's less
known is he has a Hebrew dire Asylum
which is also available uh so one of the
a critical Edition as they call it as
this expensive book and that's the only
reason why you showed it in the first
place and basically he talks about
Hanukkah and over there but the problem
is with the dating and everything and
it's still not clear but it seems that
some say for what it's possible that
some say we could have seen this work
but what because I'm sorry for how I
remembered it that's still uh beer where
is the source of
the point is we now have an answer at
least one answer there's many answers
um of for for in alanisim and we also
able to read the answer up the basically
even though we said a different answer
which is that really in the middle is
tightness but here we're answering it
Lamesa okay we tried to keep it to some
normal sense of time without going all
over the place
um with all the different tangents and
tangents that I could have gone to so
I'm being polite
thank you very much
um any questions or requests for
possible PDFs or book information please
be in touch with Eliezer brought
gmail.com if you want a sponsor
any episode we have requests for
episodes please be in touch with myself
suede mou.org or Rabbi Dr broth at
Eliezer brought
gmail.com thank you very very much and
we look forward to connecting once again