Preparing video...
0:00 / 0:00
V'Zos Habracha
14 views
By: Rabbi Moshe Taragin Download the FREE All Parsha app: https://linktr.ee/alltorah Follow us on social media: https://linktr.ee/alltorah Join the All Torah Clips WhatsApp Community: https://chat.whatsapp.com/LhFsTY2R6Ll40SFdFmh8i6 Donate: https://alltorah.org/donate
Categories:Torah/Parsha
Comments
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Mosha Taragan for the OU all para video
series for parasa
paras viz sabra like para saz is written
as a poem every phrase is laden pregnant
with multiple layers of meaning um
sometimes people actually get confused I
get confused sometimes where is in or
because they're both poems in general
haz about the history of humanity
history of amisol history of the people
punish or torturing amisol and divine
justice whereas that have to do with and
its traits and it are more likely to be
in paras
not in paren
um every p is a shiron to its own and of
course the te of mosher ra towards the
end of the para and the moniker of in
the beginning of the para so it's very
easy to get riveted or focused upon a
particular because each is a talim has
timat
that emanate from it. But going to give
an overview of something that runs like
a thread throughout parasa
obviously Moshe is delivering brahos but
he's also looking at prophecies and
delivering prophecies to the various and
he and he delivers blessings to them
based on their shit's trajectory. This
is pretty clear towards the end of Par's
visa where takes Mosha up to
and he sees Danali
Yehuda
all the different locations tell us
Rashi quotes it Mosha is not looking at
locations on a map but he's looking at
events that will unfold most of these
events or events that will take place
that will occur up into and including
the first Bikdash namely Safer Yeshua
through Safhim
And most of them pertain to either the
conquest of Israel or betrayals
um in
that some of theatim commit
but there is one phrase that perhaps
stretches Mosher Rabenu's vision beyond
those couple centuries in B of Mosha
sees sees
until the Yama which of course would be
the Mediterranan ian sea which would be
the end the final border the final
frontier of the boundaries of Israel but
Rashi says the word yamaron could also
mean
he sees until the last day which means
that isn't just looking about isn't just
casting his vision across 3 400 years
he's casting his vision or even 700
years he's casting his vision across
thousands of years um which means that
Moshe's nuos now have to be seen not
just as localized or limited to the
first B mikdash or even before but as
divorce that pertain to all of history.
Now the truth is that everything that
happens in the Torah recycles
doesn't just mean that what happened to
our aos serves as guidance to their
children and their descendants but it
happens again their historical
templates. Judaism unlike other cultures
does not see history as open-ended and
evolutionary. Doesn't seem time as
meaningless as some cultures do. Neither
of those two both both of those those
are separate approaches. We see history
as purposeoriented design driven.
There's a beginning there's an end. The
beginning of history is creation. The
end of history is redemption. We drive
humanity towards redemption. And we also
see that within that arc, within that
trajectory, events that happened before
happen again. especially if they are
redemptive events and not just um
anecdotal events. Redemptive events are
events that pertain to the Jewish people
in particular in their homeland or
pertaining their desire and struggle to
return to their homeland. So what
happens in Shushan is ultimately a
redemptive event because Amis is in the
process of returning to Israel. The
process has begun. It's stalled because
of opposition from the locals. So what's
happening in Shushan is not just a
miracle in a bottle. It's part of the
redemptive struggle to get back to
Israel in so many ways.
So what happens to ouros and certainly
what happens in Erit Isel is bound to
happen again. And that's why Nvos are
not just ancient artifacts of how Yeria
or Zakaria or Yeskel describe certain
events. But the events that they
foretold and foreshadowed recycle upon
themselves. So any event that's wrapped
up in Jewish history, in Jewish land,
the Jewish people, Jewish redemption
recycles. And you need the lenses to be
able to see through the shell. Well, the
shell seems different. We don't hurt
goats. We don't wear sandals, although
some Israelis do wear sandals. We live
in a technologically advanced world of
cars and planes and internet, social
media, and artificial intelligence. But
that's just the shell. If you look
through the shell into the life and the
heart of the matter, the heart of
experience, the prophecies are all
relevant and resonant and have
contemporary meaning.
So in honor of Erit Isel, I want to
discuss three prophecies that Moshe sees
or envisions that he in the immediate
sense he sees them within the context of
the Shvatim and the first B mikdash. But
as we know what happened in the first B
of victors will happen again and they're
happening again as we speak as we're
beginning the redemptive return and in
the of because two years ago when we
last read not last but when we read
was violated and was attacked. It wasn't
just an attack on our people was an
attack on our cities.
that these cities should be restored and
hopefully as I speak. There are
processes that are taking place
maybe sending
and and messengers and agents to perhaps
move history forward. Certainly
returning our hostages is is an event
for for not celebration. Celebration is
a is a trivial word. Word that
trivializes it, cheapens it, but for
success and at least solace and comfort
and healing which our people desperately
need. Let alone all the soldiers who are
away from their families and now for two
years including I can speak from
personal example. Some of them not all
of them obviously it's not like there's
a 180°ree turnaround but some of them
will be reunited with their families
again if um some of the fighting and the
war abates.
In any event, getting back to these
nvors, let's first start with a
statement about um let's see about
Yoseph and then we'll move to the braha
of um I think it's Asher and we'll move
to the brah of Zulan and we'll see
statements about Israel that happened
then but are happening now and then
we'll see on the back end something that
happened then which was unfortunate even
though well-intentioned and maybe
happening again. So this is to restore
the glory and the honor of Erit Isel to
remind ourselves that we're not living
in Israel. We're living in Erit Israel.
We're not living through a geopolitical
struggle. We're living through Mashiach
and maybe hundreds of years, but the
struggle of Brazil and the struggle to
rebuild our people and our peoplehood
and our ancient homeland under the eye
of. So Yoseph is described as one of the
driving forces in the conquest of Erit
Israel. The beginning of the para
describes or section describes his
agricultural success but in the middle
he's the leader
he has very very exalted horns
of and with those horns he will gore
the edges of the earth which edges of
the earth is y goring so rashi says it
means the 31 chieftains and warlords who
occupied it eritzkan then and abs
then becomes a nickname far is. So why
is absar nickname far is the same land
that Yseph will conquer with his very
beautiful exalted strong horns cars.
Why is nicknames? So she says because
every single empire in that ancient
world wanted a tow hold and a palace or
some hold in Israel because they knew it
was so important.
It's something desired by all the
nations. So, everyone made a big to-do
about this little country between the
river and the sea um that the small
Jewish people were inhabiting and they
all wanted consulates and embassies.
They wanted shares. They all wanted
parts of it. Therefore, it was called
absor because it was localized and
focused geographically. it almost it
spread across the entire ancient world
because no matter how far you were even
if you were in Britain let's say which
was the end of the the ancient world I
don't know if people were living there
that was you know the islands right
before the Atlantic everyone even those
warlords and chieftains wanted a hold
all those gnome all those Vikings and
all the uh the barbarians wanted a hold
no no insult to the British that's what
it was in those days wanted a hold in
errant Israel and of course what
happened before happens again and this
is they didn't just want hold and for
random arbitrary reasons they sense
subliminally this is the land of Hashem
this is the presence of Hashem and
therefore everyone wanted to be close to
so it was and so it is the disproportion
with with which Israel is treated the
level of attention that Israel receives
the discriminatory policies towards
Israel the opposition the fierce
opposition towards our being initi
it's frustrating it's painful but we're
not surprised this is the land of Hashem
People don't want Iceland. People don't
want Canada. People don't want
Venezuela. No insult intended to those
listening in those countries. But this
is this is the land of Hashem. This is
Raglav. This is Shahim. This is Bloim.
This is as Kazal tell us, one day will
be the metropolis. And every other city
in the world from Beijing to Tokyo to
Paris to New York to Moscow will all be
suburbs of Yusim. Therefore the nations
of the world in Sherim are referred to
as Benosim. The word Benos being a
suburb. So it was in the day of
Mosherenu. So it is in our day in 2025
touch
literally
when asher is described. So Asher's bra
is described as
your shoes or your locks l ks will be
iron and copper.
One interpretation which Rashi provides
is that you will draw iron and copper
from the mountains around you and you'll
mine some of that iron and copper. Of
course, this is a bra delivered to Asha
who lived in the highlands but it's
reminiscent of the in which the entire
is described.
You don't have to beg for your food. You
don't have to scrge your own food.
Nothing is missing.
The stones are iron
and from its mountains.
So the mountains of Israel pour forth
iron and copper and asher lived in the
highlands. So he has a specific access
to barel.
Um not quoting rashi. I'm just quoting
what should be obvious from the PK. If
you're trying to describe the beauty and
the wealth and the affluence of Israel
and the brahos, you would normally
typically in every culture describe it
as mountains that provide gold and
silver
aim as all the foreign idolatrous
cultures decorated and adorned their
idols and their sites and their sacral
sites and their palaces and their
monuments with gold and silver. And gold
and silver was wealth. gold and silver
are precious metals and yet Israel is
not described ever as a land that
provides gold and silver um in part
because of him doesn't want to associate
life in greed and avarest there's a very
famous story where and his one of his
went to America went to and struck it
rich struck gold and the other student
the other very jealous of went out to
the mountain probably mount meron I
think the median is meron I think it's
the only time that the mountain of meron
is associated with and he miraculously
draws gold and silver from the mountains
and he says look if you you want gold
and silver you don't have to get on a
flight you can just stay here but just
know that the gold and silver you take
in this world will diminish your share
in the next world but the Torah doesn't
describe the nonsens of Israel naturally
providing gold and silver was able to
summon it supernaturally miraculously
what it does described as copper and
iron and I think that Baru is
instructing us that we have to provide
um utility and technology and science
and advance and human welfare and human
machinery and human advance. That's the
role of Amisl is to to be able to is to
provide spiritual guidance, moral
guidance, spiritual guidance, cultural
repair and also to be a source of
material welfare for people. Copper and
and um iron are typically associated
with manufacturer, typically associated
with utility. If you put gold and silver
on one side, gold and silver have
relatively less utilitarian use. They're
just for adorment, for for for for
money, for wealth, for affluence, for
beauty, for aesthetics. Whereas iron and
um iron and copper have real utility.
They can be used as metals to create, to
craft, to build, to to create shields,
to create defense, to create war
weapons. And you don't use gold, you
don't use silver. These are harsher,
more powerful, more sturdy metals. not
being a meta metatallergist but or not
even knowing how to say meta
metallergist metallergist
but um what's interesting to me is that
this is coming true but in a very
different way the uh resource that's
most valuable in today's world is oil
and interestingly enough Israel at least
the dry part of Israel the dry land
doesn't have any oil and it's very odd
because we're in a region in which
almost every one of our neighbors not
all of them but many of them have oil
resources and Jo doesn't I think that's
part of a larger narrative. I don't
think Akesh Bar wants us to be burning
oil indefinitely and I think at some
point science will overtake leisure and
we'll discover other forms of energy and
I think it's going to create a sea
change politically and all the countries
whose economies are based solely on oil
production are going to face stiff
crisis and stiff tests. Um,
of course we have discovered natural gas
across the ocean. But more importantly,
we're producing iron and copper, but not
in the literal sense. I don't think
we're mining that much from Israel
proper,
but we're certainly in the copper and
iron of the day taking the lead. And
that's ingenuity and innovation and
technology. And copper and iron should
be seen as a metaphor, not as specific
metals. So we're not primarily looking
to acrue wealth without producing
anything. Let's say like some of the
countries in our area think of Qatar in
particular which has been in the news
lately which has created spheres of
influence in the modern world simply
because of oil money.
We're actually producing medical
technology, agricultural technology,
weapons technology, um many different
technologies that help humanity and that
advance humanity. And that's of course
part of Akadesh Bar's desire that Ara
be. So for Moshe was copper and iron
because those were the ores and minerals
necessary for productivity. Today we we
we've moved to a virtual world and
hopefully we'll continue to play that
role. And which leads me to the next
interesting statement about Zeulan. He's
a villain who lives across the sea along
the sea and their their um region is
described as
they draw the um the harvest and the
abundance of the sea.
Very interesting articulation
which means things that hide in the
sand. Tam is something that hides could
again is a strange word
but it could mean something sounds like
the word something that's Rashi says
which could mean that they were very
expensive that were on the sea where sea
were had to share it could be the
Slavana certain types of glass that they
had to manufacture with the sea water
but basically all these hidden riches
and hidden assets of the sea and the and
were reaped and harvested by Asher.
Rashi then gives a different shot. Rashi
says based on the next word or the
beginning of the
will be called the nation um to the to
the mountain and they will give
sacrifices. What do the nation of the
mountain and the sacrifices have to do
with making a lot of money through and
making a lot of money through glass?
namely what is the end of the Pussk
making money through glass and sand
resources have to do with the beginning
of the Pusk the nation of the mountain
who bring sacrifices. Sarashi says that
seafarers and and um businessmen and
tradesmen will arrive in Israel simply
to do business simply to for commercial
interests with Zulan to buy and trade on
dye very expensive to be called that to
buy and trade special glass that they
could manufacture to buy and trade other
wares and other commodities and they'll
say well once we're here already in
Israel we've landed for financial
motives and financial incentives let's
go to and see about their religion
because we've heard strange things.
These are the people that worship one
god. These are the p these are the
people um that eat similarly. These are
the people that are federalized and
centralized. And we all have different
gods and different states and different
chieftains, different cultures,
different fruits. And they realize the
the value both theologically as well as
experientially of of unity, of
federalization, of standardization of
one God, but also one people, one
culture, one way of life, one system.
And they convert. They actually convert.
Rashi says Msky to be Jews. A misguire
sham. So essentially you have a
phenomena where people land in Israel,
take an interest in Israel for purely
financial reasons just because they want
to invest in the Israeli stock market or
invest in Israeli startups and at some
point that rolls over into
non-commercial affiliation in this case
religious affiliation, theological
commitment, but it could just be uh
again national affiliation to see the
Jewish people and Jewish state in better
light. And we hope this will continue to
a degree it continued. October 7th threw
a monkey wrench in it and there's been a
lot of anti-Israel sentiment in the wake
of our justifiable war to defend
ourselves. Although some countries are
still deeply vested in our people. A lot
of Americans who may be listening to
this is this is an OU video are less
familiar with some of the dynamics in
central and eastern Europe. The
countries like Hungary and Romania and
places that are still deeply committed
to the Jewish people, Jewish state, let
alone India. Of course, it's not enough
to offset some of the other um viferous
enemies of the Jewish people, enemies of
the Jewish state, hostility towards the
Jewish state, but hopefully after the
war abates, hopefully some of this can
be reversed and people will once again
return to be supporters and admirers of
Israel, maybe even admirers of Israel's
God and the values that we stand for
that are under siege and and that are
being that are eroding in part because
they will be interested in trade
agreements with Israel, certainly behind
the Abraham Accords and other pe other
strides towards peace. So these are
three events that Moshe envisions all of
which are obviously noteworthy all of
which are remarkable and all of which
seem to be repeating themselves in the
current era. Number one is an absorat
people are interested across the globe
in having a tow hold in Israel. Number
two we're providing copper and iron not
gold and silver. We're providing
utility, technology, advance, uh,
manufacturer.
Number three, people are being drawn
towards Israel as a financial
powerhouse, but hopefully it leads to
larger discoveries, whether they be
discovery of the Jewish people or
ultimately, as we hope, discovery of,
and we hope that that process and
dynamic continues and actually recovers
after it has been disrupted by this war.
And then there is a different um
different pattern that seems to be
repeating itself in the story of God. So
God is one of the nations um that choose
to dwell in a yard which is generally
seen by Moshe and Paris Matos as a um
erroneous decision as a dangerous
decision. It comes back to bite them as
we see they slowly slowly disappear from
the Jewish
story even before the shivatim and even
before they disappear in the end of
Yeshua there's a lot of suspicion about
them seceding as a different people and
and a diplomats have to be sent have to
be dispatched to patch things up it's a
very fraught decision and at least the
way we read the decision in Matos it was
a less than holy decision The incentives
weren't that pure and lofty. They found
the pasture land very fertile. They felt
that it was suitable for their cattle,
for their children, for their families.
Come to Israel. You can live in Israel.
You may not strike it rich. You may not
have a large house. You may have a have
several cars in your driveway, but maybe
living in Israel is more important than
making a little extra money. But in
parasa
it sounds like at least according to
Rashi that there was a noble cause a
noble reason they first saw before we
entered Israel they first saw this god
is their land
because there the portion of the of the
lawgiver
we all know that refers to but here says
refers Mosha the portion of the classic
the epitome the our typical moenu is
hidden again the word saf this time with
a sam not with a sin saf so Mosha's
share is hidden so rashi says that god
actually lived near haro where Moshe was
buried and they chose to stay in a
because they wanted to be near Mosha
Rabenu now that's a little bit
historically intriguing I think there's
someone at my door So, um I'm home
alone. So, here my door entering opening
up. So, I'm just going to shut this for
a second and I'll come right back. Okay.
It's a good thing I stopped this year.
We're having Barak Hashem a lot of
people for Yamiff. Uh some of my
sons-in-laws are in the are in the army.
So, we're hosting grandchildren and
parents. And so, we ordered some food
for Yam. And I was supposed to be the
one listening for the door putting them
in the kitchen. So, I did my job. So,
he's putting it in the kitchen. And uh
I'll continue to share it. Anyway, so
historically it's a little bit strange
because God already makes the decision
to stay in in um init.
Does Mosha already know exactly where
he'll be buried in Matos? Remember in
Pinas he ascends Haravarim but just
because he ascends Haravarim doesn't
mean that that's where he'll be buried.
So this suggests that God already knew
the general region where Moshe would be
buried and chose to stay in
and surrender forfeit their right to
live in Israel because they want to be
near the gul near Mosher Rabenu. And if
we just abstract it beyond just the
decision about Mosher Rabenu, it it's it
appears to be a trend where people who
have the opportunity to live in Erit
Israel choose not to live in Erit Israel
for what would seem to be justifiable
reasons. But
yet even though the sh of God has lofty
noble reasons they want to be near
Mosher Rabenu, generally it doesn't work
out. there's very little um favorable
opinion of God expressed. So if God is
making the choice to stay in because
they want to be near Mosher Rabenu
ultimately that's the decision that
Tanakh our Msara frowns upon namely if
you have the chance to be in Israel
don't give it up and don't surrender it
because there's some other value that
can offset it or or kind of other reason
not to move to Israel. This isn't a move
terrace to Israel or your life is empty
message but it it does spotlight the
flaw in that logic. Now keep again there
there there's in which um certain
certain were very opposed to others
moving from Bavl to Israel because Bavl
was a center of Torah. So in Talara is
poised against life in Erit Isel. Well
that's part of the conversation of the
late 19th century.
One second. He's at the door again. I'm
sorry about all the interruptions. The
person just needed my attention. So the
gar does
hold up to as a reason at least
according to some Amaruda
felt that his should not make aliyah and
he had to avoid his his um his
supervision. So at least in this case
the desire to stay in to be near Mosher
Rabenu which is attributed to Ben
doesn't work out well. God ultimately
disappears from Amisoul's history. To
say in a more general sense if you're in
Israel you're within Jewish history. If
you're not in Israel then you're at
least facing the peril of disappearing
as God did. Doesn't mean that everyone
who doesn't live in Israel disappears.
We believe in Bzedc and in Mashiach and
people coming, but you're already on the
periphery of Jewish history. If you're
in Israel, you're in the middle, dab
smack of Jewish history. Um, which of
course raises the whole question that a
lot of people are struggling with today.
moving to Israel if it will come at the
cost of how I raise my children and how
much Torah I'll learn and which is an
important calculus but don't use
American terms like off the derek to
describe people in Israel who are
battling to defend Jewish history and
searching for in ways that may not
cohhere with classic modes for all sorts
of reasons which obviously is unjust I'm
not justifying it but to use a term such
as off the derk for people that are
squarely on the derk and squarely
building the derk it's it's a very
inappropriate application and vice versa
if you're outside of well obviously if
you're mitz you're holding one very very
tightly to msara and hopefully you
you'll get a messianic ticket but the
decision to stay in because you want to
be near Mosherenu and near Mosherenu's
doesn't work out well for God so three
historical patterns that are favorable
that end favor favor verbally or not and
they're favorable dynamics namely erit
Israel is obser number two iron and
copper not gold and silver number three
people arrive in Israel for commercial
interest become interested in our
culture hopefully our god and then one
which is unfortunate God disappears from
history at least according to rashi they
had positive and favorable motivations
they wanted to be near
the hidden portion of our lawgiver maj
Rapano.