0:00 / 0:00
Addicts, Sensitive Souls, and Other Spiritual Seekers | Yom Kippur
3,706 views
▪Why do we pray on Yom Kippur for forgiveness for "the sin we committed with the evil inclination"? Aren't all sins committed with the evil inclination? Chasidus explains that this refers to the specific sin of failing to transform the energy of the evil inclination into a force for good. ▪What did the Baal HaTanya say to rescue an at risk youth? ▪Why is there a custom to cry for the two sons of Aharon on Yom Kippur? Were these two sons rebels or were they holy? Or were they both? ▪What did Carl Jung tell the alcoholic about spirituality that became the basis for a recovery movement? ▪What is a "spiritual canary"?
Featuring:
Seekers
Comments(0)
Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
This is a special class, right?
Um
Preparing to do shiva. Yeah, preparing
to do it to shiva. Okay.
Because Yom Kippur is coming. Oh, yeah.
Yeah.
Okay.
So, you know, one time there were three
priests.
They got together and they
went on a retreat.
And uh
just by themselves.
So, one of them says to the other two,
he says, "You know, we're all taking
confession.
Confession is good for the soul, and
we're always listening to confession,
but how often do we get a chance to
unburden ourselves? Why don't we all
confess to each other about our sins?"
So, the other two say, "Okay, fine. No
problem. You go first." He says, "Okay.
Um
I have a big drinking problem. I'm
always drunk. Parishioners have no They
have no idea, but I'm always
constantly shicker."
Second one says, "You know what?
I also have a vice.
I'm always gambling.
In fact, I take from the collection
plate and I run to the casino and I
gamble away the money."
The third one
starts to walk away and leave the room.
They say, "Hey, where are you going?" He
says, "You know, my sin is gossip, and I
have to make a few phone calls."
Okay.
So, one of the big prayers of Yom Kippur
that we say
is the Al Chet prayer.
Al Chet means
for the sin
of
and then we go through the aleph-bet
through the uh
Hebrew alphabet
and we enumerate all types of sins that
start with every letter of the alphabet.
In fact, double. Aleph aleph, bet bet,
gimel gimel.
One of the uh confessions
is Al Chet she chatanu u'fanachnu
v'yeitzer hara.
We ask God to forgive us for the sin
that we committed before him
through or with
the yeitzer hara, the evil inclination.
Okay, so here here's the question.
Simple question.
What does it mean we ask you to forgive
us for the sin that we committed with
the evil inclination?
Aren't
all sins committed with the evil
inclination?
Right? If it wasn't from the evil
inclination, then where did they come
from? Obviously, every sin
comes from some motive
of the evil inclination. It's not the
good inclination that's making you sin.
Or maybe they just needed
they they they came to Yud and they
couldn't think of two good ones, so they
just threw that one in and they said,
"You know what? That applies to all of
them, so yeah, put it in there. Print
it."
You hear the question?
Yeah? It's a simple question, right?
It's not a complicated question.
So, I'll tell you a story that I'm sure
I've told before. It's one of my
favorites.
But, uh it'll help get our minds
in the right
space
to be able to understand this question
better
and to answer it.
There's a story
about a chassid, a father.
It's really a story about a father
in the times of the Alter Rebbe, the
Baal Hatanya.
He was a a simple
villager. He uh
He lived outside of the the Alter
Rebbe's village of uh Lyozna.
And he had a son
who today we would call at risk.
So the
the father went to the Alter Rebbe and
he
unburdened his his his soul and he spoke
about what was heavy upon his heart and
he told the Alter Rebbe he has this son
who's at risk.
So the that he's getting involved in all
types of things that are not appropriate
for a Jewish boy and he's spiraling
further and further.
So the Alter Rebbe says to the to the
father,
"You get him to me and and I'll take it
from there. You got to get him to me,
but you do that and then I'll I'll take
it from there."
So the uh
father goes home
and he's thinking to himself he's got to
he he has one job now.
What does he have to do?
Get his son to the Alter Rebbe.
How's he going to get his son to the
Alter Rebbe? If he's going to tell him
go to the rabbi, there's no way. It's
not happening.
So uh
he comes up with a bright idea.
As mentioning, the boy was getting into
things that were not
considered so wholesome for a Jewish
boy. Maybe this
what I'm about to tell you doesn't
translate culturally very well to New
York 2019,
but uh
the boy was into riding horses.
And uh that was not considered
aidel. That wasn't, you know, refined
behavior.
No, to to ride a wagon, that's one
thing, but to to get on a horse and ride
a horse like a jockey, that's sort of
crass.
But he was very into it. The boy was
very into it. So the father says to the
teenage boy,
"I need you to run an errand in this in
the town, the bigger town, Liashna for
me.
So, he made up some type of errand that
the boy should run for him.
He says,
"Can I take the horse?"
And of course, that's what the father
had in mind from the very beginning,
that that would lure the boy to running
the errand. So, he says, "Fine, you can
take the horse."
The boy says, "Great, then I'll go."
So, he gets on the horse and he rides
the horse.
And um
he arrives at
the uh the Alter Rebbe.
The Alter Rebbe confronts him, he sees
him.
And he says, "Young man,
what do you have there?" He says, "This
is This is my horse."
He says, "Tell me about the horse."
He says, "Oh, this is a very fine horse.
It goes very, very, very quickly."
The Alter Rebbe says, "Yeah, what's
what's so great about that?"
He says, "Well, you you don't
understand. If you have a nice, fast
horse,
then
if you're going somewhere, you get to
where you want to go much sooner."
The Alter Rebbe says, "Yeah, I suppose
that's true.
But but what if that same fast horse is
going the wrong way?
Then you also go off track
much sooner."
The boy says,
"Yeah, that's true. But when you realize
you're off track and you want to get
back on track, you also get back on
track faster, much sooner."
The Alter Rebbe says, "Yeah, that's
true.
Once you realize that you've gone off
track.
Once you realize.
He said it in Yiddish, "Ven er hat
zich."
When he realizes
And all of a sudden the boy realized
that the Alter Rebbe was having a
conversation with him on two levels.
It wasn't just about a fast horse. He
was talking about the boy.
He was saying
somebody who has a fast horse within
him, an internal fast horse and drive, a
passion
that uh causes him
in theory to get to his destination
faster.
But if he's going off track, right? Then
somebody who has
greater passions and greater greater um
fervor, if he's misguided or if those if
that passion is mischanneled, then he's
going to go
astray much faster, right? But then, if
he'll realize if he'll realize that he's
on the wrong track and he'll want to
correct himself, then he'll come back
to the proper way much faster as well.
So basically the Alter Rebbe was telling
him a story about his life.
Here you are, you're this talented,
motivated, passionate
young man.
Because of that
You know what they say, "The bigger they
are, the harder they fall," right? So
the more potential you have for good
then
the bigger your
straying or the the more the the the
farther the farther from the path you
end up when you stray.
But also when you do teshuvah, when you
return and you get back on the right
path, you'll also do that with an with
exceptional passion and excitement.
So, what does it mean?
We ask Hashem to forgive us for the sin
that we committed with the yetzer hara.
Remember that old ad campaign?
I haven't seen it in a long time, but I
remember when I was a kid,
a mind is a terrible thing to waste.
Yeah? Oh.
A yetzer hara is a terrible thing to
waste.
Yeah.
It's a fast horse.
If it's off track, yes, it's getting us
off track
faster, being that it's a fast horse.
But if it's on track, and if it wants to
do teshuvah, and if it's being
appropriately channeled, then it's
all of its power is for the good. So,
what does it mean we for- we ask God to
forgive us for the sin that we committed
with the yetzer hara? What that means is
we say, "Hashem,
we're sorry for all of the missed
opportunities
to rechannel
our mischanneled
energies."
When the yetzer hara
is being mischanneled, the fast horse is
taking us quickly off course, what we
should have done is use that as an
opportunity for teshuvah
to get back on track.
There's an interesting expression
in the Gemara.
Hashem says, "Barasi yetzer hara,
I created
the yetzer hara, the evil inclination.
And Hashem says,
ub'rasi Torah tavlin.
But I also created Torah
as tavlin." Tavlin
literally means spices.
But in this case,
it means like uh uh medicinal herbs.
It means a a remedy.
It's an interesting expression.
I created the evil inclination, but
I created medicine for the evil
inclination.
You could read that statement to mean
Hashem says,
I created medicine
so that if you have a sick yetzer hara,
we can heal him and make him a nice,
healthy, strong, robust yetzer hara.
If you don't understand the purpose of a
yetzer hara, that sounds very scary. The
yetzer hara is my enemy.
But if you understand, no, it's just an
energy.
It's mischanneled,
but if you can rechannel it, which is
the very definition of teshuvah, to
reclaim that which had become
misappropriated by negativity
and reincorporated
into positivity, then yeah, we want to
nurse the yetzer hara back to health, so
to speak,
and have it become
a force for good.
This is basic Judaism. We say in the
Shema, you should love Hashem
b'chol l'vav'cha, right? Not b'chol
lib'cha, b'chol l'vav'cha. And the sages
explain that the two bases, technically
it could have said lib'cha with one
base, but it says l'vav'cha.
With the angels, it does say with one
base, cuz an angel doesn't have an evil
inclination. But with humans, we have
two inclinations. So, b'chol l'vav'cha,
to love Hashem with both your hearts,
with your good inclination, which that's
the easy one, and also with your
negative inclination. What does that
mean? It means to reclaim it, to
rechannel it.
Okay, now I want to tell you something.
I'm going to go a little bit deeper.
So you're saying the yetzer hara is a
good thing?
The yetzer hara is potentially a
wonderful thing. Depends how you use it.
You got to use it. Yeah? I'm just
confused. I think when you're
rechanneling it and you've gone to the
yetzer tov, I would think that's the
yetzer hara, then the yetzer tov.
No, the rechanneled yetzer hara is not
the yetzer tov. The yetzer tov is the
yetzer tov.
like wanting to rechannel is coming from
the yetzer tov. No, the partnership
between that.
So, it's like
the difference between letting loose a
bull in a china shop
or hooking up a yoke on the back of the
bull and now it's pulling the plow or
it's pulling a wagon. It's a beast of
burden. So, if its energies are
unchanneled or mischanneled, it's
destructive. But if it is
being harnessed,
then it's a force for good.
It's like kung fu.
Or like some martial arts where you use
their power to help you.
Like jujitsu or judo. By the way, you
know the difference between karate and
judo?
Karate is a
eastern form of martial arts and judo is
what you make bagels with.
Hm?
It's no longer doing its job? Right,
it's no longer No, but that's the point.
That's its real job.
No, you thought the yetzer hara was here
to ruin your life? Hashem didn't create
anything to ruin your life. He only
created things to help you serve Hashem,
which means to have a good life. What's
a good life? A productive life, a life
of service to Hashem. It's all here to
help. It's all Everything here is an
asset. We just have to reclaim it and
use it in the right way. That's It's all
strategy.
I'm going to go a little bit deeper, I
said.
In the Shulchan Aruch HaRav,
the Alter Rebbe's Shulchan Aruch,
he says
something very interesting.
Something actually that somehow I didn't
notice until
past few years. Never noticed it before.
In uh
Siman Tov Resh Chaf Alef,
621,
if you want to look it up, it's uh
Halacha Tet Vav, 15.
The Alter Rebbe says
that on Yom Kippur,
anyone who cries for the Bnei Aharon,
for the sons of Aaron, the high priest,
he says, "Yadid D'mo'is." The tears,
literally, he sheds tears,
will be forgiven for his sins.
You know, in Judaism, you have shiva, 7
days of mourning, God forbid,
30 days, 11 months for the end of
kaddish, the 12 months for the
yahrtzeit.
The sons of Aaron, when did they pass
away? 3,300 some odd years ago.
Why would anyone cry? Why who's
continuing to cry?
Remember the story? The story's like
this. Let's Let's recap the story.
Aaron had four sons.
Eleazar, Itamar,
Nadab,
and Abihu.
After the Jews left Egypt,
they received the Torah.
Then there were the
the two tablets and then
the
sin of the golden calf and then Moshe
went back up on the mountain and he came
back down and then
there was Yom Kippur, there was
forgiveness and then Hashem said
according to certain timelines. Now now
build a sanctuary, but build a Mishkan,
a physical place
and basically that
happened Rosh Chodesh Nissan.
The if the the Jews left Pesach, right?
15th of Nissan, 15th of Nissan. So
basically a year minus two weeks, two
weeks short of a year after leaving
Egypt, they they inaugurated the
Mishkan, the sanctuary, which was this
portable
center of worship that they had with
them in the desert. And anyway, there
were eight days of inauguration
and
if you remember the tragedy which
happened during the inauguration
inaugural period of the of the Mishkan
is that two of the four sons of of
Aaron, they entered the Holy of Holies
with a strange fire and they were
consumed. Their souls were consumed in a
fire before Hashem.
That's how they died.
After they died,
Moshe says to Aaron, Moses says to his
brother Aaron,
I knew
I knew that there were going to be some
deaths involved in the
inauguration of the of the Mishkan.
But I I didn't know who it was going to
be and if I had to guess,
I thought it was going to be either you
or me.
Because I knew that some holy people
were going to die
as part of the inauguration.
He says
a college. He says I know told me
was from the word college close because
by those who are close to me a college I
will be sanctified. So says
I knew that
the most say I will be sanctified by
those who are near to me. So I figured
either you or me. Now I see these two
boys. They were really near to you.
They were I mean to they were really
near to them.
So here's the question. Classic
question.
Were these two boys
to dig him?
They were close to him.
Like like
my says to Adam that they are.
Or if you look at the narrative
are they two rascals who went into the
temple into an area they weren't
supposed to go into carrying fire that
they weren't supposed to be carrying.
They broke the rules and they got
zapped.
So they were holy or they were they were
rebels.
Somebody saying yeah.
Holy rebels. Holy rebels.
Thank you.
You know that in Judaism if there's a
question is it this or is it that the
answer is yes.
If you look at what the kind
writes about
the already.
The kind has a famous who is a famous
Moroccan sage and he wrote the pure and
holy Mishnah.
When he describes how Nadav and Avihu
died before Hashem,
the way he describes it is
that they were
consumed
with passion, a fiery passion
for God.
To the extent that they couldn't handle
that passion.
And it
carried them away.
They They were carried away by their
passions.
And maybe they went too far, maybe they
went where they shouldn't have gone, and
maybe it was a strange fire, or you
could read strange fire, an unusual
passion, an extraordinary passion.
And when they stood before God,
that was it. They didn't have any desire
to remain in their bodies. They didn't
want to be separate. They just wanted to
be one with the one.
And that's it with with that fervor,
that excitement,
they were just drawn
into the oneness and left their bodies
behind.
So, in other words,
who were these two boys?
They were two sensitive souls
who were passionate
and excitable
and maybe didn't know how to properly
contain
that excitement
and it ended up being their undoing.
It was tragic.
But,
their rebellion,
if you really, really trace it to its
core,
is a holy rebellion.
They were rebelling against this world.
They didn't want the world. They wanted
to be one with Hashem.
You know, there was the
the Hebrew poet, Ahad Ha'am.
And uh
he was married to a relative of the
Rebbe Rashab, the fifth Chabad Rebbe.
So, he once met the Rebbe Rashab and he
remarked
I should before I say his remark, I'll
tell you
regarding Nimrod,
King Nimrod, it says he What was his
sin? He was
He knew his master, meaning God, and he
purposely rebelled.
I mean, he did it out of spite. He knew
who God was. He knew God was the master
and he rebelled out of spite. So, Ahad
Ha'am
remarked about the Rebbe Rashab
that he is Yodea et ha'olam u'mekaven
limrod bo.
That he knows the world, meaning he's
he's not He's not just some uh
bottling sitting in Yeshiva
who only knows his books and he has He
knows nothing about what's going on
outside of the the the walls of the the
Beis Medrash.
He's a worldly guy. He knows what's
going on.
He should be enlightened like me. And
yet, he purposely
He He renounces
the worldly things out of spite. He
knows. He's smart enough. He's worldly
enough. He's sophisticated enough. He
could be part of this and he renounces
it out of spite.
Who are these boys? These were boys who
said this world
They were angry.
They were They were They were
disillusioned.
By what? What was bothering them?
What?
The limitations. Limitations, blah blah
blah. What limitations? Physicality, a
body. It's making them sick.
Who Who Who
Who gets sick from the limitations of
the physical body? I mean, that's That's
the human condition. That's everybody
has that. What That's not a problem.
That's reality. No, that That didn't
That's a problem.
These were sensitive souls who were
bothered by the idea that they should be
separate from God.
That was intolerable.
And it made them nuts to the extent they
did something they probably shouldn't
have done. They should They did They
definitely shouldn't have done. And yet,
when after the fact that they did it,
Moshiach says, "You know why they did
it? Because they're so close to Hashem."
So, who who were these kids?
These are the kids today
who everybody thinks
are rejecting
God because they are uncomfortable or
disillusioned with organized religion,
and they're the most spiritual ones
among us.
And this has been going on since time
immemorial.
Unfortunately, today right now we have
street drugs
that
are very, very fatal.
So, the ODs are worse than ever.
So, now all of the sudden we have a
problem. We don't suddenly have a
problem. We always had a problem. We
always had sensitive souls
who found
life in this world intolerable,
who were seeking something higher,
seeking a perfection,
and were self-medicating
as a form of escape.
That was always happening. Now all of a
sudden people woke up because the street
drugs are are so uh
so deadly.
I I want to show you
I wrote this book 10 years ago.
God of our understanding. Okay.
I just want to show you something from
this book.
There's uh it's it's the subtitle is
Jewish spirituality and recovery from
addiction. A lot of people misunderstand
what the book is about. The
truth is
it's just a book of Hasidus. That's all
it is. It's Hasidus, but I translated it
into the language of a certain modality
of addiction treatment.
Specifically the 12-steps approach,
which is a spiritual approach.
Historically what's the the source of
the 12-steps approach? It's very
interesting. People
don't really know about this.
Although the 12-steps approach is
spiritual,
you know, higher power.
Addicts have to find a higher power.
Um it actually has its roots
in
the medical community.
Specifically the story is like this.
There was this uh rich
privileged
New England Wasp
People still use that term Wasp, white
Anglo-Saxon Protestant.
named Rowland Hazard
back in the 1930s. And he was a drunk.
Anyway,
his parents got sick of bailing him out.
So finally they sent him to rehab. They
didn't have rehabs back then. What did
they do? They sent him to the best
psychiatrist in the world. Well, one of
the two best.
They could have sent him to Freud,
but thank God they didn't.
They sent him to Freud's ex-student,
Jung.
You know that Jung was a student of
Freud and they had a falling out. You
know why?
Jung said that spirituality was
indispensable to to mental health.
And Freud being Jewish couldn't afford
to admit that.
So they sent him to Jung.
This young man, Rowland,
he spends a year under the treatment of
Jung.
After the year of treatment, he leaves
and before he's on the boat back to
America,
he finds himself in a tavern and he's
drunk again.
He comes back to Jung and he says, "I've
been here for a year.
Am I un you know, am I incurable?"
So Jung tells him, "You know, the truth
is
alcoholics like you rarely recover.
Rarely does it happen."
He says, "I have a theory though.
See, there are very rare occasions where
there is seemingly spontaneous recovery.
But I've been studying that on the rare
occasions when it happens and trying to
find a common thread.
And what I believe is common to all of
these seemingly spontaneous
uh stories of recovery
is a vital spiritual experience. That
was the term he used. A vital spiritual
experience.
I mean, it's not just a spiritual idea,
but something that a person lives.
Something that
after you've gone through that, you
know, there's before the experience and
there's after the experience. Two
different lives, so to speak.
And he says these
experience are such are so powerful,
what they do is they cause
rearrangements
of uh ideas, emotions, and attitudes.
Which I think is interesting because
ideas
is Hochma Binah Daas
and emotions is Chesed Gevurah Tiferes
and attitudes is Netzach Hod Yesod
Malchus.
Very interesting he used those terms,
ideas, emotions, and attitudes. And
anyway he says but and once that's all
changed it's like you're a different
person.
Right? If your ideas, emotions, and
attitudes are changed
then it's like a personality transplant.
Just to to interject in the middle of
the Young story, but I remember Rabbi
Dr. Twerski once was talking about
sitting in on an AA meeting and here he
hears a guy who says
a guy who's been sober for 30 years,
mind you.
The guy says, "The man I was used to
drink. The man I was will drink again.
Thank God I'm not the man I was."
Meaning it's not that I used to drink
and now I don't.
I used to be the guy who drank. Now I'm
a different guy.
If I would be that guy, I would drink
again, but I'm not that guy. I'm a
different guy.
So Rabbi Twerski says, "From that he
understood what the Rambam says
that a baal teshuvah is a different
person."
Doesn't mean I changed my behavior. It's
not I'm a different person.
So Young says, back to the Young story.
So Young says to Roland,
"I know about these
vital spiritual experiences and I know
that they have this effect and I was
actually trying trying to induce one in
you and clearly I failed. But here's
what I'm telling you. I don't think
medical science has more to offer you. I
think the only path is a spiritual
experience. So I recommend you try to
get one."
So he went back to New York and he fell
in with a bunch of guys from the Oxford
Society.
These were guys who were trying to
practice to trying to practice first
century Christianity. That's how they
called it. I have a friend, Father Tom,
who's a Jesuit priest. So I always joke
with him. He's also big into the
recovery community. So I always joke
with him. I said, "You know the Oxford
Society, they were trying to practice
They were trying to go back to
Christianity as it was in the first
century." I said,
"They were so close. They should have
gone back one more century."
They could have gone back to Judaism,
right? But anyways, he found these guys
and they were very serious spiritual
seekers and he hung out with them and
they were into
um
reliance on God and prayer and
meditation and restitution for harms
done. And he followed their spiritual
program with spiritual spirit simple
spiritual program and he found himself
relieved of his alcoholism. Basically,
what Young told him would happen
happened.
So then he got excited and he
um
Oh, the Oxford Group, their thing was
that you had to
share it. You know, you have to give it
away in order to keep it. So he was
looking for somebody else to share it
with. He ended up sharing it with a guy
named Edwin Thacher
who'd been arrested on a drunken
disorderly.
And uh
then they then
Edwin, or they called him Ebby, he had
his spiritual experience. So they told
him, "Now you got to find a guy and pass
it on." So he says, "Oh, I know a guy
who was a real boozer back in World War
I, Bill Wilson. He lives in Brooklyn on
Clinton Street." So he went to Bill and
he told Bill he found God. Bill said, "I
ought to chase you out of here talking
like God." He says, "No, it's not a
religious thing. It's a personal
relationship with God. You know, it's
your higher power." Anyways, Bill chased
him off at first, but then
he had his spiritual awakening
and then uh
Bill was on business in Akron, Ohio and
he met a proctologist named Dr. Bob Dr.
Bob Smith who was a big alcoholic and he
told Bob about his theory that had been
taught to him by by Ebby who had been
taught to him by Rowland and and then
Bob got sober and then they said we got
to pass this on. They went down to the
hospital and they found the guy who was
strapped down because he was he was
drunk who was arrested and
he was a uh
He was a a lawyer from Kentucky named
Bill Dotson and they shared it with him
and one by one by one by one. Okay.
Anyways, basically the story is within
just a few years the program really
really took off. They ended up writing a
book codifying their spiritual program
and uh
So now cut to like 20 years later
25 years later
and somebody I don't know how it
happened but somebody said
did anybody ever tell Carl Jung
that we based our program on his advice
to Roland Hazard
back in the 30s.
And they were like, "Oh no, nobody ever
told him."
So Bill Wilson wrote a letter to Carl
Jung and basically said, "Hey
I've got this group Alcoholics Anonymous
like
we have like 100,000 people already who
have done this program. We want to thank
you. We based it on your advice to
Roland."
Happens to be
Carl Jung answered the letter
and it was one of the last letters that
he answered then he fell ill and he
died.
So really was it the last moment really
almost
to even get a response.
That letter I heard about
I heard people talking about it and I
always wanted to find it and then
finally I found a really poor facsimile
of a facsimile somewhere online
and I included it in this book.
And it's interesting when I
when we printed the book, I needed to
find out who to get the rights from. So,
actually I contacted the Young estate
in Switzerland, and they told me they
don't have the rights to it cuz they
only have the rights to the German
language letters.
And this one is in English.
So, I said, "Who do you go to?" They
said, "Go to Princeton University."
So, I went to Princeton and I asked
them,
"Can I have the the rights to the
letter?" So, I I wrote them a letter.
They wrote me back a letter. Yeah, okay,
they they gave me the rights to the
letter. I said, "Now, can I have a good
copy of it?" They said, "We don't have
it."
I said, "What I thought you said that
it's yours." They said, "No, we have the
rights to it, but we don't have the
letter."
After the book came out, there was an
article in the New York in the New York
Times, and the lady who runs Stepping
Stones up in Bedford, New York, which is
the summer home of Bill of Bill and Lois
Wilson, she has the archives. So, she
wrote me, and she says, "I have the
original letter." So, she
Okay, after the book came out. Anyways.
So, here's Carl Jung's letter
to to Bill Wilson.
I don't know. Is it possible, Rich, can
can you get it on this at all? Is it
Yeah? If I
Let's see.
If I hold it there.
No, that's okay.
Really small? Okay.
Then we'll add it in. All right.
So, he says, "Dear Mr. Wilson,
your letter has been very welcome
indeed.
I had no news from Roland H.
Okay, this is 25 years later.
He doesn't know what happened He doesn't
even know that the guy got sober, let
alone he told somebody who told somebody
who started this movement where they
took Young's advice
and applied it for 100,000 people.
And I had often wondered what had been
his fate.
Our conversation, which he has
adequately reported to you,
had an aspect of which he did not know.
The reason that I could not tell him
everything
was that those days I had to be
exceedingly careful of what I said. I
found out that I was misunderstood in
every possible way. Thus, I was very
careful when I was talking to Roland H.
In other words, Young saying, I had this
theory that the answer to the addiction
problem is spiritual,
but I almost didn't tell him because I'm
sick of being harassed for it.
Cuz everybody gets on my case.
So, I almost didn't want to You know,
what do I need it for?
So, I almost didn't tell him.
I was very careful when I talked to
Roland H, but what I really thought
about was the result of many experiences
with men of his kind.
Listen to this.
And think about
what it means.
Who were really close to Hashem.
Bikur Ivai
and Kodesh.
With these two boys, these two sons of
Aaron,
the ones who were the rebels, the ones
who did what they weren't supposed to
do, the ones who couldn't deal with life
in a body, the ones who wanted to become
one with Hashem,
these were the ones
that Moses himself testifies on and
says, "These are these are the close
These are the ones close to Hashem."
Listen Listen to this.
His craving for alcohol
was the equivalent on a low level of the
spiritual thirst of our being for
wholeness.
Expressed in medieval language, the
union with God.
So, basically, what's the diagnosis?
These are people who want union with
God.
And it manifests that desire, it
manifests itself on a lower level
as
a desire to self-medicate.
A need to escape reality.
But what is it really?
It's a desire for union with God. And
there's a footnote.
And this this part is handwritten. Young
wrote a little
footnote number one.
And at the bottom of the page
it says, "As the heart, h a r t, which
means a deer,
panteth after the water brooks, so
panteth my soul after thee, O God."
Psalm 42:1.
You know what that is? Ka'ayal ta'arek
al afikei mayim
kenafshi tzadka elacha Elohim.
So, the diagnosis from Carl Jung
of alcoholism is
Ka'ayal ta'arek al afikei mayim kenafshi
tzadka elacha Elohim.
That he's yearning for a higher
unity with God.
But how does it come out?
Self-medication, escapism.
And this creates the horror, right?
That's the real motivation behind the
yetzer hara. So, a person who thinks the
yetzer hara is there
cuz it wants to live it up and enjoy
this world.
No, that's not what it wants.
What it really wants is union with God.
This sound shocking? Does it sound
counterintuitive? Does it sound
incomprehensible? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah, but
we know it's true.
There's a
By the way, I'll just
skip to the very end.
He He writes at the end, "So therefore,
the the helpful formula expressed in
Latin is spiritum contra spiritum."
Spiritum is like spirits, like winding
spirits.
But spiritum is also like spirituality.
So spiritum contra spiritum. If you use
spirituality,
you'll antidote the need to
self-medicate. Cuz what what is the
person really looking for? They don't
want to get the numbness from the
bottle. What they really want is that
feeling of wholeness
with unity with God, and they're just
looking for it in the wrong place. If
you give them what they really need,
then they don't go looking for it in the
wrong way.
So there's a Hasidic parable.
That there was once a man
who heard a song.
He heard a song, and when he heard this
song, everything felt okay.
He was at peace.
And he only heard this song once. And
after it finished, it was done.
And all he could think about was that
feeling of wholeness and peace that he
had experienced at the time of listening
to the song.
So what did he do?
He started searching
and asking people if they knew the song.
But he could barely hum a few notes of
it. He could barely get it started.
Nobody knew the song.
So then he started going to concerts,
anywhere musicians were playing. And he
would listen to all kinds of music.
Would sit through song after song after
song after song. Cuz he's hoping maybe
one of these days he's going to hear
that song.
And he wandered from town to town, from
place to place.
And he never heard
the song that he was looking for.
That's the parable.
What's the meaning?
Meaning is the soul starts off in
heaven.
And reality, the meaning of life is very
clear.
It's all about God.
It's all about oneness,
wholeness.
And everything is right. Everything is
good.
Then the soul comes down to a body and
it's separated from that.
And it remembers that there was this
feeling.
It remembers the feeling.
But it can't exactly remember
what caused that feeling. It can't
remember how the song goes. It remembers
that there was a song. It remembers how
the song made him feel, but can't
remember what that song was.
So he starts looking for it.
He looks all over.
He looks for it in in all types of
distractions and pleasure
and experiences,
adrenaline rushes,
relationships,
chemicals,
anything. He's looking everywhere
desperately for that feeling again. He
wants to have that feeling again.
But everything he tries of this world
as an attempt to recapture
the feeling from the real song, and in
the end it never measures up because
it's not the song.
What was Jung saying?
He was saying,
"You can't tell people
who know already
that this world ultimately
is not as it should be.
You can't tell them be comfortable, grow
up,
be an adult,
become disillusioned like the rest of
us, and don't be bothered by the fact
that you're not one with God."
Be like a good proper religious Jew
who's not bothered by the fact
that he's not one with God. You davening
three times a day, you don't have to be
one with God.
And they say, "No."
They say, "I I don't want your
institutionalized religion.
I want the real thing.
I want a connection.
And I'll know it when I have it. The
proof is in the pudding."
One of the reasons I called this book
God of Our Understanding, by the way, is
because
of a story I heard from a guy
who
70-year-old guy, 20 years sober,
and he says like this.
He says, "When I was a little kid,
my zayde,
he was the religious one. My parents
were already assimilated.
My zayde used to take me to shul.
And I had a very special warm feeling
going to shul with zayde.
But my parents, they they weren't into
any of that. They were more interested
that I should do well in school,
go to good college, go to law school,
and I did all of those things.
I became a lawyer.
And he says,
"I was doing what I was supposed to do,
but morally, ethically, I was bankrupt.
And I became a good addict.
And
I burned my bridges,
divorced twice,
finally hit bottom.
And he says, "I come into this program
and they say you got to find a higher
power."
So, higher power? I found my own higher
power. Found what we call the God of my
understanding. I found the God of my
understanding, he says.
Right? Like Abby told Bill, it doesn't
have to be any anyone else's God. You
find the God of your understanding. So,
so so he said, "I found the God of my
understanding. God concept that worked
for me on a personal level."
He says,
"And I did that for a year, and I stayed
sober. And I did it for 10 years, and I
stayed sober. I did it now 20 years.
And I want to tell you something. If I
would have met the rabbi," he said,
pointing to me,
"back in my active addiction,
I would not have been interested to hear
a word he had to say to me. But I want
to tell you more than that. Even if I
had met the rabbi after I found the God
of my understanding, my first year in
recovery, I would not have wanted to
hear anything he has to say to me. In
fact, I'll tell you even more. If I
would have met him If I would have met
him last year, 19 years into my
recovery, I would not have listened to a
word the rabbi has to say to me. But
now, where has my journey taken to me
taken me to?
Is I'm talking to this rabbi, I'm
putting on t'fillin,
I'm saying Shema Yisrael,
and I realize
that I had to become a drunk, hit rock
bottom, lose everything valuable in my
life,
find the God of my understanding in AA,
so now I can finally come back to the
same God that my zaidy used to daven to
in shul.
So, that's why I called the book God of
our understanding. I mean, you start
with the God of your personal
understanding, vital spiritual
experience,
and then bring it into Yiddishkeit.
But it doesn't work the other way
around.
So, the sensitive souls who are yearning
for a personal relationship with Hashem,
and we're telling them
here are the rules and the regulations,
they're not satisfied with that.
The solution is not to brand these
people the rebels.
Or if you want to brand them rebels, at
least understand that rebel is not a
dirty word.
There was a Litvisher bochur who went to
the to the rebbe in the 1960s.
He asked about a growing a beard cuz
that wasn't his custom.
And the rebbe was encouraging about the
beard. And um
one of the things that their
conversation
led to was the rebbe saying, you know,
in the '60s, who had beards?
The hippies, right?
So, the rebbe
started saying to him, he says, you
know,
what they say outside of New York City,
what do people say about the hippies?
They're a bunch of Jews.
The hippie movement is another one of
these diseases the Jews have brought
upon us. The rebbe says, but this was
always the way. He said, back in the
'20s, if you would ask, who's a
socialist? They would say, a Jew. If you
would ask in the '40s, who's a
communist? They would say, a Jew, right?
But what's the truth? The Jews are
always part of any
revolutionary
fringe, countercultural,
anti-establishment movement. You want to
know why? Why do you think that's so?
Cuz
they're the potential. Because we
understand this cannot be what it's all
about. You're going to tell me, two cars
in the garage, white picket fence, and I
should be satisfied?
You're going to tell me, live a regular
life, be a regular person, just do what
you're told, and everything's good.
No.
They're chasing something bigger.
Not something It's not something bigger,
the biggest, the biggest oneness, unity.
So, if you try to buy me off with
anything less than unity, it's not going
to work.
So, what's the solution to all this
misguided yet to utter?
To realize what the yet to utter really
wants. The fast horse that's taking
people off track really is the same fast
horse that can get us back on track
that much quicker.
But for these sensitive souls who find
the world entirely
how does one go about being healthy
then?
They're ultimately right. We should all
be dissatisfied. We should all want
more.
But we're functioning and we're coping
with So, who's functional and who's
dysfunctional? The person who says, "I
can tolerate living my life
as a good religious Jew
and
being an entity separate and apart
from the unity of God."
That's functional. We call that
functional.
And the person who says, "I find
existence as it is intolerable to the
extent that because I don't know where
to find true unity, I'm self-medicating
as a form of escape."
We ask, "What what's the solution?" The
only solution is we got to give people
what they're really looking for.
And when you see a fast horse and you
see a nice, healthy, robust, passionate
misdirected
young person who's who's who's setting
the world on fire, you should understand
something.
That rebellion is coming from a holy
place and it's not going to be satisfied
until it's given
the real
goal that it's that it's that it's
searching for. Yeah, but what if We we
we we have to talk about God.
We have to talk about God.
I don't want to EVER HEAR ONE MORE TIME
a kid who grew up in an Orthodox family
come and tell me that the first time he
heard people talk about God was in a
church basement at an AA meeting. I
don't want to ever hear again someone
say they went to 10 years of day school
or Yeshiva and they heard all types of
rules, but they didn't hear people talk
about God until they went to a church
basement meeting of an AA
of an AA group. I don't want to ever
hear that again.
You want to know what children we need
to do as a community? Talk about God.
Talk about God. Talk about your personal
relationship with God.
Talk about faith, not as a as a as a as
a
doctrine,
but as what we live with, as something
personal,
as something
the a God of your understanding. Don't
talk about God from the books. Talk
about the God that you relate to, the
God that you live with.
That's That's That's what I'm saying.
But then But then there is a Torah.
Of course there's a Torah.
No. And there's also a
ratzon Hashem. Of course.
So,
I can be an adolescent all my life
and rebel
and not like rules, but at the end of
the day I have to mature, to grow up, to
realize
Go see what works. We're killing them
with the rules. Give them God and they
will be And you want to know what? It's
not even a theory, it's true. Find
anybody who went away and came back.
Find the recovered addict who became
frum again after he got over his Yeshiva
PTSD and these are the frumest people.
These are the people who really daven.
These are the people who really do
mitzvahs. Of course we want to bring
them back to Torah, but you have to
first connect to what they're looking
for. You cannot push the the the
organized religion agenda to the
exclusion of a personal relationship
with God. When you find a personal
relation with God, then everything falls
into place. These people become the most
firm people. They become the most firm,
the most sincere.
If you don't believe me, you don't have
to believe.
Let Let me just wrap this up because
we're going to go
gone over time.
Bottom line.
Every one of us can apply this for
ourselves.
But I I also want us to remember on a
societal level, there is a crisis.
There is a crisis.
There is a crisis in the observant
community.
And those people
who are OD'ing are only the canary in
the coal mine.
You know the canary in the coal mine?
It's an expression, but where it comes
from a real thing.
The coal miners, when they open up a new
mine shaft, there's a gas that's
invisible and it's tasteless and
odorless
and it's deadly.
So, they bring a canary.
The canary is tweeting along in the cage
and then all of a sudden the canary is
asleep in the bottom of the cage. What
does that mean?
He Right. So, then the miners clear out
of the mine shaft and they leave.
Now, let me ask you, is the canary a
toxicologist?
He's just sensitive.
More sensitive. So, the canary dies from
the same thing that kills everybody, he
just dies sooner.
So, the kid who's OD'ing,
he dies from the same thing that kills
everybody, he just does it sooner.
We were given
There's a part of us
that we were given that cannot be
satisfied with normal.
We cannot be satisfied with anything
normal.
We are radical.
We're utopian, we're dreamers, we're
idealists, we're perfectionists. We want
nothing less than oneness with God.
And when as long as that desire is
frustrated,
no good can come from it.
Don't try to push it away because
it only becomes more and more
dysfunctional the more you try to push
it off.
The only solution is get that fast horse
back on track.
Use it in a healthy way.
And then you'll see the people who are
the the the disenfranchised
of our community
when they come back, they end up being
the role models.
They end up being the people that
everyone else wants to be like or should
want to be like.
So let's just
get some priorities here.
There is a crisis. It's not the opioid
crisis, that's a symptom.
There's a crisis of spiritual
bankruptcy.
But there's something that can be done
about it.
We have the tools.
We have the information.
We have we we we have the treasures.
But again, I don't want to ever ever
hear again one more kid whose parents
paid tuition to send them to a school
and for them to tell me
that they didn't know about God
until they went to an AA meeting. I
never want to hear that again.
in the home. Never mind that they go to
school. You can't blame the school,
start in the Blame the school, blame the
family, blame the community, blame the
school, blame everybody. Yeah, you're
right. Blame ourselves. Everybody's on
one I'm a rabbi, I'm at fault.
If one person got under my nose and
didn't hear about God from me in a
sincere way, then I then I have a I have
a share
in in the blame.
But let's put it in a positive way.
Takes a village. So, every single one of
us, as a parent, as a member of a
community, as a member of a synagogue,
as as as
as someone who sends if if you're
sending your children to a school
all these different connection points
that you have in the community are
opportunities.
They're all opportunities. So, so let's
use them
and and and look at the most vulnerable
as a as a canary in the coal mine, as a
symptom of how healthy our communities
are.
Don't look at them as nebbach, oh, this
kid. No, that's that's You want to know
how healthy we are? Look at those who
are the most vulnerable, the dreamers,
the idealists, the perfectionists.
That's the indication of how healthy we
are as a community.