A Good Reason to Get Angry

I'll recent recent or actually I'll recent. So, this last that we just learned I think two very very obvious two styles to it. One very obvious two styles is this in Maseches Yevamos daf 105. The Gemara says that had once said over a memra, very very big chiddush. And the Gemara says also in the Shmaita Beis Medrash. went to Beis Medrash he said over this way and he didn't say it over. And the Gemara says heard what happened and he got angry. And this is a very long Gemara. The Gemara says only came and they went and they spoke to him and they tried being and they tried using to somehow comfort him actually worked in the reverse. And the Gemara says finally all the came and they went and they spoke to him and they tried being and they tried using to somehow comfort him actually worked in the reverse. And the Gemara says finally all the came and they went and they spoke to him and they tried being and they tried using to somehow comfort him actually worked in the reverse. And the Gemara says finally all the came and they went and they spoke to him and they tried being and they tried using to somehow comfort him actually worked in the reverse. And the Gemara says finally all the came and they went and they spoke to him and they tried being and they tried using to somehow comfort him actually worked in the reverse. He walked into and told him it says from the it seems that always said over in the name of so tells from the it seems that always said over in the name of so tells from the it seems that always said over in the name of so tells from the it seems that always said over in the name of so tells from the it seems that always said over in the name of so tells from the it seems that always said over in the name of so tells from the it seems Everyone understood that whatever says he's saying over the from is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part of the is part takes the light of the sun and it imparts it upon the world and that's exactly what was doing. So, turned to he said so to your so to your so to your so to your so he sits and he without saying anything but how can you do everybody knows he shall call you that really all the time that he's saying over is your time I'm going to answer heard what you have to say so he turned to them and who tried comforting in vain and he told him that he had to find he says how come you don't know how to be me the way our friend knows how to be as we have to do it did such a good job being with me you have to learn from him you see this is the way you give a person this is the way you comfort a person but the bottom line is this is the that mirrors our we are the said a member not it was but when he said it and we have to win and he had to be over here seems like a repeat offender this time he's not saying over something that he heard from you and plagiarizing it not saying it over in his name but now he's saying something that he heard from and he's not saying it over in his name but just a mirror between these two also I'm going to be that you see the same that's what I say you see is a mover and can you do it was also interesting I saw my in his they are on this is what he says in you they had a defend he was very successful in doing it but over here nobody comes to the defense of the meaning it sounds like he needs to be defended you can't just say yeah had this thing and he would say over sometimes as if he didn't hear from somebody else from really heard from somebody else. You found a Sadiq from a base to hear. So, what's the issue with this Gamorah? So, Rebbe Magolis says, I'm going to tell you what the issue is. He says, Rish Lakish said this Halacha, right? I'm Rish Lakish to all my brothers and all my brothers and all my brothers. Or Yada except Yada except Sh'te Avon of Kamacha my Yada reckon Sh'nayim. Says Rebbe Magolis, I found this Drasha in the Tirus Kayanim. And in the Tirus Kayanim, you know who says this Drasha? The Tanoim. Obviously, it's Braces. They're the ones that said this Drasha. You know what that means? You know who was plagiarizing the Drasha here? We're using that word loosely. But you know who's saying over a Halacha and not giving proper credit for it? It's really Rish Lakish. It's in the first of Tirus Kayanim. Said said Rebbe Magolis, but it can't be because just like Rebbe Elazar can't be doing this, Rish Lakish also can't be doing this. So, he says, must be Rish Lakish really said it over in the name of the Braces. He said it over in the name of the Tanak. Because otherwise, Rish Lakish is guilty of what he's upset at Rebbe Elazar for being guilty of. So, then what was Rish Lakish having Tinas on Rebbe Elazar for? So, he says, the Pshat is as follows. Take a look at what I wrote in my Hakdoma to Sefer Shem Olam. That's where Rebbe Magolis figured out who the Chachamim are throughout Shas. He said in my Sefer Chachamim Chachamim over there in the Shem Olam, I have a whole Arichus that in the world of saying over Torah in somebody else's name, in the world of Kol Hamair Ba'Shmo Mipiv, maybe Gulo Lo Olam So, the Divrei Kavod not your Gazlan, it's true even if the person is not the Mechadesh of the word. So, meaning if you heard something from someone who heard it from someone else, in the world of properly saying it over, it's not enough you go to the source. You're supposed to say, I heard it from him who heard it from him. So, why was Rish Lakish upset? He says, Rish Lakish was upset because why didn't Rebbe Elazar say, I heard from Rish Lakish who heard from the Tirus Kayanim. Why are you cutting out the middle man? You're not supposed to cut the middle man out. And that's for sure why he was upset. Says what's this I think being that we would just establish that it wasn't really cuz really it's right so wasn't one that was says you talking heard the from his and that we know already from not attributed to because that he didn't have to worry. You put all these together I call you up this is like one foot note of my goodness. But as we like to say this is classic my goodness.