5 Sharp Divrei Torah on Parshas Naso {Pninei Kedem}

Welcome everyone. Good morning. Parasai amazing detra from the safer pin on paras. The para in pure juxtaposes two interesting subjects. Talks about the importance of giving and then it says It juxtaposes two subjects. The subject of giving micer and the subject of sa. What do these thing two subjects uh have in common? How are they connected? If you look through shas the garra brings on the pages of shas two ways for somebody to acquire ashi. One by giving mser properly. two, honoring one's wife, like the garra says. So, honoring one's wife and giving miser. So, somebody might get into their head, we have a great idea. Forget about micer. We'll just buy our wife uh nice clothing and that's how we become wealthy. We'll keep all the meister to ourselves and we'll spend a lot of money buying the wife nice clothing. The problem though is if you keep your micer to yourself and you give all your money on your wife's clothing, she's going to have very extravagant clothing, it's going to lead to soya. Therefore, you're better off giving micer to become wealthy. It's better off to become wealthy by giving micer than spending excessively on one's wife's clothing. That's the he ofim is of said that's referring to someone who is his masro but he still wants to become wealthy by honoring his wife. So the pik warns no that could lead to sa that could lead to saita. Okay. Second idea the says so ask what do you mean says in I never violated the request of my friend even though I know I'm not a if they would say he would be but he's not a inuhim has a different ga his says not even though I know I'm not a he would say I'm not worthy. He's not talking about the kayan. He's talking about the podium that if they would ask him to speak, he would speak even though he's not worthy to speak. So according to there's no problem raising even though he's not a he was never asked to that's not the situation. brought in the says, "Why do I show favoritism to the Jewish people? I wrote in the Tory, they'll eat, they'll be satiated, and they'll bless." And they're to be the on the medic on themselves. Why the lash on themselves says even though it says vis on themselves that even if they eat a kaz or they still bench but others even though it says by giving they don't say okay I'll just give a kaz or a but we're to get like it's inn they're notic they're only interesting this is a from the that's quoted in the brought in the safer says on that that spoke harshly like it says She prayed to Hashem. She was says the briskav. You could say the says that said if you see good otherwise you'll see I'll go into seclusion. I'll seclude myself before Elana and then I'll drink the Saita waters and you'll have to give me children. So then that means Kana was bat she'll have a ben. Her question though was she would prefer Hashem to give it to her without going into seclusion cuz if she's becomes suspected of adultery and she goes through the process of she'll have a child but then Hashem's name will be will need to be erased. Therefore, al Hashem wasn't dominating for herself. She knew she would have a child. She was dominating for Hashem that Hashem's name would not have to be uh erased. She was bat on her own, but she w she uh wanted to have it done in a way that Hashem's name would not have to be erased. Now says on if you see a pot in a dream you should anticipate why a pot there's no greater royal than a pot because a pot is able to make peace says between fire and water. If you have a dream and you see Okay. And now here's another one. Why? By each day when it says that they know what the Nazi brought We emphasize they're both full of flour. But when we add them up in it says when we talk about the total number of cars, we don't say it only says only by the golden spoons. It says Malaya, but by the it doesn't say soy. It only says soy when they brought on each day. But by the it says it by each day and by the sum tally of all the offerings says Relaros something astounding. The nianim brought everything on the first day but then they they brought everything to the mikdash on the first day and then that each respective uh nasi brought their kan on each day. If on the day of the anointing they would have brought the soyas the soy would have become possible balina. So on the first day when they brought all the ingredients they didn't bring the soyless they only brought the soy on the day they offered it. But there's no concept of lina by ktoas. So they were able to bring it on day one. The ktoas they brought on day one. The soy they didn't bring until the day they were macrovit. So therefore on each day it says malayam soyas malayium kyas. But on the day the first day that they brought everything they could only bring the kyas. They couldn't bring the soy. If they would have brought the soyas it would have become pussle with Lena. So we learned one piece from Hersh of the juxiposition of mser and don't ignore messer to become wealthy by buying your wife uh nice clothing because excessive purchasing could lead to we saw the piece on that says says not but we saw that's three on the piece of a pot. A pot represents peace which is four. We saw the which is five five amazing pieces of the safer panadmas. Okay. I want to take the opportunity to invite everyone tonight at 8:30. The tonight's share is on the subject of the carbonos of the nim. Maybe we'll call it deja vu, not all over again. And have a great day. CTO.