Transcript
Auto-generated transcript. Not time-synced to the video.
Off the record, the story that begins
when the door closes. Election edition,
presented by Yossi Elituv and Avraham
Freind. A new year, new blessings,
hopes, expectations. And they stamp
this beautiful year for us with
elections. Between us, really.
Is it spelled with a 'Het' or a 'Khaf'?
No, there is really nothing more
disgraceful than elections. It's an
entire industry that is completely
manufactured, not real. Usually, most
parties and almost all the people
present some profile as if they are so
and so. Everyone is full of themselves,
some serious face, pretending they care
about the public and all that nonsense.
And the truth is that we are a country
very similar to a place I visited five
years ago, Warsaw. I was in Poland and
met a businessman there; it was a
business trip. And that man told me
that Poland is an exact mirror of
Israel. He tells me, we have almost the
same citizens, we have right and left,
we have a Shas-like party, a religious
party. And what I loved is that,
basically, it's a tribal event. No one
cared for the good of the state of
Poland or the state of Israel. The
tribes are just looking out for their
own. Each one is improving their own
status. They each care for their own
friend, what will happen when he goes
to prison or what happens when he's in
the opposition, and that’s the State
of Israel. I looked, Avraham, we are
already in...We've entered Tishrei. I
said: If the parties received so much
money, where are the campaigns? What,
some cheap video worth nothing, is that
a party campaign, and where are...The
supertankers and the strategists in our
sector? And it seems to me that these
guys have started to get tired of
themselves.
Yes, I really connect with what you are
saying. If we once saw the "Transparent
" campaign or all sorts of brilliant
campaigns, this time we don't see that.
There is no refreshing innovation, no
interesting headline, no...
There isn't even a "father looking from
above" or a "son looking from below"—
let's even start with the Likud. The
Prime Minister, what is happening to
him? Does he have a campaign? Does
anyone know what his campaign is, does
anyone know what he wants to broadcast?
Does anyone see the headlines in
Jerusalem, the posters, the billboards?
I think there is a very, very
significant event here where no one has
too much to sell. Particularly on the
right side of the map, everyone comes
with—you know—the stain of October
7th. And conversely, the Haredi parties
arrive with their own stain of their
failure in the last term, and that is
the result. In fact, the campaigns do
not focus on why to choose us, but
rather focus on campaigns of...fear:
what will happen if we don't get
elected? Then Mansour Abbas will rule
here, and they will hand over all of
Judea and Samaria to the Palestinians,
and the legal advisor will sell out the
children of Israel, the Haredi children
, and the Haredi youth. And therefore,
the campaigns focus on fear, less on a
vision. Ah, that's it, except for...
Well, the sixth episode of Freind and
Elituv focuses this time on several
very interesting arenas, and I will
actually start with what is called the
Ben-Gvir arena. One arm Shas and the
other arm Likud. We challenge and
reject the results of the polls from
all the institutes, saying that anyone
giving Itamar Ben-Gvir between six and
eight seats isn't walking the streets
and isn't reading the public. I see at
least three to five Likud seats
defecting to Ben-Gvir. I see it among
the young people, among drivers, among
lots and lots of Likudniks who are fed
up with the niceness of the Likud.
Let's put it this way: Likudniks who
don't see anything on the Likud list
besides Netanyahu, and they get that
through Ben-Gvir too.
Nice. So, on one hand, I see a very
nice package that will put Ben-Gvir in
double digits and bring the Likud down
to numbers they haven't dreamed of.
Although it remains within the bloc, it
will change all the rules of the game.
I see the same arena for Ben-Gvir
against Shas and also a bit with Torah
Judaism. I know there are quite a few
young people who want to vote Ben-Gvir
in Ashkenazi yeshivas, but with Shas,
the further you go into the more
peripheral circles, you see the pull
people have between Shas and Ben-Gvir.
Now look, I don't know what the secret
to Ben-Gvir's charm is. I don't know
everything, but I can tell you I
understand why masses of Shasniks and
Likudniks want to vote for him. Is it
because they are disgusted with their
establishments or because they want to?
I don't know, but it's clear it dawned
on Shas, albeit late, that if they
don't run a vicious campaign against
Ben-Gvir, they'll lose one or two seats
. And the Likud is also waking up—you
asked where the campaign is? They are
planning to go out to battle the day
after Simchat Torah, and they will go
for Ben-Gvir's head with all their
might, because they realize that if
Ben-Gvir is at 40%of their size, or
even a third of them—let alone 50%—
well, he opens the list and says to Mr.
Netanyahu: one portfolio for you, one
for me, one for me, one for you.
Defense, Justice, Foreign Affairs,
whatever he wants. Because this whole
event is very interesting, since right
now the assessments of all the
pollsters are that we are in a kind of
political tie. The Arabs are in the
middle; the pendulum was once more
toward the "Change" bloc, now more
toward the right-wing Haredi bloc, but
these things are still within the
margin of error, and we are in a
situation where most pollsters estimate
there will be no decision in the
upcoming elections. Meaning, if there
were elections tomorrow, I'd be willing
to put more than 100 shekels on the
table that there is no resolution. Not
Liberman, and not Eizenkot—as the
Moroccans call him, Eizenkot, not
Eizenkat—and not Netanyahu; no one
knows how to form a government. It’s
frustrating, it’s disappointing, but
that's the result.
But we do see a trend reversal in
Netanyahu's favor in recent polls, in
polls we saw a few weeks ago that gave
a 61-seat bloc in some of the polls to
Eizenkot and Bennett without the Arab
parties. Now we see them deteriorating
and lagging more. The truth is, I can't
really understand those polls that gave
61 seats to that bloc without the Arab
parties. I mean, they are now, they are
now at 40 mandates, 40-something
mandates, to say that they brought a
surge to 61 mandates without having
some kind of magnet there. And while we
know that the public is leaning right,
I don't really know who dared to
present this thing. But listen,
something is starting here that
Filber said would happen right after
the lists closed, and that is that the
trend would start to shift toward the
polls he publishes, where he claims
there is a solid right-wing bloc for
Netanyahu and that he also has 30
mandates. So a very, very interesting
event: if in the coming month, as we
have a month or so left until the
elections, whether we will see the
polls going up and giving more towards
a decision that will indeed be on the
right side, that will indeed be for
Netanyahu, or if we are really staying
in a tie. Come on.
Look at the elections in Sweden, where
the center-left bloc beat the
right-wing bloc by 26,000 votes.
What are you saying?
Only that, meaning less than a mandate
compared to our elections here and
there.
Yes, let's move to the second arena;
the second arena is the
Smotrich-Feiglin vs. Ben-Gvir arena; we
constantly had a tendency to say this
goes up, this falls, and vice versa.
Now we are noticing a very interesting
phenomenon. Feiglin and Smotrich are
becoming a home for masses of
right-wingers. Some of them even
considered voting for centrist parties,
the center of the political map, some
even considered voting for Lieberman.
And you see them coming to Feiglin.
Feiglin and Smotrich are bringing eight
mandates in most of the polls. You are
talking about a party that wasn't even
sure it would bring four mandates.
Feiglin, I even see young people like
that, you know, observant, who tell me:
listen, Feiglin is a serious man,
examined all the country's problems,
knows how to deal with issues, a
level-headed man, a man with an agenda.
Smotrich delivered the goods, a big
deal. If the Haredim brought 5%of what
he brought, we would be dancing in the
streets. He drew his voters, and here
we reach a very interesting phenomenon:
these two movements are taking off
together. They won't both drop today,
probably, below eight mandates, which
is 16 mandates. That is a lot. You know
why? Because who believed that to the
right of the right there is room for a
16-mandate bloc, and alongside them is
this political animal that we don't
know what to call, which is Zehut, a
combination of half-meshuggenah and
half-Messiah. Some kind of guy who is
sure of himself.
A Yair guy.
A very Yair-like guy, reminds me of
Yair in his first editions.
He thinks that what he says is what
happens, and we are in a very
interesting phenomenon. Why do I call
it an interesting phenomenon? Because
if Zehut passes, it's almost the only
chance for Bibi to form a government.
Because think about what's happening.
It's true that Smotrich, Feiglin, and
Ben-Gvir will weaken the Likud, but
that doesn't matter. Because in the end
, if the bloc is strong, and if United
Torah Judaism brings its votes, and
Shas starts to move toward nine
mandates, Bibi can start to smell the
61 mandates. And we didn't believe we
would reach this place. It was clear to
us that Smotrich lowers Ben-Gvir and
vice versa, but what are you
discovering here? They succeeded in
dividing the votes to the right of the
right between them with professionalism
and artistry. Smotrich really centers
the educated public and the
Torah-observant core and the people,
how shall we put it, the salt of the
earth of the Right, and Ben-Gvir all
the hot temperament, all the guys who
say: "Come on, let's go get them."
Nobody asks Ben-Gvir: "What did you do
in the last term?", right?
They want to see him on patrols with
dogs in all the Arab villages, feeling
that now it's not just some boiling
temperament, because it's like we need
one crazy person against all those
crazy people, and this is our crazy
person.
Do you think Winter will run to the end
? Give me a status, let's see.
Regarding that, tell me.
At least before he set out on his way,
he conveyed to everyone who needed to
know—and by that, I mean the rabbis
and politicians he met with—that if
he sees he is endangering the
Right-wing bloc, and if he sees he is
endangering a Right-wing government, he
will withdraw and not run to the end.
He also has people on his list who are
identified as even further right than
him, who I believe could pressure him
on judgment day. Therefore, Winter
isn't taking off, and it's a very, very
interesting event, because he was
actually the biggest promise of this
election cycle. He launched a party at
the last minute, relatively speaking,
before the list closure, and brought in
a diverse and interesting list: like
Yoseph Haddad and Natalie Sam Tov from
the media. And so, the fact that he
isn't taking off in the end, and is
still hovering at four mandates, may
certainly bring him to a place where he
withdraws. Netanyahu is debating:
Should he attack him? Should he not
attack him? There is total confusion
there, one day like this, one day like
that. There are people in his inner
circle who tell him: "Look here." He is
debating for two reasons: one reason is
that he might not pass the electoral
threshold and will waste votes; the
second reason is that he isn't loyal to
the bloc, it could be that he will go
with Liberman. There are those
conspiracies, which at least according
to everyone who knows this man, that's
not where he is. But you know, we
already saw Naftali Bennett who did
that exact thing. So Winter is still
going to be a question mark until the
very last moment: will he really run to
the end when he is hovering around four
to six mandates in the best polls? Or
will he withdraw at the last moment and
fold?
Great, let's move to the next arena,
another arena is
The arena in the Change Bloc of the
struggles between Bennett and Liberman
on one side and Eisenkot on the other;
they are already talking among
themselves as if the cake is already in
their hands.
There is a crazy feeling there in the
Change Bloc; for months they have felt
they are winning. None of them know how
to conduct an election 100 percent like
Bibi knows how to do. They aren't
killers, they aren't cruel.
None of them also go out to the street
and get the...
When Bibi ignites the fires, who can
stand against him? He doesn't see
anyone in his way and he takes no
prisoners, and we know things he is
doing these days that are borderline.
But he will do everything in his power,
with his age, his exhaustion, and the
face—you can see he's an old man—
but he’s putting up a fight. But then
, what is the celebration inside the "
Change Bloc" really about? They are
essentially sitting as if they have
already won the election; they’re in
the thick of negotiations. So he says:
"Guys, listen, I’ve been on the
sidelines for four election cycles,
I’m the most experienced of you all,
how many will I bring?""
I’ve held every position, yes, how
many will I bring? Eight or nine seats?
I don't have the capacity for more, but
without me, you can't form a government
." And Bennett’s current sting is: "
Listen, Eisenkot, you’re a good guy,
you’re a nice guy, but you can’t
lead. I will be prime minister." He
says it to him in private rooms, he
says it outside, and he blows Eisenkot
away.
And he builds a block with Bennett;
they meet quite frequently together.
After all, Bennett, having been
diminished to the dust, what does he
have to do? Form some sort of
partnership of destiny with Liberman.
Why? He thinks very correctly, really.
He says: "If I come with Liberman, then
we will snatch the premiership and
create a triple leadership." Meaning
Liberman is Prime Minister. Defense
portfolio for Eisenkot. "
I am Alternate Prime Minister."
And I am Alternate Prime Minister. He
is Foreign Minister and in charge of
the Abraham Accords and the dialogues
with Washington and the Emirates.
Putin and Zelensky—he can even
mediate between them.
Beautiful. And they think they will
walk, step with arrogance, with a lot
of nerve toward Eisenkot, and Eisenkot
is perceived by them as a product—a
candidate to be exploited, someone
managed by people. This, by the way, is
true; unlike him, who manages everyone,
he is a product that is managed 100%.
When they asked him, "Do you listen to
your advisors?" he said, "I hear them,
I..."
Not Liberman. "I hear them, but I am
the manager, I am the boss."
So, so the discourse between them now
is constantly: "No, no, no, Eisenkot,
don't think you’re getting close to
the premiership; you’re just here to
be with us in the wagon." Eisenkot says
just now, on the eve of Yom Kippur: "I
will not let the head of an eight-seat
party be prime minister." Now, it’s "
I won't let" and "I won't let," and
it’s a delusional and detached group.
I think, and I advise them: First of
all, go win, go see how you handle the
Arab side, can you rely on an Arab
party—just do your own math.
There was some uproar Eisenkot had with
the heads of the authorities he met
with.
Yes, the Bedouins.
This is his toughest day of the
campaign, perhaps the day that will
take everything back after months.
By the way, you also notice something
interesting. It's true that Eisenkot is
leading with some sort of seniority and
polls above 20 seats, but he is
preventing the bloc’s breakthrough.
After all, one must think "bloc" all
the time, not "party." What will you
gain if you bring another three seats
but your bloc has dropped to 50 seats?
And it's true that Eisenkot is
considered balanced, and it’s true
that he appeals more to the 150,000
swing voters in the center of the
political map.
And they tried to sell him as a civil
tradition. Fair, but still, still, we
are a federation of tribes and sectors.
And getting Eisenkot into the voting
bases of Ramla, or bringing him into
Netanya—entire regions—is very,
very, very complicated. That is why I
am following this arena within the "
Change Bloc" with interest. I think the
one who could actually make a
breakthrough there is Yair Golan. And
ask me why? Because, in the end, they
brought the most people to the
primaries, and if they flex their
muscles, they could pick up another two
mandates. By the way, what mandates?
Giving everything for every vote, for
every elderly person in a nursing home,
for every tourist vacationing in
Amsterdam or Athens—bringing them
here. I'm not underestimating their
organizational power; I don't
understand what's happening to
Lapid’s campaign machine, it was
always one of the best. Maybe we’ll
see it on the day after, it’s true,
but.
And Bennett brought his good luck to
the whole bloc, and the event there is
definitely a very interesting one. The
connection between Bennett and Liberman
that you mentioned earlier. I think
that is part of Netanyahu's fear.
Because now we see, as we talked about
at the beginning, that the polls are a
bit better and they did make a change
and a facelift on the Right, but,
Netanyahu, in my opinion, feared a bloc
that would rise against him, an
additional right-wing bloc that would
rise within the political system—that
is Liberman, Bennett, and Saar. And
this thing, after all, what is
happening? Let's assume we get to the
day after the elections and there is no
resolution of 60 mandates for either
side, then Netanyahu will have to
negotiate with Eisenkot. Yes, we even
see that Eisenkot doesn't completely
rule out a rotation with Netanyahu, and
all of this, I think, is Netanyahu's
fear: that a bloc will rise within the
right-wing bloc in the political system
and say: "If Netanyahu is negotiating
with Eisenkot and wants to get the
Prime Minister position, why, why can't
we do it?" After all, he doesn't have a
full right-wing government; he has to
bring in elements from the Left, so we
will do it. And the fact that Saar
isn't rising and isn't managing to take
many mandates, still keeping this bloc
at under 3-something mandates, is also
a source of reassurance, as it were,
for Netanyahu. I would like to dedicate
our last 10 minutes to our three
favorite and cherished parties.
Four parties, by the way, no?
There is UTJ and Agudat Yisrael.
Yes, yes, you're right, I want us to
start precisely with Shas.
Go ahead.
An interesting story is developing here
between Shas’s spiritual leader,
Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, and Shas chairman
Aryeh Deri. Let’s just say the peace
agreement between them is quite
strained, meaning, we haven’t
discussed this here in depth.
Yes, we have discussed this in depth.
And here is what is happening. Rabbi
Yitzhak Yosef started off hesitantly.
After that, it seemed like he was
making an effort to visit the trouble
in Holon, and in the last week, he is
giving a fight. As the spiritual leader
of Shas. Maybe the definition isn't "
giving a fight." The definition is that
he is stirring up the field. Listen,
what he is doing.
He is issuing the most incendiary
sermons against Ben-Gvir and against
the Attorney General.
He has become the front of the
right-wing bloc in everything; it’s
not just that suddenly you see the
right-wing bloc has a leader, has a
rabbi,
There is, of course, the Attorney
General who landed the perfect campaign
for them with the story of the Hillula
of Rabbi Ovadia. While Ben-Gvir is
scouring the homes of the Council of
Torah Sages, visiting Rabbi Yigal Cohen
, visiting Rabbi Ben-Albaz, everything
is immediately all over TikTok.
Yes.
Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef steps up, hits him
right between the eyes, and says:
Anyone who supports and calls to ascend
the Temple Mount, I forbid voting for
him according to Halacha. Now listen,
in the surrounding circle of Shas, if
these videos are circulated on phones
until the polls open, Rabbi Yitzhak
will take quite a few votes—I
wouldn’t say—and bring them back to
Shas. These statements are sharp, and
as the spiritual leader of Shas, Rabbi
Yitzhak Yosef sees something here; he
goes up with the flu, with a fever, to
give a speech, he’s not a young man
and with the...what do you call it, the
last bit of fuel in...
And in the late hours of the night, the
scenes at Shas are crazy.
An amazing phenomenon, and you see
Aryeh Deri next to him, looking
completely enchanted, saying: What’s
happening here? A moment ago I had
nothing, and suddenly now I have
everything. I wouldn’t be surprised,
by the way (they can’t hear us,
Avraham), I wouldn’t be surprised if
they manage to reach an agreement on
the presidency of the Council of Torah
Sages the day after the elections, and
won’t need to pressure and send
emissaries to bring it about. Because
Aryeh Deri will suddenly realize,
suddenly, that his avoidance for an
entire term of appointing a president
and official leader is part of his
difficulty in managing and moving the
systems now. There is a "landlord,"
there is a spiritual figure, there is a
mantle—you can't keep working off a
poster from 10 years ago. The poster is
nice, but people ask: Who is the boss?
Who has the keys and all that? This is
a crazy phenomenon that is happening.
And it’s excellent for him even if,
God forbid, he doesn’t succeed in
regularizing the status of Torah
scholars in the next Knesset either.
It’s much better for him that Rabbi
Yitzhak is by his side, and let's call
it, he will share part of the blame
with him so it doesn't fall solely on
him. It will also fall on the spiritual
leadership, both in Shas and in the
Ashkenazi party. That can be much, much
more comfortable for the politicians.
And that is why perhaps Aryeh is
starting to understand that Rabbi
Yitzhak is a very, very great asset.
That is his winning ticket.
Yes. Come enlighten us, Avraham, on the
street battles within Agudat Yisrael,
because I’ve already lost track of
what’s happening there; explain to me
what’s going on.
Let’s start with the fact that
something else probably happens every
hour, and it’s as if everything is
constantly changing. But first of all,
unlike previous elections, this time
there is a new, young, and energetic
chairman there, but one we already know
: Yaakov Asher, who stepped into the
shoes of Golknov and replaced Gafni.
Also, and he is closing deals with, uh
...the two parties. He doesn’t just
have one Hasidic party to close with;
he has two: Agudat Yisrael and Chomat
Torat Yisrael, the new party that was
established. He needs to close with
them, he’s closing a joint campaign
with them that...will probably launch
after the elections–or rather...after
the holidays, until the elections in
the month that remains. And that is, in
fact, news in the sense that they are
going to...go with a single message,
and together there will still be
campaigns, you know, smaller and
focused on the various sects. But there
is a big question about whether the
Hasidic public, and the Litvak public
as well, will come out to vote in
droves this time. Regarding the Litvak
public, we know the turmoil it went
through with the ousting of Gafni and
Maklev and how it was received—
whether it was done well or poorly.
There is, within the Hasidic public—I
could build you a whole conspiracy that
they are talking about in the
headquarters. Why there might be a drop
in the numbers there, and it goes like
this: keep in mind, in the eighth spot
on the list stands Tesler.
And the Vizhnitzer.
And the Vizhnitz representative, yes,
there the interest of Belz is to keep
him out, because if he stays out, it
means two mandates for Chomat Torat
Yisrael and one for Agudat Yisrael,
which is 2—so they have an interest
in staying home; conversely, Gur and
Vizhnitz also have no interest in
turning out. On the contrary, they have
an interest in a very, very significant
collapse of the party. Why? Gur gets
their representative in. Tesler is
shaky anyway. Let’s collapse the
party down to five mandates, that’s
how far some are willing to go. And the
new, young, threatening Belz
representative, Eliyahu Stark, will be
left out. These are things being
discussed, I tell you, in the highest
places. Although when I checked and
tried to talk, everyone denied it, but
they talked—they are talking about
these scenarios. And yet, I think,
first of all in Belz I think we will
see very high turnout, because they
have an interest in showing that the
young representative they brought in,
you know, has something behind him and
it’s worth bringing him in. And there
is also a sense of rejuvenation there,
a feeling of something new and fresh,
and that it’s fun to come and vote.
And also in the end, you know, both Gur
and Vizhnitz, ultimately the Admor of
Gur and the Admor of Vizhnitz will
instruct their Hasidim to vote, and we
will see—we know the Gur Hasidism
comes in masses to vote every time, and
I don't think there will be a decline
in that regard either. And also within
the Litvak public, once Rabbi Landau
and Rabbi Hirsch release their videos
on the importance of voting for the
party, everyone will show up and fall
into line. Therefore, I think we can
talk about seven or eight mandates for
United Torah Judaism and there won't
really be a collapse.
I’d like to ask a question, Avraham.
What is Yitzhak Goldknopf's interest in
talking leftist all the time and
driving away Chabad Hasidim and
right-wingers who fear the installation
of a left-wing government? When in fact
he wants to get his friend Tesler
inside. If I follow what’s been
happening here for the last two weeks,
at least 10,000 Chabad votes—that’s
the Jerusalem and Bnei Brak bases, the
ultra-Orthodox Chabadniks who voted for
Gimmel, Rabbi Landau’s family in Bnei
Brak, all these families that have
always voted Gimmel—not one of them
will vote Gimmel now after Goldknopf
goes on air every two hours and
announces he’s going to crown
Eisenkot. Now, if he’s working in the
service of another party, it would be
interesting to know if he doesn't grasp
the significance of what he’s doing.
What, out of all 100,000 Gerrer Hasidim
in Israel, is there not one person who
will whisper to him and say: "Rabbi
Yitzhak, go lead the prayers in the
synagogue because you’re causing us a
disaster here"? What, maybe...what am I
missing here, Avraham?
Maybe he’s got a deal with Ben Gvir,
you know, and he decided to—could be
he’ll be a minister in Ben Gvir’s
party.
That’s it, maybe on his behalf, yes.
No, I honestly, I really can’t
understand this whole event.
Actually, I haven't really seen him
speaking out or being interviewed
lately. I’m talking to you about
today—today he released a video: "We
will go with Eisenkot, we will...he
will give us, we will take..."
Well, I didn’t notice that video, but
I think Yitzhak Goldknopf—we already
know his statements, and we’ve talked
about it here. We even issued an
emotional appeal in one of the episodes
: "Mr. Goldknopf, when the threat of
your removal from your position in the
Gerrer Hasidut was on the table, you
knew how to hide, you knew how to run
away, you knew how to go underground,
to talk less and do less damage." We
stand by that call. Go back home, talk
less, do less damage, disturb less, and
...
And on that optimistic note, Avraham,
we part ways. Exactly.
With all the blessings for a new year,
that with God's help we will only be
able to share good news and that this
unpleasant election period will pass
quickly.
That there will be no sadness.
Yes, and that the Holy One, blessed be
He, as they say, will shine His face
upon this people, which is accustomed
to strife, that is dragging through
this war and is truly suffering from
rifts and disasters—it is time for a
little rest and tranquility for the
people dwelling in Zion. Happy holiday.
Happy holiday, thank you.
You have been listening to "Off the
Record" from Mishpacha Podcast. I am
Yossi Elituv, and with me is Avraham
Freund. Thanks to content editor Tehila
Siton, production manager Yael
Goldstein, and sound and video editors
Avremi Weiz, Daniel Levin, and Yael
Vella. All series and episodes are
waiting for you on the Mishpacha
website, on all podcast apps, and on
the phone line 077-220. Extension 74.
Goodbye, with God's help, in the coming
episodes.